| Literature DB >> 35053739 |
Madeleine M Russell1, Mara L Leimanis-Laurens2,3, Sihan Bu1, Gigi A Kinney1, Shao Thing Teoh4, Ruth-Anne L McKee3, Karen Ferguson3, John W Winters2,3, Sophia Y Lunt4,5, Jeremy W Prokop2,6, Surender Rajasekaran2,3,7, Sarah S Comstock1.
Abstract
The feasibility of gastrointestinal (GI) microbiome work in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) to determine the GI microbiota composition of infants as compared to control infants from the same hospital was investigated. In a single-site observational study at an urban quaternary care children's hospital in Western Michigan, subjects less than 6 months of age, admitted to the PICU with severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis, were compared to similarly aged control subjects undergoing procedural sedation in the outpatient department. GI microbiome samples were collected at admission (n = 20) and 72 h (n = 19) or at time of sedation (n = 10). GI bacteria were analyzed by sequencing the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Alpha and beta diversity were calculated. Mechanical ventilation was required for the majority (n = 14) of study patients, and antibiotics were given at baseline (n = 8) and 72 h (n = 9). Control subjects' bacterial communities contained more Porphyromonas, and Prevotella (p = 0.004) than those of PICU infants. The ratio of Prevotella to Bacteroides was greater in the control than the RSV infants (mean ± SD-1.27 ± 0.85 vs. 0.61 ± 0.75: p = 0.03). Bacterial communities of PICU infants were less diverse than those of controls with a loss of potentially protective populations.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotics; critical care; diet; gut microbiome; pediatrics; respiratory syncytial virus; viral bronchiolitis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35053739 PMCID: PMC8774632 DOI: 10.3390/children9010114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Children (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9067
PICU patient characteristics at 24 h (baseline) and 72 h.
| 24 h Timepoint | 72 h Timepoint | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Age | Sex | Admit Weight (kg) | Sequenced | Abx a | Mode of Feeding b | Diet b | % Calories b,c | % Protein b,c | Sequenced | Abx a (Yes/No) | Mode of Feeding b | Diet b | % Calories b,c | % Protein b,c |
| 1 | 2–4 | M | 5.8 | No | No | N/A e | MD | N/A | N/A | Yes | Yes | NG | MD | 100 | 100 |
| 2 | 2–4 | M | 6.5 | Yes | No | PO | FF | <33 | <33 | Yes | Yes | NG | FF | 94 | 100 |
| 3 | 2–4 | M | 5.7 | No | No | BF | BM | <33 | <33 | Yes | No | NG | BM | 99 | 70 |
| 4 | >4 | F | 8.5 | Yes | Yes | NG | FF | 74 | 67 | No | Yes | PO/NG | FF | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | <2 | F | 3.8 | No | No | NG | FF | 20 | 24 | Yes | Yes | NG | FF | 95 | 100 |
| 6 | <2 | M | 3.9 | No | Yes | None | BM | 0 | 0 | Yes | No | NG | BM | 1 | 1 |
| 7 | <2 | F | 3.2 | Yes | Yes | None | FF | 0 | 0 | No | No | NG | FF | 44 | 63 |
| 8 | 2–4 | F | 6.3 | No | No | BF | MD | <33 | <33 | No | Yes | None | MD | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | <2 | F | 2.9 | Yes | Yes | NG | FF | 67 | 79 | Yes | No | NG | FF | 100 | 100 |
| 10 | 2–4 | F | 2.3 | Yes | No | NG | FF | 43 | 65 | Yes | Yes | NG | FF | 100 | 100 |
