Literature DB >> 35058708

The Psychological Nursing Interventions Based on Pygmalion Effect Could Alleviate Negative Emotions of Patients with Suspected COVID-19 Patients: a Retrospective Analysis.

Sisi Zhang1, Yazi Liu2, Shuning Song3, Shixiong Peng4, Mao Xiong5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to explore the psychological status of suspected COVID-19 patients during quarantine and put forward a new yet effective psychological nursing strategy for intervention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study with suspected COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized to the two hospitals of Hunan province, China and accepted the intervention of psychological nursing from 01/2020 to 03/2020. The control group received routine psychological nursing care and the observation group received the new psychological nursing intervention according to Pygmalion effect.
RESULTS: A total of 89 objects were included in the analysis. Results of the questionnaire before intervention showed that the majority of isolated suspected COVID-19 patients showed negative emotions, with the incidence of depression (51.69%), anxiety (14.617%), inverted provocation (22.47%), extraverted provocation (25.84%). And the extraverted provocation scores of female patients was significantly higher than that of male counterparts (P < 0.05). At discharge, compared with the control group, the scores of depression, anxiety, introversion and extraversion of patients in the observation group were significantly lower after nursing intervention based on Pygmalion effect. The satisfaction rate of psychological care based on Pygmalion effect was 86.66%.
CONCLUSION: Suspected COVID-19 patients tend to show the symptoms of depression, anxiety and irritation during quarantine. The psychological nursing based on Pygmalion effect is helpful to alleviate their negative emotions.
© 2022 Zhang et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Pygmalion effect; anxiety; depression; psychological care; suspected patients

Year:  2022        PMID: 35058708      PMCID: PMC8764294          DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S347439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gen Med        ISSN: 1178-7074


Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (sars-cov-2) had rapidly spread all over the world and developed into a pandemic.1 The World Health Organization (WHO) announced the new name of the disease: coronavirus disease (COVID-19).2 As of April 30, 2020, more than 3 million COVID-19 cases have been confirmed in more than 100 countries and regions.3 So far, the rapid spread of sars-cov-2 has caused considerable harm to public health and economy.4 The infectious disease epidemic situations caused by COVID-19 is a sudden public crisis. It not only poses a serious threat to people’s physical health, but also brings strong psychological impact to the masses, resulting in corresponding psychological and behavioral problems.5–7 COVID-19 cases are prone to negative emotions, such as anxiety, depression, fear, irritability, especially during the 14 days of isolation observation.8,9 This brings a burden to the society and leads to the decline in their life quality and treatment compliance. Therefore, the need for psychological intervention is urgent. However, there is few researches in this field. The Pygmalion effect is a psychological effect summarized by American psychologist Rosenthal, who believes that positive suggestions, encouragement, trust and expectation can enhance people’s self-worth, obtain positive motivation and strive to reach the expected value.10,11 Initially, it was mainly used in education and teaching. In recent years, it has been gradually used in clinical intervention to alleviate patients’ negative emotions and improve treatment compliance.12 This study developed a new nursing program based on Pygmalion effect and explored its affect on psychological intervention of suspected COVID-19 patients in isolation period. It will offer a new perspective for the psychological nursing of COVID-19 patients in isolation period.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Objects

This study is a multi-center, retrospective study conducted at the Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University) and The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China. And this work was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital/The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University (2020 Scientific Research Ethics Review NO: 04), and conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines of Declaration of Helsinki. According to the following criteria, two investigators independently collected the data of patients who were suspected COVID-19 during 01/2020-03/2020 from the medical records management system, including age, sex, occupation, educational level, family location, and results of questionnaire survey. Then the data was crosschecked, and if there were any differences, consult a third investigator.13 Inclusion criteria: ① Meet the diagnostic criteria of suspected cases in the “Diagnosis and Treatment Plan for COVID-19” issued;14 ②Education above elementary school, with good communication skills; ③ Informed consent to participation in this study. Exclusion criteria: ① Confirmed cases of COVID-19; ②History of mental illness; ③Cancer and other serious diseases. (The minimum sample size was calculated as 88, considering the type I error rate = 0.05 and power = 90% (the G*Power tool was used for calculations)).15,16 Suspected COVID-19 patients began to receive psychological intervention in 2 individual isolation wards after admission, once a day, 20–30 minutes each time. The control group received regular psychological care, including empathy, comfort, question and answer, and diversion. The observation group was added psychological nursing care based on the Pygmalion effect on the basis of the intervention of control group (detail as follows). Questionnaires were used before and after the intervention.

