| Literature DB >> 35047962 |
Makoto Segawa1, Norio Iizuka1,2, Hiroyuki Ogihara3, Koichiro Tanaka4, Hajime Nakae5, Koichiro Usuku6, Yoshihiko Hamamoto3.
Abstract
Tongue examination is an important diagnostic method for judging pathological conditions in Kampo (traditional Japanese medicine), but it is not easy for beginners to learn the diagnostic technique. One reason is that there are few objective diagnostic criteria for tongue examination findings, and the educational method for tongue examination is not standardized in Japan, warranting the need for a tongue image database for e-learning systems that could dramatically improve the efficiency of education. Therefore, we constructed a database comprising tongue images whose findings were determined on the basis of votes given by five Kampo medicine specialists (KMSs) and confirmed the educational usefulness of the database for tongue diagnosis e-learning systems. The study was conducted in the following five steps: development of a tongue imaging collection system, collection of tongue images, evaluation and annotation of tongue images, development of a tongue diagnosis e-learning system, and verification of the educational usefulness of this system. Five KMSs evaluated the tongue images obtained from 125 participants in the following eight aspects: (i) tongue body size, (ii) tongue body color, (iii) tongue body dryness and wetness, (iv) tooth marks on the edge of the tongue, (v) cracks on the surface of the tongue, (vi) thickness of tongue coating, (vii) color of tongue coating, and (viii) dryness and wetness of tongue coating. Medical students (MSs) were given a tongue diagnosis test using an e-learning system after a lecture on tongue diagnosis. The cumulative and individual match rates (%) (individual match rates of 100% (5/5), 80% (4/5), and 60% (3/5) are shown in parentheses, respectively) were as follows: (i) tongue body size: 92.8 (26.4/26.4/40.0); (ii) tongue body color: 83.2 (10.4/20.8/52.0); (iii) tongue body dryness and wetness: 88.8 (13.6/34.4/40.8); (iv) tooth marks on the edge of the tongue: 88.8 (6.4/35.2/47.2); (v) cracks on the surface of the tongue: 96.8 (24.0/35.2/37.6); (vi) thickness of tongue coating: 84.8 (7.2/21.6/56.0); (vii) color of tongue coating: 88.0 (15.2/37.6/35.2); and (viii) dryness and wetness of tongue coating: 74.4 (4.8/19.2/50.4). The test showed that the tongue diagnosis ability of MSs who attended a lecture on tongue diagnosis was almost the same as that of KMSs. We successfully constructed a tongue image database standardized for training specialists on tongue diagnosis and confirmed the educational usefulness of the e-learning system using a database. This database will contribute to the standardization and popularization of Kampo education.Entities:
Keywords: Kampo; database; e-learning; education; glossitis; malnutrition; tongue diagnosis; tongue examination
Year: 2021 PMID: 35047962 PMCID: PMC8757883 DOI: 10.3389/fmedt.2021.760542
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med Technol ISSN: 2673-3129
Figure 1Tablet-type mobile device equipped with a tongue image collection system. Tablet-type mobile device with a camera function that has a “tongue-shaped framework” set on the shooting screen. When shooting the tongue according to the framework, the shooting conditions are naturally unified; thus, the shooting bias due to the difference in the size and direction of the tongue and the manner of tongue presentation can be reduced.
Figure 2Standard tongue image. Standard tongue images for each item are presented. As the images of dryness and wetness of the tongue body overlap with those of the tongue coating, they have been combined into one.
Figure 3Screen of tongue diagnosis test using e-learning system. Candidates select an answer by referring to the sample image.
Correct answer of the 80 questions used for the tongue diagnosis test.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tongue body size | Normal | Normal | Normal | Swelling | Swelling | Normal | Thin | Normal | Normal | Swelling |
| Tongue body color | Light red | Pale | Red–dark red | Purple | Light red | Light red | Light red | Purple | Red–dark red | Light red |
| Tongue body dryness and wetness | Normal | Normal | Wet | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Dry | Normal | Normal |
| Tooth marks | None | None | None | None | Mild | None | None | None | None | None |
| Cracks | None | None | Mild | Mild | None | None | None | Mild | Mild | None |
| Thickness of tongue coating | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate or higher with some peeling |
| Color of tongue coating | White | White | White | Yellowish white–light brown | White | White | White | Yellowish white–light brown | White | Yellowish white–light brown |
| Dryness and wetness of tongue coating | Normal | Normal | Wet | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Wet | Normal | Wet |
The correct answer was automatically determined by a majority vote of 5 KMSs. KMS, Kampo medicine specialists.
