| Literature DB >> 35060495 |
Ying-Chun Zhu1, Yun-Feng Mi2, Bo Jiang2, Qirong Dong1.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Ischial tuberosity cyst is a common disease, and the conventional incision procedure is associated with several disadvantages, leading to unsatisfactory therapeutic outcomes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic treatment for ischial tuberosity cyst and compared it with conventional incision surgery.The clinical data of 57 patients with ischial tuberosity cyst from May 2016 to September 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 49 patients were included. Of these patients, 24 patients received arthroscopic procedure (N = 24) and 25 patients received conventional incision procedure (N = 25). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. Visual analogue scale scores was used to evaluate pain at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month after the surgery.All 49 patients were followed up for (11.3 ± 3.3) months. All patients in the arthroscopy group achieved phase I healing while 3 patients in conventional incision group developed complications. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and hospital stay in the arthroscopy group were (54.7 ± 7.7) minutes, (20.8 ± 3.5) mL, (20.3 ± 5.6) mL, and (2.8 ± 0.6) days, and were significantly better than those of (71.8 ± 8.8) minutes, (67.3 ± 12.0) mL, (103.6 ± 20.3) mL, and (7.8 ± 2.9) days in the conventional incision group, respectively. In the arthroscopy group, the visual analogue scale scores at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month after the surgery [(2.6 ± 0.7), (0.5 ± 0.6), (0.3 ± 0.5) points] were significantly lower than those in the conventional incision group [(6.0 ± 0.7), (3.0 ± 1.0), and (1.1 ± 1.0) points], and the differences were statistically significant (P < .05). Finally, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative complications between the 2 groups (P > .05).In the treatment of ischial tuberosity cysts, arthroscopy has advantages of minimal invasion, less blood loss during perioperative period, milder postoperative pain, and rapid recovery when compared with conventional incision surgery.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35060495 PMCID: PMC8772662 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.889
Figure 1A 75-year-old female patient with right ischiogluteal cyst A. Cross-sectional MRI image of the ischial tuberosity cyst showing separation of the right ischial tuberosity cyst. B. Coronal MRI image shows cystic changes of ischial tuberosity on the right side. C. The location of ischial tuberosity cyst before surgery was marked. D. A dissection along the surface of the cyst was made to establish an operative space under an arthroscope, which showed a pale blue translucent cyst wall. E. Arthroscopic radiofrequency incision of the cyst showing brown bloody fluid flowing out. F. Arthroscopic radiofrequency gasification of the cyst wall. G. A basket punch was used to bite off the cyst wall under an arthroscope. H. Arthroscopic radiofrequency cleaning of the synovial layer of the ischial tuberosity cyst. I. The wound was well healed at 1 month after the arthroscopy surgery. J. Ultrasound image showed disappearance of the cyst 12 months after the arthroscopic surgery. MRI = magnetic resonance imaging.
Comparison of clinical data between arthroscopy group and conventional incision group.
| Gender (n) | Age | Location (n) | Cyst diameter | Disease course | Diabetes(n) | |||||
| Group | Number of cases | M | F | (X ± S, yr) | Left | Right | (X ± S,cm) | (X ± S, mo) | Yes | No |
| Arthroscopy group | 24 | 16 | 8 | 64.1 ± 9.3 | 11 | 13 | 7.72 ± 1.71 | 17.0 ± 9.1 | 5 | 19 |
| Conventional incision group | 25 | 11 | 14 | 61.2 ± 10.6 | 11 | 14 | 7.69 ± 1.64 | 17.5 ± 8.5 | 6 | 19 |
| Test value | X2 = 2.543 | t = 1.001 | X2 = 0.017 | t = 0.770 | t = −0.192 | X2 = 0.071 | ||||
| .111 | .322 | .897 | .939 | .849 | .791 | |||||
Comparison of the results between arthroscopy group and conventional incision group during and after surgery.
| Operation time | Intraoperative blood loss | Follow-up duration | VAS score | Postoperative drainage | Hospital stay | Postoperative complications | ||||||
| Group | Number of cases | (min, x ± s) | (mL, x ± s) | (m, x ± s) | 1 d after surgery | 1 wk after surgery | 1 mo after surgery | (mL , x ± s) | (d, x ± s) | Incision infection | Incision dehiscence | Relapse |
| Arthroscopy group | 24 | 54.7 ± 7.7 | 20.8 ± 3.5 | 10.9 ± 2.7 | 2.6 ± 0.7 | 0.5 ± 0.6 | 0.3 ± 0.5 | 20.3 ± 5.6 | 2.8 ± 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Conventional incision group | 25 | 71.8 ± 8.8 | 67.3 ± 12.0 | 11.7 ± 3.5 | 6.0 ± 0.7 | 3.0 ± 1.0 | 1.1 ± 1.0 | 103.6 ± 20.3 | 7.8 ± 2.9 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Statistics | −5.044 | −18.140 | 1.765 | −6.140 | −5.955 | −3.171 | −5.950 | −6.082 | 1.335 | |||
| .000 | .000 | .247 | .000 | .000 | .002 | .000 | .000 | .248 | ||||