Literature DB >> 35051883

Therapeutic implications of germline vulnerabilities in DNA repair for precision oncology.

Shreya M Shah1, Elena V Demidova2, Randy W Lesh3, Michael J Hall4, Mary B Daly4, Joshua E Meyer5, Martin J Edelman6, Sanjeevani Arora7.   

Abstract

DNA repair vulnerabilities are present in a significant proportion of cancers. Specifically, germline alterations in DNA repair not only increase cancer risk but are associated with treatment response and clinical outcomes. The therapeutic landscape of cancer has rapidly evolved with the FDA approval of therapies that specifically target DNA repair vulnerabilities. The clinical success of synthetic lethality between BRCA deficiency and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition has been truly revolutionary. Defective mismatch repair has been validated as a predictor of response to immune checkpoint blockade associated with durable responses and long-term benefit in many cancer patients. Advances in next generation sequencing technologies and their decreasing cost have supported increased genetic profiling of tumors coupled with germline testing of cancer risk genes in patients. The clinical adoption of panel testing for germline assessment in high-risk individuals has generated a plethora of genetic data, particularly on DNA repair genes. Here, we highlight the therapeutic relevance of germline aberrations in DNA repair to identify patients eligible for precision treatments such as PARP inhibitors (PARPis), immune checkpoint blockade, chemotherapy, radiation therapy and combined treatment. We also discuss emerging mechanisms that regulate DNA repair.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA repair; Germline; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; PARP inhibitors; Precision oncology; Therapeutic response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35051883      PMCID: PMC9016579          DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev        ISSN: 0305-7372            Impact factor:   13.608


  210 in total

1.  Supreme Court to Myriad Genetics: Synthetic DNA is Patentable but Isolated Genes Are Not.

Authors:  Richard Weinmeyer; Tobin Klusty
Journal:  AMA J Ethics       Date:  2015-09-01

2.  Population genetic screening efficiently identifies carriers of autosomal dominant diseases.

Authors:  J J Grzymski; G Elhanan; J A Morales Rosado; E Smith; K A Schlauch; R Read; C Rowan; N Slotnick; S Dabe; W J Metcalf; B Lipp; H Reed; L Sharma; E Levin; J Kao; M Rashkin; J Bowes; K Dunaway; A Slonim; N Washington; M Ferber; A Bolze; J T Lu
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Molecular Tumor Boards: Realizing Precision Oncology Therapy.

Authors:  Maulik Patel; Shumei M Kato; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 4.  Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient neoplasia.

Authors:  Anthony J Gill
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Functional roles of p12, the fourth subunit of human DNA polymerase delta.

Authors:  Hao Li; Bin Xie; Yajing Zhou; Amal Rahmeh; Sandra Trusa; Sufang Zhang; Yan Gao; Ernest Y C Lee; Marietta Y W T Lee
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Germ-line BRCA1 mutations in Jewish and non-Jewish women with early-onset breast cancer.

Authors:  M G FitzGerald; D J MacDonald; M Krainer; I Hoover; E O'Neil; H Unsal; S Silva-Arrieto; D M Finkelstein; P Beer-Romero; C Englert; D C Sgroi; B L Smith; J W Younger; J E Garber; R B Duda; K A Mayzel; K J Isselbacher; S H Friend; D A Haber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-01-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Writing, erasing and reading histone lysine methylations.

Authors:  Kwangbeom Hyun; Jongcheol Jeon; Kihyun Park; Jaehoon Kim
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 8.718

8.  POLE and POLD1 germline exonuclease domain pathogenic variants, a rare event in colorectal cancer from the Middle East.

Authors:  Abdul K Siraj; Rong Bu; Kaleem Iqbal; Sandeep K Parvathareddy; Tariq Masoodi; Nabil Siraj; Maha Al-Rasheed; Yan Kong; Saeeda O Ahmed; Khadija A S Al-Obaisi; Ingrid G Victoria; Maham Arshad; Fouad Al-Dayel; Alaa Abduljabbar; Luai H Ashari; Khawla S Al-Kuraya
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.183

9.  Mosaic PPM1D mutations are associated with predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Elise Ruark; Katie Snape; Peter Humburg; Chey Loveday; Ilirjana Bajrami; Rachel Brough; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Anthony Renwick; Sheila Seal; Emma Ramsay; Silvana Del Vecchio Duarte; Manuel A Rivas; Margaret Warren-Perry; Anna Zachariou; Adriana Campion-Flora; Sandra Hanks; Anne Murray; Naser Ansari Pour; Jenny Douglas; Lorna Gregory; Andrew Rimmer; Neil M Walker; Tsun-Po Yang; Julian W Adlard; Julian Barwell; Jonathan Berg; Angela F Brady; Carole Brewer; Glen Brice; Cyril Chapman; Jackie Cook; Rosemarie Davidson; Alan Donaldson; Fiona Douglas; Diana Eccles; D Gareth Evans; Lynn Greenhalgh; Alex Henderson; Louise Izatt; Ajith Kumar; Fiona Lalloo; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Patrick J Morrison; Joan Paterson; Mary Porteous; Mark T Rogers; Susan Shanley; Lisa Walker; Martin Gore; Richard Houlston; Matthew A Brown; Mark J Caufield; Panagiotis Deloukas; Mark I McCarthy; John A Todd; Clare Turnbull; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Alan Ashworth; Antonis C Antoniou; Christopher J Lord; Peter Donnelly; Nazneen Rahman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Impact of a Cancer Gene Variant Reclassification Program Over a 20-Year Period.

Authors:  Lisa Esterling; Ranjula Wijayatunge; Krystal Brown; Brian Morris; Elisha Hughes; Dmitry Pruss; Susan Manley; Karla R Bowles; Theodora S Ross
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.