| Literature DB >> 35053229 |
Liang Hong1, Jiangmin Li1, Yali Luo1, Tao Guo1, Chenshuang Zhang2, Sha Ou1, Yaohang Long1, Zuquan Hu1.
Abstract
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a treatment modality that uses light to target tumors and minimize damage to normal tissues. It offers advantages including high spatiotemporal selectivity, low side effects, and maximal preservation of tissue functions. However, the PDT efficiency is severely impeded by the hypoxic feature of tumors. Moreover, hypoxia may promote tumor metastasis and tumor resistance to multiple therapies. Therefore, addressing tumor hypoxia to improve PDT efficacy has been the focus of antitumor treatment, and research on this theme is continuously emerging. In this review, we summarize state-of-the-art advances in strategies for overcoming hypoxia in tumor PDTs, categorizing them into oxygen-independent phototherapy, oxygen-economizing PDT, and oxygen-supplementing PDT. Moreover, we highlight strategies possessing intriguing advantages such as exceedingly high PDT efficiency and high novelty, analyze the strengths and shortcomings of different methods, and envision the opportunities and challenges for future research.Entities:
Keywords: hypoxia; nanomaterials; oxygen; photodynamic therapy; tumor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35053229 PMCID: PMC8774200 DOI: 10.3390/biom12010081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1The photogenerated hole therapy with Nano-SA-TCPP. (a) The images of photogenerated hole therapy for tumor-bearing mice (irradiation condition: 600 nm, 0.1 W cm−2). (b) The ultrasound pictures of tumors before and after photogenerated hole therapy (irradiation condition: 600 nm, 0.1 W cm−2). (c) The viability of Hela cells with various concentrations of Nano-SA-TCPP under light irradiation. (d) Fluorescence images of living (green) and dead (red) Hela cells (irradiation condition: 600 nm, 0.1 W cm−2). (e) Photogenerated hole therapy on diverse cancer cell lines (irradiation condition: 600 nm, 0.1 W cm−2). (f) Relative tumor volumes of mice. (g) Survival rates of mice. Nano-SA-TCPP, nano-self-assembled tetra-carboxyphenyl porphyrin. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [14]. Copyright 2020 Oxford University Press.
Figure 2Schematic illustration of photo-acid therapy with photoacid generators (PAGs) under two-photon excitation. Adapted with permission from Ref. [18]. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.
Figure 3Schematic illustration of the structure of TPP-NN NPs and the mechanism of photo-induced alkyl radical generation therapy. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [23]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.
Figure 4Schematic illustration of H2O2, pH, and photothermal-enhanced Fenton reaction based on γ-Fe2O3-GOx-DMSN for hypoxic tumor therapy. Adapted with permission from Ref. [32]. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Figure 5Schematic illustration of the mechanism of type I and type II photodynamic therapy. PS, photosensitizer. Adapted with permission from Ref. [5]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Figure 6NO-based theranostic nanocomposite which enhances PDT efficiency via economizing oxygen and impeding ATP synthesis. EPR, enhanced permeability and retention. OXPHOS, oxidative phosphorylation. ATP, adenosine triphosphate. NIR, near-infrared. PA, photoacoustic. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [79]. Copyright 2021 Ivyspring International Publisher.
A summary of the representative materials, strengths, and shortcomings of different approaches for oxygen-supplementing PDT. ROS, reactive oxygen species.
| Strategy | Representative Materials | Strengths | Shortcomings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Increasing oxygen utilization efficiency using micro-/nanomotors | Poly(ethylene glycol) block polystyrene, Fe3O4 nanoparticle-loaded hemoglobin | Deep tumor penetration through movement | Maximum efficiency limited by oxygen concentration |
| Living organism oxygen generators | Chlorella, Cyanobacteria, | Synchronous activation of oxygen supply and ROS generation, abundance of water in the human body beneficial for oxygen generation | Harsh tumor microenvironment harming organism activity; micrometer size limiting deep tumor penetration; light wavelengths in visible light range |
| Light-driven water splitting | Tungsten nitride, carbon nanodot, graphdiyne oxide, iron disulfide, cobalt phytate, C3N4 | Synchronous activation of oxygen supply and ROS generation, abundance of water in the human body for oxygen production | Safety concern due to presence of metal ions |
| Modification of tumor blood circulation | Heparin, warm water bath | Concurrent improvement of light delivery | Weak effect on tumor regions distant from blood vessels |
| Tumor H2O2 decomposition | Metal-based materials, catalase | Inherent tumor specificity | Efficiency limited by H2O2 concentration |
| Oxygen delivery | Hemoglobin, perfluorocarbon, metal–organic frameworks | High efficiency | Lack of inherent tumor specificity |
Figure 7Preparation of ISP-NMs and mechanism of nanomotor-mediated photodynamic therapy. PEG-b-PS, poly(ethylene glycol) block polystyrene. IONP, iron oxide nanoparticle. ZnPc, zinc phthalocyanine. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [82]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Figure 8Illustration of thylakoid membrane-decorated upconversion nanoparticles (UCTM) for enhanced photodynamic efficacy against hypoxic tumors. (a) Preparation of UCTM and the corresponding electron transfer as well as oxygen and reactive oxygen species generation mechanism of UCTMs under near-infrared light irradiation. (b) the therapeutic process mediated by synchronous oxygen supply and reactive oxygen species generation under near-infrared light irradiation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [104]. Copyright 2021 John Wiley and Sons.
A summary of the strengths and shortcomings of different materials for tumor H2O2 decomposition.
| Materials for Tumor H2O2 Decomposition | Strengths | Shortcomings |
|---|---|---|
| Metal-based materials | Superior stability in environments with different pH values and temperatures | Lower activity than catalase, safety concern arisen from metal ions |
| Catalase | High activity as a biological catalyst | Low stability in environments with different pH values and temperatures |
A summary of the representative materials, strengths, and shortcomings of different oxygen delivery approaches for hypoxic tumor PDT. 1O2, singlet oxygen. ZIF-90, zeolitic imidazolate framework-90.
| Strategy | Representative Materials | Strengths | Shortcomings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hemoglobin | Modified hemoglobin, red blood cells | Tumor-specific oxygen release owing to Bohr effect, ability of the red blood cell membrane to escape from immune clearance | Low oxygen loading capacity, safety concern |
| Perfluorocarbon | Perfluorohexane, perfluorooctyl bromide, perfluoro-15-crown-5-ether, perfluorotributylamine | High oxygen loading capacity, FDA-approved materials such as perfluorohexane, increased 1O2 lifetime | Relatively weak tumor-specific oxygen release |
| Metal–organic frameworks | UiO-66, ZIF-90 | Multifunctionality, high oxygen loading capacity | Potential toxicity arisen from metal ions |
An overview of strategies for modulating tumor hypoxia in photodynamic therapy. ROS, reactive oxygen species. 1O2, singlet oxygen. ATP, adenosine triphosphate.
| Strategy | Strengths | Shortcomings |
|---|---|---|
| Oxygen-independent phototherapy | Generation of ROS with stronger oxidation performance than 1O2 | Hypoxia-related issues such as drug-resistant gene expression unresolved |
| Oxygen-economizing PDT | Synergetic ATP production inhibition | Maximum efficiency limited by the existing oxygen content |
| Oxygen-supplementing PDT | Hypoxia-related issues such as drug-resistant gene expression attenuated | Difficulty in achieving both continuous and efficient oxygen supply |