Literature DB >> 3505870

Comprehension of informed consent information by young-old through old-old volunteers.

H A Taub1, M T Baker, G E Kline, J F Sturr.   

Abstract

Comprehension of typewritten informed consent information was evaluated for young-old (60-69 years) through old-old (80-89 years) volunteers as a function of years of education (less than 12, 12, and greater than 12), readability of information (low [college level] vs high [7th grade]), and typeface used in the preparation of the materials (Prestige Elite 72, Letter Gothic, and Orator). All volunteers (N = 235) read a typewritten information sheet and retained it for review while answering eight multiple choice questions. Immediate feedback was provided, and a second test was administered if any answers were incorrect. The findings indicated that comprehension varied directly with education and inversely with age. Typeface and age interacted due to age-related differences with the two smaller (Prestige Elite and Letter Gothic), but not with the largest of the typefaces (Orator). These findings suggest that the observed age-related differences may have been due to visual and not cognitive deficits. Readability did not affect performance either by itself or in combination with any other variable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3505870     DOI: 10.1080/03610738708259321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Aging Res        ISSN: 0361-073X            Impact factor:   1.645


  12 in total

Review 1.  Applying cognitive design principles to formatting HRQOL instruments.

Authors:  P A Mullin; K N Lohr; B W Bresnahan; P McNulty
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Rebecca L Sudore; C Seth Landefeld; Brie A Williams; Deborah E Barnes; Karla Lindquist; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Monitoring clinical research: an obligation unfulfilled.

Authors:  C Weijer; S Shapiro; A Fuks; K C Glass; M Skrutkowska
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Corrected Feedback: A Procedure to Enhance Recall of Informed Consent to Research among Substance Abusing Offenders.

Authors:  David S Festinger; Karen L Dugosh; Jason R Croft; Patricia L Arabia; Douglas B Marlowe
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2010-01-01

5.  Facilitating Informed Permission/Assent/Consent in Pediatric Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Susan M Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.022

6.  Informed Assent Recall Among Adolescents in Substance Use Disorder Treatment Research.

Authors:  Jordan P Davis; Emily A Lux; Douglas C Smith; Leah Cleeland
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse       Date:  2016-05-04

Review 7.  The doctor's duty to the elderly patient in clinical trials.

Authors:  Antony Bayer; Mark Fish
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Assessment of Capacity to Consent to Treatment: Challenges, the "ACCT" Approach, Future Directions.

Authors:  Jennifer Moye; Michele J Karel; Barry Edelstein; Bret Hicken; Jorge C Armesto; Ronald J Gurrera
Journal:  Clin Gerontol       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 2.619

9.  Difficult behaviors in the emergency department: a cohort study of housed, homeless and alcohol dependent individuals.

Authors:  Tomislav Svoboda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials.

Authors:  Adam Nishimura; Jantey Carey; Patricia J Erwin; Jon C Tilburt; M Hassan Murad; Jennifer B McCormick
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.