The Psychological Nursing Interventions Based on Pygmalion Effect

Establishment of Nursing Group

The nursing group was composed of 6 nurses who had been trained in the Pygmalion effect (2h/day, 2 weeks) and had the qualifications of psychological counselors. A deputy director of the Nursing Department, a national second-level psychological counselor, was mainly responsible for guiding plan design and activity coordination in this event; 1 head nurse in the isolation ward and 3 primary nurses are mainly responsible for the implementation of the activity. Taking three shifts a day, 8 hours a shift working mode.

Creating a Good Atmosphere

The members of the team communicated with the patient to understand the patient’s psychological needs, the source of negative emotions, and the specific factors that affected emotions. In the ward, hung up the reminder to wear a mask, 7 correct steps to wash hands, the 48-character code for the new coronavirus, the publicity pictures for the prevention and control of the COVID-19, and encouragement slogans such as the fight against the “epidemic”; played targeted mindfulness decompression audio, and used modern communication methods to timely input the care, comfort, encouragement and other emotional support from relatives to create a positive humanistic environment in the isolation ward.

Delivering Expectations and Internalizing Expectations

Nursing group members integrated the Pygmalion effect concept into emotional management, focusing on strengthening isolated patients’ cognition of the COVID-19 in order to change their negative views, and regulate their own emotions. ①Longing and expecting. Head nurses and primary nurses told patients about the epidemiological characteristics, clinical manifestations, latest epidemic developments, disease prognosis and treatment plans of the COVID-19; and the purpose of isolation; guided patients to protect themselves, such as wearing masks and correcting the way they wash their hands; informed patients of the successful cases of healing to help them build confidence and courage to fight the disease, and enhance the patient’s vision and expectations for curing the disease. ②Behaviours and feelings. The responsible nurse approached the patient, listened carefully to the patient’s complaint, created an atmosphere for the patient to vent bad emotions, and encouraged the patient through eyes and body language, such as tapping the patient’s shoulders and back, to eliminate the patient’s fear and helplessness. At the same time, the patient was guided to carry on meditating and relaxation. First, the patient was asked to close his eyes and feel the inner feelings, and then was guided by the nurse to imagine the scenes of his future life with a relaxed, confident and firm belief, and finally was invited to share their inner emotions. During this process, the patient’s feelings and emotional changes were recorded, and they were given affirmation, praise and encouragement during the sharing process. ③Acceptance and internalization: Under the guidance of the group members, the patients were encouraged to use self-motivation methods such as positive “self-talk”, saying to themselves “I did a good job!” to affirm their own efforts and achievements, such as actively cooperating with the treatment, ensuring adequate sleep; enjoying solitude by reading a good book, listening to a piece of beautiful music, watching a good inspirational drama etc. Psychological suggestion: positive “self-talk” as well as other methods to control negative emotions could help patients gradually accept isolation, and establish expectations of overcoming the disease.17

Information Feedback

Patients still need to do home isolation after discharge. The following measures are targeted to evaluate the behavior of discharged patients in a timely and accurate manner for the purpose of deciding whether to maintain or adjust expectations: ① Strengthen the health guidance of discharged patients: instructing patients to continue self-health monitoring after discharge; supervising patients to actively and promptly report personal information and health status through various means, and guiding patients to do self-management after discharge, such as wearing masks, doing hand hygiene, and reducing close contact with family members and outings, etc. ② Make full use of communication technology to do follow-up visits. The nursing group members are able to timely discover and deal with possible physical and psychological problems of patients via WeChat, telephone return visits, family doctors signing App and other means to interact with discharged patients’ information. ③ Develop five measures for home isolation, including making a plan, arranging the things to do every day, especially ensuring regular diet and adequate sleep; learning a new skill and enjoying the process; talking to family members and friends through video, phone calls, etc. and seeking professional support through various media when they are not available and self-adjustment is difficult; taking a daily workout, do your favorite indoor sports or use fitness apps to exercise remotely with friends; considering it a specific experience that you obtain valuable life experience from it, and thinking about what kind of life attitude should be possessed to face work, life and study in the future.

