| Literature DB >> 35055070 |
Magdalena Skalníková1,2, Kateřina Staňo Kozubík1,2, Jakub Trizuljak1,2,3, Zuzana Vrzalová1,2, Lenka Radová1, Kamila Réblová1,2,3, Radka Holbová1, Terézia Kurucová1, Hana Svozilová1,2,3, Jiří Štika1, Ivona Blaháková1,2, Barbara Dvořáčková2, Marie Prudková4,5, Olga Stehlíková2, Michal Šmída1,2, Leoš Křen6, Petr Smejkal4,5, Šárka Pospíšilová1,2,3, Michael Doubek1,2,3.
Abstract
Bernard-Soulier syndrome (BSS) is a rare inherited disorder characterized by unusually large platelets, low platelet count, and prolonged bleeding time. BSS is usually inherited in an autosomal recessive (AR) mode of inheritance due to a deficiency of the GPIb-IX-V complex also known as the von Willebrand factor (VWF) receptor. We investigated a family with macrothrombocytopenia, a mild bleeding tendency, slightly lowered platelet aggregation tests, and suspected autosomal dominant (AD) inheritance. We have detected a heterozygous GP1BA likely pathogenic variant, causing monoallelic BSS. A germline GP1BA gene variant (NM_000173:c.98G > A:p.C33Y), segregating with the macrothrombocytopenia, was detected by whole-exome sequencing. In silico analysis of the protein structure of the novel GPIbα variant revealed a potential structural defect, which could impact proper protein folding and subsequent binding to VWF. Flow cytometry, immunoblot, and electron microscopy demonstrated further differences between p.C33Y GP1BA carriers and healthy controls. Here, we provide a detailed insight into its clinical presentation and phenotype. Moreover, the here described case first presents an mBSS patient with two previous ischemic strokes.Entities:
Keywords: Bernard-Soulier syndrome; GP1BA; autosomal dominant; macrothrombocytopenia; monoallelic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35055070 PMCID: PMC8777725 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23020885
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Proband’s (II1) family pedigree shows segregation of macrothrombocytopenia, platelet count (PLT), and mean platelet volume (MPV). Squares represent male, circles represent female individuals, black squares and circles mean macrothrombocytopenia. The samples with an asterisk were analyzed by whole-exome sequencing. UNK—unknown.
Figure 2Platelet immunophenotype. CD41, CD61, CD42a, CD42b, CD9 antigens expression and negative controls on the platelets of two thrombocytopenic patients (II-1, II-2) and one healthy individual (III-3). Flow cytometric analysis shows decreased expression of the GPIbα-IX complex and CD9 and slightly increased expression of GPIIb and GPIIIa in both patients compared to the healthy individual. Negative controls are in grey, population of interest is in red. The peak height is normalized to mode.
Figure 3Human crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of GPIbα (pdb code 1p9a). Cys33 and Cys20 creating a disulfide bridge are highlighted in the magenta circle. Leucine-rich repeats folded into β-strands create an arc, which is highlighted by the black arrow. Cysteine–tyrosine substitution results in a disruption of a disulfide bond.
The reference limits and maximum aggregation results in patient II-1 and healthy individual III-2.
| Name of Agonists | Reference Limits | Patient II-1 | Healthy Individual III-2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platelet count in PRP (×109/L) | 150–300 | 105 | 228 |
| Platelet count in PPP (×109/L) | 0–20 | 0 | 1 |
| Aggregation—collagen | |||
| Collagen 2—Amax (%) | 74.5–87.3 | 57.9 | 79.9 |
| Collagen 5—Amax (%) | 74.7–88.9 | 72 | 75.8 |
| Aggregation—ADP | |||
| ADP 5—Amax (%) | 57.0–86.2 | 57.5 | 69.2 |
| ADP 5—disaggregation (%) | 0–10.0 | ||
| ADP 10—Amax (%) | 66.6–90.7 | 64.1 | 69.1 |
| ADP 10—disaggregation (%) | 0–10.0 | ||
| Aggregation—ristocetin | |||
| Ristocetin—Amax (%) | 77.8–97.1 | 60.6 | 84.9 |
| Ristocetin correction—Amax(%) | N.A. | 36.4 | |
| Low ristocetin—Amax (%) | 0.0–10.0 | 1.0 | 2.6 |
| Aggregation—arachidonic acid | |||
| Arachidonic acid—Amax (%) | 73.2–89.6 | 4.7 | 75.0 |
| Spontaneous aggregation | less than 5 | N.D. | N.D. |
The reference limits were determined based on the results of the 2.5–97.5 percentile. Reference aggregation limits were obtained from 50 peripheral blood donors. Not applicable N.A., not done N.D.
Figure 4Transmission electron microscopy of a platelet from the affected individual (II-1) and the healthy individual (III-3) platelets. The platelet of the affected individual II-1 is enlarged, containing an increased number of α-granules (α-G) of different shapes. The surface-connected open canalicular system (OCS) and an intact mitochondrion (m) and glycogen (Gly) are also seen. Scale bar (a black bar bottom right) represents 1µm.
Figure 5Histograms showing number of α-granules per platelet in patient II-1 and healthy individual III-3.
Figure 6Immunoblot analysis of platelets proteins of patient II-1 and healthy individual III-2 showed decreased expression of GPIbα1ba in patient II-1 (0.74) compared with healthy individual III-2 (1.0). Antibody GPIba, Rabbit (1:3000), Sigma-Aldrich, antibody GAPDH, Rabbit (1:3000), Cell Signaling.
In silico online prediction tools.
| Tool | Link | Score and Limits | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Align GVGD |
| C65 | “most likely pathogenic” |
| MetalR |
| 0.9997 (>1.0) | “to be deleterious” |
| MutationTaster |
| 1.00 (≥0.46) | “disease-causing” |
| PROVEAN |
| −10.07 (≤−2.5) | “deleterious effect” |
| SIFT |
| 0.001 (≤0.78) | “to be damaging” |