| Literature DB >> 35055280 |
Szabolcs Bognár1, Predrag Putnik2, Daniela Šojić Merkulov1.
Abstract
Polluting the natural water resources is a serious global issue, which is confirmed by the fact that today at least 2 billion people consume water from contaminated sources. The conventional wastewater treatment methods cannot effectively remove the persistent pollutants (e.g., drugs, organic dyes, pesticides) from the aqueous environment. Heterogeneous photocatalysis is a promising and sustainable alternative for water remediation. It is based on the interaction between light irradiation and the semiconductors (e.g., TiO2, ZnO) as photocatalysts, but these compounds, unfortunately, have some disadvantages. Hence, great attention has been paid to the nanotechnology as a possible way of improvement. Nanomaterials have extraordinary properties; however, their conventional synthesis is often difficult and requires a significant amount of dangerous chemicals. This concise topical review gives recent updates and trends in development of sustainable and green pathways in the synthesis of nanomaterials, as well as in their application for water remediation. In our review we put emphasis on the eco-friendly, mostly plant extract-based materials. The importance of this topic, including this study as well, is proved by the growing number of publications since 2018. Due to the current serious environmental issues (e.g., global warming, shortage of pure and quality water), it is necessary for the traditional TiO2 and ZnO semiconductors to be replaced with the harmless, non-toxic, and more powerful nanocomposites as photocatalysts. Not only because of their higher efficiency as compared to the bulk semiconductors, but also because of the presence of biomolecules that can add up to the pollutant removal efficiency, which has been already confirmed in many researches. However, despite the fact that the application of heterogeneous photocatalysis together with green nanotechnology is absolutely the future in water purification, there are some challenges which have to be overcome. The exact effects of the biomolecules obtained from plants in the synthesis of nanoparticles, as well as in the photocatalytic processes, are not exactly known and require further investigation. Furthermore, heterogeneous photocatalysis is a well-known and commonly examined process; however, its practical use outside the laboratory is expensive and difficult. Thus, it has to be simplified and improved in order to be available for everyone. The aim of our review is to suggest and prove that using these bio-inspired compounds it is possible to reduce human footprint in the nature.Entities:
Keywords: TiO2/ZnO; environmental pollution; green nanotechnology; heterogeneous photodegradation; plant extract; water purification
Year: 2022 PMID: 35055280 PMCID: PMC8779975 DOI: 10.3390/nano12020263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Possible application of heterogeneous photocatalysis.
Figure 2Crystalline structures of TiO2 in different phases: (a) Anatase, (b) rutile, (c) brookite, and (d) TiO2 (B). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [12]. Copyright 2021 ACS publications.
Basic properties of titanium dioxide. Adapted from Ref. [13].
| Properties | Values |
|---|---|
| CAS number | 13463-67-7 |
| Molecular formula | TiO2 |
| Molar mass | 79.866 g/mol |
| Appearance | White powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 3.9 to 4.2 g/mL |
| Melting point | 1860 °C (decomposes) |
| Boiling point | 2500–3000 °C |
| Solubility in water | Less than 1 mg/mL (20 °C) |
| Band gap | 3.2 eV (anatase); 3.02 eV (rutile) |
| Refractive index (nD) | 2.554 (anatase); 2.583 (brookite); 4.17 (rutile) |
Basic properties of zinc oxide. Adapted from Ref. [18].
| Properties | Values |
|---|---|
| CAS number | 1314-13-2 |
| Molecular formula | ZnO |
| Molar mass | 81.408 g/mol |
| Appearance | White solid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 5.606 g/mL |
| Melting point | 1975 °C (decomposes) |
| Boiling point | 2360 °C |
| Solubility in water | 0.16 mg/100 mL (30 °C) |
| Band gap | 3.3 eV (direct) |
| Refractive index (nD) | 2.0041 |
Figure 3ZnO crystal structures: (a) Cubic rock salt, (b) cubic zinc blende and (c) hexagonal wurtzite. Shaded gray and black spheres denote Zn and O atoms, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [8], Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Figure 4Properties of different nanomaterials form. Adapted from Ref. [22].
