| Literature DB >> 35055660 |
Katarzyna Blitek1, Daniel Pruchniewicz2, Przemysław Bąbelewski1, Marta Czaplicka-Pędzich1, Marcin Kubus3.
Abstract
The selection of species which show the highest possible tolerance to negative habitat conditions, also among plants of foreign origin, is a pressing issue. One of the species we would like to recommend for planting in urban areas is the white mulberry species (Morus alba) due to both its outstanding adaptability and its ecosystem services. There are no reliable studies on the distribution of this species in urbanized areas in Poland, nor sufficient analyses of the methods of its renewal, both deliberate and spontaneous spread through self-seeding. Collecting data on the population of an alien species within individual regions and forecasting potential changes in the population's size and structure, as well as its possible impacts on other organisms, is one of the basic measures to reduce biological invasions, which is one of the six priority objectives of the European Biodiversity Strategy and an element of the Strategy on Invasive Alien Species. The aim of this study was to determine the size and structure of the white mulberry population in the city of Wrocław and to analyse the relationship between this structure and intensity of anthropopressure and thermal conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Wrocław; ecology; environment; population; white mulberry
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35055660 PMCID: PMC8776231 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19020838
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Environmental conditions. The type of development is generalized in a network of squares with an area of 1 square kilometer.
Figure 2Thermal conditions, varied within the area of Wrocław due to the urban heat island generalized in a network of squares with an area of 1 square kilometre, in °C.
Figure 3Mulberry growth types.
Figure 4The distribution of Morus alba circumference. Percentage values represented the proportion of individuals trees of Morus alba in given circumference ranges (W Shapiro-Wilk test = 0.845; p ≤ 0.0001). The number of observations were calculated as mean for each square.
Mean values along with standard errors of parameters describing the natural (self-seeding) and artificial (intentional planting) of Morus alba. Different letters (a, b) indicate significant differences obtained after the Tukey’s test or Kruskal–Wallis test (p ≤ 0.05).
| Green Areas | High Residential Density up to 5 Floors | Low Residential Density of up to 5 Floors | Residential Buildings of More than 5 Floors | Service, Industrial and Railroad Areas | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| SE |
| SE |
| SE |
| SE |
|
| |
| Number of | 21.07 a | 5.31 | 29.75 a | 12.51 | 20.14 a | 6.89 | 31.40 a | 21.14 | 34.27 a | 15.41 |
| intentional planting | ||||||||||
| Number of trees (excluding adult seedlings) | 18.27 a | 5.22 | 27.25 a | 12.24 | 18.00 a | 6.66 | 27.60 a | 21.69 | 32.27 a | 15.34 |
| Mean tree circumference [cm] | 149.94 a | 17.15 | 149.73 a | 36.25 | 121.22 a | 15.27 | 107.11 a | 20.30 | 117.53 a | 18.55 |
| Hedges [number] | 0.73 a | 0.21 | 0.88 a | 0.52 | 1.00 a | 0.36 | 0.40 a | 0.24 | 0.40 a | 0.16 |
| Hedges length [m] | 20.93 a | 10.34 | 49.50 a | 32.83 | 27.89 a | 14.51 | 11.60 a | 11.60 | 43.93 a | 27.81 |
| Hedgerow lines | 0.20 a | 0.14 | 0.50 a | 0.19 | 0.14 a | 0.10 | 0.60 a | 0.40 | 0.00 a | 0.00 |
| Hedgerow length [m] | 4.40 a | 3.01 | 39.13 a | 21.86 | 3.43 a | 2.65 | 142.40 a | 139.42 | 0.00 a | 0.00 |
| self-seeding | ||||||||||
| Number of adult seedlings | 0.53 a | 0.29 | 0.25 a | 0.25 | 0.29 a | 0.29 | 1.60 a | 1.60 | 0.40 a | 0.19 |
| Number of young seedlings | 1.33 a | 0.30 | 0.88 a | 0.40 | 0.71 a | 0.27 | 1.20 a | 0.97 | 1.20 a | 0.46 |
The results of PCA main components analysis conducted for an additional variable representing urbanization level.