Questionnaire Survey

Irritating, Depression and Anxiety Status

The irritation, depression, and anxiety scales (Irritability, Depression and Anxiety Scale, IDA)18 were used to evaluate the emotional status of two groups of patients within 12 hours after admission and 12 hours before discharge. IDA included depression, anxiety, introverted agitation, and extroverted agitation, a total of 18 items, with a scale of 0 to 3. The higher the score, the greater the degree of depression, anxiety, and agitation. Depression factor <4 is considered normal, 4–6 points are marginal, >6 is abnormal; anxiety factor <6 is normal, 6–8 is marginal, >8 is abnormal; introverted stimulus factor <4 is normal, 4 to 6 points edge, >6 points to abnormal; extroversion stimulus factor <5 points to normal, 5 to 7 points edge, >7 points to abnormal. The scale has good reliability and validity.19

Evaluation of Psychological Nursing Activities

The self-made psychological nursing activity evaluation questionnaire was used to evaluate the psychological nursing activity based on the Pygmalion effect, which was filled out by the observation group at the time of discharge. The questionnaire included 10 items, with 1–10 points from extremely non-conforming to extremely conforming. The higher the score, the higher the satisfaction, and the 9 points was set as cut-off.20

Statistical Analysis

SPSS19.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) software21 was utilized for statistical description. The χ2 test was used for comparisons among the categorical variables and independent t-test to compare the continuous variables, and the test level is α = 0.05, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Population Characteristics

A total of 89 objects were included in the analysis (control group 44 and observation group 45). Among of the 89 participants, the majority were women (62.9%); most were middle-aged; most had a bachelor’s degree (50.6%); most occupations were not related to medicine (69.7%) (Table 1). However, there were no significant differences between the observation group and the control group in gender, age, education level, residence and occupation (Figure 1).
Table 1

Population Characteristics

Group the Number of CasesGenderAgeEducational LevelFamily LocationOccupation
Control group observation group89 (100%)Male (37.1%)Female (62.9%)College degree (49.4%)Above (50.6%)Rural (48.3%)Town (51.7%)Medical related (30.3%)No medical Related (69.7%)
44152940.09±13.8938.18±10.58242021231430
451827202522231332
t/χ20.330.730.910.010.09
P0.5640.4660.3410.9130.764
Figure 1

Population characteristics of control group and the observation group suspected COVID-19 patients. (A) Gender; (B) age; (C) educational level; (D) family location; (E) occupation.

Population Characteristics Population characteristics of control group and the observation group suspected COVID-19 patients. (A) Gender; (B) age; (C) educational level; (D) family location; (E) occupation.

Emotions of Suspected COVID-19 Patients Tend to Be Negative and Psychological Nursing Based on Pygmalion Effect Can Effectively Alleviate Them

A total of 89 valid questionnaires were collected (response rate of 100%). Scale test results for all participants indicated that most of the suspected COVID-19 patients in isolation were depression (51.69%), anxiety (14.617%), inverted provocation (22.47%) and extraverted provocation (25.84%) (Table 2). And the extraverted provocation score of female patients was significantly higher than that of male counterparts (P < 0.05) (Table 3, Figure 2). This phenomenon suggests that psychological problems are common among suspected COVID-19 patients in isolation. In addition, there were no differences in depression, anxiety, introverted and extraverted irritations between suspected COVID-19 patients in the pre-intervention treatment group and the control group. However, after the psychological nursing based on Pygmalion effect, the psychological status of depression, anxiety, inward and outward irritations of suspected COVID-19 patients in the observation group were significantly relieved compared with the control group (Table 4, Figure 3).
Table 2

The Incidence Rate of Negative Emotions in Suspected COVID-19 Patients During Isolation

ItemThe Number of CasesRate
Totality89100%
Depression4651.69%
Anxiety1314.61%
Inverted provocation2022.47%
Extraverted provocation2325.84%
Table 3

The Comparison of the Scores of Negative Emotions Between Female and Male During Isolation

GenderDepressionAnxietyInverted ProvocationExtraverted Provocation
Female7.48±2.776.89±1.876.20±1.517.38±2.65
Male6.94±2.406.55±1.915.67±1.796.21±1.93
t/P0.94/0.3510.84/0.4021.49/0.1402.20/0.030
Figure 2

The comparison of the scores of negative emotions between female and male during isolation. (A) Depression; (B) Anxiety; (C) Inverted provocation; (D) Extraverted provocation. *P <0.05.