Figure 5Number of publications on the “green synthesis” topic for photocatalytic purposes (Scopus, September 2021).
Basic information about the discussed methods of green synthesis and the main characteristics of the synthesized NPs.
| Type of Catalyst | Applied Plant Extract in Experiments | Method of Synthesis | Size of the Newly Synthesized Particles | Structure of the Newly Synthesized Particles | Type of Pollutant in the Photocatalytic Experiments | Applied Irradiation | Efficiency of the Photocatalytic Degradation (%) | Reaction Rate Constant | Study |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2 | Leaf extract of | Plant-mediated synthesis | Average crystal size in the range of 12.7–16.8 nm | Mesoporous structure of TiO2 | Rhodamine 6 G | UV irradiation | 64% after 57 min of irradiation | 0.0321 min−1 | [ |
| TiO2 | Hydrothermal synthesis | Size of pure TiO2 57 nm, while the Ag@TiO2 38 nm | Combination of anatase and rutile phase | Picric acid | Visible irradiation | After 50 min of irradiation a decent amount of PA was removed | Not mentioned | [ | |
| TiO2 | Leaf extract of | Synthesis under ambient conditions | 12.6 ± 1.7 nm | Spherical shape and anatase phase of the Au-Ag/TiO2 | methyl orange (MO), rhodamine B and methylene blue | UV-Vis irradiation (Xe lamp) | 89.4% of MO after 60 min of irradiation; Complete degradation in the case of mixture dyes after 60 min of irradiation | 0.0356 min−1 in the case of MO degradation; For the mixture the constant was not mentioned | [ |
| TiO2 | Leaf extract of | Sol–gel method | Average crystal size in the range of 19–21 nm | Aggregated, semi-spherical shape with anatase phase | Methyl orange | UV irradiation | 97.53% after 150 min of irradiation | Not mentioned | [ |
| TiO2 | Leaf extract of | Plant-mediated synthesis | Avarage crystal size in the range of 20–50 nm | Spherical shape and cubic phase of TiO2 | Methylene blue (MB), MO, alizarin red (AR) and crystal violet (CV) | Direct sunlight | 86.8% (CV); 81.3% (AR); 77.5% (MO) after 6 h of irradiation | Not mentioned | [ |
| ZnO | Leaf extract of | Not mentioned | 11.35 nm | Agglomerated, well-crystallized hexagonal wurtzite structure | Methylene blue | Sunlight irradiation | 91.4% after 180 min of irradiation | Not mentioned | [ |
| ZnO | Pullulan, product of | Precipitation method | Average particle size 110.86 nm | Flower-like strucutre | Methyl orange | UV irradiation | 97% after 300 min of irradiation | Not mentioned | [ |
| ZnO | Leaf extract of | Plant-mediated synthesis | Average particle size 35 nm | Hexagonal wurtzite crystallite structure | Methylene blue | Direct sunlight | 98.07% after 90 min of irradiation | Not mentioned | [ |
| ZnO | Plant extract of | Co-precipitation method | 35.41 nm | Hexagonal structure of crystalline nanoparticles | Malachite green | UV irradiation | 89% after 180 min of irradiation | Not mentioned | [ |
| ZnO | Peel extract of | Plant-mediated synthesis | 15.3 nm | Triangular and spherical shaped particles with hexagonal wurtzite structure | BB9 organic dye; Crystal violet (CV) and Congo red (CR) | UV-Vis irradiation (xenon lamp) | 100% of BB9 after 90 min of irradiation; 97.79% of CV and 81.70% of CR after 420 min of irradiation | 0.5254 h−1 for CV and 0.2837 h−1 for CR | [ |
| ZnO | Leaf extract of | Plant-mediated synthesis | 29–38 nm, depending on the volume of leaf extract | Quasi-hexagonal shape with hexagonal crystallographic phase | Congo red | Direct sunlight | 87% after 60 min of irradiation | 0.0401 min−1 | [ |
