| Literature DB >> 35047725 |
Ahmad Yudianto1,2,3, Arofi Kurniawan1,4, Toetik Koesbardiati1,5, Achmad Faisol1, Fery Setiawan1,6, Abdul Hadi Furqoni3,6, Yessi Andriani Fauziah1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The non-invasive cff-DNA and siblings DNA methods are the latest breakthroughs in the forensic identification process. The use of cff-DNA and siblings DNA as non-invasive techniques in the forensic identification process has, hitherto, not been widely proven. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was an analytic observational study. The sample of this study consisted of peripheral blood of women in the second trimester of pregnancy and their two biological children. The kinship analysis was carried out through siblings' DNA and cff-DNA from the mothers through CODIS STR loci (CSF1PO, THO1, TPOX, and vWA).Entities:
Keywords: Siblings; cell-free fetal-DNA (cff-DNA); paternity test; pregnant women
Year: 2021 PMID: 35047725 PMCID: PMC8751391 DOI: 10.21010/Ajid.v16i1.2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr J Infect Dis ISSN: 2006-0165
Figure 1PCR visualization of locus CSF1PO [321bp – 357bp], M [marker 100bp], Child 1, Child 2, Mother, cff-DNA and K+ [K562].
Allele profile of CODIS-STRs of the samples
| CODIS STR LOCI | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| Family | Code | CSF1PO | THOI | TPOX | vWA | ||||
|
|
| 9 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
| 8 | 9 | 9 | 9.3 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 17 | |
|
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 16 |
|
| 8 | 9 | 9 | 9.3 | 8 | 10 | 15 | 16 | |
|
| 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
|
| 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 |
|
| 9 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
| 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
|
| 8 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 13 | 15 |
|
| 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 14 | 15 | |
|
| 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 13 | 14 | |
|
| 8 | 9 | 9 | 9.3 | 9 | 10 | 14 | 15 | |
|
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 |
|
| 8 | 9 | 9 | 9.3 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 17 | |
|
| 8 | 10 | 9 | 9.3 | 7 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 |
|
| 8 | 9 | 9 | 9.3 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 17 | |
|
| 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
| 8 | 9 | 9 | 9.3 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 17 | |
|
|
| 9 | 11 | 9 | 9.3 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9.3 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 11 | 9.3 | 9.3 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
| 8 | 9 | 9 | 9.3 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 17 | |
|
|
| 9 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 |
|
| 9 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 16 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
|
| 9 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 |
|
| 8 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
| 8 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
|
| 9 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 |
|
| 9 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
|
| 8 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 |
|
| 8 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 14 | 16 | |
|
| 8 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 |
|
| 8 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 14 | 17 | |
|
| 8 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 14 | 16 | |
|
| 9 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 16 | |
|
|
| 9 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 |
|
| 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
| 8 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
|
| 9 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 14 | 15 | |
|
| 9 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 |
|
| 9 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
| 7 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
|
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 |
|
| 6 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
| 6 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 |
|
| 8 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 15 | 17 | |
|
| 8 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
|
| 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 17 | |
Allele frequency in the samples of CODIS STR LOCI CSF1PO, THO1, TPOX, vWA [n: 160].
| Loci | Allele | Frequency | Loci | Allele | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 6 | 0.01875 |
| 7 | 0.02500 |
| 7 | 0.05000 | 8 | 0.10000 | ||
| 8 | 0.11875 | 9 | 0.61250 | ||
| 9 | 0.40625 | 9.3 | 0.07500 | ||
| 10 | 0.28125 | 10 | 0.18750 | ||
| 11 | 0.12500 | ||||
|
| 13 | 0.01250 |
| 7 | 0.01875 |
| 14 | 0.04375 | 8 | 0.47500 | ||
| 15 | 0.25625 | 9 | 0.46875 | ||
| 16 | 0.21875 | 10 | 0.03750 | ||
| 17 | 0.46875 |
Percentage of Sibship Index [SI] in the research
| Probability Ratio in Sibship Indices ( | Strength | Percentage in the research |
|---|---|---|
| < 1 | Weak | 10% |
| 1 - 10 | Moderate | 10% |
| 10 -100 | Strong | 20% |
| >100 | Very Strong | 55% |
Figure 2The allele sharing frequency in the samples of CODIS STR LOCI CSF1PO, THO1, TPOX, vWA [n : 160]