Table 4

The Comparison of the Scores of Negative Emotions Between the Two Groups Before and After Intervention

GroupTimeThe Number of CasesDepressionAnxietyInverted ProvocationExtraverted Provocation
Control groupBefore the intervention447.45±2.777.07±2.216.18±1.477.14±2.64
After the intervention446.70±1.676.32±1.684.91±2.006.75±1.51
Observation groupBefore the intervention457.11±2.536.47±1.445.82±1.786.76±2.29
After the intervention455.93±1.605.38±2.533.91±2.325.73±2.23
t/P (before intervention in both groups)0.60/0.5421.52/0.1311.04/0.3010.73/0.469
t/P (after intervention in both groups)2.22/0.0292.06/0.0422.17/0.0332.51/0.014
Figure 3

The comparison of the scores of negative emotions between the two groups before and after intervention. (A) Depression; (B) anxiety; (C) inverted provocation; (D) extraverted provocation. *P <0.05.

The Incidence Rate of Negative Emotions in Suspected COVID-19 Patients During Isolation The Comparison of the Scores of Negative Emotions Between Female and Male During Isolation The Comparison of the Scores of Negative Emotions Between the Two Groups Before and After Intervention The comparison of the scores of negative emotions between female and male during isolation. (A) Depression; (B) Anxiety; (C) Inverted provocation; (D) Extraverted provocation. *P <0.05. The comparison of the scores of negative emotions between the two groups before and after intervention. (A) Depression; (B) anxiety; (C) inverted provocation; (D) extraverted provocation. *P <0.05.

Patients in the Observation Group Were Satisfied with the Psychological Nursing Activities Based on Pygmalion Effect

Patients in the observation group were given 10 items to evaluate psychological nursing activities based on Rosenthal effect, and the average score of each item was more than 8 points, indicating that psychological nursing activities based on Pygmalion effect had a positive impact on patients. The patient satisfaction score was 9.20±0.72, and the satisfaction rate was 91.01%, suggesting that psychological nursing activities based on Rosenthal effect were highly accepted among suspected COVID-19 patients in isolation period (Table 5).
Table 5

The Evaluation Score of Psychological Nursing Activity Based on Pygmalion Effect

EntryScore#
Learned to regulate my bad emotions8.02±1.00
Learned about COVID-198.13±0.93
Learned how to better deal with illness8.20±0.81
I have new expectations for my future life8.16±0.84
Taking part in this activity makes me more and more confident8.04±1.33
Trust and honesty can be achieved in activities8.13±1.34
Being willing to share my inner thoughts in activities8.04±1.03
Be willing to share your opinions with others8.02±0.98
I like the way of this activity9.02±0.77
Satisfied with this activity9.20±0.72
Satisfaction rate91.01%

Note: #The total score is 10.

The Evaluation Score of Psychological Nursing Activity Based on Pygmalion Effect Note: #The total score is 10.

