| Literature DB >> 35056615 |
Andrea Springer1, Daniela Jordan1, Antje Glass1, Olaf Kahl2, Volker Fingerle3, Philipp Girl4, Lidia Chitimia-Dobler4, Christina Strube1.
Abstract
In Europe, Ixodes ricinus plays a major role as a vector of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.) spirochaetes, the causative agents of Lyme borreliosis, among other pathogens. In unfed ticks, Borrelia spirochaetes experience prolonged nutrient restriction. However, only few studies exist with regard to Borrelia infections in unfed ticks of different physiological ages. Changing body dimensions of unfed ticks, due to the consumption of energy reserves, allow physiological age estimation. The present study investigated the relationship of morphometric age with Borrelia prevalence and spirochaete load in 1882 questing I. ricinus nymphs, collected at two different locations in northern Germany in 2020. In addition, Borrelia species composition was investigated by employing a reverse line blot (RLB) probe panel suitable for the detection of ten different B. burgdorferi s.l. species, as well as the relapsing-fever spirochaete B. miyamotoi. Overall, Borrelia prevalence was 25.8% (485/1882). Whilst there was no statistically significant difference in Borrelia prevalence between the different morphometric age groups, Borrelia infection intensity as determined by probe-based quantitative real-time PCR significantly declined with increasing morphometric age. Borrelia species differentiation by RLB was successful in 29.5% of positive ticks, and revealed B. afzelii as the dominating species (65.0% of the differentiated infections). Additionally, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. spielmanii, and B. miyamotoi were detected.Entities:
Keywords: Borrelia burgdorferi s.l.; Borrelia miyamotoi; Lyme borreliosis; biological age; morphometric age ratio; tick-borne pathogens
Year: 2022 PMID: 35056615 PMCID: PMC8778018 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10010166
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Tick morphometric age categories used in the current study.
| Age Category | Alloscutal/Scutal Index | Age Group According to Balashov [ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.61−1.70 | II (young ticks) |
| 2 | 1.51−1.60 | II (young ticks) |
| 3 | 1.41−1.50 | III (middle-aged ticks) |
| 4 | 1.31−1.40 | III (middle-aged ticks) |
| 5 | 1.21−1.30 | III (middle-aged ticks) |
| 6 | 1.11−1.20 | III (middle-aged ticks) |
| 7 | 1.01−1.10 | IV (old ticks) |
| 8 | 0.8−1.00 | IV (old ticks) |
Probes and positive controls used in the reverse line blot for Borrelia species discrimination.
| Probe | Target Species | Probe References | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SL2 | - | [ | |
| AF |
| PBas | [ |
| GA | PWudII, | [ | |
| BisNE2 |
| DN127 | [ |
| SS | PAbe, | [ | |
| LusiNE2 |
| Poti B2 | [ |
| SpiNE3 |
| PHap | [ |
| SpiNE3T |
| PHap | this study |
| VSNE |
| VS116 | [ |
| BisNE1 |
| 25015 | [ |
| MIYA |
| HT31 | [ |
Figure 1Distribution of the morphometric age ratio and Borrelia prevalence in the dataset of 1882 I. ricinus ticks. Percentages indicate the Borrelia prevalence in each category.
Monthly Borrelia spp. prevalence in questing I. ricinus nymphs.
| Month | Hanover | Neustrelitz | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| March | 35/151 (23.2%) | 48/153 (31.4%) | 83/304 (27.3%) |
| April | 46/150 (30.7%) | 31/148 (20.9%) | 77/298 (25.8%) |
| May | 29/147 (19.7%) | 30/149 (20.1%) | 59/296 (19.9%) |
| June | 31/147 (21.1%) | 44/108 (40.7%) | 75/255 (29.4%) |
| July | 40/148 (27.0%) | 42/141 (29.8%) | 82/289 (28.4%) |
| August | 21/134 (15.7%) | 21/63 (33.3%) | 42/197 (21.3%) |
| September | 31/118 (26.3%) | 3/8 (37.5%) | 34/126 (27.0%) |
| October | 16/68 (23.5%) | 17/49 (34.7%) | 33/117 (28.2%) |
Figure 2Borrelia spp. composition as determined by RLB among the 142 successfully differentiated samples according to (A) sampling location and (B) tick morphometric age ratio. Percentages above the bars indicate RLB differentiation success in each category. Coinfections consisted of B. garinii/bavariensis + B. valaisiana (1× in Neustrelitz, and 1× in Hanover), B. afzelii + B. valaisiana (1× in Hanover), and B. afzelii + B. miyamotoi (1× in Hanover).