| ZnO | Peel extract of banana | Plant-mediated synthesis | 18.86–20.72 depending on the type of banana | Nanocrystalline ZnO | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Believed to be effective in the photodegradation | Not mentioned | [ |
| ZnO | Jujube fruit extract | Plant-mediated synthesis | 19 nm | Highly spherical shape with hexagonal wurtzite structure | Methylene blue (MB) and Eriochrome black-T (ECBT) | Direct sunlight | 85% of both dyes after 300 min of irradiation | 0.0087 min−1 for MB and 0.0067 min−1 for ECBT | [ |
| ZnO | Leaf extract of | Plant-mediated synthesis | Average crystal size 12 nm | Aggregated spheroidal shape with wurtzite hexagonal phase | Bromocresol green (BG), Bromophenol Blue (BB), Methyl red (MR) and Methyl blue (MB) | Direct sunlight | 93.12% of BG; 90.54% of BB; 88.49% of MR and 76.76% of MB after 10 min of irradiation | Not mentioned | [ |
| ZnO | Leaf extract of | Biological approach | Average crystal size of 20 nm | Hexagonal wurtzite structure | Methylene blue | UV irradiation | 69% after 200 min of irradiation | 0.0019 min−1 | [ |
| ZnO | Root extract of | Modified co-precipitation method | 500 nm | Spherical, flower-like shape with hexagonal wurtzite structure of ZnO | Methylene blue | UV irradiation | 90.3% after 40 min of irradiation | 0.057 min−1 | [ |
| ZnO | Leef extract of | Plant-mediated synthesis | 11.64 nm | Flowershaped particles with hexagonal wurtzite phase of ZnO | Methylene blue | Sunlight irradiation | 95% after 120 min of irradiation | 0.021 min−1 | [ |
| ZnO | Husk extract of | Co-precipitation method under low temperature | 28 (Z-ZnO), 55 (A-ZnO) and 25 (P-ZnO) nm | Z-ZnO flower-like; A-ZnO cauliflower-like and P-ZnO small nanoflower structure with hexagonal ZnO wurtzite phase | Antibacterial activity | Visible light irradiation | 93.2% (Z-ZnO), 85.7% (A-ZnO) and 99.2% (P-ZnO) after 180 min of irradiation | 0.0130 (Z-ZnO), 0.0091 (A-ZnO) and 0.0280 (p-ZnO) min−1 | [ |
| ZnO | Leaf extract of | Plant-mediated synthesis | 10–1000 nm | Spherical-spiral shape | Methylene blue | Sunlight irradiation | 99% (ZnO-PMMA); 98% (Ni2O3-PMMA); 93% (CuO-PMMA); 90% (Fe3O4-PMMA) after 130 min of irradiation | 0.1349 (ZnO-PMMA); 0.1321 (Ni2O3-PMMA); 0.1263 (CuO-PMMA); 0.1231 (Fe3O4-PMMA) min−1 | [ |
| ZnO | Leaf extract of curry with coconut water | Plant-mediated synthesis | 1.80, 1.62 and 1.88 nm with respect to 10-, 15- and 20-mL concentration of extract | Agglomerated, irregular spherical shape | Methylene blue | Sunlight irradiation | 98.45% after 60 min of irradiation | 0.0579 min−1 | [ |
| ZnO | Leaf extract of | Co-precipitation method | Average crystallite size 4.71 nm | Agglomerated flower-like shape with hexagonal wurtzite structure of the ZnO | Methylene blue | UV irradiation | 76% after 30 min of irradiation | Not mentioned | [ |
| ZnO | Root extract of | Precipitation method | 42–5500 nm | Sowrd-like shapes with hexagonal wurtzite phase of ZnO | Methylene blue | Visible light irradiation | 15–42% depending on the applied catalyst, after 40 min of irradiation | Lower than the used reference value (i.e. lower than 0.0344 min−1) | [ |
| ZnO | Leaf extract of | Plant-mediated synthesis | 82–250 nm for ZnO and 71–280 nm for 1% Fe-ZnO | Spherical cubic phase | Naphthalene | UV irradiation | 63.5% (ZnO) and 71.7% (Fe-ZnO) after 240 min of irradiation | 0.0045 (ZnO) and 0.0054 (Fe-ZnO) min−1 | [ |
| ZnO | Leaf extract of Rosemary | Plant-mediated synthesis | Average crystalline size 28.946 ± 0.002 nm | Quasi-hexagonal structure with high degree of agglomeration | Textile effluent | Visible light irradiation | 63% after 100 min of irradiation | 0.0111 s−1 | [ |
