Literature DB >> 35058639

When seeking help, women and racial/ethnic minorities benefit from explicitly stating their identity.

Erika L Kirgios1, Aneesh Rai2, Edward H Chang3, Katherine L Milkman2.   

Abstract

Receiving help can make or break a career, but women and racial/ethnic minorities do not always receive the support they seek. Across two audit experiments-one with politicians and another with students-as well as an online experiment (total n = 5,145), we test whether women and racial/ethnic minorities benefit from explicitly mentioning their demographic identity in requests for help, for example, by including statements like "As a Black woman…" in their communications. We propose that when a help seeker highlights their marginalized identity, it may activate prospective helpers' motivations to avoid prejudiced reactions and increase their willingness to provide support. Here we show that when women and racial/ethnic minorities explicitly mentioned their demographic identity in help-seeking emails, politicians and students responded 24.4% (7.42 percentage points) and 79.6% (2.73 percentage points) more often, respectively. These findings suggest that deliberately mentioning identity in requests for help can improve outcomes for women and racial/ethnic minorities.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35058639     DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01253-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  13 in total

1.  Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999.

Authors:  J F Dovidio; S L Gaertner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-07

2.  Yes, but what's the mechanism? (don't expect an easy answer).

Authors:  John G Bullock; Donald P Green; Shang E Ha
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-04

3.  A general approach to causal mediation analysis.

Authors:  Kosuke Imai; Luke Keele; Dustin Tingley
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2010-12

4.  The active control of prejudice: unpacking the intentions guiding control efforts.

Authors:  E Ashby Plant; Patricia G Devine
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-03

5.  Does Mentoring Matter? A Multidisciplinary Meta-Analysis Comparing Mentored and Non-Mentored Individuals.

Authors:  Lillian T Eby; Tammy D Allen; Sarah C Evans; Thomas Ng; David Dubois
Journal:  J Vocat Behav       Date:  2008-04

Review 6.  Prejudice reduction: what works? A review and assessment of research and practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth Levy Paluck; Donald P Green
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Temporal distance and discrimination: an audit study in academia.

Authors:  Katherine L Milkman; Modupe Akinola; Dolly Chugh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-05-21

8.  Seeing race and seeming racist? Evaluating strategic colorblindness in social interaction.

Authors:  Evan P Apfelbaum; Samuel R Sommers; Michael I Norton
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-10

9.  What happens before? A field experiment exploring how pay and representation differentially shape bias on the pathway into organizations.

Authors:  Katherine L Milkman; Modupe Akinola; Dolly Chugh
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2015-04-13

10.  Logistic or linear? Estimating causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis.

Authors:  Robin Gomila
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-09-24
View more
  1 in total

1.  Reply to Mitterer: Conceptual and empirical issues that arise when using correspondence audits to measure racial discrimination.

Authors:  Ray Block; Charles Crabtree; John B Holbein; J Quin Monson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.