Discussion

The public often have different degrees of psychological stress in the face of sudden infectious public health incidents, especially in the high-incidence period of infectious diseases, they are prone to various negative emotions.22,23 In the research of D’Emeh W. et al, COVID-19 scale and self-testing anxiety scale were collected from 240 nurses. They found that they had experienced tremendous pressure and anxiety related to work under the background of COVID-19 pandemic.24 Sandín B. et al found that 144 adolescents were investigated (aged 12–18, 55 boys (38.2%) and 89 girls (61.8%)), most of whom showed a higher level of anxiety and depression symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic.25 It is even possible to change people’s lifestyles under such intense psychological pressure, for example, women are more likely to eat to cope with stress.26,27 Therefore, nursing intervention is of great importance to negative emotions caused by COVID-19. Pygmalion effect has been more and more widely used in clinical nursing in recent years.28,29 Therefore, this study explored the effect of new intervention on patients with new crown pneumonia from the perspective of psychological nursing based on Pygmalion effect. The results of this study showed that the depression, anxiety, introversion and extroversion stimulus scores of the two groups of suspected infected patients were all in an “abnormal” state when they were admitted to the hospital, which indicate that the COVID-19 patients in isolation period generally have negative emotions. It may be due to: ① subjective perception. COVID-19 is highly contagious and there is no specific treatment, which has increased people’s tension.15 Meanwhile, the speed of information dissemination on modern social networks is fast, and many false information can easily cause panic among the people.30 In addition, there was the fear from one’s heart, the fear of infecting his/her family members and/or afraid of losing his/her job. ② The objective environment. Being treated in isolation in a single room and in a closed space for a long time, patients are more likely to produce negative emotions due to lack of communication and worries about the disease.31 Furthermore, by gender grouping, we found that the extraverted provocation score of female patients was significantly higher than that of male ones, suggesting that women might be more prone to negative emotions during the COVID-19 epidemic. This is consistent with previous research, which women were more likely to suffer from psychological stress during and after the recent pandemic.32 However, after given Pygmalion effect psychological care based on the above, the observation group had significantly lower scores of depression, anxiety, introversion and extroversion than the control group, indicating that the Pygmalion effect Psychological care can effectively alleviate the negative emotions of suspected COVID-19 patients. Our study brought a new strategy for the psychological treatment of COVID-19 patients in isolation period. Psychological care of patients needed to promote the patient’s understanding of the disease and pay attention to the patient’s psychological feelings.33 The result of the evaluation of psychological nursing activities showed that the patients could feel the effects of subjective efforts, transform passive behaviors into active behaviors, strengthen self-affirmation, and enhance patients’ self-regulation and self-management capabilities by Pygmalion effect psychological nursing. The follow-up visits were equally important in the psychological care when the patients were at post-discharge.34 Psychological interventions conducted through modern information methods could continuously track the emotional changes of the patients, help the patients adjust their mental health in time, and play a dynamic and continuous role in alleviating negative emotions. In addition, the evaluation of observation group’s psychological care activities based on the Pygmalion effect was above 8 points, and the overall satisfaction with the activities was 9.17 points, indicating that the patients recognized and were satisfied with the psychological care activities. Psychological care based on the Pygmalion effect allows patients to realize that hard work is rewarding, which constantly motivates patients to actively share and regulate emotions. Alleviated negative emotions through continuous intervention contributes to patients’ gradual acceptance of the isolation, hence their feeling full of hope towards the future.

Implications

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, there are suspected COVID-19 patients in isolation every day.35 During the 14-day isolation period, they experienced a high level of stress due to uncertainty about the nucleic acid results.36 Given this situation, we aim to provide evidence of the psychological status of suspected COVID-19 patients in isolation. It calls for improvement not only in the physical health but also mental health of patients. Moreover, our study provides an intervention strategy for negative emotions in patients with suspected COVID-19 in isolation.

Limitations

This study still has some limitations. This study is not a prospective research. The number of cases in this study is small, and there may be some bias. In the later stage, a larger sample and long-term study is needed and we will further explore the effect of nursing intervention based on Pygmalion effect on the prognosis of COVID-19.

Conclusion

Suspected COVID-19 patients tend to suffer from depression, anxiety and irritating during quarantine. The psychological nursing based on Pygmalion effect is helpful to alleviate the negative emotions of patients with suspected COVID-19 and promote patients’ confidence and courage to face diseases.
  36 in total

1.  The Pygmalion effect in management.

Authors:  T Trudeau
Journal:  Hosp Top       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug

2.  Mitigating the psychological effects of social isolation during the covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Mohammad S Razai; Pippa Oakeshott; Hadyn Kankam; Sandro Galea; Helen Stokes-Lampard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-05-21

