| Literature DB >> 35055199 |
Muhammad Sohail Khan1, Sun Mei1, Unai Fernandez-Gamiz2, Samad Noeiaghdam3,4, Said Anwar Shah5, Aamir Khan6.
Abstract
The introduction of hybrid nanofluids is an important concept in various engineering and industrial applications. It is used prominently in various engineering applications, such as wider absorption range, low-pressure drop, generator cooling, nuclear system cooling, good thermal conductivity, heat exchangers, etc. In this article, the impact of variable magnetic field on the flow field of hybrid nano-fluid for the improvement of heat and mass transmission is investigated. The main objective of this study is to see the impact of hybrid nano-fluid (ferrous oxide water and carbon nanotubes) CNTs-Fe3O4, H2O between two parallel plates with variable magnetic field. The governing momentum equation, energy equation, and the magnetic field equation have been reduced into a system of highly nonlinear ODEs by using similarity transformations. The parametric continuation method (PCM) has been utilized for the solution of the derived system of equations. For the validity of the model by PCM, the proposed model has also been solved via the shooting method. The numerical outcomes of the important flow properties such as velocity profile, temperature profile and variable magnetic field for the hybrid nanofluid are displayed quantitatively through various graphs and tables. It has been noticed that the increase in the volume friction of the nano-material significantly fluctuates the velocity profile near the channel wall due to an increase in the fluid density. In addition, single-wall nanotubes have a greater effect on temperature than multi-wall carbon nanotubes. Statistical analysis shows that the thermal flow rate of (Fe3O4-SWCNTs-water) and (Fe3O4-MWCNTs-water) rises from 1.6336 percent to 6.9519 percent, and 1.7614 percent to 7.4413 percent, respectively when the volume fraction of nanomaterial increases from 0.01 to 0.04. Furthermore, the body force accelerates near the wall of boundary layer because Lorentz force is small near the squeezing plate, as the current being almost parallel to the magnetic field.Entities:
Keywords: BVP4C; PCM; ariable magnetic field; hybrid nano-fluid; magnetic Reynold parameter
Year: 2022 PMID: 35055199 PMCID: PMC8781856 DOI: 10.3390/nano12020180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Geometry of the problem with coordinate system.
The thermophysical properties of water base fluid and hybrid nanoparticles.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 997.1 | 4179 | 0.613 | 5.5 × |
|
| 5200 | 670 | 6 | 9.74 × |
| SWCNT | 2600 | 425 | 6600 |
|
| MWCNT | 1600 | 796 | 3000 |
|
Comparison of the numerical results of when = = = = 0.
|
|
| M. Bilal et al. [ | Present |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.5 | 4.713254 | 4.713061 |
| 1 | 4.739148 | 4.739224 | |
| 2 | 4.820361 | 4.820101 | |
| 3 | 4.396271 | 4.396400 | |
| 2 | 0 | 1.842331 | 1.842350 |
| 0.3 | 3.653601 | 3.653573 | |
| 0.6 | 5.391148 | 5.391053 | |
| 1 | 7.593006 | 7.593187 |
Comparison of the numerical results by two methods PCM and BVP4C for Skin friction and Nusselt number, with various physical parameters and = = 0.1.
| PCM | BVP4C | PCM | BVP4C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.1 | 5.9662 | 5.9917 | 2.7615 | 2.7688 |
| 0.2 | 5.9105 | 5.9143 | 2.7369 | 2.7344 |
| 0.3 | 5.8437 | 5.8422 | 2.7103 | 2.7178 |
| 0.4 | 5.7714 | 5.7756 | 2.6831 | 2.6812 |
| 0.5 | 5.6968 | 5.6990 | 2.6557 | 2.6554 |
| 0.6 | 5.6219 | 5.6252 | 2.6278 | 2.6282 |
| 0.7 | 5.5489 | 5.5432 | 2.6057 | 2.6076 |
| 0.8 | 5.4779 | 5.4723 | 2.5822 | 2.5871 |
| 0.9 | 5.4081 | 5.4023 | 2.5538 | 2.5532 |
Comparison of the numerical results by two methods PCM and BVP4C for skin friction and Nusselt number, with various physical parameters and = 0.02.
| PCM | BVP4C | PCM | BVP4C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.1 | 5.1032 | 5.1076 | 0.6308 | 0.6366 |
| 0.2 | 5.0736 | 5.0722 | 0.6774 | 0.6732 |
| 0.3 | 5.0801 | 5.0854 | 0.7399 | 0.7321 |
| 0.4 | 5.1222 | 5.1200 | 0.7957 | 0.7960 |
| 0.5 | 5.1989 | 5.1943 | 0.7765 | 0.7790 |
| 0.6 | 5.3095 | 5.3083 | 0.4537 | 0.4502 |
| 0.7 | 5.4558 | 5.4511 | 0.3872 | 0.3845 |
| 0.8 | 5.6343 | 5.6334 | 0.2733 | 0.2712 |
| 0.9 | 5.8421 | 5.8466 | 0.1209 | 0.1255 |
Comparison of the numerical results by two methods PCM and BVP4C for skin friction and Nusselt number, with various physical parameters and = = 0.1.
