| Literature DB >> 35048016 |
Xiang Qi1, Xiaomin Qu2, Bei Wu1.
Abstract
Objective: China's dental care system is bifurcated between urban and rural areas. However, very few studies have examined the dental services utilization inequities in China's megacities, particularly in these urban and rural areas. This study aims to examine the urban-rural disparities in dental services utilization among adults living in China's megacities based on the Andersen dental services utilization model.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese; dental care use; dental visit; oral health; urban-rural
Year: 2021 PMID: 35048016 PMCID: PMC8757718 DOI: 10.3389/froh.2021.673296
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oral Health ISSN: 2673-4842
Figure 1Modified andersen dental services utilization model.
Sample characteristics (N = 4,049, weighted).
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| Male | 46.6 | 44.1 | 46.0 | 51.8 | 50.3 |
|
| |||||
| 18–25 | 6.3 | 5.2 | 8.6 | 4.4 | 9.1 |
| 26–30 | 10.7 | 9.6 | 14.3 | 8.3 | 12.3 |
| 31–35 | 11.8 | 10.9 | 12.9 | 12.4 | 12.9 |
| 36–40 | 10.8 | 11.3 | 11.0 | 10.6 | 8.8 |
| 41–45 | 10.3 | 10.3 | 10.1 | 9.0 | 12.4 |
| 46–50 | 12.0 | 11.9 | 12.0 | 10.7 | 13.8 |
| 51–55 | 9.7 | 8.3 | 10.9 | 10.6 | 11.8 |
| 56–60 | 10.8 | 11.9 | 7.1 | 12.5 | 9.7 |
| 61–65 | 17.6 | 20.6 | 13.1 | 21.5 | 9.2 |
|
| |||||
| Married/living with partner | 80.1 | 79.6 | 79.7 | 79.4 | 83.3 |
|
| |||||
| Illiterate/elementary school | 8.7 | 3.7 | 14.3 | 6.4 | 20.6 |
| Middle/high/vocational school | 50.6 | 43.9 | 56.1 | 54.6 | 62.1 |
| 3 years college or more | 40.7 | 52.4 | 29.6 | 39.0 | 17.3 |
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| High (≥54) | 31.1 | 40.3 | 16.8 | 36.3 | 13.1 |
|
| |||||
| High (≥54) | 33.3 | 44.2 | 24.2 | 28.4 | 13.4 |
|
| |||||
| High (≥78,000) | 32.2 | 37.9 | 31.6 | 29.7 | 16.1 |
|
| |||||
| No health insurance | 8.5 | 5.6 | 10.2 | 10.4 | 14.0 |
| New Cooperative Medical Scheme | 11.1 | 1.2 | 25.4 | 2.2 | 35.4 |
| Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance | 22.0 | 23.9 | 18.9 | 24.6 | 16.8 |
| Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance | 51.7 | 60.6 | 40.7 | 56.2 | 30.8 |
| Other medical insurance | 6.7 | 8.7 | 4.8 | 6.6 | 3.0 |
|
| |||||
| Yes | 60.7 | 72.5 | 54.5 | 55.0 | 34.4 |
|
| |||||
| Yes | 56.9 | 64.5 | 54.9 | 50.9 | 40.0 |
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| SRHMS (range:0–90) | 61.5 (12.7) | 61.0 (12.4) | 61.2 (12.4) | 61.8 (13.2) | 63.1 (13.2) |
|
| |||||
| Number of missing teeth (range:0-28) | 1.5 (3.3) | 1.7 (3.4) | 1.5 (2.8) | 1.3 (3.4) | 1.0 (3.0) |
|
| |||||
| Yes (occasionally/frequently/always) | 50.9 | 56.1 | 59.1 | 37.4 | 36.6 |
SD, standard deviation; ISEI, international socio-economic index of occupational status; SRHMS, self-rated health measurement scale.
Multivariate logistic regression models of having dental services utilization at least once (N =4,049, weighted).
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||||
| Urban | 2.442 | 2.095–2.845 | 1.731 | 1.460–2.052 | 1.566 | 1.299–1.889 | 1.573 | 1.296–1.908 |
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Male | 0.810 | 0.691–0.949 | 0.773 | 0.657–0.909 | 0.777 | 0.658–0.918 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| 26–30 | 1.079 | 0.726–1.603 | 1.006 | 0.680–1.488 | 0.976 | 0.658–1.448 | ||
| 31–35 | 0.909 | 0.604–1.367 | 0.855 | 0.571–1.281 | 0.819 | 0.545–1.230 | ||
| 36–40 | 1.232 | 0.812–1.871 | 1.160 | 0.767–1.756 | 1.068 | 0.702–1.625 | ||
| 41–45 | 1.196 | 0.780–1.833 | 1.101 | 0.719–1.684 | 1.053 | 0.688–1.611 | ||
| 46–50 | 1.359 | 0.891–2.072 | 1.270 | 0.837–1.927 | 1.146 | 0.752–1.745 | ||
| 51–55 | 1.243 | 0.797–1.936 | 1.209 | 0.780–1.873 | 1.044 | 0.669–1.631 | ||
| 56–60 | 1.206 | 0.784–1.855 | 1.181 | 0.771–1.807 | 0.969 | 0.627–1.498 | ||
| 61–65 | 1.504 | 0.992–2.279 | 1.485 | 0.986–2.236 | 1.185 | 0.777–1.806 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Married/living with partner | 0.861 | 0.686–1.081 | 0.848 | 0.676–1.064 | 0.859 | 0.682–1.081 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Middle/high/vocational school | 1.301 | 0.988–1.713 | 1.203 | 0.910–1.590 | 1.225 | 0.913–1.643 | ||
| 3 years college or more | 2.165 | 1.567–2.993 | 1.537 | 1.082–2.182 | 1.529 | 1.061–2.205 | ||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| High | 1.010 | 0.844–1.209 | 1.014 | 0.844–1.218 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| High | 1.422 | 1.167–1.732 | 1.490 | 1.222–1.817 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| High | 1.382 | 1.131–1.689 | 1.438 | 1.175–1.760 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| New Cooperative Medical Scheme | 1.070 | 0.765–1.498 | 1.098 | 0.775–1.554 | ||||
| Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance | 1.474 | 1.094–1.986 | 1.570 | 1.154–2.135 | ||||
| Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance | 1.335 | 1.011–1.763 | 1.383 | 1.040–1.838 | ||||
| Other medical insurance | 1.608 | 1.053–2.455 | 1.763 | 1.147–2.708 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| Yes | 1.669 | 1.410–1.977 | 1.661 | 1.399–1.972 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| Yes | 1.457 | 1.238–1.716 | 1.429 | 1.209–1.689 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| Self–rated health (SRHMS) | 0.901 | 0.766–1.059 | ||||||
| Tooth loss (Number of missing teeth) | 1.053 | 1.017–1.092 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Yes (occasionally/frequently/always) | 2.286 | 1.948–2.682 | ||||||
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Significance level:
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001. ISEI, international socio-economic index of occupational status; SRHMS, self-rated health measurement scale.
Figure 2Disparities in predicted probability of having dental visit by place of residence (urban vs. rural) with 95% confidence intervals (N = 4,049, weighted). All estimations include gender, marital status, education, attending the regular physical exam, care about eating a healthy diet, father's occupational status, individual's occupational status, income, insurance, self-rated health, tooth loss, and gum bleeding as covariates.