| Literature DB >> 35054505 |
Sergey Luzyanin1, Anatoly Saveliev2, Nadezhda Ukhova3, Iraida Vorobyova4, Igor Solodovnikov5, Anatoliy Anciferov6, Rifgat Shagidullin7, Teodora Teofilova8, Sargylana Nogovitsyna9, Viktor Brygadyrenko10, Viktor Alexanov11, Raisa Sukhodolskaya7.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to test the steepness of body size variation in males and females in the widespread ground beetle Pterostichus melanarius in geographical gradients. Beetles were sampled in 15 regions of Europe and Asia, and sampling territories differed 17° in latitude and 121° in longitude. We measured six linear traits in every captured beetle and formed a data set that included 2154 individuals. Body size variation in all traits in general was sawtooth, both in latitude and in longitude gradients. Regression analysis showed slight trends: in the latitude gradient, elytra parameters increased, pronotum length did not change but the width increased, and head parameters decreased. In the longitude gradient, the changes were as follows: elytra length increased, but its width did not change; pronotum length did not change, but its width increased; the head parameters decreased. Thus, we observed the elytra length increase and the head parameters decrease northwards and eastwards. We compared female and male regression curves (trait size on latitude/longitude): p-levels were significant only in four cases out of 12. Thus, we conclude that, in general, there is no evidence for the steepness in trait variation in males compared with females.Entities:
Keywords: body size variation; geographical gradients; ground beetles; regression analysis; sexual size dimorphism
Year: 2022 PMID: 35054505 PMCID: PMC8781924 DOI: 10.3390/life12010112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Sampling localities and sample size.
| N | Region | Latitude, °N | Longitude, °E | Number of Sites | Type of | Sample Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 1 | Tatarstan Republic | 55°47′ | 49°06′ | 53 | Meadow, birch, oak, elm | 11,312 |
| 2 | Sverdlovsk region | 58°42′ | 61°20′ | 6 | Meadow, pine, birch | 458 |
| 3 | Kemerovo region | 54°56′ | 87°14′ | 20 | Meadows, birch, lawn | 1954 |
| 5 | Udmurtia Republic | 57°17′ | 52°45′ | 16 | Birch, oak, elm | 396 |
| 6 | Mariy El Republic | 56°42′ | 47°52′ | 14 | Meadow, birch, oak | 67 |
| 7 | Cis-Ural | 57°01′ | 57°9′ | 21 | Birch, oak, elm | 58 |
| 8 | Stavropol region | 45°02′ | 41°55′ | 6 | Meadow, birch | 76 |
| 12 | Ukraine | 48°27′ | 34°56′ | Artificial forest plantation | 225 | |
| 14 | Kostroma region | 57°48′ | 41°19′ | 3 | Fir dominated ecosystem recovery after felling | 60 |
| 15 | Belarus | 55°13′ | 30°18′ | 3 | Forest with pine, oak, alder, willow | 369 |
| 16 | Germany | 52°45′ | 9°23′ | 18 | Oilseed rape fields | 1339 |
| 17 | Kaluga region | 54°32′ | 36°16′ | 8 | Gardens, old-growth forest | 233 |
| 18 | Switzerland | 47°23′ | 8°05′ | 8 | Oilseed rape fields | 450 |
| 19 | Kirov region | 58°001′ | 48°027′ | 3 | Spruce, lime and oak forests | 57 |
| 21 | Yakutsk region | 62°01′ | 129°43′ | 2 | Meadows, lawn | 48 |
1 In the first column are the numbers that corresponded to the number in the database of our laboratory. The latter includes newly studied regions. In some regions, we did not record P. melanarius, so these regions were not included in the analysis. Therefore, the numbers in the first column are not continuous. These numbers are included in Figure 1 and are noted on the X-axis.
Figure 1Map of the study. Note: Sampling localities; see Table 1.
Figure 2Placement of morphometric measurements. A—Elytra length as distance between posterior end of scutellum and terminus of right elytron (in the case of absence of intact right elytron, left one is acceptable). B—Elytra width as distance between anterior-distal corners of elytra. V—Pronotum length measured along of central furrow. G—Pronotum width as distance between posterior corners of the pronotum. D—Head length as distance between labrum and juncture of occiput and postgena. E—Head width as distance between proximal innermost sides of eyes. Measured sample size is presented in Table 1.
Figure 3Elytra length variation in latitude gradient in P. melanarius.
Figure 4Elytra length variation in longitude gradient in P. melanarius.
Regression results in latitude elytra length variation in P. melanarius.
| Estimate | Std. Error | t Value | Pr(>|t|) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 7.8008 | 0.1933 | 40.350 | <2 × 10−16 | *** |
| fSexMale | −0.9916 | 0.2692 | −3.683 | 0.0002 | *** |
| Lat | 0.0276 | 0.0035 | 7.869 | 4.16 × 10−15 | *** |
| fSexMale:Lat | 0.0022 | 0.0049 | 0.447 | 0.6549 |
Notes. fSexMale—how males differed in trait size from females (here we see that they were smaller); Lat—significance of regression coefficient in females (latitude affected trait size in positive direction); fSexMale:Lat—difference in regression coefficients between males and females (it was insignificant); *** p-level < 0.001.
Regression results in longitude elytra length variation in P. melanarius.
| Estimate | Std. Error | t value | Pr(>|t|) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 9.1650 | 0.0301 | 303.632 | <2 × 10−16 | *** |
| fSexMale | −0.9406 | 0.0418 | −22.488 | <2 × 10−16 | *** |
| Lon | 0.0032 | 0.0005 | 5.561 | 2.8 × 10−8 | *** |
| fSexMale:Lon | 0.0012 | 0.0008 | 1.564 | 0.118 |
Note: see Table 2. *** p-level < 0.001.
Figure 5Regression slopes of elytra length variation in latitude gradient in P. melanarius.
Figure 6Regression slopes of elytra length variation in longitude gradient in P. melanarius.