| Literature DB >> 35052936 |
Shanmuga Priya Ramasamy1, Anitha Rajendran1, Muthukrishnan Pallikondaperumal1, Priya Sundararajan1, Fohad Mabood Husain2, Altaf Khan3, Mohammed Jamal Hakeem2, Abdullah A Alyousef4, Thamer Albalawi5, Pravej Alam5, Hazim M Ali6, Abdulaziz Alqasim4.
Abstract
The current study aimed to screen the preliminary phytochemicals in the leaf extract of the medicinal plant Simarouba glauca and to analyze its potential antimicrobial, antioxidant and anticancer properties. The phytochemical profile of the methanol extract was analyzed, and bioactive compounds were identified using chromatography, FTIR and GCMS. Antimicrobial activity and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) were determined against 14 bacterial and 6 fungal strains. Moreover, the synergistic effect of a plant extract with commercially available antibiotics was also evaluated using the checkerboard method. The ethanolic and methanolic extracts showed exclusive activity against S. aureus and profound activity against E. coli and S. marcescens. Upon comparing breakpoints, methanolic extract demonstrated higher antimicrobial activity with a MIC value of 3.2 mg/mL against the test pathogens. Furthermore, the extracts demonstrated potential antioxidant activity; methanol extract had higher antioxidant potential compared to the ethanol extract. The major proactive bioactive compound with maximum antioxidant capacity was observed to be terpenoids. The methanol extract of S. glauca showed significant cytotoxicity against the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line with an IC50 value of 16.12 µg/mL. The overall results of our work provide significant evidence for the usage of methanolic extract of S. glauca as an efficient ethnomedicinal agent and a potential candidate for relieving many human ailments.Entities:
Keywords: MCF-7 cell line; Simarouba glauca; anticancer; antimicrobial; antioxidants; terpenoids
Year: 2022 PMID: 35052936 PMCID: PMC8773097 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11010059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
Phytochemical screening of leaf extract of Simarouba glauca.
| Phytochemicals | Test Performed | Methanol | Ethanol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alkaloids | Mayer’s test | Absent | Absent |
| Hager’s test | Present | Present | |
| Wagner’s test | Present | Present | |
| Flavonoids | Alkaline Reagent test | Present | Present |
| Ferric Chloride test | Present | Present | |
| Phenolic compounds | Ferric Chloride test | Present | Present |
| Steroids and Terpenoids | Liebermann–Burchard test | Present | Present |
| Tannins | Ferric Chloride test | Present | Present |
| Glycosides | Keller kiliani test | Present | Present |
| Saponins | Foam test | Present | Present |
| Carbohydrates | Molisch’s test | Present | Present |
| Proteins | Biuret test | Absent | Absent |
| Aminoacids | Ninhydrin test | Absent | Absent |
| Fixed oils | Spot test | Present | Present |
Antimicrobial activity of plant extracts.
| Microbial Pathogens | Zone of Inhibition (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Methanol | Ethanol | Streptomycin | |
|
| |||
|
| - | - | - |
|
| 20.00 | 19.00 | 18.00 |
|
| - | - | 13.00 |
|
| - | - | 19.00 |
|
| 18.00 | 18.00 | 20.00 |
|
| - | - | 20.00 |
|
| 18.00 | 17.00 | 20.00 |
|
| 20.00 | 19.00 | 18.00 |
|
| 18.00 | 15.00 | 25.00 |
| 16.00 | 16.00 | 20.50 | |
|
| 12.00 | 12.00 | - |
| MRSA | 21.00 | 17.00 | 20.00 |
|
| 24.00 | 23.00 | 19.00 |
|
| 17.00 | 15.00 | 16.00 |
|
|
| ||
|
| 14.00 | 13.00 | 15.00 |
|
| 18.00 | 14.00 | 16.00 |
|
| - | 10.00 | 19.00 |
| 12.50 | - | - | |
| 10.00 | 13.00 | 14.00 | |
| 14.00 | 13.50 | - | |
Breakpoints of S. glauca extract.
| Test Organism | Methanol | Ethanol | Streptomycin |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 6.30 | 12.50 | 6.30 |
|
| 25.00 | 25.00 | 12.50 |
|
| 6.30 | 6.30 | 6.30 |
|
| 6.30 | 12.50 | 6.30 |
|
| 12.50 | 6.30 | 3.20 |
| 3.20 | 12.50 | 1.60 | |
|
| 25.00 | 12.50 | - |
| MRSA | 6.30 | 6.30 | 3.20 |
|
| 6.30 | 1.60 | 25.00 |
|
| 3.20 | 6.30 | 1.60 |
Figure 1Loss of cellular content upon treatment with methanol extract of Simarouba glauca against S. aureus. Absorbance was read at 260 nm.