| PCM | BVP4C | PCM | BVP4C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.1 | 5.9632 | 5.9632 | 2.7584 | 2.7584 |
| 0.2 | 5.9391 | 5.9391 | 2.7486 | 2.7486 |
| 0.3 | 5.8992 | 5.8992 | 2.7325 | 2.7325 |
| 0.4 | 5.8437 | 5.8437 | 2.7103 | 2.7103 |
| 0.5 | 5.7731 | 5.7731 | 2.6826 | 2.6826 |
| 0.6 | 5.6879 | 5.6879 | 2.6499 | 2.6499 |
| 0.7 | 5.5887 | 5.5887 | 2.6128 | 2.6128 |
| 0.8 | 5.4762 | 5.4762 | 2.5721 | 2.5721 |
| 0.9 | 5.3512 | 5.3512 | 2.5283 | 2.5283 |
Numerical results by parametric continuation method for hybrid nanofluid with various physical parameters.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.02 | 5.6736 | 0.1161 | 5.6834 | 0.1351 | 5.6997 | 0.0573 |
| 0.03 | 5.6725 | 0.1170 | 5.6822 | 0.1356 | 5.6984 | 0.0564 |
| 0.04 | 5.6717 | 0.1181 | 5.6811 | 0.1361 | 5.6965 | 0.0554 |
| 0.05 | 5.6704 | 0.1196 | 5.6802 | 0.1370 | 5.6953 | 0.0542 |
| 0.06 | 5.6691 | 0.1208 | 5.6793 | 0.1379 | 5.6940 | 0.0529 |
| 0.07 | 5.6679 | 0.1220 | 5.6780 | 0.1387 | 5.6926 | 0.0516 |
| 0.08 | 5.6662 | 0.1236 | 5.6766 | 0.1399 | 5.6911 | 0.0503 |
| 0.09 | 5.6645 | 0.1251 | 5.6752 | 0.1410 | 5.6891 | 0.0488 |
| 0.10 | 5.6633 | 0.1269 | 5.6732 | 0.1422 | 5.6873 | 0.0471 |
| 0.11 | 5.6619 | 0.1282 | 5.6715 | 0.1438 | 5.6858 | 0.0457 |
| 0.12 | 5.6603 | 0.1301 | 5.6690 | 0.1455 | 5.6843 | 0.0441 |
| 0.13 | 5.6593 | 0.1325 | 5.6672 | 0.1471 | 5.6829 | 0.0425 |
Numerical results by BVP4C Method for hybrid nanofluid with various physical parameters.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.02 | 5.6731 | 0.1157 | 5.6843 | 0.1343 | 5.6980 | 0.0563 |
| 0.03 | 5.6721 | 0.1164 | 5.6830 | 0.1350 | 5.6971 | 0.0551 |
| 0.04 | 5.6711 | 0.1173 | 5.6821 | 0.1355 | 5.6961 | 0.0540 |
| 0.05 | 5.6698 | 0.1190 | 5.6810 | 0.1363 | 5.6945 | 0.0533 |
| 0.06 | 5.6683 | 0.1201 | 5.6800 | 0.1370 | 5.6930 | 0.0521 |
| 0.07 | 5.6671 | 0.1213 | 5.6791 | 0.1378 | 5.6918 | 0.0502 |
| 0.08 | 5.6653 | 0.1226 | 5.6773 | 0.1391 | 5.6902 | 0.0492 |
| 0.09 | 5.6636 | 0.1242 | 5.6764 | 0.1403 | 5.6887 | 0.0476 |
| 0.10 | 5.6622 | 0.1253 | 5.6750 | 0.1413 | 5.6871 | 0.0462 |
| 0.11 | 5.6610 | 0.1270 | 5.6730 | 0.1428 | 5.6847 | 0.0445 |
| 0.12 | 5.6595 | 0.1292 | 5.6708 | 0.1441 | 5.6828 | 0.0432 |
| 0.13 | 5.6580 | 0.1311 | 5.6691 | 0.1464 | 5.6814 | 0.0413 |
The heat transfer has been calculated percent wise as for the various nanoparticles Pr = 6.2, S = 1.5, Ec = 0.4, using the percentage formula %increase = × 100 = Result, Result-100 = %enhancement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 5.5582 | 5.5582 |
| 0.01 | 5.6490 | 5.6561 |
|
|
| |
| 0.03 | 5.8421 | 5.8628 |
|
|
| |
| 0.04 | 5.9446 | 5.9718 |
|
|
|
Figure 2Effect of and for (a) , (b) and fixed values of .
Figure 3Effect of for (a) , (b) and fixed values of .
Figure 4Effect of for and fixed values of .
Figure 5Effect of for (a) S, (b) and fixed values of .
Figure 6Effect of for and fixed values of .
Figure 7Effect of for and fixed values of .
Figure 8Effect of for and fixed values of .
Figure 9Effect of skin friction for S and and fixed values of .
Figure 10Effect of Nusslet number for S and and fixed values of .