Literature DB >> 35060684

Can periodontal pockets and caries lesions act as reservoirs for coronavirus?

Zuhair S Natto1, Marwah Afeef2, Muhammed A Bakhrebah3, Heba Ashi1, Khaled A Alzahrani4, Abdulkarim F Alhetheel5,6, Hansel M Fletcher7.   

Abstract

The periodontal pocket and likely caries lesions may act as a reservoir and source of dissemination and development of systemic infections. While periodontal pockets have been found to harbor several viral species, there is no information on its ability to serve as a reservoir for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We have used a real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) approach to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 in periodontal pockets and cavitated caries lesions in a cross-sectional study of 72 participants who were divided into six groups: symptomatic positive COVID-19 cases with periodontal pockets, symptomatic positive with cavitated caries lesions, asymptomatic positive with periodontal pockets, asymptomatic positive with cavitated caries lesions, positive control, and negative control. A total of 180 samples were interrogated by RT-PCR to amplify the SARS-CoV-2 E and S genes. SARS-CoV-2 was present in 41.7% of symptomatic positive COVID-19 cases with periodontal pockets and 16.7% of symptomatic positive with cavitated caries lesions. The mean Ct value of E and S genes in periodontal pockets patients were 36.06±0.46 and 30.06±6.73, respectively, and the mean Ct value for both genes in caries lesions patients were 35.73±4.14, and 34.78±1.93, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to detect SARS-CoV-2 among periodontal pockets were 20.8% (95% CI 7.13-42.15), 100% (95% CI 73.54-100.0), and 47.2% (95% CI 30.22-64.51), respectively. Among cavitated caries lesions patients, they were 8.3% (95% CI 1.03-27.0), 100% (95% CI 73.54-100.0), and 38.9% (95% CI 23.14-56.54), respectively. SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in periodontal pockets and caries lesions, and these sites may act as reservoirs for the virus. However, the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 detection is low compared with other methods. To our knowledge, this report is the first to investigate the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and periodontal pockets and caries.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35060684      PMCID: PMC9237656          DOI: 10.1111/omi.12362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Oral Microbiol        ISSN: 2041-1006            Impact factor:   4.107


  16 in total

Review 1.  Viruses: Bystanders of periodontal disease.

Authors:  Titiksha Aggarwal; Arundeep Kaur Lamba; Farrukh Faraz; Shruti Tandon
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  2016-11-27       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Viruses: are they really culprits for periodontal disease? A critical review?

Authors:  Craig S Miller
Journal:  J Investig Clin Dent       Date:  2014-08

Review 3.  Viruses in periodontal disease - a review.

Authors:  I Cappuyns; P Gugerli; A Mombelli
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.511

4.  Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus.

Authors:  Yushun Wan; Jian Shang; Rachel Graham; Ralph S Baric; Fang Li
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 5.  Survey of Saliva Components and Virus Sensors for Prevention of COVID-19 and Infectious Diseases.

Authors:  Priya Kishor Dave; Roberto Rojas-Cessa; Ziqian Dong; Vatcharapan Umpaichitra
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-31

6.  Periodontal pockets: A potential reservoir for SARS-CoV-2?

Authors:  Zahi Badran; Alexis Gaudin; Xavier Struillou; Gilles Amador; Assem Soueidan
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 1.538

7.  Does sampling saliva increase detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR? Comparing saliva with oro-nasopharyngeal swabs.

Authors:  Ozlem Akgun Dogan; Betsi Kose; Nihat Bugra Agaoglu; Jale Yildiz; Gizem Alkurt; Yasemin Kendir Demirkol; Arzu Irvem; Gizem Dinler Doganay; Levent Doganay
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.014

8.  Performance of Saliva Specimens for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Community Setting: Does Sample Collection Method Matter?

Authors:  Marta Fernández-González; Vanesa Agulló; Mar Masiá; Félix Gutiérrez; Alba de la Rica; Ana Infante; Mar Carvajal; José Alberto García; Nieves Gonzalo-Jiménez; Claudio Cuartero; Montserrat Ruiz-García; Carlos de Gregorio; Manuel Sánchez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Immunochromatographic test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva.

Authors:  Katsuhito Kashiwagi; Yoshikazu Ishii; Kotaro Aoki; Shintaro Yagi; Tadashi Maeda; Taito Miyazaki; Sadako Yoshizawa; Katsumi Aoyagi; Kazuhiro Tateda
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 2.211

Review 10.  Saliva is a non-negligible factor in the spread of COVID-19.

Authors:  Yuqing Li; Biao Ren; Xian Peng; Tao Hu; Jiyao Li; Tao Gong; Boyu Tang; Xin Xu; Xuedong Zhou
Journal:  Mol Oral Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.