| Literature DB >> 35049570 |
Nebojša Pavlović1, Isidora Anastasija Bogićević1, Dragana Zaklan1, Maja Đanić2, Svetlana Goločorbin-Kon1, Hani Al-Salami3, Momir Mikov2.
Abstract
Clindamycin hydrochloride is a widely used antibiotic for topical use, but its main disadvantage is poor skin penetration. Therefore, new approaches in the development of clindamycin topical formulations are of great importance. We aimed to investigate the effects of the type of gelling agent (carbomer and sodium carmellose), and the type and concentration of bile acids as penetration enhancers (0.1% and 0.5% of cholic and deoxycholic acid), on clindamycin release rate and permeation in a cellulose membrane in vitro model. Eight clindamycin hydrogel formulations were prepared using a 23 full factorial design, and they were evaluated for physical appearance, pH, drug content, drug release, and permeability parameters. Although formulations with carbomer as the gelling agent exerted optimal sensory properties, carmellose sodium hydrogels had significantly higher release rates and permeation of clindamycin hydrochloride. The bile acid enhancement factors were higher in carbomer gels, and cholic acid exerted more pronounced permeation-enhancing effects. Since the differences in the permeation parameters of hydrogels containing cholic acid in different concentrations were insignificant, its addition in a lower concentration is more favorable. The hydrogel containing carmellose sodium as a gelling agent and 0.1% cholic acid as a penetration enhancer can be considered as the formulation of choice.Entities:
Keywords: clindamycin; flux; gel; permeability; topical drug
Year: 2022 PMID: 35049570 PMCID: PMC8774652 DOI: 10.3390/gels8010035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gels ISSN: 2310-2861
Physical appearance and pH values of formulated hydrogels.
| Formulation | Color | Homogeneity * | Consistency ° | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Transparent | 5 | 3 | 6.8 ± 0.1 |
| C2 | Yellowish | 4 | 5 | 7.1 ± 0.1 |
| G1 | Hazy white | 3 | 3 | 6.6 ± 0.1 |
| G2 | Hazy white | 2 | 3 | 6.6 ± 0.2 |
| G3 | Transparent | 5 | 3 | 6.7 ± 0.2 |
| G4 | Transparent | 5 | 3 | 6.5 ± 0.1 |
| G5 | Hazy yellowish | 3 | 5 | 6.9 ± 0.0 |
| G6 | Hazy yellowish | 2 | 5 | 7.0 ± 0.1 |
| G7 | Yellowish | 4 | 5 | 6.9 ± 0.2 |
| G8 | Yellowish | 4 | 5 | 6.8 ± 0.0 |
* Homogeneity: from 1 (nonhomogeneous) to 5 (excellent homogeneity); ° Consistency: from 1 (very low viscosity) to 5 (very high viscosity).
Clindamycin content in hydrogel formulations.
| Formulation | Clindamycin Content | Relative Content of Clindamycin |
|---|---|---|
| C1 | 1.12 ± 0.01 | 98.75 ± 1.27 |
| C2 | 1.13 ± 0.02 | 99.62 ± 1.34 |
| G1 | 1.11 ± 0.00 | 98.62 ± 0.07 |
| G2 | 1.13 ± 0.01 | 99.56 ± 0.60 |
| G3 | 1.13 ± 0.01 | 99.96 ± 0.47 |
| G4 | 1.11 ± 0.00 | 98.42 ± 0.40 |
| G5 | 1.13 ± 0.02 | 99.96 ± 1.54 |
| G6 | 1.11 ± 0.01 | 98.48 ± 1.14 |
| G7 | 1.12 ± 0.01 | 98.75 ± 0.74 |
| G8 | 1.12 ± 0.02 | 98.89 ± 1.81 |
Figure 1Dissolution profiles of clindamycin hydrochloride from hydrogel formulations: (a) control formulations C1 and C2; (b) hydrogels G1-G4 in comparison to control gel C1; and (c) hydrogels G5–G8 in comparison to control gel C2.
Permeability parameters of clindamycin in hydrogel formulations.
| Formulation | Linear Regression Equation | Coefficient of Determination, R2 | Steady-State Flux, Jss | Permeability Coefficient, Pm | Enhancement Factor (EF) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | y = 43.64x + 6.2349 | 0.9874 | 43.64 | 3.862 | 1 |
| C2 | y = 117.86x + 69.187 | 0.9953 | 117.86 | 10.430 | 1 |
| G1 | y = 63.56x + 11.263 | 0.9774 | 63.56 | 5.625 | 1.46 * |
| G2 | y = 64.36x − 12.872 | 0.9903 | 64.36 | 5.695 | 1.47 * |
| G3 | y = 73.61x + 33.387 | 0.9914 | 73.61 | 6.514 | 1.69 * |
| G4 | y = 76.03x + 67.981 | 0.9810 | 76.03 | 6.728 | 1.74 * |
| G5 | y = 133.55x + 79.646 | 0.9878 | 133.55 | 11.819 | 1.13 ** |
| G6 | y = 135.16x + 85.278 | 0.9936 | 135.16 | 11.961 | 1.15 ** |
| G7 | y = 147.63x + 56.718 | 0.9940 | 147.63 | 13.065 | 1.25 ** |
| G8 | y = 159.29x + 74.819 | 0.9942 | 159.29 | 14.096 | 1.35 ** |
* vs. C1; ** vs. C2.
The minimized total energies of clindamycin hydrochloride (EC), bile acids (EBA) and clindamycin-bile acid complexes (EC+BA).
| Bile Acid | EC | EC + EBA | EC+BA | ΔE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cholic acid | 29.3047 | 81.4606 | 58.6516 | −22.8090 |
| Deoxycholic acid | 29.3047 | 78.1123 | 66.6174 | −11.4949 |
Figure 2Geometrically optimized three-dimensional structures of clindamycin/cholic acid (A) and clindamycin/deoxycholic acid (B) complexes.
Factors and levels for 23 factorial design.
| Independent Variable | Levels | |
|---|---|---|
| −1 | +1 | |
| Carbomer 940 | Carmellose sodium | |
| Deoxycholic acid | Cholic acid | |
| 0.1% | 0.5% | |
Quantitative composition of hydrogel formulations (% wt/wt).
| Component | Hydrogel Formulation | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | G2 | G3 | G4 | G5 | G6 | G7 | G8 | C1 | C2 | |
| Clindamycin HCl | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1.13 |
| Carbomer 940 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - | - | - | 0.5 | - |
| Carmellose sodium | - | - | - | - | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | - | 5 |
| Deoxycholic acid | 0.1 | 0.5 | - | - | 0.1 | 0.5 | - | - | - | - |
| Cholic acid | - | - | 0.1 | 0.5 | - | - | 0.1 | 0.5 | - | - |
| TEA solution 10% | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | - | - | - | - | 7 | - |
| Propylene glycol | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Purified water | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Figure 3Schematic representation of in vitro drug release and permeation model.