Figure 4Tongue images for the tongue diagnosis test. Tongue images of 10 people used in the tongue diagnosis test are shown. The features of each tongue image are listed in Table 1.
Diagnostic match rates of five KMSs.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Tongue body size | 26.4 | 26.4 | 40.0 | 92.8 |
| Tongue body color | 10.4 | 20.8 | 52.0 | 83.2 |
| Dryness and wetness of tongue body | 13.6 | 34.4 | 40.8 | 88.8 |
| Tooth marks on the edge of the tongue | 6.4 | 35.2 | 47.2 | 88.8 |
| Cracks on the surface of the tongue | 24.0 | 35.2 | 37.6 | 96.8 |
| Thickness of tongue coating | 7.2 | 21.6 | 56.0 | 84.8 |
| Color of tongue coating | 15.2 | 37.6 | 35.2 | 88.0 |
| Dryness and wetness of tongue coating | 4.8 | 19.2 | 50.4 | 74.4 |
| Mean value ± SD | 13.5 ± 8.1 | 28.8 ± 7.6 | 44.9 ± 7.5 | 87.2 ± 6.7 |
The match rate of the tongue diagnosis results of the five KMSs with respect to the tongue images of 125 patients was calculated for each of the eight items. The individual match rate shows the match rate of five out of five KMSs, four out of five KMSs, and three out of five KMSs. The cumulative match rate shows the sum of the individual match rates of three out of five KMSs. KMS, Kampo medicine specialists; SD, standard deviation.
Diagnosis result of tongue image determined by majority vote of three or more out of five KMSs.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tongue body size | Thin | 7 | 6.0 |
| Normal | 66 | 56.9 | |
| Swelling | 43 | 37.1 | |
| Total | 116 | 100 | |
| Tongue body color | Pale | 19 | 18.3 |
| Light red | 55 | 52.9 | |
| Red or deep red | 14 | 13.5 | |
| Purple | 16 | 15.4 | |
| Total | 104 | 100 | |
| Tongue body dryness and wetness | Normal | 65 | 58.6 |
| Dry | 19 | 17.1 | |
| Wet | 27 | 24.3 | |
| Total | 111 | 100 | |
| Tooth marks on the edge of the tongue | None | 74 | 66.7 |
| Mild | 29 | 26.1 | |
| Severe | 8 | 7.2 | |
| Total | 111 | 100 | |
| Cracks on the surface of the tongue | Normal | 55 | 45.5 |
| Mild | 54 | 44.6 | |
| Severe | 12 | 9.9 | |
| Total | 121 | 100 | |
| Thickness of tongue coating | None | 2 | 1.9 |
| Normal | 52 | 49.1 | |
| Moderate | 47 | 44.3 | |
| Moderate or higher with peeling | 4 | 3.8 | |
| Thick | 1 | 0.9 | |
| Total | 106 | 100 | |
| Color of tongue coating | White | 64 | 58.2 |
| Yellowish white to brown | 39 | 35.5 | |
| Yellow | 6 | 5.5 | |
| Dark brown to black | 0 | 0 | |
| Not applicable | 1 | 0.9 | |
| Total | 110 | 100 | |
| Dryness and wetness of tongue coating | Normal | 41 | 44.1 |
| Dry | 22 | 23.7 | |
| Wet | 30 | 32.3 | |
| Total | 93 | 100 |
The diagnosis results of the tongue image determined by a majority vote of three or more out of five KMSs were analyzed for each of the eight items. Tongue images that were not decided by majority vote were excluded. KMS, Kampo medicine specialists.
Figure 5Distribution of test scores for 112 medical students. The scores of the tongue diagnosis test of 112 MSs showed a normal distribution from the lowest score of 34 points to the highest score of 100 points. The average score was 60.9 ± 10.7 points.
Comparison of mean diagnostic match rate for 10 tongue images between 112 MSs and five KMSs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical students ( | 62.9 ± 15.2 | 65.1 ± 32.6 | 65.3 ± 16.1 | 68.9 ± 19.6 | 53.0 ± 22.9 | 59.4 ± 20.7 | 59.1 ± 24.6 | 54.5 ± 19.3 |
| Kampo specialists ( | 68.0 ± 23.4 | 60.0 ± 28.2 | 66.0 ± 23.2 | 60.0 ± 28.3 | 64.0 ± 32.4 | 51.0 ± 25.1 | 42.0 ± 25.7 | 50.0 ± 27.1 |
| 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.94 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.15 | 0.67 |
The mean diagnostic match rate for the 10 tongue images of MS and KMS is shown. The diagnostic match rate of MS was similar to that of KMSs. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the eight items. KMS, Kampo medicine specialists; MSs, medical students.