| Literature DB >> 35059412 |
Zhulin Wang1, Fang Zhang1, Long Xiang1, Yinyu Yang2, Wei Wang2, Biru Li1, Hong Ren1.
Abstract
The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the treatment of cardiopulmonary failure in children with malignant tumors is controversial. There are few reports on the use of ECMO in the treatment of children with tumor lysis syndrome. This article reports a case of a 9-year-old girl who presented with hyperkalemia and cardiogenic shock. The discovery of an abdominal mass with critical ultrasound provided key evidence for the initial diagnosis of tumor lysis syndrome. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed for 1 h. Veno-arterial ECMO was installed at the bedside to provide cardiopulmonary support for the patient and was combined with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) to improve her internal environment. The patient was ultimately diagnosed with mature B-cell lymphoma with tumor lysis syndrome. A severe electrolyte disorder led to cardiogenic shock. After the electrolyte imbalance was corrected, the patient's heart function gradually improved, ECMO was successfully weaned, and chemotherapy was continued with the support of CRRT. One month after ECMO weaning, the organ function of the patient had recovered and there were no serious complications. In this case report, we paid attention to the rapid diagnosis of the etiology behind a patient's shock with critical ultrasound as well as the initiation and management of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), which provided us with valuable experience using VA-ECMO on critically ill children with tumors. It is also important evidence for the use of ECMO in the treatment of children with cardiopulmonary arrest secondary to malignancy.Entities:
Keywords: ECMO (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation); case report; continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT); pediatric; tumor lysis syndrome
Year: 2022 PMID: 35059412 PMCID: PMC8764359 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.762788
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1Sequential imaging evaluations performed on Day 0. (A) The electrocardiogram on admission indicates ventricular tachycardia. (B) The abdominal CT indicates the presence of space. (C) The rapid bedside abdominal B-ultrasound prompts abdominal occupation.
Hemodynamic and laboratory measurements over the course of the ECMO treatment of the patient.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||
| ECMO Flow (L/min) | 2.79 | 2.39 | 2.4 | 1.5 | - |
| Blood pressure (mmHg) | 72/60 | 79/61 | 71/60 | 95/62 | 110/55 |
| CVP (cm H2O) | 8 | 12 | 9 | 8 | 12 |
| ScvO2 (%) | 75 | 63 | 66 | 69 | 55 |
| PCO2 gap | 10 | 11 | 10 | 4.3 | 7.1 |
| LVOT-VTI (cm) | 2 | 4 | 8 | 13 | 14 |
| Fluid balance (ml) | +2,854 | +640 | +550 | +194 | −11 |
| Adrenaline (μg/kg/min) | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.25 | 0.05 |
| Norepinephrine (μg/kg/min) | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| |||||
| PH | 6.72 | 7.36 | 7.33 | 7.39 | 7.4 |
| PaO2 (mmHg) | 81.3 | 118 | 115 | 210 | 99.1 |
| PaCO2 (mmHg) | 53.2 | 38.7 | 39.1 | 38.5 | 38.8 |
| Lac (mmol/L) | 26 | 12 | 4.9 | 1.2 | 1 |
| K+ (mmol/L) | 9.03 | 6.11 | 3.98 | 4 | 3.47 |
| Free Ca2+ (mmol/L) | 1.3 | 1.78 | 1.8 | 2.16 | 2.1 |
| Phosphorus (mmol/L) | 8.4 | 3.98 | 1.38 | 1.01 | 0.66 |
| Uric acid (μmol/L) | 2,620 | 1,198 | 471 | - | 85.5 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 177 | 73 | 42 | - | 48 |
CVP, central venous pressure; ScvO2, central venous oxygen saturation; PCO2 gap, central venous to arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference; LVOT-VTI, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral; PH, Potential of Hydrogen; Lac, lactic acid.
Additional biologic parameters, treatments, and relevant data during the ECMO treatment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||
| Heparin (UI/kg/h) | 5 | 7.5 | 10 | 7.5 | 0 |
| ACT (S) | 220 | 190 | 204 | 180 | - |
| APTT (S) | 69 | 45 | 69 | 67 | 36 |
| Anti-X (IU/ml) | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.17 | 0.16 | - |
| AT (%) | - | 33 | - | 27 | - |
| Platelet(x10∧9/L) | 103 | 88 | 21 | 13 | 18 |
|
| |||||
| CRP (mg/L) | 73 | 53 | 120 | 140 | 106 |
| Procalcitonin (ng/ml) | 1.27 | - | - | 75 | - |
| White blood cell (x10∧9/L) | 20.6 | 10.6 | 1.38 | 1.15 | 0.99 |
| Neutrophil (%) | 39 | 30.7 | 55 | 43 | 39 |
| Lymphocyte (%) | 53 | 64.5 | 39 | 50.4 | 53.5 |
| Monocyte (%) | 5.9 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 3 |
| Ferritin(ng/ml) | - | 314 | - | 6,000 | - |
| Interleukin-6 (pg/ml) | - | - | - | 5,378 | - |
| Etiology | Sputum/Blood/Urine Culture (-) | ||||
| Antibiotics | VA + CAZ | VA + MEM | |||
|
| |||||
| Analgesics-sedatives | Midazolam + Fentanyl + Rocuronium | ||||
| RASS | −5 | −5 | −4 | −2 | −2 |
| NIRS-ScO2 | 55 | 60 | 61 | 65 | 68 |
| BIS | 40 | 45 | 51 | 60 | - |
| TAP (cm/s) | - | 72 | 86 | 106 | 100 |
| Perfusion index | - | 1.92 | 1.36 | 1.04 | 0.58 |
|
| |||||
| Amylopsin (U/L) | 69 | 357 | 219 | 72 | 30 |
| Lipase (U/L) | 1,048 | 1,884 | 1,317 | 384 | 131 |
| cTNI (μg/L) | 0.06 | 1.53 | 2.64 | 1.42 | 0.68 |
| NT-proBNP (pg/ml) | 1,874 | - | 3,589 | 3,726 | 1,994 |
| ALT(U/L) | 31 | 460 | 293 | 259 | 215 |
| AST(U/L) | 190 | 1,805 | 1,027 | 920 | 785 |
| TBIL (μmol/L) | 5.4 | 11.2 | 22.8 | 23.6 | 33.6 |
ACT, activated clotting time; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; AT-III, antithrombin-III; CRP, C-reactive protein; PCT, procalcitonin; VA, Vancomycin; CAZ, Ceftazidime; MEM, meropenem; RASS, Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale; NIRS-ScO2, Cerebral oxygen saturation monitoring by near-infrared spectroscopy; BIS, bispectral index; cTNI, cardiac troponin I; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; TBIL, total bilirubin.
Figure 2The clinical timeline of the patient.