| Literature DB >> 35060512 |
Qing Xu1,2, Xuewen Tian3, Xintong Bao4, Dongren Liu5, Fanshuo Zeng1, Qiangsan Sun1.
Abstract
RATIONALE: With the spread of computers and mobile phones, cervical spondylosis has become a common occupational disease in clinics, which seriously affects the quality of life of patients. We used a nonsurgical spinal decompression system (SDS) combined with physical therapy electroacupuncture (EA) to treat a case of mixed cervical spondylosis caused by multi-level cervical disc herniation, and we achieved satisfactory results. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 44-year-old Caucasian Asian woman presented with neck pain and numbness on the left side of the limb. MRI showed the patient's C3-C7 segment cervical disc herniation, and the flexion arch of the cervical spine was reversed. DIAGNOSIS: The patient was diagnosed with a mixed cervical spondylosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35060512 PMCID: PMC8772752 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028540
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.889
Figure 1T1 weighted sagittal image of cervical spine before treatment. Note: The white arrows indicate the location of the cervical disc herniation and the location of the dural and spinal cord compression. Fig. 1-4. Sagittal image of cervical spine before treatment and after treatment.
Figure 2T2 weighted sagittal image of cervical spine before treatment. Note: The white arrows indicate the location of the cervical disc herniation and the location of the dural and spinal cord compression, and the red line measures the flexion angle of the cervical spine.
Cervical active ROM evaluation, VAS score of neck pain, CCI and Grip strength evaluation before treatment and after treatment.
| Right | Left | |||||
| Initial | After treatment | Initial | After treatment | Initial | After treatment | |
| Rotation ROM | 20° | 45° | 20° | 45° | ||
| Lateral Flexion ROM | 15° | 45° | 15° | 45° | ||
| Flexion ROM | 10° | 42° | ||||
| Extension ROM | 30° | 40° | ||||
| VAS pain score | 8 | 0 | ||||
| CCI | −16.04% | −3.50% | ||||
| Grip strength | 20.1 kg | 22.6 kg | 7.5 kg | 19.2 kg | ||
| 3 trials | 19.6 kg | 22.6 kg | 6.8 kg | 18.9 kg | ||
| 19.7 kg | 21.2 kg | 6.8 kg | 18.9 kg | |||
Figure 4T2 weighted sagittal image of cervical spine after treatment. Note: The white arrows indicate a reduction in cervical disc herniation and a significant reduction in spinal cord and dural compression; the red line indicates the flexion angle of the cervical spine.