| Literature DB >> 35056033 |
Konstantinos V Arsenopoulos1, Eleftherios Triantafillou2, Athanasios I Gelasakis3, Elias Papadopoulos1.
Abstract
Fly infestation remains a universal problem for dairy cattle herds, affecting the animals' health and welfare status. Pre-weaned dairy calves are significantly challenged by the direct and indirect consequences of severe fly infestation, heat-stress and their interaction, which contribute to a stressful and fatiguing environment. Among several physiological, behavioral, clinical and biochemical traits, serum cortisol (SC) and creatine kinase (CK) levels, as well as feed consumption can be used as valid indicators of potential stressful and fatiguing conditions and, therefore, can be efficiently used for stress analysis studies. Hence, the objective of the study was to assess the fly-repellency effect of deltamethrin on pre-weaned dairy calves exposed to heat stress conditions, as well as its association with SC, CK concentrations and feed consumption. Two commercial dairy cattle herds of the Holstein breed in Central Macedonia (Greece) were involved in the study during summer months and under heat stress conditions. Deltamethrin administration resulted in (i) a decreased fly population (100% Musca domestica) landing on pre-weaned dairy calves, (ii) a reduced SC (stress indicator) and CK (fatigue indicator) concentration, and (iii) an increased consumption of feedstuff in deltamethrin treated animals compared to the untreated ones.Entities:
Keywords: concentrates; fatigue indicator; fly-repellent; houseflies; pre-ruminants; roughages; stress indicator; temperature-humidity index
Year: 2022 PMID: 35056033 PMCID: PMC8780268 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11010085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
Air temperature (°C), relative humidity (%) and temperature-humidity index (THI) during the five sampling occasions per farm.
| Farm | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day | A | B | ||||
| Temp. (°C) | Hum. (%) | THI | Temp. (°C) | Hum. (%) | THI | |
| 0 | 38.9 | 69 | 94.5 | 37.9 | 73 | 94.0 |
| 10 | 39.3 | 67 | 94.5 | 38.4 | 75 | 95.0 |
| 20 | 39.1 | 68 | 95.5 | 39.4 | 72 | 96.0 |
| 30 | 38.2 | 76 | 95.0 | 39.2 | 71 | 95.5 |
| 40 | 39.6 | 70 | 96.0 | 38.8 | 76 | 96.0 |
Temp.: Temperature, Hum.: Humidity, THI: Temperature-Humidity Index.
Effects of deltamethrin treatment, sampling occasion and farm on (i) flies’ number, (ii) serum cortisol (SC) level and (iii) creatine kinase (CK) level, in the studied calves, as estimated by the inverse Gaussian mixed linear regression models applied.
| 95% CI | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Category Level |
| SE | Lower | Upper | |
|
| ||||||
| Deltamethrin treatment | Yes | −60.6 | 1.72 | 0.000 | −64.0 | −57.2 |
| No |
| |||||
| Sampling occasion | Day 15 | 45.6 | 2.78 | 0.000 | 40.1 | 51.0 |
| Day 25 | 0.0 | 0.43 | 0.935 | −0.8 | 0.9 | |
| Day 35 | −0.2 | 0.39 | 0.632 | −1.0 | 0.6 | |
| Day 45 | 0.2 | 0.36 | 0.521 | −0.5 | 0.9 | |
| Day 55 |
| |||||
| Farm | A | −1.1 | 0.64 | 0.099 | −2.3 | 0.2 |
| B |
| |||||
|
| ||||||
| Deltamethrin treatment | Yes | −1.86 | 0.051 | 0.000 | −1.97 | −1.76 |
| No |
| |||||
| Sampling occasion | Day 15 | 1.09 | 0.079 | 0.000 | 0.93 | 1.24 |
| Day 25 | −0.13 | 0.048 | 0.008 | −0.22 | −0.03 | |
| Day 35 | −0.02 | 0.042 | 0.697 | −0.10 | 0.07 | |
| Day 45 | −0.03 | 0.052 | 0.605 | −0.13 | 0.08 | |
| Day 55 |
| |||||
| Farm | A | 0.00 | 0.053 | 0.911 | −0.11 | 0.10 |
| B |
| |||||
|
| ||||||
| Deltamethrin treatment | Yes | −1101 | 47.3 | 0.000 | −1194 | −1009 |
| No |
| |||||
| Sampling occasion | Day 15 | 828 | 56.3 | 0.000 | 718 | 939 |
| Day 25 | −14 | 11.0 | 0.199 | −36 | 7 | |
| Day 35 | −128 | 18.1 | 0.000 | −163 | −92 | |
| Day 45 | −21 | 9.7 | 0.030 | −40 | −2 | |
| Day 55 |
| |||||
| Farm | A | −15 | 12.6 | 0.248 | −39 | 10 |
| B |
| |||||
CI: Confidence interval (Wald confidence interval was calculated for the inverse Gaussian model); B: Coefficient; SE: Standard error; “Ref”: Reference category.
Effects of deltamethrin treatment, sampling occasion and farm on (i) daily consumption of concentrates and (ii) daily consumption of roughages, in the studied calves, as estimated by the inverse Gaussian mixed linear regression models applied.
| 95% CI | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Category Level |
| SE | Lower | Upper | |
|
| ||||||
| Deltamethrin treatment | Yes | 137 | 5.0 | 0.000 | 127 | 147 |
| No |
| |||||
| Sampling occasion | Day 25 | −748 | 13.5 | 0.000 | −775 | −722 |
| Day 35 | −570 | 17.0 | 0.000 | −604 | −537 | |
| Day 45 | −375 | 15.2 | 0.000 | −405 | −345 | |
| Day 55 |
| |||||
| Farm | A | −3 | 4.2 | 0.509 | −11 | 5 |
| B |
| |||||
|
| ||||||
| Deltamethrin treatment | Yes | 25 | 2.8 | 0.000 | 20 | 31 |
| No |
| |||||
| Sampling occasion | Day 25 | −314 | 12.7 | 0.000 | −338 | −289 |
| Day 35 | −278 | 12.0 | 0.000 | −301 | −254 | |
| Day 45 | −234 | 9.0 | 0.000 | −252 | −216 | |
| Day 55 |
| |||||
| Farm | A | 6 | 3.1 | 0.073 | −1 | 12 |
| B |
| |||||
CI: Confidence interval (Wald confidence interval was calculated for the inverse Gaussian model); B: Coefficient; SE: Standard error; “Ref”: Reference category.
Feeding program of milk/milk replacer in both farms.
| Week | Milk/MR (L) |
|---|---|
| 1st | 4.5–6 |
| 2nd | 7 |
| 3rd | 7 |
| 4th | 7 |
| 5th | 7 |
| 6th | 7 |
| 7th | 5 |
| 8th | 2 |
| 9th | 0 |
MR: milk replacer.