| Literature DB >> 35059378 |
Dexuan Li1, Wensheng Dai2, Weimin Guan3.
Abstract
The study investigates the influence of the COVID-19 on the rate of R&D investment and foreign exchange development of China's most important emerging industry firms. From 2010 to 2020, data were collected from 26 locations across China, focusing on seven different types of critical creating companies. To analyze the data, we have applied Fourier Increased Unit Root Test, Granger causality assessments test, Pattern Assessment test, Poisson pseudo most excellent probability (PPML) approach, Wald test, and Regression analysis test. The results of the tests reveal a clear underlying association among COVID-19 relates Chinese exports and imports. COVID-19's instant effects on imports and exports lack working capital have been calculated, but the short-term, medium-to-long-term products are composite and unidentified. The article result main results are following: (i) The COVID-19 impacts the R&D investment is main industries like as high-end equipment industry, new materials industry, and new-era data innovation. (ii) The COVID-19 highly affects the imports and exports development network of Chinese strategic emerging industries which emphasizes cross-industry grouping features. The study provides the guidance to the future researchers to focus on COVID-19 affects on the strategic emerging industries of developed and underdeveloped countries to determine of foreign direct investment inflow and unemployment growth rates. JEL: G20, O10, O40.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19 epidemic; Chinese strategic emerging industries; Fourier Augmented Unit Root Test; PPML; R&D investment rate; baseline estimation test; financing constraints
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35059378 PMCID: PMC8763789 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.778548
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Shows the 26 industries classified in eight strategic emerging industries.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical raw materials and products indust | |||||
| Chemical fiber industry | |||||
| Case A | New material industry | Rubber and plastic products | Case D | New energy automobile | Automobile industry |
| The production and supply of water | Case E | New energy industry | Power and heat production and supply industries | ||
| Case B | High-end equipment industry industry | Industry of railway, shipping, aerospace, and other transport equipment | Case F | Biological industry | Agricultural and sideline food processing |
| Electrical machinery and equipment industry | |||||
| Instrument industry | Food industry | ||||
| Metal products, machinery, and equipment repair industry | |||||
| Case C | Energy conservation and environmental protection industry | Mining and cleaning of coal are two different industries. | Pharmaceutical industry | ||
| The mining of nonferrous metals | Case G | The new generation of the information technology industry | Computers, communications, and other electronics | ||
| Non-metallic mining industry | |||||
| Petrochemical, coking, and nuclear fuel processing industries | |||||
| General equipment industry | |||||
| Special equipment industry |
Source: List of these strategic emerging industries get from .
The short-term impact of the COVID-19 on the strategic emerging industries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss as a result of a product's expiration (S1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Working capital shortage (S2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Expenses of routine operations are difficult to meet (S3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The lack of cash causes a delay in the opening of LCs (S4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Distributors and trade partners stop or curtail their activities (S5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Authors.
Indicates the result is significant.
The medium-to-long-term impacts of the COVID-19 on Strategic emerging industries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on investment (ROI) reduction (L1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| In the industry, there are job cutbacks (L2) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Reduction of trade relationships (L3) |
|
|
|
|
| |||
| The supply chain network is being rebuilt and restructured (L4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| The industry's contribution to GDP is being reduced (L5) |
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Authors.
Indicates the result is significant.
Fourier ADF unit root test.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| COVID-19 cases | −2.689 | 1 | |
| COVID-19 deaths | −1.597 | −3.198 | 1 |
| Imports | −1.713 | −5.088 | 1 |
| Exports | −2.697 | 1 |
Note that the symbols .
These estimates are from the author.
COVID-19's influence on Chinese exports and imports: a causality test.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | ||||
| Exports of COVID-19 Cases | 2.4546 | 0.382 | 0.08 | 11 |
| Exports of COVID-19 fatalities | 4.897 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 11 |
| Imports of COVID-19 Cases | 1.107 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 11 |
| Imports of COVID-19 fatalities | 4.007 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 11 |
The author discovers these estimations.
Measurements of Imports for Chinese strategic emerging industries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case A | 35.3 | 4.6 | 2.86 | Yes | Negative | |
| 9.3 | 1.21 | 0.75 | TW | |||
| Case B | 3.1 | 0.4 | 0.25 | DI | ||
| 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.19 | SH | |||
| Case C | 2.2 | 0.29 | 0.18 | Yes | ||
| 1.7 | 0.22 | 0.14 | SH | |||
| Case D | 1.1 | 0.14 | 0.09 | TW | ||
| 1 | 0.12 | 0.08 | Yes | |||
| Case E | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.06 | Negative | ||
| 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.06 | SH? | |||
| Case F | 0.7 | 0.09 | 0.06 | Negative | ||
| 0.6 | 0.08 | 0.05 | Yes | |||
| Case G | 0.6 | 0.08 | 0.05 | Negative | ||
| 0.6 | 0.07 | 0.05 | SH? |
The products listed here are those with contribution ratios of more than 0.5%. DD denotes differences between January 2020 and Gap2019, and TW, DI, and SH indicate teleworking disinfection and stay-home.