3.  Underdetection of cases of COVID-19 in France threatens epidemic control.

Authors:  Giulia Pullano; Laura Di Domenico; Chiara E Sabbatini; Eugenio Valdano; Clément Turbelin; Marion Debin; Caroline Guerrisi; Charly Kengne-Kuetche; Cécile Souty; Thomas Hanslik; Thierry Blanchon; Pierre-Yves Boëlle; Julie Figoni; Sophie Vaux; Christine Campèse; Sibylle Bernard-Stoecklin; Vittoria Colizza
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ke Wang; Amit Goldenberg; Charles A Dorison; Jeremy K Miller; Andero Uusberg; Jennifer S Lerner; James J Gross; Bamikole Bamikole Agesin; Márcia Bernardo; Olatz Campos; Luis Eudave; Karolina Grzech; Daphna Hausman Ozery; Emily A Jackson; Elkin Oswaldo Luis Garcia; Shira Meir Drexler; Anita Penić Jurković; Kafeel Rana; John Paul Wilson; Maria Antoniadi; Kermeka Desai; Zoi Gialitaki; Elizaveta Kushnir; Khaoula Nadif; Olalla Niño Bravo; Rafia Nauman; Marlies Oosterlinck; Myrto Pantazi; Natalia Pilecka; Anna Szabelska; I M M van Steenkiste; Katarzyna Filip; Andreea Ioana Bozdoc; Gabriela Mariana Marcu; Elena Agadullina; Matúš Adamkovič; Marta Roczniewska; Cecilia Reyna; Angelos P Kassianos; Minja Westerlund; Lina Ahlgren; Sara Pöntinen; Gabriel Agboola Adetula; Pinar Dursun; Azuka Ikechukwu Arinze; Nwadiogo Chisom Arinze; Chisom Esther Ogbonnaya; Izuchukwu L G Ndukaihe; Ilker Dalgar; Handan Akkas; Paulo Manuel Macapagal; Savannah Lewis; Irem Metin-Orta; Francesco Foroni; Megan Willis; Anabela Caetano Santos; Aviv Mokady; Niv Reggev; Merve A Kurfali; Martin R Vasilev; Nora L Nock; Michal Parzuchowski; Mauricio F Espinoza Barría; Marek Vranka; Markéta Braun Kohlová; Ivan Ropovik; Mikayel Harutyunyan; Chunhui Wang; Elvin Yao; Maja Becker; Efisio Manunta; Gwenael Kaminski; Jordane Boudesseu; Dafne Marko; Kortnee Evans; David M G Lewis; Andrej Findor; Anais Thibault Landry; John Jamir Benzon Aruta; Manuel S Ortiz; Zahir Vally; Ekaterina Pronizius; Martin Voracek; Claus Lamm; Maurice Grinberg; Ranran Li; Jaroslava Varella Valentova; Giovanna Mioni; Nicola Cellini; Sau-Chin Chen; Janis Zickfeld; Karis Moon; Habiba Azab; Neil Levy; Alper Karababa; Jennifer L Beaudry; Leanne Boucher; W Matthew Collins; Anna Louise Todsen; Kevin van Schie; Jáchym Vintr; Jozef Bavolar; Lada Kaliska; Valerija Križanić; Lara Samojlenko; Razieh Pourafshari; Sandra J Geiger; Julia Beitner; Lara Warmelink; Robert M Ross; Ian D Stephen; Thomas J Hostler; Soufian Azouaghe; Randy McCarthy; Anna Szala; Caterina Grano; Claudio Singh Solorzano; Gulnaz Anjum; William Jimenez-Leal; Maria Bradford; Laura Calderón Pérez; Julio E Cruz Vásquez; Oscar J Galindo-Caballero; Juan Camilo Vargas-Nieto; Ondřej Kácha; Alexios Arvanitis; Qinyu Xiao; Rodrigo Cárcamo; Saša Zorjan; Zuzanna Tajchman; Iris Vilares; Jeffrey M Pavlacic; Jonas R Kunst; Christian K Tamnes; Claudia C von Bastian; Mohammad Atari; MohammadHasan Sharifian; Monika Hricova; Pavol Kačmár; Jana Schrötter; Rima-Maria Rahal; Noga Cohen; Saeideh FatahModares; Miha Zrimsek; Ilya Zakharov; Monica A Koehn; Celia Esteban-Serna; Robert J Calin-Jageman; Anthony J Krafnick; Eva Štrukelj; Peder Mortvedt Isager; Jan Urban; Jaime R Silva; Marcel Martončik; Sanja Batić Očovaj; Dušana Šakan; Anna O Kuzminska; Jasna Milosevic Djordjevic; Inês A T Almeida; Ana Ferreira; Ljiljana B Lazarevic; Harry Manley; Danilo Zambrano Ricaurte; Renan P Monteiro; Zahra Etabari; Erica Musser; Daniel Dunleavy; Weilun Chou; Hendrik Godbersen; Susana Ruiz-Fernández; Crystal Reeck; Carlota Batres; Komila Kirgizova; Abdumalik Muminov; Flavio Azevedo; Daniela Serrato Alvarez; Muhammad Mussaffa Butt; Jeong Min Lee; Zhang Chen; Frederick Verbruggen; Ignazio Ziano; Murat Tümer; Abdelilah C A Charyate; Dmitrii Dubrov; María Del Carmen M C Tejada Rivera; Christopher Aberson; Bence Pálfi; Mónica Alarcón Maldonado; Barbora Hubena; Asli Sacakli; Chris D Ceary; Karley L Richard; Gage Singer; Jennifer T Perillo; Tonia Ballantyne; Wilson Cyrus-Lai; Maksim Fedotov; Hongfei Du; Magdalena Wielgus; Ilse L Pit; Matej Hruška; Daniela Sousa; Balazs Aczel; Nandor Hajdu; Barnabas Szaszi; Sylwia Adamus; Krystian Barzykowski; Leticia Micheli; Nadya-Daniela Schmidt; Andras N Zsido; Mariola Paruzel-Czachura; Rafał Muda; Michal Bialek; Marta Kowal; Agnieszka Sorokowska; Michal Misiak; Débora Mola; María Victoria Ortiz; Pablo Sebastián Correa; Anabel Belaus; Fany Muchembled; Rafael