| Literature DB >> 35054394 |
Sabrina Sommatis1, Maria Chiara Capillo1, Elsa Liga1, Cristina Maccario2, Raffaele Rauso2, Martha Herrera3, Nicola Zerbinati4, Roberto Mocchi1.
Abstract
(1) Background: The dysbiosis of some cutaneous commensal microorganisms is the trigger factor for the activation of the inflammatory cascade by keratinocytes in many skin disorders. Mesotherapy is an innovative technique for many scalp disorders, with the function of restoring the physiology of the skin. (2)Entities:
Keywords: Reconstructed Human Epidermis; antimicrobial; biofilm; hyaluronic acid; inflammation; interleukin (IL)-8; keratinocytes; mesotherapy; microbial and yeast infections; scalp disorders
Year: 2021 PMID: 35054394 PMCID: PMC8781863 DOI: 10.3390/life12010002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Figure 1Graphical representation of the antimicrobial activity of the non-cross-linked HA hydrogel (Hydro Deluxe) against the selected strains (S. aureus ATCC 6538, S. epidermidis ATCC 12228, C. acnes ATCC 11827 and M. furfur ATCC 14521). Results are shown as culture growth (OD595nm) of the selected bacteria and yeast compared with the control (Ctrl, medium inoculated with 106 CFU/mL of the strains) after 24 h of incubation with 8 serial dilutions of the formulation (range tested 100–0.78%).
Figure 2Biofilm metabolic activity (%) of a preformed biofilm after 24 h of treatment with the non-cross-linked HA hydrogel (Hydro Deluxe) 100% (in toto). For each strain, in association with the effect of the HA-based formulation, the efficacy of a compound with recognized antibiofilm activity is evaluated. The baseline condition (Ctrl) is represented by the preformed biofilm treated with fresh medium. The positive controls selected for each strain are: Cynnamaldeide (1.2 mg/mL) for S. epidermidis, 2-Aminoimidazole (50 µM) for S. aureus, Resveratrol (394 µg/mL) for C. acnes and Ketaconazole (32 µg/mL) for M. furfur. Values of * p ≤ 0.05 and *** p ≤ 0.001 were considered statistically significant compared with respective controls by one-way ANOVA statistical analysis, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons as post-test.
Figure 3RHE inserts cell viability expressed as a percentage (%) compared to negative control Ctrl (-): RHE treated with DPBS; (+): RHE inserts treated with the selected strains (S. aureus ATCC 6538, S. epidermidis ATCC 12228, C. acnes ATCC 11827 and M. furfur ATCC 14521) Hydro Deluxe (+): RHE co-treated for 24 h with the HA-based formulation 100% (in toto) and the selected heat-killed strains; Hydro Deluxe: RHE inserts treated with for 24 h with the HA-based formulation 100% (in toto).
Figure 4IL-8 amount (pg/mL) in medium after treatment with non-cross-linked HA hydrogel (Hydro Deluxe) in RHE inserts stimulated with the selected strains (S. aureus ATCC 6538, S. epidermidis ATCC 12228, C. acnes ATCC 11827 and M. furfur ATCC 14521). Ctrl (-): cells treated with DPBS; Ctrl (+): RHE stimulated with each of selected strains. Hydro Deluxe (+): RHE co-treated with selected strains and the non-cross-linked HA formulation 100% (in toto). Values of * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01 and *** p ≤ 0.001 were considered statistically significant compared with respective controls by one-way ANOVA statistical analysis, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons as post-test.