| Literature DB >> 35049180 |
Jian Zhang1, Yi Chang, Shaohua Ding.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: This study aims to investigate whether there is imaging evidence of disrupted hypothalamic functional connectivity (FC) in patients with diffuse axonal injury (DAI) and relationships with cognitive impairment.Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were acquired from acute patients with diagnosed DAI (n = 30) and healthy controls (HC) (n = 30). We first assessed hypothalamic FC with seed-based analysis. Furthermore, the lateral and medial hypothalamic seed was selected to show distinct functional connectivity in DAI. In addition, partial correlation was used to measure the clinical associations with the altered hypothalamic FC in DAI patients.Compared with HC, DAI group showed significantly increased hypothalamic FC with superior temporal gyrus, and the regions around the operculum. Furthermore, there was a significant negative correlation between the connectivity coefficient of hypothalamus to right and left superior temporal gyrus and the disability rating scale scores in DAI group. When the seed regions were divided into lateral and medial hypothalamus, except for increased connectivity of medial hypothalamus (P < .01 with correction), we more observed that decreased left lateral hypothalamic connectivity was positively correlated with mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores.Our results suggest that there are alterations of hypothalamic FC in DAI and offer further understanding of clinical symptoms including related cognitive impairment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35049180 PMCID: PMC9191382 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027805
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Demographic characteristics in DAI patients and HC.
| Characteristics | DAI patients (n = 30) | HC (n = 30) | |
| Age (years) | 46.30 ± 11.93 | 48.07 ± 10.55 | .546 |
| Sex (Female/Male) | 9/15 | 10/16 | .944 |
| Education (years) | 12.60 ± 2.91 | 12.80 ± 3.68 | .816 |
| FD values | 0.17 ± 0.09 | 0.21 ± 0.12 | .210 |
| Disease duration (weeks) | 10.70 ± 3.93 | – | – |
| GCS scores | 9.83 ± 2.37 | – | – |
| DRS scores | 9.07 ± 4.40 | – | – |
| MMSE scores | 20.63 ± 4.08 | – | – |
| MAS scores | 33.13 ± 4.87 | – | – |
Figure 1The group differences of the hypothalamic FC pattern between the DAI and HC groups (PT correction with TFCE at P < .01).
Figure 2The group differences of the left and right medial hypothalamic FC pattern between the DAI and HC groups (PT correction with TFCE at P < .01). MH = medial hypothalamus.
Figure 3The group differences of the left lateral hypothalamic FC pattern between the DAI and HC groups (PT correction with TFCE at P < .01). LH = lateral hypothalamus.
The significantly different brain regions in the hypothalamic ROI between the DAI and HC groups.
| ROI | Brain region | BA | Cluster voxels | Peak MNI (X, Y, Z) | Peak T values | Effect size |
| Hypothalamus | ||||||
| Temporal operculum/Insula | 13,41 | 46 | −36, −21, −6 | 4.293 | 1.450 | |
| Superior temporal gyrus | 22 | 22 | 54, −12, 0 | 5.898 | 1.650 | |
| Superior temporal gyrus | 22 | 21 | −51, 6, 0 | 5.063 | 1.364 | |
| Temporal operculum/Insula | 13,41 | 26 | −36, −33, 21 | 4.352 | 1.450 | |
| Left MH | ||||||
| Temporal pole: superior gyrus | 38 | 14 | 42, −6, −15 | 4.058 | 1.374 | |
| Temporal operculum/Insula | 13,41 | 83 | −36, −24, −3 | 5.239 | 1.654 | |
| Inferior frontal gyrus (orbital) | 47 | 27 | −42, 21, −6 | 4.239 | 1.297 | |
| Superior temporal gyrus | 22 | 23 | 54, −9, 0 | 5.273 | 1.455 | |
| Right MH | ||||||
| Superior temporal gyrus | 38 | 19 | 51, 6, −12 | 4.534 | 1.358 | |
| Frontal operculum/Insula | 13 | 353 | −36, −30, −6 | 4.586 | 1.663 | |
| Superior temporal gyrus/Rolandic operculum | 22,13 | 144 | 54, −9, 0 | 6.137 | 1.531 | |
| Cuneus | 18 | 33 | 9, −84, 18 | 4.561 | 1.324 | |
| Parietal operculum/insula | 13 | 48 | −30, −45, 15 | 4.372 | 1.819 | |
| Left LH | ||||||
| Lentiform nucleus, Putamen | – | 255 | 21, 9, 9 | −4.956 | 1.204 | |
| Precuneus/Anterior and middle cingulate/Middle frontal gyrus | 7,9,10,24,31,32,33 | 1598 | 18, −6, 36 | −5.500 | 1.680 | |
| Lentiform nucleus, pallidum | – | 10 | −15, 6, −3 | −4.558 | 1.196 | |
Figure 4Partial correlations between the altered hypothalamic FC and clinical variables. The hypothalamic FC to left and right STG were negatively correlated with DRS scores (r = −0.436, P = .026; r = −0.459, P = .018, respectively) (Figure 4A–B). The left MH connectivity to right STG were negatively correlated with DRS scores (r = −0.552, P = .003) (Figure 4C). The left LH connectivity to right putamen and left pallidum were positively correlated with MMSE scores (r = 0.417, P = .034; r = 0.420, P = .033, respectively) (Figure 4D–E). LH = lateral hypothalamus, MH = medial hypothalamus, PAL = pallidum, PUT = putamen, STG = superior temporal gyrus.