Literature DB >> 3505642

Length of consultation: how well do patient's choose?

L Lowenthal, E Bingham.   

Abstract

Patients attending a rural Berkshire surgery were invited to decide the length of appointment they required with the general practitioner. They were offered a choice of five minutes, 10 minutes, or longer, but the general practitioner was unaware of the time requested. Of 200 consecutive patients 115 requested five minutes, 80 requested 10 minutes and five requested longer. The mean consultation length of these groups was 6.5, 9.2 and 14.5 minutes, respectively. Patients given a diagnosis of psychiatric disorder were less accurate in their choice of time than any other diagnostic group. The results suggest that patients are generally good at estimating the time they require in consultation, and do not request over long appointments. It may thus be reasonable to allow patients to choose their consultation length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3505642      PMCID: PMC1711118     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract        ISSN: 0035-8797


  4 in total

1.  Appointment systems: feasibility study of a new approach.

Authors:  A T Harrison
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-06-06

2.  The "five minute" consultation: effect of time constraint on clinical content and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  D C Morrell; M E Evans; R W Morris; M O Roland
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-29

3.  Consultation length and outcome in two group general practices.

Authors:  D Hughes
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1983-03

4.  Time and the general practitioner: the patient's view.

Authors:  F M Hull; F S Hull
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1984-02
  4 in total
  10 in total

1.  Calling time on the 10-minute consultation.

Authors:  Jonathan Silverman; Paul Kinnersley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Longer booking intervals in general practice: effects on doctors' stress and arousal.

Authors:  A Wilson; P McDonald; L Hayes; J Cooney
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Sharing control of appointment length with patients in general practice.

Authors:  Robert Lambourn; Joanne Richardson; Elizabeth Batley; Caroline Douglas
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  The CRQ paper: sample questions and answers.

Authors: 
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1990-11

5.  The exceptional potential of the consultation revisited.

Authors:  J F Middleton
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-09

6.  The efficient use of time in general practice.

Authors:  M Roland
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-12

7.  Patient demographics as a predictive tool of consultation duration.

Authors:  Volha Pankevich
Journal:  London J Prim Care (Abingdon)       Date:  2014

8.  Mathematical relationship between waiting times and appointment interval for doctor and patients.

Authors:  I Hill-Smith
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-12

9.  Factors influencing waiting times and consultation times in general practice.

Authors:  D J Heaney; J G Howie; A M Porter
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Sharing control of appointment length with patients in general practice: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Rod Sampson; Jeremiah O'Rourke; Ross Hendry; David Heaney; Samantha Holden; Alex Thain; Ronald MacVicar
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.386

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.