| Literature DB >> 35058874 |
Feiyun Qin1, Jiaqiang Liu1, Xintong Zhao1, Degang Wu1, Niansheng Lai1, Zihuan Zhang1, Zhenbao Li1.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for ruptured very small (≤3 mm) intracranial aneurysms (VSIAs).Entities:
Keywords: clinical outcomes; complications; endovascular treatment; recurrence; ruptured; very small intracranial aneurysms
Year: 2022 PMID: 35058874 PMCID: PMC8764134 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.767649
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1A ruptured very small middle cerebral artery (MCA) intracranial aneurysm treated with stent-assisted coiling (SAC). (A) The patient was admitted with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage. (B,C) Cerebral angiography and 3D reconstruction revealed a tiny MCA aneurysm with a bleb at the tip. (D,E) The aneurysm was treated with stent-assisted coiling embolization using a Leo baby stent (2.5 × 18 mm). Immediate angiography showed that the aneurysm was completely occluded. (F) A year later, angiographic images showed complete occlusion of the aneurysm without in-stent artery stenosis.
Characteristics of patients at baseline.
|
| |
|---|---|
| Age, mean ± SD, years | 56.1 ± 11.2 |
| Female, | 98 (64.5) |
| Hypertension, | 73 (48.0) |
| Diabetes, | 7 (4.6) |
| Smoking history, | 11 (7.2) |
| Hunt-Hess grade 1-2, | 106 (69.7) |
| CT Fisher grade 1-2, | 89 (58.5) |
| AcomA | 64 (42.1) |
| PcomA | 27 (17.8) |
| MCA | 15 (9.9) |
| A1 segment | 9 (5.9) |
| Pericallosal artery | 6 (3.9) |
| ICA | 16 (10.5) |
| AchA | 8 (5.3) |
| BA | 2 (1.3) |
| Pca | 2 (1.3) |
| Pica | 3 (2.0) |
| Neck size, mean ± SD, mm | 1.9 ± 0.5 |
| Aneurysm size, mean ± SD, mm | 2.5 ± 0.4 |
| Neck-dome ratio, mean ± SD | 0.90 ± 0.27 |
| Coiling alone | 90 (59.2) |
| Stent-assisted coiling | 62 (40.8) |
SD, standard deviation; PcomA, posterior communicating artery; AcomA, anterior communicating artery; MCA, middle cerebral artery; PCA, posterior cerebral artery; PICA, posterior inferior cerebellar artery; AchA, anterior choroidal artery; BA, basilar artery; ICA, internal carotid artery.
Risk factors for procedure-related complications.
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean ± SD, years | 55.7 ± 12.7 | 56.2 ± 11.1 | 0.512 |
| Female, | 9 (50.0) | 89 (66.4) | 0.172 |
| Hypertension, | 9 (50.0) | 64 (47.8) | 0.858 |
| Diabetes mellitus, | 1 (5.6) | 6 (4.5) | 0.594 |
| Smoking, | 1 (5.6) | 10 (7.5) | 1.000 |
| Hunt-Hess grade 1-2, | 11 (61.1) | 95 (70.9) | 0.543 |
| CT Fisher grade 1-2, | 10 (55.6) | 79 (59.0) | 0.454 |
| Aneurysm size, mean ± SD, mm | 2.5 ± 0.42 | 2.5 ± 0.44 | 0.392 |
| Neck size, mean ± SD, mm | 2.1 ± 0.47 | 1.9 ± 0.54 | 0.344 |
| Neck-dome ratio, mean ± SD | 0.99 ± 0.27 | 0.89 ± 0.27 | 0.342 |
| Anterior circulation, | 16 (88.8) | 129 (96.2) | 0.852 |
| Treatment modality | 0.062 | ||
| Coiling alone | 7 (38.9) | 83 (61.9) | |
| Stent-assisted coiling | 11 (61.1) | 51 (38.1) |
Aneurysm occlusion and clinical outcomes at discharge and follow-up.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| 1 | 116 (76.3) | 73 (69.5) |
| 2 | 27 (17.7) | 23 (21.9) |
| 3 | 9 (6.0) | 9 (6.0) |
|
| ||
| 4-5 | 131 (86.2) | 102 (97.1) |
| 1-3 | 21 (13.8) | 3 (2.9) |
RR, Raymond-Roy; GOS, Glasgow Outcome Scale.