R Ribeiro; Patricia Arriaga; Raquel Oliveira; Leigh Ann Vaughn; Paulina Szwed; Małgorzata Kossowska; Gabriela Czarnek; Julita Kielińska; Benedict Antazo; Ruben Betlehem; Stefan Stieger; Gustav Nilsonne; Nicolle Simonovic; Jennifer Taber; Amélie Gourdon-Kanhukamwe; Artur Domurat; Keiko Ihaya; Yuki Yamada; Anum Urooj; Tripat Gill; Martin Čadek; Lisa Bylinina; Johanna Messerschmidt; Murathan Kurfalı; Adeyemi Adetula; Ekaterina Baklanova; Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir; Heather B Kappes; Biljana Gjoneska; Thea House; Marc V Jones; Jana B Berkessel; William J Chopik; Sami Çoksan; Martin Seehuus; Ahmed Khaoudi; Ahmed Bokkour; Kanza Ait El Arabi; Ikhlas Djamai; Aishwarya Iyer; Neha Parashar; Arca Adiguzel; Halil Emre Kocalar; Carsten Bundt; James O Norton; Marietta Papadatou-Pastou; Anabel De la Rosa-Gomez; Vladislav Ankushev; Natalia Bogatyreva; Dmitry Grigoryev; Aleksandr Ivanov; Irina Prusova; Marina Romanova; Irena Sarieva; Maria Terskova; Evgeniya Hristova; Veselina Hristova Kadreva; Allison Janak; Vidar Schei; Therese E Sverdrup; Adrian Dahl Askelund; Lina Maria Sanabria Pineda; Dajana Krupić; Carmel A Levitan; Niklas Johannes; Nihal Ouherrou; Nicolas Say; Sladjana Sinkolova; Kristina Janjić; Marija Stojanovska; Dragana Stojanovska; Meetu Khosla; Andrew G Thomas; Franki Y H Kung; Gijsbert Bijlstra; Farnaz Mosannenzadeh; Busra Bahar Balci; Ulf-Dietrich Reips; Ernest Baskin; Byurakn Ishkhanyan; Johanna Czamanski-Cohen; Barnaby James Wyld Dixson; David Moreau; Clare A M Sutherland; Hu Chuan-Peng; Chris Noone; Heather Flowe; Michele Anne; Steve M J Janssen; Marta Topor; Nadyanna M Majeed; Yoshihiko Kunisato; Karen Yu; Shimrit Daches; Andree Hartanto; Milica Vdovic; Lisa Anton-Boicuk; Paul A G Forbes; Julia Kamburidis; Evelina Marinova; Mina Nedelcheva-Datsova; Nikolay R Rachev; Alina Stoyanova; Kathleen Schmidt; Jordan W Suchow; Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm; Teodor Jernsäther; Jonas K Olofsson; Olga Bialobrzeska; Magdalena Marszalek; Srinivasan Tatachari; Reza Afhami; Wilbert Law; Jan Antfolk; Barbara Žuro; Natalia Van Doren; Jose A Soto; Rachel Searston; Jacob Miranda; Kaja Damnjanović; Siu Kit Yeung; Dino Krupić; Karlijn Hoyer; Bastian Jaeger; Dongning Ren; Gerit Pfuhl; Kristoffer Klevjer; Nadia S Corral-Frías; Martha Frias-Armenta; Marc Y Lucas; Adriana Olaya Torres; Mónica Toro; Lady Grey Javela Delgado; Diego Vega; Sara Álvarez Solas; Roosevelt Vilar; Sébastien Massoni; Thomas Frizzo; Alexandre Bran; David C Vaidis; Luc Vieira; Bastien Paris; Mariagrazia Capizzi; Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho; Anna Greenburgh; Cassie M Whitt; Alexa M Tullett; Xinkai Du; Leonhard Volz; Minke Jasmijn Bosma; Cemre Karaarslan; Eylül Sarıoğuz; Tara Bulut Allred; Max Korbmacher; Melissa F Colloff; Tiago J S Lima; Matheus Fernando Felix Ribeiro; Jeroen P H Verharen; Maria Karekla; Christiana Karashiali; Naoyuki Sunami; Lisa M Jaremka; Daniel Storage; Sumaiya Habib; Anna Studzinska; Paul H P Hanel; Dawn Liu Holford; Miroslav Sirota; Kelly Wolfe; Faith Chiu; Andriana Theodoropoulou; El Rim Ahn; Yijun Lin; Erin C Westgate; Hilmar Brohmer; Gabriela Hofer; Olivier Dujols; Kevin Vezirian; Gilad Feldman; Giovanni A Travaglino; Afroja Ahmed; Manyu Li; Jasmijn Bosch; Nathan Torunsky; Hui Bai; Mathi Manavalan; Xin Song; Radoslaw B Walczak; Przemysław Zdybek; Maja Friedemann; Anna Dalla Rosa; Luca Kozma; Sara G Alves; Samuel Lins; Isabel R Pinto; Rita C Correia; Peter Babinčák; Gabriel Banik; Luis Miguel Rojas-Berscia; Marco A C Varella; Jim Uttley; Julie E Beshears; Katrine Krabbe Thommesen; Behzad Behzadnia; Shawn N Geniole; Miguel A Silan; Princess Lovella G Maturan; Johannes K Vilsmeier; Ulrich S Tran; Sara Morales Izquierdo; Michael C Mensink; Piotr Sorokowski; Agata Groyecka-Bernard; Theda Radtke; Vera Cubela Adoric; Joelle Carpentier; Asil Ali Özdoğru; Jennifer A Joy-Gaba; Mattie V Hedgebeth; Tatsunori Ishii; Aaron L Wichman; Jan Philipp Röer; Thomas Ostermann; William E Davis; Lilian Suter; Konstantinos Papachristopoulos; Chelsea Zabel; Sandersan Onie; Charles R Ebersole; Christopher R Chartier; Peter R Mallik; Heather L Urry; Erin M Buchanan; Nicholas A Coles; Maximilian A Primbs; Dana M Basnight-Brown; Hans IJzerman; Patrick S Forscher; Hannah Moshontz
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-08-02

