| Literature DB >> 35049522 |
Liwei Zou1,2,3, Xiaoyan Wu4,2,5,3, Shuman Tao6, Yajuan Yang7, Qingjun Zhang8, Xuedong Hong8, Yang Xie4,2,3, Tingting Li4,2,3, Suisheng Zheng8, Fangbiao Tao4,2,5,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Problematic mobile phone use (PMPU) is prevalent and increases the risk for a variety of health problems. However, few studies have explored the neural mechanisms that might render adolescents more or less vulnerable. Here, we aimed to identify whether PMPU is associated with depressive symptoms and whether this relationship is moderated by intrinsic functional connectivity (iFC) which is associated with PMPU.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; depression; moderate effect; resting-state; smartphone addiction
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35049522 PMCID: PMC9109627 DOI: 10.1556/2006.2021.00090
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Behav Addict ISSN: 2062-5871 Impact factor: 7.772
Fig. 1.The flow diagram of sample selection in this study
Demographic characteristics of adolescents with and without problem mobile phone use
| Total ( | PMPU group ( | Non-PMPU group ( | Test value ( |
| |
| Age (years), Mean ± SD | 19.05 ± 0.81 | 19.12 ± 0.65 | 19.02 ± 0.87 | −0.89 | 0.376 |
| Gender | |||||
| Male ( | 55 (23.1%) | 14 (18.4%) | 41 (25.3%) | 1.38 | 0.240 |
| Female ( | 183 (76.9%) | 62 (81.6%) | 121 (74.7%) | ||
| Residential Area | |||||
| Rural ( | 142 (59.7%) | 48 (63.2%) | 94 (58.0%) | 0.57 | 0.452 |
| Urban ( | 96 (40.3%) | 28 (36.8%) | 68 (42.0%) | ||
| Any siblings | |||||
| Yes ( | 53 (22.3%) | 14 (18.4%) | 39 (24.1%) | 0.96 | 0.328 |
| No ( | 185 (77.7%) | 62 (81.6%) | 123 (75.9%) | ||
| Perceived family income | |||||
| Low ( | 49 (20.6%) | 18 (23.7%) | 31 (19.1%) | 1.67 | 0.422 |
| Medium ( | 177 (74.4%) | 56 (73.7%) | 121 (74.7%) | ||
| High ( | 12 (5.0%) | 2 (2.6%) | 10 (6.2%) | ||
| Father's educational level | |||||
| Primary school or lower ( | 50 (21.0%) | 22 (28.9%) | 28 (17.3%) | 5.36 | 0.068 |
| Middle school (n, %) | 121 (50.8%) | 38 (50.0%) | 83 (51.2%) | ||
| College or above ( | 77 (28.2%) | 16 (21.1%) | 51 (31.5%) | ||
| Mother's educational level | |||||
| Primary school or lower ( | 109 (45.8%) | 38 (50%) | 71 (43.8%) | 2.04 | 0.360 |
| Middle school (n, %) | 81 (34.0%) | 21 (27.6%) | 60 (37.1%) | ||
| College or above ( | 48 (20.2%) | 17 (23.4%) | 31 (19.1%) | ||
| SQAPMPU scores (Median) | 23.50 | 34.00 | 21.00 | – | – |
| DASS-depression scores (Baseline, Median) | 2 | 6 | 0 | −5.45 | <0.001 |
| DASS-depression scores (1 year later, Median) | 0 | 2 | 0 | −1.93 | 0.054 |
Note: PMPU, problematic mobile phone use; SD, standard deviation; SQAPMPU, Self-rating Questionnaire for Adolescent Problematic Mobile Phone Use scale; DASS, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale.