Figure 2A ruptured very small posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) intracranial aneurysm treated with coiling alone (CA). (A) The patient was admitted with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage. (B,C) Cerebral angiography and 3D reconstruction revealed a tiny PICA aneurysm. (D) The aneurysm was treated with coiling embolization only. Immediate angiography showed that the aneurysm was completely occluded. (E,F) Six months later, angiographic images showed postoperative recurrence of the aneurysm.
Risk factors for aneurysm recurrence.
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean ± SD, years | 53.6 ± 7.6 | 55.5 ± 10.5 | 0.076 |
| Female, | 13 (72.2) | 59 (68.6) | 0.762 |
| Hypertension, | 9 (50.0) | 45 (52.3) | 0.857 |
| Diabetes mellitus, | 0 | 4 (4.7) | 1.000 |
| Smoking, | 1 (5.5) | 7 (8.1) | 0.602 |
| Hunt-Hess grade1-2, | 11 (61.1) | 67 (77.9) | 0.145 |
| CT Fisher grade 1-2, | 9 (50.0) | 56 (65.1) | 0.411 |
| Aneurysm size, mean ± SD, mm | 2.7 ± 0.36 | 2.6 ± 0.45 | 0.067 |
| Neck size, mean ± SD, mm | 1.8 ± 0.41 | 1.9 ± 0.58 | 0.075 |
| Neck-dome ratio, mean ± SD | 0.78 ± 0.18 | 0.93 ± 0.29 | 0.155 |
| Anterior circulation, | 16 (88.8) | 83 (95.4) | 0.477 |
| Immediate aneurysm occlusion (mRS) | 0.555 | ||
| 1 | 14 (77.8) | 67 (77.9) | |
| 2 | 3 (16.6) | 13 (15.1) | |
| 3 | 1 (5.6) | 6 (7.0) | |
| Treatment modality | 0.000 | ||
| Coiling alone | 17 (94.4) | 42 (47.8) | |
| Stent-assisted coiling | 1 (5.6) | 45 (52.2) |
Risk factors for clinical outcomes.
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean ± SD, | 55.6 ± 10.7 | 59.9 ± 14.1 | 0.051 | - |
| Female, | 86 (65.2) | 12 (60.0) | 0.654 | - |
| Hypertension, | 62 (47.0) | 11 (55.0) | 0.503 | - |
| Diabetes mellitus, | 7 (5.3) | 0 | 0.595 | - |
| Smoking, | 10 (7.6) | 1 (5.0) | 1.000 | - |
| Hunt-Hess grade 1-2, | 97 (73.5) | 9 (45.0) | 0.019 | 0.169 |
| CT Fisher grade 1-2, | 83 (62.9) | 6 (30.0) | 0.038 | 0.353 |
| Aneurysm size, mean ± SD, mm | 2.58 ± 0.43 | 2.58 ± 0.46 | 0.751 | - |
| Neck size, mean ± SD, mm | 1.9 ± 0.54 | 2.0 ± 0.57 | 0.438 | - |
| Neck-dome ratio, mean ± SD | 0.89 ± 0.27 | 0.98 ± 0.25 | 0.563 | - |
| Anterior circulation, | 126 (95.4) | 19 (95.0) | 0.628 | - |
| Treatment modality | 0.165 | - | ||
| Coiling alone | 81 (61.4) | 9 (45.0) | ||
| Stent-assisted coiling | 51 (38.6) | 11 (55.0) | ||
| Complications | 9 (6.8) | 9 (45.0) | 0.000 | 0.000 |