| Literature DB >> 35056535 |
Roberta Marra1,2, Nadia Lombardi1,2, Alessandro Piccolo1,3, Navid Bazghaleh4, Pratibha Prashar4, Albert Vandenberg4, Sheridan Woo2,5,6.
Abstract
Biofortification of crops via agricultural interventions represents an excellent way to supply micronutrients in poor rural populations, who highly suffer from these deficiencies. Soil microbes can directly influence plant growth and productivity, e.g., by contrasting plant pathogens or facilitating micronutrient assimilation in harvested crop-food products. Among these microbial communities, Trichoderma fungi are well-known examples of plant symbionts widely used in agriculture as biofertilizers or biocontrol agents. In this work, eleven Trichoderma strains and/or their bioactive metabolites (BAMs) were applied to lentil plants to evaluate their effects on plant growth and mineral content in greenhouse or field experiments. Our results indicated that, depending upon the different combinations of fungal strain and/or BAM, the mode of treatment (seed and/or watering), as well as the supplementary watering with solutions of iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn), the mineral absorption was differentially affected in treated plants compared with the water controls. In greenhouse conditions, the largest increase in Fe and Zn contents occurred when the compounds were applied to the seeds and the strains (in particular, T. afroharzianum T22, T. harzianum TH1, and T. virens GV41) to the soil. In field experiments, Fe and Zn contents increased in plants treated with T. asperellum strain KV906 or the hydrophobin HYTLO1 compared with controls. Both selected fungal strains and BAMs applications improved seed germination and crop yield. This biotechnology may represent an important challenge for natural biofortification of crops, thus reducing the risk of nutrient deficiencies.Entities:
Keywords: Trichoderma; bioactive metabolites; biofortification; iron; lentil; mineral content; zinc
Year: 2021 PMID: 35056535 PMCID: PMC8779936 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10010087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Characteristics of lentil (Lens culinaris L.) variety CDC MAXIM CL used in this study [24].
| Variety | CDC MAXIM CL |
|---|---|
|
| Red |
|
| Small |
|
| 100 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 51 |
|
| 40 |
|
| Good |
|
| Good |
List of Trichoderma species and strains used for the experiments.
| No. | Strain | Origin | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| TH1 | Italy |
| 2 |
| M10 | Australia |
| 3 |
| MK1 | Italy |
| 4 |
| P1 | Norway |
| 5 |
| T22 | USA |
| 6 |
| T53 | Spain |
| 7 |
| HK2 | USA |
| 8 |
| HK5 | USA |
| 9 |
| CRN1 | Costa Rica |
| 10 |
| KV906 | Brazil |
| 11 |
| GV41 | USA |
Trichoderma bioactive metabolites (BAMs) used in this work.
| Metabolite | Chemical Feature | Source | Properties | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-pentyl-alpha-pyrone (6PP) | Pyrone | Antibiotic, volatile compound with a characteristic smell of coconut. | [ | |
| Harzianic acid (HA) | Tetramic acid | Antifungal activity, promotion of plant growth, ability to bind iron. | [ | |
| HYTLO1 | Hydrophobin | Involved in the aerial mycelium formation and stimulation of plant defenses and root growth, antifungal activity. | [ |
Figure 1Development of lentil plants treated with various Trichoderma strains. (Left) Control (water) untreated. (Center) Plants treated with T. afroharzianum strain T22. (Right) Plants treated with the strain P1 of T. atroviride.
Figure 2Iron content in lentil plants treated with Trichoderma strains (T22, M10 or P1) or metabolites (HA or 6PP) to the seeds and to the soil (1st watering). Water treatments served as controls (Ctrl). Data represent the mean value of three biological replicates ± standard error. The second soil watering was performed with a 1X solution of iron and zinc (+FeZn) or water (−FeZn). Asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) compared with the control. Statistical analysis was carried out using the one-way ANOVA.
Figure 3Effects of treatments based on different Trichoderma strains (TH1, M10, MK1, P1, T22, T53, HK2, HK5, CRN1, KV906, GV41) on the yield of lentil plants (expressed as fresh weight of seed pods per treatment). Data represent the mean value of three biological replicates ± standard error. The treatments consisted of two applications of spore suspensions, first to the seeds and then, 4 weeks later, to the soil. Water treatments served as controls (CTRL). After 7 d, another soil watering was carried out using the 1X FeZn solution. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01) compared with the control. Statistical analysis was carried out using the one-way ANOVA.
