| Literature DB >> 35055265 |
Svetlana Razumova1, Anzhela Brago1, Dimitriy Serebrov1, Haydar Barakat1, Yuliya Kozlova1, Ammar Howijieh1, Zoya Guryeva1, Yulianna Enina2, Vasiliy Troitskiy3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endodontic treatment of various forms of pulpitis with variations of root canal system anatomy should be performed with high quality. The use of various antibacterial agents is aimed at maintaining the success of endodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the penetration and fixation of the nano-silver solution on the dentinal surface during endodontic treatment.Entities:
Keywords: dentinal surface; irrigants; nano-silver; root canal treatment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35055265 PMCID: PMC8781615 DOI: 10.3390/nano12020248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
GE v |tome| x m300 parameters.
| N | Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Voltage, kV | 300/180 |
| 2 | Power, W | 500/20 |
| 3 | Distinction of details, microns | <1.0/<0.5 |
| 4 | Detector resolution, MPix | 4 |
| 5 | Max. sample dimensions, mm | 500 × 600 |
| 6 | Volume of 3D-tomography, mm | 290 × 400 |
| 7 | Max. manipulator load, kg | Up to 20 |
Parameters scanning of samples.
| N | Parameters Scanning | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Voltage, kV | 130 |
| 2 | Current, μA | 70 |
| 3 | Power, W | 9.1 |
| 4 | Focal spot size, μm | 9.1 |
| 5 | Shooting time, min | 30 |
| 6 | Voxel size, μm | 10 |
| 7 | Number of projections, pcs. | 2400 |
Figure 1Micro CT scan of sample with removed smear layer.
Figure 2Micro CT scan of sample with preserved smear layer.
Results of silver detection in groups of samples with removed and preserved smear layer.
| Sample Groups/Quantity | Energy Dispersive Spectral Analysis (Elemental Mapping) | MACRO Photography | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group of Samples with Removed Smear Layer | Group of Samples with Preserved Smear Layer | Group of Samples with Removed Smear Layer | Group of Samples with Preserved Smear Layer | ||||
| Longitudinal sections | Ag− | (0) not found | (0) not found | 1.00 | (0) not found | (0) not found | 1.00 |
| Ag+ | (4) silver found (100%) | (4) silver found (100%) | (4) silver found (100%) | (4) silver found (100%) | |||
| Cross sections | Ag− | (20) not found (66.7%) | (14) not found (46.7%) | 0.12 | (9) not found (30%) | (0) not found (0%) | 0.01 |
| Ag+ | (10) silver found (33.3%) | (16) silver found (53.3%) | (21) silver found (70%) | (30) silver found (100%) | |||
| Control longitudinal (1 sample) | silver not found (1) | silver not found (1) | 1.00 | silver not found (1) | silver not found (1) | 1.00 | |
| Total silver found | 14 (41.2%) | 20 (58.8%) | 0.14 | 25 (73.5%) | 34 (100%) | 0.001 | |
Figure 3Scans of longitudinal sections of specimens group with removed smear layer.
Figure 4Scans of cross-sections of specimens group with preserved smear layer.
Figure 5Samples with preserved smear layer.
Figure 6Samples with removed smear layer.