| Literature DB >> 35059041 |
Xiaolin Ye1, Jing Li1, Hongyu Wang1, Jie Wu1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of NAFLD requires a liver biopsy, which is difficult in children. This study explored the diagnostic value of pentraxin 3 (PTX-3) and the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index for NAFLD in children.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35059041 PMCID: PMC8764277 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8833287
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
General subject data.
| Variable | NAFLD patients | Healthy controls |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| Age (years) | 10 (9, 11) | 10 (7, 12) | 0.205b |
| Male (%) | 43 (67.2) | 32 (50.0) | 0.072c |
| Overweight and obese | 62 (96.9) | 19 (29.6) | <0.001c |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.8 (23.4, 28.3) | 17.8 (17.1, 18.4) | <0.001b |
| BMI z-score | 0.71 (0.26, 1.20) | -0.80 (-0.94, -0.69) | <0.001b |
| ALT (U/l) | 61.0 (19.5, 145.0) | 13.5 (10.0, 16.0) | <0.001b |
| AST (U/L) | 31.0 (19.3, 65.0) | 23.0 (18.0, 25.8) | <0.001b |
| GGT (U/L) | 33.5 (19.0, 63.3) | 12.0 (9.3, 14.8) | <0.001b |
| FPG (mmol/l) | 5.0 (4.7, 5.2) | 4.9 (4.3, 5.2) | 0.115b |
| Fasting insulin (mU/l) | 16.3 (11.3, 26.6) | 9.7 (7.2, 12.3) | <0.001b |
| TC (mmol/l) | 4.2 (3.5, 4.7) | 4.2 (3.8, 4.6) | 0.989b |
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.2 (1.0, 1.8) | 0.8 (0.7, 1.1) | <0.001b |
| HDL-C (mmol/l) | 1.1 (1.0, 1.2) | 1.3 (0.9, 1.6) | 0.031b |
| LDL-C (mmol/l) | 2.6 (2.0, 3.0) | 2.3 (1.9, 2.7) | 0.046b |
| ApoA1 (g/l) | 1.30 ± 0.22 | 1.31 ± 0.34 | 0.757a |
| ApoB (g/l) | 0.8 (0.6, 1.0) | 0.7 (0.6, 0.8) | 0.061b |
| Uria acid ( | 371.5 (336.0, 468.5) | 289.0 (266.0, 315.8) | <0.001b |
| PTX-3 (ng/ml) | 2.52 (1.60, 4.48) | 1.57 (1.19, 2.12) | <0.001b |
| HOMA-IR | 3.6 (2.2, 5.5) | 1.0 (0.7, 1.7) | <0.001b |
| TyG | 8.53 ± 0.48 | 8.06 ± 0.43 | <0.001a |
a = Student's t-test; b = Mann–Whitney U-test; c = Pearson's chi-square test. Data are expressed as mean ± SD, median (25th–75th interquartile range), or number of cases (%), as appropriate. BMI: body mass index; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; GGT: γ-glutamyltransferase; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR: homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; ApoA1: Apolipoprotein A1; ApoB: apolipoprotein B; PTX-3: pentraxin-3; TyG: triglyceride-glucose.
Figure 1The expression of PTX-3 and the TyG index. (a) PTX-3 expression level detected by ELISA. (b) TyG index. ∗∗∗, compared with the healthy control group, P < 0.001.
Correlations between PTX-3 or the TyG index and the clinical biochemical indicators.
| PTX3 | TyG | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.365 | <0.001 | 0.408 | <0.001 |
| ALT (U/l) | 0.4 | <0.001 | 0.388 | <0.001 |
| AST (U/L) | 0.194 | 0.029 | 0.228 | 0.01 |
| GGT (U/L) | 0.31 | <0.001 | 0.493 | <0.001 |
| FPG (mmol/l) | 0.091 | 0.307 | 0.308 | <0.001 |
| Fasting insulin (mU/l) | 0.327 | <0.001 | 0.379 | <0.001 |
| TC (mmol/l) | 0.006 | 0.948 | 0.214 | 0.016 |
| TG (mmol/l) | 0.169 | 0.056 | 0.974 | <0.001 |
| HDL-C (mmol/l) | -0.047 | 0.598 | -0.064 | 0.47 |
| LDL-C (mmol/l) | 0.14 | 0.114 | 0.354 | <0.001 |
| ApoA1 (g/l) | 0.01 | 0.91 | 0.119 | 0.181 |
| ApoB (g/l) | 0.174 | 0.05 | 0.336 | <0.001 |
| Uria acid ( | 0.274 | 0.002 | 0.372 | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.343 | <0.001 | 0.407 | <0.001 |
Figure 2ROC curves of PTX-3, the TyG index, and ALT. The combination of PTX-3, the TyG index, and ALT had the largest AUC (0.964), followed by ALT (AUC: 0.873), the TyG index (AUC: 0.765), and PTX-3 (AUC: 0.731).
Comparison of the predictive value for diagnosing NAFLD between PTX-3, the TyG index, or ALT and their combination.
| Cut-off value | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | AUC (95% CI) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALT | 20 U/l | 75 (62.6-85.0) | 89.06 (78.8-95.5) | 0.873 (0.802-0.925) | 0.75 | 0.89 |
| PTX-3 | 1.89 ng/ml | 65.62 (52.7-77.1) | 71.87 (59.2-82.4) | 0.731 (0.646-0.806)∗∗ | 0.66 | 0.72 |
| TyG | 8.16 | 81.25 (69.5-89.9) | 60.94 (47.9-72.9) | 0.765 (0.682-0.835)∗ | 0.81 | 0.61 |
| Combined model | 90.62 (80.7-96.5) | 95.31 (86.9-99.0) | 0.964 (0.916-0.989)∗∗ | 0.91 | 0.95 |
Note: ∗, compared with the AUC of ALT, P < 0.05; ∗∗, compared with the AUC of ALT, P < 0.01. AUC: the area under the ROC curve; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value.