| ZnO | Leaf extract of | Plant-mediated synthesis | Average crystalline size 33 nm | Agglomerated spherical shape with hexagonal wurtzite structure of ZnO | Congo red | Sunlight irradiation | 80% after 300 min of irradiation | Not mentioned | [ |
Figure 6Schematic preparation of TiO2 NPs (size range of 240−410 nm) using leaf extract of Azadirachta indica. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [29], Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Figure 7Preparation scheme of ZnO nanoparticles. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [37], Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Figure 8Photodegradation of MB using Codonopsis lanceolata-mediated ZnO NPs under UV irradiation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [50], Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Figure 9Synthesis of ZnO NPs, using three different plant extracts. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [52], Copyright 2021 Springer.
Figure 10Green preparation of TiO2–CeO2 nanocomposites. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [64], Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Figure 11Scheme of the green synthesis of ZnO nanoflowers. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [67], Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Summary of the green-inspired special nanomaterials.
| Type of Catalyst | Applied Plant Extract in Experiments | Method of Synthesis | Size of the Newly Synthesized Particles | Structure of the Newly Synthesized Particles | Type of Pollutant in the Photocatalytic Experiments | Applied Irradiation | Efficiency of the Photocatalytic Degradation (%) | Reaction Rate Constant | Study |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p-Co3O4/n-ZnO | Plant extract of Eichhornia Crassipes | Co-precipitation method | Average crystal size 16.68 nm | Clusters of close packed organization with hexagonal phase of ZnO and cubic phase of Co3O4. | Methylene blue | Simulated sunlight | 95.5% of the MB, after 60 min of irradiation | 0.028 min−1 | [ |
| TiO2–CeO2 | Lemon extract | Combination of sol–gel and precipitation method | 9.4 nm | Combined tetragonal and cubic structures | 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4 DCP) | Simulated sunlight | 49% of 2,4-DCP was removed after 300 min of irradiation | Not mentioned | [ |
| ZnO@FeHCF | Leaf extract of | Plant-mediated synthesis | Size within nanorange (100 nm) | Flakes like geometry; hexagonal wurtzite-like structure in the case of ZnO and cubic lattice for FeHCF | bisphenol A (BPA) and nonylphenol (NP) | Simulated sunlight | 94% (BPA) and 91% (NP) after 24 h of irradiation | 0.2797 h−1 (BPA) and 0.2663 h−1 (NP) | [ |
| ZnO nanorods | Leaf extract of | Plant-mediated synthesis | Length between 20 and 200 nm; diameter between 20 and 80 nm; and width between 20 and 50 nm | Nano-rods in hexagonal pattern | Titan yellow (TY) | UV irradiation | >95% (under optimal conditions) after 60 min of irradiation | Average rate found to be 35, 37 and 40 min−1 | [ |
| ZnO nanoflowers | Panos extract | Co-precipitation method | 480 nm (pedals of 240 nm in length and 120 nm in width) | Four-way leafy flower-like structure with confirmed wurtzite phase of ZnO | Methylene blue (MB), eosin Y (EY) and malachite green (MG) | UV irradiation | >99% of MB, EY and MG was removed after 80 min, 90 min and 110 min of irradiation | Not mentioned | [ |