| Literature DB >> 35059576 |
Mehmet Fatih Kocamaz1, Gulseren Sahin2, Ferda Ozbay Hosnut2, Nesibe Gokce Kocamaz3, Pinar Altiaylik Ozer4, Ahmet Sengun4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection on choroidal thickness (CT), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, and ganglion cell (GCL+IPL) complex thickness in childhood cases of gastritis.Entities:
Keywords: Choroidal thickness; Helicobacter pylori; ganglion cell layer complex thickness; gastritis; optical coherence tomography; retinal nerve fiber layer thickness
Year: 2021 PMID: 35059576 PMCID: PMC8759548 DOI: 10.14744/bej.2021.42104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beyoglu Eye J ISSN: 2459-1777
Figure 1.Example of subfoveal choroidal thickness and average submacular choroidal thickness measurement of a patient in Group 2 with HD-OCT, horizontal section and vertical section, respectively. SFCT: subfoveal choroidal thickness. T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6 show measurements of temporal region; N1, N2, N3, N4, N5, N6 show measurements of nasal region; I1, I2, I3, I4, I5, I6 show measurements of inferior region; S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6 show measurements of superior region at 500 micron intervals from the central fovea.
Figure 2.Example of peripapillary choroidal thickness measurement of a patient in Group 2 with high definition OCT images, horizontal section and vertical section, respectively. PPCT: peripapillary choroidal thickness. T-PPCT shows the measurement of temporal region; N-PPCT shows the measurement of nasal region; I-PPCT shows the measurement of inferior region; S-PPCT shows the measurement of superior region at 500 micron distance from the end point of the RPE at optic disc.
Demographics of cases in our study
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 13 ( | 12 (10–14.5) | 0.428‡ |
| Male/Female Ratio (n/n) | 8/19 | 7/18 | 0.999† |
| Male, n (%) | 8 (29.6) | 7 (28.0) | >0.01 |
| Female, n (%) | 19 (70.4) | 18 (72.0) | >0.01 |
‡Mann-Whitney U test; †Chi-square test with contunuity correction,
Comparison of RNFL thickness, GCL + IPL complex thickness, Central subfield thickness and Macular cube volume measurements in Study Groups
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Average RNFL thickness (μm) | 99.0 (92.0–110.5) | 93.5 (90.5–100.0) | 0.068‡ |
| Superior RNFL thickness (μm) | 131.5 (120.5–138.5) | 127.0 (113.0–133.0) | 0.062‡ |
| Nasal RNFL thickness (μm) | 72.0 (67.0–87.0) | 68.0 (65.2–77.5) | 0.107‡ |
| Inferior RNFL thickness (μm) | 126.5 (109.5–148.0) | 122.0 (112.7–134.0) | 0.621‡ |
| Medial RNFL thickness (μm) | 67.0 (61.5–74.0) | 66.5 (58.5–70.7) | 0.452‡ |
| Central subfield thickness (μm) | 247.1±15.1 | 240.6±23.4 | 0.243# |
| Macular cube volume (mm3) | 282.5±12.0 | 279.8±10.3 | 0.401# |
| Mean GCL+IPL complex thickness (μm) | 84.9±6.0 | 84.2±5.6 | 0.671# |
| Minimum GCL+IPL complex thickness (μm) | 82.5 (80.0–85.0) | 82.0 (77.5–85.0) | 0.458‡ |
| Superior GCL+IPL complex thickness (μm) | 85.6±6.1 | 85.3±5.5 | 0.866# |
| Superonasal GCL+IPL complex thickness (μm) | 86.2±6.2 | 85.4±6.9 | 0.661# |
| Inferonasal GCL+IPL complex thickness (μm) | 85.6±6.5 | 85.0±5.8 | 0.765# |
| Inferior GCL+IPL complex thickness (μm) | 84.7±6.7 | 83.5±5.7 | 0.491# |
| Inferotemporal GCL+IPL complex thickness (μm) | 84.8±6.4 | 83.6±6.2 | 0.484# |
| Superotemporal GCL+IPL complex thickness (μm) | 82.4±5.7 | 82.8±5.5 | 0.783# |
‡Mann-Whitney U test according to Bonferroni Correction, p<0.05 was statistically significant.
#Student’s t test according to Bonferroni Correction, p<0.05 was statistically significant.
RFNL: Retinal nerve fiber layer; GCL: Ganglion cell layer; IPL: Inner plexiform layer; OCT: Optical coherence tomography.
Mean subfoveal, mean submacular and mean peripapillary choroidal thickness values of H. pylori positive gastritis group and H. pylori negative gastritis group
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 376.0 (315.5–431.0) | 166.5 (138.5–185.0) | 318.0 (270.0–344.0) | ||
| 328.0 (297.75–367.0) | 148.5 (122.5–186.25) | 289.0 (263.75–310.75) | ||
| p | 0.042‡ | 0.327‡ | 0.206‡ |
‡Mann-Whitney U test according to Bonferroni Correction, p<0.05 was statistically significant.