| Literature DB >> 35056630 |
Youwei Zuo1,2, Huanhuan Qu1,2, Changying Xia1,2, Huan Zhang1,2, Jiahui Zhang1,2, Hongping Deng1,2,3.
Abstract
The uncontrolled invasion of moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) dramatically alters soil nitrogen cycling and destroys the natural habitat of Alsophila spinulosa. Nevertheless, no clear evidence points out the role of denitrifying bacteria in the invasion of bamboo into the habitat of A. spinulosa. In the present study, we found that low (importance value 0.0008), moderate (0.6551), and high (0.9326) bamboo invasions dramatically altered the underground root biomass of both P. pubescens and A. spinulosa. The root biomass of A. spinulosa was maximal at moderate invasion, indicating that intermediate disturbance might contribute to the growth and survival of the colonized plant. Successful bamboo invasion significantly increased rhizospheric soil available nitrogen content of A. spinulosa, coupled with elevated denitrifying bacterial abundance and diversity. Shewanella, Chitinophaga, and Achromobacter were the primary genera in the three invasions, whereas high bamboo invasion harbored more denitrifying bacteria and higher abundance than moderate and low invasions. Further correlation analysis found that most soil denitrifying bacteria were positively correlated with soil organic matter and available nitrogen but negatively correlated with pH and water content. In addition, our findings illustrated that two denitrifying bacteria, Chitinophaga and Sorangium, might be essential indicators for evaluating the effects of bamboo invasion on the growth of A. spinulosa. Collectively, this study found that moso bamboo invasion could change the nitrogen cycling of colonized habitats through alterations of denitrifying bacteria and provided valuable perspectives for profound recognizing the invasive impacts and mechanisms of bamboo expansion.Entities:
Keywords: Alsophila spinulosa; Phyllostachys pubescens; denitrifying bacteria; invasion; nitrogen cycle
Year: 2022 PMID: 35056630 PMCID: PMC8780856 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10010180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Effects of moso bamboo invasion on forest structure and tree characteristics. (A–C) Field pictures of A. spinulosa community disturbed by low (A), moderate (B), and high (C) moso bamboo invasions. IMP indicates the importance value of moso bamboo. (D,E) Root biomass of moso bamboo (D) and A. spinulosa (E) at different vertical depths, respectively. abc Different superscripts indicate the significant difference (p < 0.05).
The basic information about three sampling sites.
| Intensities of Disturbance | Latitude and Longitude | Elevation/m | Importance Value | Dominant Woody Species |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | E 106°01′38.49″ | 564 | 0.9326 |
|
| N 28°28′41.89″ | ||||
| E 106°38′22.30″ | 553 |
| ||
| N 28°27′23.31″ | ||||
| E 106°01′37.36″ | 562 |
| ||
| N 28°28′42.81″ | ||||
| mod | E106°00′38.26″ | 547 | 0.6551 |
|
| N 28°27′38.00″ | ||||
| E 106°00′45.33″ | 525 |
| ||
| N 28°19′40.14″ | ||||
| E 106°00′50.02″ | 527 |
| ||
| N 28°25′36.44″ | ||||
| low | E 105°58′00.83″ | 538 | 0.0008 |
|
| N 28°23′39.04″ | ||||
| E 105°58′02.61″ | 535 |
| ||
| N 28°23′38.55″ | ||||
| E 105°58′03.72″ | 523 |
| ||
| N 28°23′37.46″ |
Figure 2Effects of moso bamboo invasion on rhizospheric soil properties of A. spinulosa. Alterations of (A) soil pH, (B) water content, (C) organic matter, and (D) available nitrogen under low, moderate, and high moso bamboo invasions. ** Asterisk indicates the significant difference (p < 0.01).
Figure 3Effects of moso bamboo invasion on denitrifying bacterial community composition. Barplots showing the denitrifying bacterial community composition at class (A) and genus (B) levels.
The relative abundance of dominant denitrifying bacteria in the rhizosphere of three sites.
| Type of Bacteria | Low | Moderate | High | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.066 | 0.078 | 0.082 | 0.076 |
|
| 0.045 | 0.08 | 0.085 | 0.07 |
|
| 0 | 0.041 | 0.047 | 0.029 |
|
| 0.009 | 0.026 | 0.026 | 0.02 |
|
| 0.044 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.016 |
|
| 0.009 | 0.002 | 0.01 | 0.007 |
|
| 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.006 | 0.007 |
|
| 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.004 |
|
| 0.002 | 0.011 | 0.001 | 0.005 |
|
| 0.012 | 0.002 | 0.012 | 0.009 |
|
| 0 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.003 |
|
| 0.008 | 0.015 | 0.007 | 0.01 |
|
| 0.01 | 0.007 | 0.012 | 0.01 |
|
| 0.007 | 0.011 | 0.016 | 0.011 |
|
| 0.007 | 0.009 | 0.011 | 0.009 |
|
| 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.003 |
|
| 0.006 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
|
| 0.016 | 0.005 | 0 | 0.007 |
Figure 4OTUs association network showing interactions between different treatments. The nodes represent OTUs shared or specialized by low, moderate, and high moso bamboo invasions. Heatmap showing the clustering patterns and abundances of OTUs identified in the three groups.
Diversity index of various groups of denitrifying bacteria.
| Intensities of Disturbance | Ace | Chao1 | Shannon | Simpson | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| low | 190.18 | 191.16 | 4.15 | 0.029 | 0.99971 |
| moderate | 205.49 | 204.5 | 4.19 | 0.03 | 0.99983 |
| high | 207.69 | 205.75 | 4.29 | 0.024 | 0.99959 |
Figure 5Effects of moso bamboo invasion on denitrifying bacterial community beta diversity. Barplots showing the denitrifying bacterial community composition at the class (A) and genus (B) levels. Weighted unifrac tree showing the distances of the identified denitrifying bacteria.
The relationships of denitrifying bacteria with plant and soil properties based on Spearman rank correlation analysis.
| Type of Bacteria | pH | WC | OM | AN | Diameter | Crown Width | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| −0.24 | −0.99 | 1.000 * | 0.835 | 0.343 | −0.982 | −0.999 |
|
| −0.115 | −1.000 * | 0.991 | 0.758 | 0.221 | 0.555 | −0.984 * |
|
| −0.117 | −1.000 * | 0.992 | 0.759 | −0.406 | −0.706 | 0.984 |
|
| 0 | −0.995 | 0.97 | 0.678 | 0.107 | 0.465 | 0.957 |
|
| 0.041 | −0.998 * | 0.979 | −0.708 | −0.148 | −0.492 | −0.968 |
|
| −0.918 | 0.3 | −0.162 | 0.405 | 0.107 | 0.456 | −0.114 |
|
| 0.866 | 0.588 | 0.696 | −0.976 | −0.915 | −0.999 * | −0.73 |
|
| 0 | −0.995 | −0.97 | 0.678 | −0.107 | −0.456 | −0.957 |
|
| 0.908 | −0.322 | 0.185 | −0.383 | −0.324 | −0.617 | 0.138 |
|
| −0.866 | 0.407 | −0.274 | 0.298 | −0.871 | −0.635 | −0.228 |
Note: * Asterisk indicates the significant difference (p < 0.05).