Fig. 2.Cross-lagged model of PMPU associated with depressive symptoms in this study. PMPU, problematic mobile phone use
Standardized coefficient of PMPU and depressive symptom on cross-lagged model
| Parameter |
| SE |
|
|
| |||
| PMPU 1→PMPU 2 | 0.497 | 0.059 | <0.001 |
| Dep 1→Dep 2 | 0.382 | 0.065 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| PMPU 1→Dep 2 | 0.153 | 0.069 | 0.008 |
| Dep 1→PMPU 2 | 0.023 | 0.065 | 0.729 |
Note: PMPU, problematic mobile phone use; Dep, depressive symptom; SE, standard error.
Fig. 3.Intrinsic functional connectivity (iFC) of whole brain analysis between college students with PMPU and without PMPU. PMPU students showed increased iFC of left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) to left occipital gyrus (OcG), right orbital gyrus (OrG) to left OcG and left parahippocampal gyrus (PhG) to right middle temporal gyrus (MTG) than college students without PMPU (P FDR < 0.05). PMPU, problematic mobile phone use
Results from the moderated regression analysis predicting depressive symptoms in baseline and 1 year later
| Predictors | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||||
|
|
| ΔR2 |
|
|
| ΔR2 |
| ||
| Cross-sectional effect | |||||||||
| 1 | PMPU | 0.368 | 9.042** | <0.001 | 0.009 | 0.375 | 8.982** | 0.001 | 0.238 |
| IFG-OcG | 2.377 | 1.336 | 1.445 | 0.783 | |||||
| PMPU × IFG-OcG | 0.020 | 0.096 | 0.103 | 0.488 | |||||
| 2 | PMPU | 0.368 | 9.064** | 0.004 | 1.216 | 0.376 | 9.003** | 0.007 | 2.316 |
| OrG-OcG | 2.860 | 1.531 | 2.018 | 1.057 | |||||
| PMPU × OrG-OcG | 0.260 | 1.103 | 0.365 | 1.523 | |||||
| 3 | PMPU | 0.352 | 8.756** | 0.021 | 7.038* | 0.351 | 8.527** | 0.028 | 9.304** |
| PhG-MTG | 2.663 | 1.757 | 2.167 | 1.430 | |||||
| PMPU × PhG-MTG | 0.477 | 2.653* | 0.554 | 3.050** | |||||
| Longitudinal effect | |||||||||
| 1 | PMPU | 0.172 | 4.104** | 0.002 | 0.584 | 0.173 | 3.979** | 0.002 | 0.531 |
| IFG-OcG | −2.014 | −1.101 | −1.663 | −0.862 | |||||
| PMPU × IFG-OcG | 0.164 | 0.764 | 0.161 | 0.729 | |||||
| 2 | PMPU | 0.168 | 4.006** | 0.001 | 0.239 | 0.172 | 3.923** | 0.001 | 0.219 |
| OrG-OcG | −0.588 | −0.304 | −0.713 | −0.352 | |||||
| PMPU × OrG-OcG | 0.119 | 0.489 | 0.118 | 0.468 | |||||
| 3 | PMPU | 0.147 | 3.526** | 0.026 | 6.754* | 0.149 | 3.412** | 0.023 | 5.847* |
| PhG-MTG | 0.559 | 0.356 | 0.587 | 0.366 | |||||
| PMPU × PhG-MTG | 0.484 | 2.600* | 0.463 | 2.418* | |||||
Note: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, model 1 was did not adjust any variables, model 2 was adjusted by age, gender, residential area, any siblings, perceived family income and parents' education level. PMPU, problematic mobile phone use; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; OcG, occipital gyrus; OrG, orbital gyrus; PhG, parahippocampal gyrus; MTG, middle temporal gyrus.
Fig. 4.Simple slope analyzes of moderation effect by iFC of left PhG to right MTG on PMPU and depressive symptom in baseline and 1 year later. For illustrative purposes, iFC of left PhG to right MTG were graphed at lower (-1 standard deviation) and higher (+1 standard deviation) connectivity from the mean level. PMPU, problematic mobile phone use; iFC, intrinsic functional connectivity; PhG, parahippocampal gyrus; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; L, left; R, right