Literature DB >> 35050411

Reverse rhino sign as a radiological sign of low-grade infected reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Nathalie Pruijn1, Nienke M Kosse1, M van der Pluijm2, Oscar Dorrestijn3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Low-grade infections following shoulder surgery are difficult to diagnose. Recently, curved-shaped bony spurs, further mentioned "reverse rhino signs" because of its shape, growing inferior on the glenoid were noticed on X-rays of patients with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and a Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) infection. This study aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the reverse rhino sign as a radiological marker for detecting low-grade shoulder infections in RSA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A diagnostic study was performed including patients who underwent revision surgery of an RSA with perioperative cultures taken. Blinded radiographic evaluation was performed by two orthopedic surgeons for presence of rhino signs, humeral osteophytes, and notching. Efficacy measures of the reverse rhino sign for detecting low-grade infections were determined. Furthermore, results were stratified for notching and gender.
RESULTS: Thirty-two revised RSA patients had a low-grade infection and 36 had no infection. Seventeen (53%) patients with infection had a reverse rhino sign present, compared to 6 (17%) in the non-infection group. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the reverse rhino sign were, respectively, 53%, 83%, 74%, and 67%. These measures changed to 68%, 77%, 72%, and 74% for patients without notching and to 47%, 100%, 100%, and 8% for males.
CONCLUSION: In the absence of a reverse rhino sign in RSA patients, a low-grade shoulder infection is unlikely. Hence, the reverse rhino sign can be used to rule in a low-grade shoulder infection, especially in males and in the absence of notching. Low-grade infections should be considered in patients with unexplained persistent shoulder complaints after RSA placement, especially when a rhino sign is present. For these patients, we advise to perform mini-open biopsy for cultures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic level IV.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cutibacterium acnes; Efficacy measures; Low-grade infections; Reverse rhino sign; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Revision shoulder surgery

Year:  2022        PMID: 35050411     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04334-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  27 in total

1.  Revision shoulder arthroplasty with positive intraoperative cultures: the value of preoperative studies and intraoperative histology.

Authors:  Mark S Topolski; Patrick Y K Chin; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Prognostic factors for bacterial cultures positive for Propionibacterium acnes and other organisms in a large series of revision shoulder arthroplasties performed for stiffness, pain, or loosening.

Authors:  Paul Pottinger; Susan Butler-Wu; Moni Blazej Neradilek; Andrew Merritt; Alexander Bertelsen; Jocelyn L Jette; Winston J Warme; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Patient and procedure-specific risk factors for deep infection after primary shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jason Richards; Maria C S Inacio; Michael Beckett; Ronald A Navarro; Anshuman Singh; Mark T Dillon; Jeff F Sodl; Edward H Yian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Deep infection after rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  George S Athwal; John W Sperling; Damian M Rispoli; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Periprosthetic infections after total shoulder arthroplasty: a 33-year perspective.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; John W Sperling; Cathy Schleck; William S Harmsen; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Clinical meaning of unexpected positive cultures (UPC) in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Antonio M Foruria; Tyler J Fox; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Characteristics and outcome of 16 periprosthetic shoulder joint infections.

Authors:  Y Achermann; F Sahin; H K Schwyzer; C Kolling; J Wüst; M Vogt
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 3.553

8.  Positive culture rate in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  James D Kelly; E Rhett Hobgood
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Propionibacterium acnes colonization of the human shoulder.

Authors:  Amar Patel; Ryan P Calfee; Matthew Plante; Staci A Fischer; Andrew Green
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Sensitivity of frozen section histology for identifying Propionibacterium acnes infections in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew J Grosso; Salvatore J Frangiamore; Eric T Ricchetti; Thomas W Bauer; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.