Source: Author's calculations.
Baseline estimation results.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Importers' COVID-19 | −0.032 | −0.023 | −0.342 | −0.083 |
| Exporters' COVID-19 | [0.003] | [0.004] | [0.052] | [0.026] |
| COVID-19 measure | Case | Death | Immobility | Lockdown |
| Wald statistics | 0.049 | 0.478 | 4.087 | 0.02 |
| Wald | 0.932 | 0.523 | 0.062 | 0.897 |
| Log Pseudo likelihood | 9.2+E 10 | 8.8+E 10 | 9.3+E 10 | 8.9+E 10 |
| Pseudo | 0.8789 | 0.9876 | 0.9356 | 0.9834 |
| Number of observations | 75,430 | 75,430 | 75,430 | 75,430 |
This table reports the estimation results using the PPML method. .
Monthly estimation results of Chinese strategic emerging industries trade values.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 1 for December | −0.023 | −0.034 | −0.632 | |
| 1 for January | −0.042 | −0.044 | −0.227 | |
| 1 for February | −0.027 | −0.021 | −0.398 | −0.143 |
| 1 for March | −0.041 | −0.025 | −0.421 | −0.315 |
| 1 for April | −0.032 | −0.056 | −0.378 | −0.127 |
| 1 for May | −0.038 | −0.026 | −0.129 | −0.053 |
| 1 for June | −0.022 | −0.008 | −0.054 | −0.042 |
| 1 for July | −0.009 | −0.003 | −0.052 | −0.49 |
| 1 for August | −0.007 | −0.007 | −0.111 | −0.042 |
| 1 for September | −0.004 | −0.014 | −0.089 | −0.093 |
| 1 for October | −0.005 | −0.023 | −0.075 | −0.048 |
| 1 for November | −0.009 | −0.009 | −0.065 | −0.031 |
| 1 for December | −0.003 | −0.005 | −0.121 | −0.078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Log pseudolikelihood | 9.2+E 10 | 8.8+E 10 | 9.3+E 10 | 8.9+E 10 |
| Pseudo R-squared | 0.8789 | 0.9876 | 0.9356 | 0.9834 |
| Number of observations | 75,430 | 75,430 | 75,430 | 75,430 |
This table reports the estimation results using the PPML method. .
The findings of the evaluation using the PPML approach are presented in this table. .
Shows the findings of the FIN-NAT relationship and R&D investment.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Constant term | 3.201 | 4.081 |
| FIN1 | 0.201 | |
| FIN2 | 5.003 | |
| FC | −0.092 | −0.076 |
| ROA | −1.306 | −1.211 |
| Growth | −0.201 | −0.201 |
| Cap | −0.312 | −0.305 |
| Q | 0.108 | 0.129 |
| Size | −0.194 | −0.207 |
| NAT | −0.003 | −0.231 |
| (−0.041) | ||
| FIN1 | −0.208 | |
| (−2.091) | ||
| FIN2 | −2.722 | |
| (−2.035) | ||
| Age | −0.011 | −0.102 |
| Year | Controlled | Controlled |
| Adjusted R squared | 0.256 | 0.276 |
| Prob>F | 0 | 0 |
Denotes a significant level of 0.01;
denotes a significant level of 0.1.
Shows the consequences of the FIN and SIZE connection time period.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Constant items | 2.081 | 4.007 |
| FIN1 | 0.201 | |
| FIN2 | 5.038 | |
| FC | −0.079 | −0.092 |
| ROA | −2.062 | −2.005 |
| Growth Rate | −0.214 | −0.203 |
| Cap | −0.224 | −0.321 |
| Q | 0.098 | 0.0792 |
| Size | −0.206 | −0.206 |
| NAT | −0.195 | −0.197 |
| Size | 0.0076 | −0.0087 |
| −0.943 | (−1.543) | |
| FIN1 | −0.202 | |
| FIN2 | −0.846 | |
| (−0.525) | ||
| Year | Controlled | Controlled |
| Adjusted R squared | 0.308 | 0.266 |
| Prob>F | 0 | 0 |
Note that
indicates that a level of 0.01 is significant,
means that a group of 0.05 is strategic, and
indicates that a level of 0.1 is necessary.