Effects of Trichoderma strains (TH1, M10, MK1, P1, T22, T53, HK2, CRN1, KV906, GV41) on the lentil mineral content. Water treatments served as controls (CTRL). Data represent the mean value of three biological replicates ± standard deviation (SD). Different letters in a column indicate statistically significant differences for p < 0.05.
| Mineral Content (mg/100 g Sample) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Strain | Fe | Zn |
| TH1 | 5.82 ± 0.65 bd | 7.345 ± 0.84 a |
| M10 | 4.02 ± 0.41 a | 7.245 ± 0.80 a |
| MK1 | 2.77 ± 0.28 c | 7.695 ± 0.69 a |
| P1 | 4.75 ± 0.39 ad | 6.845 ± 0.77 c |
| T22 | 6.47 ± 0.45 b | 9.395 ± 0.85 b |
| T53 | 3.99 ± 0.52 a | 7.295 ± 0.64 a |
| HK2 | 4.42 ± 0.68 a | 7.345 ± 0.25 a |
| HK5 | 4.01 ± 0.54 a | 7.245 ± 0.84 a |
| CRN1 | 3.15 ± 0.27 c | 7.745 ± 0.67 a |
| KV906 | 4.22 ± 0.51 a | 7.545 ± 0.64 a |
| GV41 | 6.88 ± 0.52 b | 7.695 ± 0.34 a |
| Control | 4.00 ± 0.63 a | 7.995 ± 0.40 a |
Figure 4Effect of the seed treatment with Trichoderma strains (T22, TH1, GV41) or metabolites (6PP, HA, HYTLO1) on the germination of lentil seeds cv. CDC MAXIM CL (3 days after the treatment). Water treatments served as controls (Ctrl). Asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) compared with the control. Statistical analysis was carried out using the one-way ANOVA.
Effects of Trichoderma strains (T22, TH1, GV41) or metabolites (HA, 6PP, HYTLO1), applied singly, on the lentil mineral content. Water treatments served as controls (CTRL). Treatments were applied to the seed (indicated on the left), then to the soil (indicated on the right). After 7 d from the soil treatment, another soil watering was carried out using the 1X FeZn solution (+FeZn) or water (−FeZn). Data represent the mean value of three biological replicates ± standard deviation (SD). Different letters in a column indicate statistically significant differences for p < 0.05; nd: Not determined.
| Mineral Content (mg/100 g Sample) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Applied to Seed/Soil | IRON CONTENT | ZINC CONTENT | ||||||
| −FeZn | +FeZn | −FeZn | +FeZn | |||||
| CTRL | 5.60 | ±0.41 a | 12.06 | ±0.84 a | 6.00 | ±0.62 a | 4.28 | ±0.45 a |
| H2O/T22 | 13.59 | ±1.63 b | 4.57 | ±0.35 b | 7.95 | ±0.84 b | 3.81 | ±0.25 a |
| H2O/TH1 | 4.21 | ±0.58 c | 4.55 | ±0.65 b | 6.31 | ±0.36 a | 4.62 | ±0.41 a |
| H2O/GV41 | 13.88 | ±1.28 b | 10.77 | ±0.96 a | 4.85 | ±0.58 a | 4.46 | ±0.56 a |
| H2O/HA | 7.13 | ±0.63 d | 7.21 | ±0.78 c | 7.52 | ±0.89 ab | 4.28 | ±0.69 a |
| H2O/6PP | 4.38 | ±0.48 c | 24.99 | ±1.96 d | 6.40 | ±0.54 a | 4.47 | ±0.85 a |
| H2O/HYTLO1 | 3.36 | ±0.36 c | 47.89 | ±1.84 e | 5.82 | ±0.23 a | 3.79 | ±0.55 a |
| T22/H2O | 5.56 | ±0.69 ac | nd | 4.90 | ±0.85 a | nd | ||
| TH1/H2O | 7.73 | ±0.36 d | 19.53 | ±2.65 d | 5.53 | ±0.96 a | 5.29 | ±0.98 a |
| GV41/H2O | 5.73 | ±0.44 a | 2.81 | ±0.24 f | 6.08 | ±0.65 a | 4.04 | ±0.63 a |
| HA/H2O | 7.76 | ±0.18 d | 5.51 | ±0.75 c | 5.69 | ±0.41 a | 5.13 | ±0.35 a |
| 6PP/H2O | 9.13 | ±0.85 e | 8.57 | ±0.96 cg | 6.93 | ±0.21 a | 4.56 | ±0.14 a |
| HYTLO1/H2O | 7.02 | ±1.00 ad | 9.94 | ±1.45 ag | 6.61 | ±0.36 a | 5.01 | ±0.56 a |
Effects of combined treatments with Trichoderma strains (T22, TH1, GV41) or metabolites (HA, 6PP, HYTLO1) on the lentil mineral content. Water treatments served as controls (CTRL). Treatments were applied to the seed (indicated on the left), then to the soil (indicated on the right). After 7 d from the soil treatment, another soil watering was carried out using the 1X FeZn solution (+FeZn) or water (−FeZn). Data represent the mean value of three biological replicates ± standard deviation (SD). Different letters in a column indicate statistically significant differences for p < 0.05.
