| Literature DB >> 35059444 |
Paul Human1,2, Deon Bezuidenhout1,2, Elena Aikawa3, Peter Zilla1,2,4.
Abstract
Despite early realization of the need to control inherent immunogenicity of bioprosthetic replacement heart valves and thereby mitigate the ensuing host response and its associated pathology, including dystrophic calcification, the problem remains unresolved to this day. Concerns over mechanical stiffness associated with prerequisite high cross-link density to effect abrogation of this response, together with the insinuated role of leaching glutaraldehyde monomer in subsequent dystrophic mineralization, have understandably introduced compromises. These have become so entrenched as a benchmark standard that residual immunogenicity of the extracellular matrix has seemingly been relegated to a very subordinate role. Instead, focus has shifted toward the removal of cellular compartment antigens renowned for their implication in the failure of vascularized organ xenotransplants. While decellularization certainly offers advantages, this review aims to refocus attention on the unresolved matter of the host response to the extracellular matrix. Furthermore, by implicating remnant immune and inflammatory processes to bioprosthetic valve pathology, including pannus overgrowth and mineralization, the validity of a preeminent focus on decellularization, in the context of inefficient antigen and possible residual microbial remnant removal, is questioned.Entities:
Keywords: bioprosthetic; calcification; decellularization; extracellular matrix; immunogenicity; inflammation; pathology; valve
Year: 2022 PMID: 35059444 PMCID: PMC8764456 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.760635
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Sterile granulocytic pus response to SDS-based decellularization of porcine aortic wall in the rabbit subdermal model. (A) Macro photo at time of retrieval. (B) Haematoxylin & Eosin histology showing thick granulocytic rim surrounding the implant.
Figure 2Absence of inflammatory infiltrate in (A) electrophoretically enhanced anionic detergent decellularization of bovine pericardium following 6-week subdermal implantation in the rat compared to (B) non-ionic decellularization with exhaustive washing (Haematoxylin & Eosin stain).
Figure 3In vitro evidence of post-implant rabbit sera specificity to elastin (A) and collagen (B) in GA fixed (0.2%) porcine aortic wall using gold-labeled anti-IgG.
Figure 4Positive immunostaining (A) to Gram+ bacteria in unimplanted commercial bioprosthetic valve tissue compared to (B) negative control.
Figure 5Suspected colocalization of areas of Gram + bacterial contamination of GA-fixed bovine pericardial tissue and mineralization in a stented mitral valve replacement bioprosthesis retrieved after 112 days (A) Brown & Brenn stain (B) Von Kossa & Van Gieson stain.
Figure 6IgG binding in areas of Gram-positive bacterial contamination together with mineralization in a stented, GA-fixed, mitral valve pericardial bioprosthesis retrieved after 112 days (A) Brown & Brenn stain (B) Von Kossa & Van Gieson stain (C) Anti-Sheep IgG.
Figure 7Hypothetical mechanistic overview, based on animal models, of the potential impact of a residual immunogen presence on inflammatory and immune sequelae in bioprosthetic tissue and the ensuing potential for mineralization.