| Value Number | Eigenvalue | % of Total Variance | Accumulated Eigenvalues | Accumulated of Total Variance [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.59 | 28.76 | 2.59 | 28.76 |
| 2 | 2.30 | 25.59 | 4.89 | 54.34 |
| 3 | 1.67 | 18.59 | 6.56 | 72.93 |
| 4 | 0.80 | 8.85 | 7.36 | 81.78 |
| 5 | 0.76 | 8.39 | 8.12 | 90.18 |
| 6 | 0.45 | 5.04 | 8.57 | 95.21 |
| 7 | 0.26 | 2.87 | 8.83 | 98.08 |
| 8 | 0.17 | 1.92 | 9.00 | 100.00 |
Figure 5Principal component analysis conducted for parameters characterizing natural and artificial renewal of Morus alba. The level of urbanization was introduced into analyses as an additional variable.
Mean values along with standard errors of parameters describing natural (self-seeding) and artificial (intentional planting) renewal of Morus alba with regard to thermal variable. Different letters (a, b, ab) indicate significant differences as showed by the Tukey’s test or Kruskal–Wallis test (p ≤ 0.05).
| Class | <4 | 4.1–6.9 | 7–9.9 | 10–10.9 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| SE |
| SE |
| SE |
| SE | |
| Number of | 8.57 b | 4.09 | 48.76 a | 14.47 | 20.25 ab | 4.17 | 30.20 ab | 12.83 |
| Intentional planting | ||||||||
| Number of trees (excluding adult seedlings) | 6.14 b | 3.88 | 46.47 a | 14.49 | 18.05 ab | 4.01 | 25.80 ab | 11.93 |
| Mean tree circumference [cm] | 85.35 a | 15.66 | 106.48 a | 15.57 | 146.55 a | 18.05 | 151.65 a | 34.32 |
| Hedges [number] | 0.57 a | 0.2 | 0.53 a | 0.26 | 0.85 a | 0.26 | 1.00 a | 0.45 |
| Hedges length [m] | 28.04 a | 15.21 | 9.18 a | 4.69 | 29.15 a | 13.76 | 56.00 a | 33.88 |
| Hedgerow lines | 0.29 a | 0.16 | 0.24 a | 0.14 | 0.10 a | 0.07 | 0.40 a | 0.24 |
| Hedgerow length [m] | 53.43 a | 49.81 | 4.00 a | 2.4 | 13.45 a | 9.52 | 10.80 a | 6.68 |
| Self-seeding | ||||||||
| Number of adult seedlings | 0.86 a | 0.62 | 0.35 a | 0.17 | 0.30 a | 0.21 | 0.80 a | 0.49 |
| Number of young seedlings | 0.71 a | 0.4 | 1.18 a | 0.32 | 0.95 a | 0.27 | 2.20 a | 0.86 |
The results of PCA conducted for an additional variable–thermal factor.
| Eigenvalue | % of Total Variance | Accumulated Eigenvalues | Accumulated of Total Variance [%] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.44 | 27.08 | 2.44 | 27.08 |
| 2 | 2.22 | 24.68 | 4.66 | 51.76 |
| 3 | 1.59 | 17.71 | 6.25 | 69.47 |
| 4 | 1.00 | 11.16 | 7.26 | 80.63 |
| 5 | 0.76 | 8.45 | 8.02 | 89.07 |
| 6 | 0.48 | 5.30 | 8.49 | 94.37 |
| 7 | 0.30 | 3.38 | 8.80 | 97.75 |
| 8 | 0.20 | 2.25 | 9.00 | 100.00 |
Figure 6PCA conducted for parameters characterizing the natural and artificial renewal of Morus alba. The thermal factor was introduced into the analysis as an additional variable.