| Literature DB >> 35048010 |
Bathsheba Turton1, Jilen Patel2, Chanthyda Sieng3, Ranuch Tak1, Callum Durward1.
Abstract
Background: Achieving Universal Oral Health Care among Low-to Middle-Income settings is challenging and little literature exists around exploring what a "Highest Priority Package" of care might look like in the context of oral health. The Healthy Kids Cambodia (HKC) program differs from most conventional school dental services in that the initial package of care that is offered is daily toothbrushing with 1,500 ppm fluoride toothpaste (DTB) together with the topical application of Silver Diamine fluoride (SDF) for management of lesions in primary teeth. Aim: To examine tooth level outcomes for 8- to 10-year old children from two schools that performed DTB with application of SDF at differing time-points. Design: This was an observational cohort study that examined lesion progression among children in late mixed dentition at two schools. Data were collected using the dmft and pufa indices. Both schools received materials and training for DTB at baseline. School One received SDF at baseline while School Two received SDF after 9-months. Intraoral examinations were performed and the presentation of primary teeth with cavitated carious lesions were compared at baseline and 12 m. If a tooth was still caries-active or had become pulpally involved, this was considered to be an unacceptable outcome. Descriptive analysis was performed the chi-squared test was used to examine differences in the proportion of teeth with unacceptable outcomes by school membership.Entities:
Keywords: daily toothbrushing; highest priority package; school health; silver diammine fluoride; universal health coverage
Year: 2021 PMID: 35048010 PMCID: PMC8757788 DOI: 10.3389/froh.2021.667867
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oral Health ISSN: 2673-4842
The three-tiered system used to triage children based on clinical presentation and treatment needs.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | All participants | General health screening where possible. |
| Daily tooth brushing with fluoridated toothpaste and hand washing. | ||
| Biannual basic health screening, de-worming, and Vitamin A supplementation. Silver diammine fluoride application to arrest caries in primary teeth. | ||
| Oral health education. | ||
| Level 2 | All children 6- to 8-years of age AND older children who have open cavitations on permanent posterior teeth | Placement of restorations using the atraumatic restorative technique (ART) and pit and fissure sealants in permanent teeth using glass ionomer cement. |
| Level 3 | Children with active (acute) infection OR those who have open cavitation on permanent anterior teeth OR those who have cavitations on permanent posterior teeth that are not restorable by ART | Comprehensive oral rehabilitation in a fixed or mobile dental clinic, including extractions and conventional restorations. |
Children may qualify both level 2 and level 3 depending on their clinical presentation. These categories are not mutually exclusive.
Figure 1Project flow of events.
Sociodemographic characteristics and referral qualification of participants by clinical characteristics at baseline.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| School 1 | 286 (54.9) | 4 (1.4) | 155 (54.2) | 2.6 (2.6) |
| School 2 | 235 (45.1) | 3 (1.3) | 164 (69.8) | 3.7 (3.1) |
|
| ||||
| Male | 264 (50.7) | 4 (1.5) | 161 (61.0) | 3.2 (3.0) |
| Female | 257 (49.3) | 3 (1.2) | 158 (61.5) | 2.9 (2.8) |
| Overall | 521 (100.0) | 7 (1.3) | 319 (61.2) | 3.0 (2.9) |
Brackets contain column percent.
Difference between school is statistically significant (P-value < 0.05; chi-square test).
Difference between school is statistically significant (P-value < 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis test).
Attrition of participants between baseline and 1-year follow-up.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
| 7-years | 3 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (0.6) |
| 8-years | 110 (89.4) | 13 (10.6) | 123 (23.6) |
| 9-years | 159 (33.8) | 12 (23.5) | 171 (32.8) |
| 10-years | 129 (86.0) | 21 (14.0) | 150 (28.8) |
| 11-years | 50 (94.3) | 3 (5.7) | 53 (10.2) |
| 12-years | 15 (93.8) | 1 (6.2) | 16 (3.1) |
| 13-years | 2 (66.7) | 1 (33.3) | 3 (0.6) |
| 14-years | 2 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.4) |
|
| |||
| Male | 236 (89.4) | 28 (10.6) | 264 (50.7) |
| Female | 234 (91.1) | 23 (8.9) | 257 (49.3) |
|
| |||
| School 1 | 236 (82.5) | 50 (17.5) | 286 (54.9) |
| School 2 | 234 (99.6) | 1 (0.4) | 235 (45.1) |
| Total | 470 (90.2) | 51 (9.8) | 521 (100.0) |
Brackets contain column percentage.
P-value ≤ 0.05; chi squared test for differences in proportions among groups within the same column.
Attrition of teeth between baseline and 1-year follow-up by clinical characteristics.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
| Pulpally involved | 574 (88.4) | 75 (11.6) | 649 (46.7) |
| No pulpal involvement | 659 (88.8) | 83 (11.2) | 742 (53.3) |
|
| |||
| Molar | 942 (88.5) | 123 (11.5) | 1,065 (76.6) |
| Incisor | 291 (89.3) | 35 (10.7) | 326 (23.4) |
|
| |||
| School 1 | 497 (76.0) | 157 (24.0) | 654 (47.0) |
| School 2 | 736 (99.9) | 1 (0.01) | 737 (53.0) |
| Total | 1,233 (88.6) | 158 (11.4) | 1,391 (100.0) |
Brackets contain column percentage.
P-value ≤ 0.05; chi squared test for differences in proportions among groups within the same column.
Figure 2Tooth-level outcomes by baseline lesion description and school membership. aP-value for difference in the proportion of cavitated and pulpally involved lesions ≤ 0.001; chi squared test. bP-value for difference in arrest rate by school ≤ 0.001; chi squared test. cP-value for difference in rate of infection by school membership ≤ 0.001; chi squared test.