| Literature DB >> 35059645 |
Mridula Sunder1, Kamalesh D Mumbrekar2, Nirmal Mazumder1.
Abstract
Starch is one of the most common and abundantly found carbohydrates in cereals, roots, legumes, and some fruits. It is a tasteless, colorless, and odorless source of energy that is present in the amyloplasts of plants. Native starch comprises amylose, a linear α-glucan having α-1,4-linkage and amylopectin, a branched polysaccharide with both α-1,4-linkage and α-1,6-linkage. Due to the low solubility, high viscosity, and unstable pasting property of native starch, it has been restricted from its application in industries. Although native starch has been widely used in various industries, modification of the same by various chemical, enzymatic and physical methods have been carried out to alter its properties for better performance in several industrial aspects. Physical modification like gamma radiation is frequently used as it is rapid, penetrates deeper, less toxic, and cost-effective. Starch when irradiated with gamma rays is observed to produce free radicals, generate sugars owing to cleavage of amylopectin branches, and exhibit variation in enzymatic digestion, amylose content, morphology, crystallinity, thermal property, and chemical composition. These physicochemical properties of the starch due to gamma radiation are assessed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and its application are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Amylopectin; Amylose Content, AC; Amylose content; Crystallinity; Differential Scanning Calorimetry, DSC; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Fourier-Transform Infrared, FTIR Spectroscopy; Gamma radiation; Gelatinization; Rapidly Digestible Starch, RDS; Resistant Starch, RS; Scanning Electron Microscopy, SEM; Slow Digestible Starch, SDS; Starch; X-Ray Diffraction, XRD
Year: 2022 PMID: 35059645 PMCID: PMC8760443 DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.01.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Res Food Sci ISSN: 2665-9271
Fig. 1Enzymatic hydrolysis and amylose content of starch. i. In vitro digestibility of native and irradiated kithul starch. Figure adapted with permission from Sudheesh et al. (2019). ii. Ratio of apparent amylose content (AAC) of irradiated starch (IS) to AAC of native starch (NS) vs. irradiation dose (▲: wheat starch, ■: potato starch). Figure adapted with permission from Atrous et al. (2017).
Fig. 2SEM results of starch. i. Scanning electron micrographs of brown rice starches. Figure adapted with permission from Kumar et al. (2017). ii. Scanning electron micrographs of chickpea starches: a (0 kGy), b (0.5 kGy), c (1 kGy), d (2.5 kGy), e (5 kGy) and f (10 kGy). Figure adapted with permission from Bashir and Aggarwal (2017). iii. Scanning electron microscopy of native and irradiated kithul starch. Figure adapted with permission from Sudheesh et al. (2019). iv. Scanning electron micrograph of (A) native, (B) 6 kGy, (C) 10 kGy and (D) 25 kGy irradiated sago starch at magnification of 1500x. Figure adapted with permission from Othman et al. (2015). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Variation in physicochemical properties in different starch types.
| Properties | Morphology (SEM) | Crystallinity (XRD) | Chemical Composition (FTIR) | Gelatinization Property (DSC) | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starch Type | ||||||
| A-Type Crystallinity (Rice) | 0 kGy | Round or polyhedral | 22.53% | Highly ordered structural peaks | ΔH = 11.5 J/g | ( |
| 10 kGy | Deformation and cracks | 22.06% | Increased intensity in some peaks | ΔH = 9.2 J/g | ( | |
| B-Type Crystallinity (Potato) | 0 kGy | Smooth surface and oval | 32.8% | Highly ordered structural peaks | ΔH = 19.2 J/g | ( |
| 10 kGy | Depolymerization and fused granules | 30.7% | Increased peak intensity | ΔH = 18.2 J/g | ( | |
| C-Type Crystallinity (Chickpea) | 0 kGy | Smooth surface and oval to spherical | 27.04% | Highly ordered structural peaks | ΔH = 8.37 J/g | ( |
| 10 kGy | Fissures | 16.91% | Increased intensity in some peaks | ΔH = 6.26 J/g | ( | |
Fig. 3XRD results of starch. i. XRD pattern of native and irradiated brown rice starch. Figure adapted with permission from Kumar et al. (2017). ii. X-ray diffraction patterns of native and gamma irradiated chickpea starches. Figure adapted with permission from Bashir and Aggarwal (2017). iii. XRD spectra of native and irradiated kithul starch. Figure adapted with permission from Sudheesh et al. (2019). iv. X-ray diffractogram of sago starch for (a) native and irradiated at doses (b) 6 kGy, (c) 10 kGy and (d) 25 kGy. Figure adapted with permission from Othman et al. (2015). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 4FTIR results of starch. i. FTIR Spectra of native and gamma irradiated chickpea starch. Figure adapted with permission from Bashir and Aggarwal (2017). ii. FTIR spectra of native and irradiated brown rice starch. Figure adapted with permission from Kumar et al. (2017). iii. FT-IR spectra of native and irradiated kithul starch. Figure adapted with permission from Sudheesh et al. (2019). iv. FTIR spectrum of gamma-irradiated elephant foot yam starches. Figure adapted with permission from Reddy et al. (2015a). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 5DSC results of starch. i. DSC thermogram of native and irradiated kithul starch (a) 0 kGy, (b) 0.5 kGy, (c) 1 kGy, (d) 2.5 kGy, (e) 5 kGy, (f) 10 kGy. Figure adapted with permission from Sudheesh et al. (2019). ii. DSC gelatinization endotherm of native (0 kGy) and irradiated (6, 10, 25 kGy) sago starch. Figure adapted with permission from Othman et al. (2015).