Literature DB >> 35058354

The Trifecta Study: Comparing Plasma Levels of Donor-derived Cell-Free DNA with the Molecular Phenotype of Kidney Transplant Biopsies.

Philip F Halloran1,2,3, Jeff Reeve4, Katelynn S Madill-Thomsen4,3, Zachary Demko5, Adam Prewett5, Paul Billings5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between the donor-derived cell-free DNA fraction (dd-cfDNA[%]) in plasma in kidney transplant recipients at time of indication biopsy and gene expression in the biopsied allograft has not been defined.
METHODS: In the prospective, multicenter Trifecta study, we collected tissue from 300 biopsies from 289 kidney transplant recipients to compare genome-wide gene expression in biopsies with dd-cfDNA(%) in corresponding plasma samples drawn just before biopsy. Rejection was assessed with the microarray-based Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System using automatically assigned rejection archetypes and molecular report sign-outs, and histology assessments that followed Banff guidelines.
RESULTS: The median time of biopsy post-transplantation was 455 days (5 days to 32 years), with a case mix similar to that of previous studies: 180 (60%) no rejection, 89 (30%) antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), and 31 (10%) T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and mixed. In genome-wide mRNA measurements, all 20 top probe sets correlating with dd-cfDNA(%) were previously annotated for association with ABMR and all types of rejection, either natural killer (NK) cell-expressed (e.g., GNLY, CCL4, TRDC, and S1PR5) or IFN-γ-inducible (e.g., PLA1A, IDO1, CXCL11, and WARS). Among gene set and classifier scores, dd-cfDNA(%) correlated very strongly with ABMR and all types of rejection, reasonably strongly with active TCMR, and weakly with inactive TCMR, kidney injury, and atrophy fibrosis. Active ABMR, mixed, and active TCMR had the highest dd-cfDNA(%), whereas dd-cfDNA(%) was lower in late-stage ABMR and less-active TCMR. By multivariate random forests and logistic regression, molecular rejection variables predicted dd-cfDNA(%) better than histologic variables.
CONCLUSIONS: The dd-cfDNA(%) at time of indication biopsy strongly correlates with active molecular rejection and has the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04239703.
Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopsy; blood donors; cell-free DNA; genomics; microarrays; phenotype; rejection; transplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35058354      PMCID: PMC8819982          DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2021091191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  32 in total

1.  Donor-derived Cell-free DNA in Solid-organ Transplant Diagnostics: Indications, Limitations, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Ashish Kataria; Dhiren Kumar; Gaurav Gupta
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Real Time Central Assessment of Kidney Transplant Indication Biopsies by Microarrays: The INTERCOMEX Study.

Authors:  P F Halloran; J Reeve; E Akalin; O Aubert; G A Bohmig; D Brennan; J Bromberg; G Einecke; F Eskandary; C Gosset; J-P Duong Van Huyen; G Gupta; C Lefaucheur; A Malone; R B Mannon; D Seron; J Sellares; M Weir; A Loupy
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Cell-Free DNA and Active Rejection in Kidney Allografts.

Authors:  Roy D Bloom; Jonathan S Bromberg; Emilio D Poggio; Suphamai Bunnapradist; Anthony J Langone; Puneet Sood; Arthur J Matas; Shikha Mehta; Roslyn B Mannon; Asif Sharfuddin; Bernard Fischbach; Mohanram Narayanan; Stanley C Jordan; David Cohen; Matthew R Weir; David Hiller; Preethi Prasad; Robert N Woodward; Marica Grskovic; John J Sninsky; James P Yee; Daniel C Brennan
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 4.  Next-generation sequencing methods to detect donor-derived cell-free DNA after transplantation.

Authors:  Fungai Dengu
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.943

5.  Molecular phenotypes of acute kidney injury in kidney transplants.

Authors:  Konrad S Famulski; Declan G de Freitas; Chatchai Kreepala; Jessica Chang; Joana Sellares; Banu Sis; Gunilla Einecke; Michael Mengel; Jeff Reeve; Philip F Halloran
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Discrepancy analysis comparing molecular and histology diagnoses in kidney transplant biopsies.

Authors:  Katelynn Madill-Thomsen; Agnieszka Perkowska-Ptasińska; Georg A Böhmig; Farsad Eskandary; Gunilla Einecke; Gaurav Gupta; Philip F Halloran
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Generating automated kidney transplant biopsy reports combining molecular measurements with ensembles of machine learning classifiers.

Authors:  Jeff Reeve; Georg A Böhmig; Farsad Eskandary; Gunilla Einecke; Gaurav Gupta; Katelynn Madill-Thomsen; Martina Mackova; Philip F Halloran
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Relationships among injury, fibrosis, and time in human kidney transplants.

Authors:  Jeffery M Venner; Konrad S Famulski; Jeff Reeve; Jessica Chang; Philip F Halloran
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2016-01-21

9.  Donor-Specific Antibody Is Associated with Increased Expression of Rejection Transcripts in Renal Transplant Biopsies Classified as No Rejection.

Authors:  Katelynn S Madill-Thomsen; Georg A Böhmig; Jonathan Bromberg; Gunilla Einecke; Farsad Eskandary; Gaurav Gupta; Luis G Hidalgo; Marek Myslak; Ondrej Viklicky; Agnieszka Perkowska-Ptasinska; Philip F Halloran
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Kinetics Post-kidney Transplant Biopsy.

Authors:  Yousuf Kyeso; Anshul Bhalla; Alyssa P Smith; Yaqi Jia; Safa Alakhdhair; Stephanie C Ogir; Mohammad Abuzeineh; Daniel C Brennan; Sami Alasfar
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-05-25
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Donor Derived Cell Free DNA in Kidney Transplantation: The Circa 2020-2021 Update.

Authors:  Sam Kant; Daniel C Brennan
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.842

2.  Comparing Plasma Donor-Derived Cell-free DNA to Indication Kidney Biopsy Tissue Gene Expression: Toward Understanding the Molecular Equivalents of Non-Invasive Tests.

Authors:  Sunil Kurian; John Friedewald
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Combining donor-derived cell-free DNA and donor specific antibody testing as non-invasive biomarkers for rejection in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Bogdan Obrișcă; Maria Butiu; Lena Sibulesky; Ramasamy Bakthavatsalam; Kelly D Smith; Idoia Gimferrer; Paul Warner; Gener Ismail; Nicolae Leca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Extracellular vesicle-bound DNA in urine is indicative of kidney allograft injury.

Authors:  Ivana Sedej; Maja Štalekar; Magda Tušek Žnidarič; Katja Goričar; Nika Kojc; Polona Kogovšek; Vita Dolžan; Miha Arnol; Metka Lenassi
Journal:  J Extracell Vesicles       Date:  2022-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.