5.  Headache related to mask use of healthcare workers in COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Cansu Köseoğlu Toksoy; Hayri Demirbaş; Erhan Bozkurt; Hakan Acar; Ülkü Türk Börü
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2021-04-01

6.  COVID-19 pandemic to lead to thousands of additional UK lung cancer deaths.

Authors:  Emma Wilkinson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Symptoms of Depression, Anxiety, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, and Suicidal Ideation Among State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Public Health Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic - United States, March-April 2021.

Authors:  Jonathan Bryant-Genevier; Carol Y Rao; Barbara Lopes-Cardozo; Ahoua Kone; Charles Rose; Isabel Thomas; Diana Orquiola; Ruth Lynfield; Dhara Shah; Lori Freeman; Scott Becker; Amber Williams; Deborah W Gould; Hope Tiesman; Geremy Lloyd; Laura Hill; Ramona Byrkit
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  Mental Health Outcomes Among Italian Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Rodolfo Rossi; Valentina Socci; Tommaso Benedetto Jannini; Francesca Pacitti; Alberto Siracusano; Alessandro Rossi; Giorgio Di Lorenzo
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01

9.  Increased generalized anxiety, depression and distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in Germany.

Authors:  Alexander Bäuerle; Martin Teufel; Venja Musche; Benjamin Weismüller; Hannah Kohler; Madeleine Hetkamp; Nora Dörrie; Adam Schweda; Eva-Maria Skoda
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.341

10.  The COVID-19 pandemic and maternal mental health in a fragile and conflict-affected setting in Tumaco, Colombia: a cohort study.

Authors:  Andrés Moya; Pieter Serneels; Alethea Desrosiers; Vilma Reyes; María José Torres; Alicia Lieberman
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 26.763

View more
  2 in total

1.  Development of the Nurse Occupational Stigma Scale.

Authors:  Lu Yang; Shuangxin Zhang; Jiaqi Leng; Zhiguang Fan; Yi Luo
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2022-07-02

2.  Application of Meditation Relaxation Training and Rosenthal Effect in Patients with Adenoidectomy.

Authors:  Wei Jun; Yue Tian
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 2.650

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.