| 11 | 2–4 | F | 2.8 | Yes | No | NG | FF | 40 | 93 | Yes | No | NG | FF | 99 | 100 |
| 12 | <2 | M | 4.2 | No | N/A | N/A | BM | N/A | N/A | Yes | No | NJ | MD | 100 | 100 |
| 13 | 2–4 | F | 5.0 kg | Yes | No | OG | MDBM + Beneprotein | 76 | 71 | Yes | No | OG | MD | 100 | 72 |
| 14 | <2 | F | 2.7 | Yes | Yes | NG | BM | 10 | 10 | Yes | Yes | NG | BM | 77 | 80 |
| 15 | 2–4 | F | 4.9 | Yes | No | PO | FF | 13 | 14 | Yes | No | PO | FF | 77 | 84 |
| 16 | <2 | F | 4.2 | No | No | NG | MD: BM + Enf Inf | 96 | 81 | Yes | No | NG | FF | 100 | 98 |
| 17 | 2–4 | F | 3.3 | Yes | Yes | None | FF | 0 | 0 | Yes | Yes | NG | FF | 97 | 100 |
| 18 | <2 | M | 3.1 | Yes | Yes | PO 85% | FF | 16 | 23 | Yes | No | NG | FF | 100 | 100 |
| 19 d | 2–4 | F | 6.0 | No | Yes | NG | BM | 32 | 17 | Yes | Yes | NG | MD:BM + Beneprtein | 100 | 100 |
| 20 | 2–4 | M | 6.4 | Yes | No | NPO | NPO | 0 | 0 | No | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
a Taking antibiotics at time of sample collection; details of antibiotic administration included in Supplemental Table S3; b Mode of feeding, diet, % calories & % protein = 24 h period prior to sample collection; c % calories and % protein estimated for baseline if <33 listed; otherwise calculated; d Pt 19, time 2: breast milk + protein modular (beneprotein powder); e N/A = information was not available. The ratio of Prevotella to Bacteroides was greater in control infants than in RSV patients (mean ± SD, 1.27 ± 0.85 vs. 0.61 ± 0.75: p = 0.03). Multiple taxa in the bacterial communities of infants with RSV in the PICU differed in abundance from those observed in the bacterial communities of control infants (Table 2). The GI microbiota of RSV and control infants differed with respect to seven of these highly abundant taxa. Microbiotas of RSV infants had greater abundance of Bifidobacterium, Enterobacteriaceae, Lachnospiracaea intcertae sedis, and Enterococcus compared to control infants. Control infants had greater abundance of Prevotella, Clostridiales and Porphyromonas compared to RSV infant bacterial communities.
Alpha diversity of the gut microbiota for all infants at a single timepoint.
| Measures | Controls | RSV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median (min, max) | Median (min, max) | ||
| Chao1 | 106.2 (84.2, 200.1) | 87.3 (42.0, 189.0) | 0.02 |
| Shannon | 2.8 (2.2, 3.2) | 2.1 (0.8, 3.0) | 0.001 |
RSV: respiratory syncytial virus.
Figure 1Gastrointestinal bacterial community dissimilarity based on the Bray–Curtis metric.
Relative abundance of bacterial genera in RSV and control infants at a single timepoint.
| Taxa | Controls (Mean ± SD) | RSV (Mean ± SD) | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.9 ± 2.2 | 4.3 ± 3 | 0.071 |
|
| 7.3 ± 9.4 | 20.8 ± 11.7 | 0.011 |
|
| 9.5 ± 7.2 | 23.7 ± 18.7 | 0.005 |
|
| 11.6 ± 5.9 | 10.9 ± 8.1 | 0.888 |
|
| 10.1 ± 6.5 | 9.2 ± 11.2 | 0.888 |
|
| 10.9 ± 9.5 | 3.1 ± 4.9 | 0.019 |
|
| 8.3 ± 12.4 | 3.6 ± 4.6 | 0.079 |
|
| 2.4 ± 3.7 | 0.6 ± 1.5 | 0.019 |
|
| 1.7 ± 1 | 1.1 ± 2.5 | 0.556 |
|
| 2.1 ± 2.2 | 5.7 ± 4.3 | 0.025 |
|
| 4.6 ± 7.4 | 0.1 ± 0.3 | 0.015 |
|
| 0.1 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 2.6 | <0.001 |
|
| 1.5 ± 1.7 | 1.1 ± 3.2 | 0.773 |
|
| 3 ± 3.2 | 3.1 ± 7.9 | 0.973 |
a FDR corrected p-values. SD: standard deviation; RSV: respiratory syncytial virus.