Results of the binomial GLMM investigating the effect of tick morphometric age, sampling month, and Ixodes ITS2 copy numbers on Borrelia spp. prevalence. The full model was significantly different from a null model containing only the random factor (χ2 = 27.13, Df = 15, p = 0.028). Significant p-values (≤0.050) are shown in bold.
| Variable | Estimate | Std. Error | z-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | −1.92 | 1.34 | −1.43 | 0.154 |
| Month | ||||
| March | Reference | − | − | − |
| April | −0.07 | 0.19 | −0.36 | 0.716 |
| May | −0.41 | 0.20 | −2.06 |
|
| June | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.62 | 0.536 |
| July | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.37 | 0.715 |
| August | −0.06 | 0.28 | −0.21 | 0.836 |
| September | 0.36 | 0.31 | 1.15 | 0.250 |
| October | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.91 | 0.362 |
| Morphometric age ratio | ||||
| 1.61–1.70 | Reference | − | − | − |
| 1.51–1.60 | 0.16 | 1.44 | 0.11 | 0.910 |
| 1.41–1.50 | 0.51 | 1.19 | 0.42 | 0.672 |
| 1.31–1.40 | −0.18 | 1.17 | −0.15 | 0.881 |
| 1.21–1.30 | −0.01 | 1.17 | −0.01 | 0.996 |
| 1.11–1.20 | −0.18 | 1.17 | −0.15 | 0.878 |
| 1.01–1.10 | −0.73 | 1.21 | −0.60 | 0.550 |
| 0.80–1.00 | 1.71 | 1.69 | 1.01 | 0.312 |
| 0.07 | 0.05 | 1.49 | 0.136 |
1 log transformed.
Figure 3Borrelia 5S–23S IGS copies in the different morphometric age groups. Boxplots are shown for groups with n ≥ 5, while individual data points are shown in dark blue. The thick line indicates the median.
Results of the LMM investigating the effects of different variables on log-transformed Borrelia 5S–23S IGS copy numbers among 485 Borrelia-positive ticks. The full model was significantly different from a null model containing only the random factor (χ2 = 91.82, Df = 15, p < 0.001). Significant p-values (≤0.050) are shown in bold.
| Variable | Estimate | Std. Error | Df | t-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 2.25 | 2.76 | 466.20 | 0.81 | 0.416 |
| Month | |||||
| March | Reference | − | − | − | − |
| April | −0.45 | 0.38 | 439.99 | −1.18 | 0.239 |
| May | 1.02 | 0.41 | 468.98 | 2.50 |
|
| June | 1.71 | 0.38 | 468.08 | 4.53 |
|
| July | 2.16 | 0.38 | 468.61 | 5.70 |
|
| August | 0.79 | 0.59 | 416.62 | 1.33 | 0.184 |
| September | 1.83 | 0.63 | 177.98 | 2.89 |
|
| October | 1.27 | 0.64 | 441.67 | 1.99 |
|
| Morphometric age ratio | |||||
| 1.61−1.70 | Reference | − | − | − | − |
| 1.51−1.60 | −0.88 | 2.88 | 468.13 | −0.31 | 0.760 |
| 1.41−1.50 | −4.50 | 2.39 | 468.58 | −1.88 | 0.060 |
| 1.31−1.40 | −3.78 | 2.35 | 468.97 | −1.61 | 0.109 |
| 1.21−1.30 | −3.41 | 2.35 | 468.96 | −1.45 | 0.147 |
| 1.11−1.20 | −3.85 | 2.35 | 468.96 | −1.64 | 0.102 |
| 1.01−1.10 | −4.45 | 2.45 | 468.96 | −1.81 | 0.070 |
| 0.80−1.00 | −6.48 | 2.85 | 468.71 | −2.27 |
|
| 0.25 | 0.10 | 361.62 | 2.52 |
|
1 log transformed.