| Literature DB >> 35056908 |
Dóra Kósa1,2,3, Ágota Pető1,2,3, Ferenc Fenyvesi1,2, Judit Váradi1,2, Miklós Vecsernyés1,2, István Budai4, József Németh5, Pálma Fehér1,2, Ildikó Bácskay1,2,3, Zoltán Ujhelyi1,2.
Abstract
The rapid progress in biotechnology over the past few decades has accelerated the large-scale production of therapeutic peptides and proteins, making them available in medical practice. However, injections are the most common method of administration; these procedures might lead to inconvenience. Non-invasive medications, such as oral administration of bio-compounds, can reduce or eliminate pain and increase safety. The aim of this project was to develop and characterize novel melanin concentrating hormone (MCH) formulations for oral administration. As a drug delivery system, penetration enhancer combined alginate beads were formulated and characterized. The combination of alginate carriers with amphiphilic surfactants has not been described yet. Due to biosafety having high priority in the case of novel pharmaceutical formulations, the biocompatibility of selected auxiliary materials and their combinations was evaluated using different in vitro methods. Excipients were selected according to the performed toxicity measurements. Besides the cell viability tests, physical properties and complex bioavailability assessments were performed as well. Our results suggest that alginate beads are able to protect melanin concentrating hormones. It has been also demonstrated that penetration enhancer combined alginate beads might play a key role in bioavailability improvement. These formulations were found to be promising tools for oral peptide delivery. Applied excipients and the performed delivery systems are safe and highly tolerable; thus, they can improve patients' experience and promote adherence.Entities:
Keywords: Caco-2 cells; MTT test; alginate beads; bioavailability; biocompatibility investigation; penetration enhancers; peptide carriers
Year: 2021 PMID: 35056908 PMCID: PMC8778866 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14010009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Composition of the selected blends.
| Selected Blends | Sodium-Alginate Solution | Labrasol | Transcutol HP |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCH beads | 40 mL | - | - |
| MCH beads + 0.01% ( | 40 mL | 0.01% ( | - |
| MCH beads + 0.01% ( | 40 mL | - | 0.01% ( |
| MCH beads + 0.01% ( | 40 mL | 0.01% ( | 0.01% ( |
Figure 1Results of encapsulation efficiency measurements regarding the different formulations containing MCH. Although there is no major difference in encapsulation efficiency between the formulations, beads containing both Labrasol and Transcutol HP as penetration enhancers showed the highest EE value. Each data point represents the mean ± SD, n = 3.
Figure 2Bead swelling behavior according to the nozzle size applied for the formulation. Equilibrium water uptake is highly affected by particle size. Each data point represents the mean ± SD, n = 5.
Figure 3Scanning electron microscopy images of the different formulated sodium-alginate beads containing MCH. During the drying process some squashes occurred on the bead surface.
Results of laser diffraction particle size distribution.
| Sample | d(0.1) µm | d(0.9) µm | d(4.3) µm |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCH beads | 144.03 ± 7.37 | 193.32 ± 8.25 | 209.65 ± 28 |
| MCH beads + 0.01% ( | 146.09 ± 6.21 | 198.42 ± 3.63 | 208.23 ± 1.56 |
| MCH beads + 0.01% ( | 141.52 ± 3.97 | 205.26 ± 2.83 | 220.30 ± 3.85 |
| MCH beads + 0.01% ( | 146.71 ± 7.02 | 199.47 ± 4.23 | 211.10 ± 1.19 |
Figure 4Results of laser diffraction particle size distribution according to the volume moment mean values. Particle size of the beads is close to the theoretical 200 µm regarding all four formulations.
Figure 5In vitro dissolution profile of MCH from sodium-alginate beads in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 6.80). Significant peptide release started after 60 min and reached a plateau after 120 min. Each data point represents the mean ± SD, n = 3.
Figure 6Enzymatic stability of melanin concentrating hormone (MCH) encapsulated in sodium-alginate beads with free (not formulated) MCH as a control: (a) in SGF medium; (b) in SIF medium. Each data point represents the mean ± SD, n = 3.
Figure 7Results of in vitro cytotoxicity measurement of the applied excipients and bead components for the formulation of sodium-alginate beads containing MCH. Bead forming sodium-alginate and calcium chloride dehydrate did not show substantial toxicity, while penetration enhancer excipients (Labrasol, Transcutol HP) seemed to be toxic at higher concentration. Triton-X was used as a positive control; the phosphate-buffered solution (PBS)-treated group was the negative control. Each data point represents the mean ± SD, n = 10.
Figure 8Results of a 6 h treatment of Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells with MCH beads, MCH beads containing 0.01% (v/v%) Labrasol, MCH beads containing 0.01% (v/v%) Transcutol HP, and MCH beads containing 0.01% (v/v%) Labrasol and 0.01% (v/v%) Transcutol HP.
Figure 9Evaluation of permeability of MCH across Caco-2 epithelial cell layers treated with the different formulations for 1 h. Increased peptide permeability was observed when penetration enhancers were added to the compositions. Each data point represents the mean ± SD, n = 10.
Figure 10Transepithelial electrical resistance of Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells: (a) regarding the whole experiment; (b) focusing on the first 100 min. Each data point represents the mean ± SD, n = 5.