Figure 2SEM analysis of control and plant extract treated S. aureus.
Figure 3Quantification of protein in the cell culture from 0–24 h.
Figure 4Protein analysis by SDS PAGE.
FIC values and FIC index of antibiotic and plant extract.
| MIC Combination | Breakpoints $ | FIC A | FIC B | FIC Index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ½ MIC of extract | 1.6 | 0.125 | 2.00 | 2.25 (Indifference) | |
| ½ MIC of Streptomycin | 0.8 | ||||
| ½ MIC of extract + ½ MIC of Streptomycin | 3.2 (A) | 1.6 (B) | |||
| MIC of plant extract | 3.2 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.50 (Synergistic) | |
| MIC of Streptomycin | 1.6 | ||||
| MIC of extract + MIC of Streptomycin | 0.8 (A) | ||||
| 2× MIC of extract | 1.6 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.375 (Synergistic) | |
| 2× MIC of Streptomycin | 1.6 | ||||
| 2× MIC of extract + 2× MIC of Streptomycin | 0.4 (A) | 0.2 (B) | |||
$ Breakpoints of extract in mg/mL; Breakpoints of streptomycin in µg/mL; A: Plant extract; B: Streptomycin.
Separated column fractions.
| Column | Color | Zone of Inhibition (in mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| F1 | Dark green | 12.00 | 13.50 | 11.00 |
| F2 | Light green | 16.00 | 14.00 | 10.70 |
| F3 | Brown | 21.00 | 16.50 | 11.50 |
| F4 | Pale green | 13.00 | 10.00 | 9.50 |
FTIR absorbance values of the F3 column fraction.
| Absorption Peak (cm−1) | Bond | Functional Groups |
|---|---|---|
| 3425.58 | O-H strech | Carboxylic acids |
| 2924.09, 2854.65, 2376.3 | C-H strech | Alkanes |
| 1705.07–1720.8 | C=O stretch | Ketone |
| 1627.92 | N-H bend | Amines |
| 1450.47, 1373.32 | C-H strech | Alkanes |
| 1327.03 | C-N stretch | Aromatic amines |
| 1249.87 | C-N stretch | Aromatic amines |
| 1056.99–671.23 | C=C bend | Aromatic compounds |
GCMS analysis of F3 column fraction of S. glauca.
| Peak No | Retention Time | % Peak Area A/H | Compound Name | Compound Nature | Structure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.705 | 2.61 | Cyclohexanone | Terpenoid, oil with ketone group |
|
| 2 | 16.757 | 2.3 | Benzoic acid, 2.6-bis (Trimethylsiloxy) | Aromatic carboxylic acid |
|
| 3 | 19.926 | 1.63 | Squalene, 2,6,10,14,18,22-Tetracosahexaene | Trierpenoid |
|
| 4 | 21.883 | 2.26 | Cyclopentanol | Cyclic Alcohol |
|
| 5 | 22.715 | 2.92 | Pthalic acid, Cyclobutyl isobutyl ester | Aromatic dicarboxylic acid |
|
| 6 | 24.179 | 3.03 | 3-ethyl-3-methyl Decane | Alkane hydrocarbon |
|
| 7 | 26.266 | 3.31 | (2,4,4,6,6,8,8-Heptamethyltetrasiloxan-2-yloxy) | Alkene |
|
| 8 | 34.601 | 5.17 | 7-Oxabicyclo(4.1.0)Heptane | Alkane |
|
Figure 5TLC of F3 column fraction (a) and Bioautography (b).
Figure 6Antioxidant activity of Simarouba glauca extracts (Reducing power activity).
Anticancer activity of Simarouba glauca extract.
| Concentration | Absorbance at | % Cell Inhibition $ |
|---|---|---|
| 6.25 | 0.398 | 18.10 |
| 12.50 | 0.288 | 40.70 |
| 25.00 | 0.150 | 67.14 |
| 50.00 | 0.070 | 84.01 |
| 100.00 | 0.030 | 93.41 |
| Control | 0.486 | - |
$ values are mean inhibition ± S.D of three replicates.
Figure 7Anticancer activity of Simarouba glauca extract on MCF-7 cell line.