| Mineral Content (mg/100 g Sample) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Applied to Seed/Soil | IRON CONTENT | ZINC CONTENT | ||||||
| −FeZn | −FeZn | −FeZn | +FeZn | |||||
| CTRL | 5.60 | ±0.41 a | 12.06 | ±2.56 a | 6.00 | ±0.62 a | 4.28 | ±0.44 a |
| HA/H2O | 7.76 | ±0.18 bc | 5.51 | ±0.75 b | 5.69 | ±0.41 ab | 5.13 | ±0.35 b |
| HA/T22 | 6.31 | ±0.56 a | 12.46 | ±1.69 a | 5.23 | ±0.63 ab | 4.00 | ±0.72 a |
| HA/TH1 | 6.26 | ±0.98 a | 13.21 | ±1.45 a | 5.28 | ±0.66 ab | 3.61 | ±0.35 a |
| HA/GV41 | 6.29 | ±0.68 a | 46.74 | ±6.51 c | 4.39 | ±0.58 b | 4.37 | ±0.68 a |
| 6PP/H2O | 9.13 | ±0.85 c | 8.57 | ±0.96 b | 6.93 | ±0.21 a | 4.56 | ±0.14 a |
| 6PP/T22 | 7.97 | ±0.77 bc | 13.29 | ±1.69 a | 5.36 | ±0.81 ab | 4.61 | ±0.35 a |
| 6PP/TH1 | 3.91 | ±0.45 d | 4.41 | ±0.87 b | 5.08 | ±0.80 ab | 4.49 | ±0.16 a |
| 6PP/GV41 | 7.77 | ±0.85 bc | 50.76 | ±5.12 c | 7.00 | ±0.96 a | 4.06 | ±0.41 a |
| HYTLO1/H2O | 7.02 | ±1.00 ab | 9.94 | ±1.45 ab | 6.61 | ±0.36 a | 4.56 | ±0.14 a |
| HYTLO1/T22 | 5.49 | ±0.66 a | 7.22 | ±0.98 b | 5.44 | ±0.63 ab | 3.94 | ±0.34 a |
| HYTLO1/TH1 | 9.75 | ±0.84 c | 8.04 | ±0.74 b | 5.61 | ±0.31 a | 4.79 | ±0.23 a |
| HYTLO1/GV41 | 3.95 | ±0.63 d | 7.61 | ±0.84 b | 4.16 | ±0.54 b | 5.10 | ±0.23 b |
Effects of Trichoderma strains (TH1, M10, P1, T22, T53, HK5, CRN1, KV906 or GV41) or metabolites (HA, 6PP, HYTLO1), applied singly as seed coating, on the lentil mineral content. Plants were grown in field conditions and water treatments served as controls (CTRL). Data represent the mean value of three biological replicates (each one consisting of 10 plants) ± standard error (SE). Different letters in a column indicate statistically significant differences for p < 0.05. Significant increments compared with control (CTRL) are reported as %; nd: Not determined.
| Treatment | Plant Dry Weight | Seed Weight | Mineral Content | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SE | % | Mean ± SE | % | Iron | Zinc | |
| CTRL | 16.9 ± 2.5 a | - | 5.6 ± 0.5 a | - | 83.1 ± 8.6 a | 66.33 ± 3.7 a |
| TH1 | 26.6 ± 2.7 b | +57 | 15.2 ± 1.0 b | +169 | 82.2 ± 6.6 a | 62.43 ± 1.8 a |
| M10 | 37.1 ± 0.4 c | +120 | 12.0 ± 0.4 c | +112 | 85.3 ± 10.8 a | 66.38 ± 5.5 a |
| P1 | nd | - | 4.8 ± 0.3 a | - | 73.6 ± 0.1 b | 59.94 ± 1.0 b |
| T22 | 7.3 ± 0.2 e | - | 5.8 ± 0.3 a | - | 70.4 ± 3.6 b | 56.40 ± 82.9 b |
| T53 | 13.3 ± 1.6 ad | - | 9.7 ± 0.5 d | +71 | 87.3 ± 1.4 a | 61.29 ± 2.7 a |
| HK5 | 16.5 ± 1.4 a | - | 8.7 ± 2.4 de | +53 | 83.5 ± 2.0 a | 68.82 ± 1.1 a |
| CRN1 | 17.5 ± 1.6 a | - | 5.3 ± 2.1 a | - | 82.1 ± 20.5 a | 66.44 ± 7.6 a |
| KV906 | 20.4 ± 2.1 a | - | 10.2 ± 0.7 cd | +81 | 98.4 ± 4.6 c (+11%) | 73.97 ± 6.7 c (+18%) |
| GV41 | 17.9 ± 4.5 a | - | 9.3 ± 1.9 cde | +65 | 76.1 ± 1.7 b | 62.28 ± 4.2 a |
| HA | 8.6 ± 0.6 e | - | 5.1 ± 0.7 a | - | 90.6 ± 0.1 a | 66.72 ± 4.2 a |
| 6PP | 12.9 ± 0.7 d | - | 7.6 ± 0.4 de | +36 | 73.6 ± 0.9 b | 62.12 ± 0.1 a |
| HYTLO1 | 21.5 ± 3.4 ab | - | 14.0 ± 2.9 b | +147 | 99.9 ± 2.0 c (+6%) | 70.55 ± 2.2 c (+20%) |
| T22 + HA | 16.3 ± 2.2 ad | - | 6.6 ± 1.3 ae | - | 88.6 ± 5.0 a | 67.45 ± 3.3 a |