| Literature DB >> 35054517 |
Noriko Ishii-Kitano1, Hirayuki Enomoto1, Takashi Nishimura1,2, Nobuhiro Aizawa1, Yoko Shibata2, Akiko Higashiura2, Tomoyuki Takashima1, Naoto Ikeda1, Yukihisa Yuri1, Aoi Fujiwara1, Kohei Yoshihara1, Ryota Yoshioka1, Shoki Kawata1, Shogo Ota1, Ryota Nakano1, Hideyuki Shiomi1, Seiichi Hirota3, Tsutomu Kumabe4, Osamu Nakashima5, Hiroko Iijima1,2.
Abstract
Inflammatory pseudotumor (IPT) of the liver is a rare benign disease. IPTs generally develop as solitary nodules, and cases with multiple lesions are uncommon. We herein report a case of multiple IPTs of the liver that spontaneously regressed. A 70-year-old woman with a 10-year history of primary biliary cholangitis and rheumatoid arthritis visited our hospital to receive a periodic medical examination. Abdominal ultrasonography revealed multiple hypoechoic lesions, with a maximum size of 33 mm, in the liver. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed low-attenuation areas in the liver with mild peripheral enhancement at the arterial and portal phases. We first suspected metastatic liver tumors, but fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography suggested the tumors to be inconsistent with malignant nodules. A percutaneous biopsy showed shedding of liver cells and abundant fibrosis with infiltration of inflammatory cells. Given these findings, we diagnosed the multiple tumors as IPTs. After careful observation for two months, the tumors almost vanished spontaneously. Physicians should avoid a hasty diagnosis of multiple tumors based solely on a few clinical findings, and a careful assessment with various imaging modalities should be conducted.Entities:
Keywords: contrast-enhanced computed tomography; contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; inflammatory pseudotumor; spontaneous regression
Year: 2022 PMID: 35054517 PMCID: PMC8779591 DOI: 10.3390/life12010124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Figure 1Abdominal ultrasonography (US). Multiple masses with the hypoechoic halo sign at their margins were detected. Some typical tumors with the hypoechoic halo sign are shown with arrows.
Laboratory examinations: CRE: creatinine; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; γ-GTP: γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; TP: total protein; BS: blood sugar; CRP: C-reactive protein; ANA: antinuclear antibody; AMA-M2: anti-mitochondrial antibody-M2; CEA: carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9: carbohydrate antigen 19-9; AFP: α-fetoprotein; PIVKA-II: protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II. The lower and upper limits of the normal ranges are shown in parentheses (lower limit-upper limit).
| WBC | 6970 | /μL | (4000–9000) | T-bil | 0.3 | mg/dL | (0.2–1.2) | PT-INR | 1.06 | (0.91–1.14) | |
| Hb | 11.7 | g/dL | (11.5–15.0) | AST | 37 | U/L | (13–33) | PT% | 90.5 | % | (70–120) |
| Hct | 36.3 | % | (35.0–46.0) | ALT | 20 | U/L | (6–27) | IgM | 112 | mg/dL | (46–260) |
| Plt | 279 | ×103 /μL | (150–350) | LDH | 387 | U/L | (119–229) | IgG | 931 | mg/dL | (870–1700) |
| ALP | 374 | U/L | (115–339) | ANA | ×160 | (<40) | |||||
| Na | 143 | mmol/L | (138–146) | γ-GTP | 30 | U/L | (6–46) | AMA-M2 | 193 | idx | (≤7.0) |
| K | 3.4 | mmol/L | (3.6–4.9) | Alb | 3.1 | g/dL | (3.7–4.7) | CEA | 2.8 | ng/mL | (≤5.0) |
| Cl | 109 | mmol/L | (99–109) | TP | 6.0 | g/dL | (6.6–8.7) | CA19–9 | 29.6 | U/mL | (≤37.0) |
| BUN | 7 | mg/dL | (8–20) | BS | 92 | mg/dL | (70–109) | AFP | 8.8 | ng/mL | (≤10.0) |
| CRE | 0.44 | mg/dL | (0.36–1.06) | CRP | 0.7 | mg/dL | (≤0.3) | PIVKA-II | 20 | mAU/mL | (<40) |
Figure 2(a) Plain CT. Multiple low-attenuation areas were detected; (b,c) contrast-enhanced CT revealed multiple low-attenuation areas with mild peripheral enhancements at the arterial (b) and portal phases (c). A typical tumor is shown with an arrow in each panel.
Figure 3(a) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and (b) FDG-PET with CT. No apparently significant signal was observed in the tumors (arrowheads).
Figure 4Findings of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): (a) hypo-intensity lesions on T1-weighted imaging; (b) high-intensity masses on T2-weighted imaging; (c) high-intensity lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI); (d) high values on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. In the dynamic gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI), multiple masses were detected as hypo-intensity lesions both in the early phase (e) and hepatobiliary phase (f). Typical tumors are indicated with arrowheads.
Figure 5Findings of ultrasonography (US): (a) a hypoechoic tumor of 10 mm in size was observed (Aplio; Canon Medical Systems, Japan). On Sonazoid contrast-enhanced US, the tumor showed very slight hypoenhancement in the arterial phase (b), washout with peripheral enhancement in the portal phase (c) and hypointensity in the Kupffer phase (d).
Figure 6Histological findings obtained by the US-guided needle biopsy: shedding of liver cells, edematous changes and fibrosis with the infiltration of inflammatory cells, including lymphocytes and macrophages, were observed; (a) Hematoxylin and Eosin (HE) staining (×4); (b) Azan staining (×10); (c,d) HE staining (×20).
Figure 7Changes in the US and CT findings: multiple tumors that had been suggested to be metastatic tumors (a,b) were barely detected after two months of observation; (a,b) US findings; (c,d) CT findings.