| Literature DB >> 35047601 |
De-Hua Wang1, Gui-Ping Zhang2, Zeng-Tao Wang1, Meng Wang1, Qin-Yi Han3, Fan-Xiao Liu4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thumb polydactyly is one of the most common congenital hand deformities, and the Bilhaut-Cloquet procedure or a modified one is often used. However, controversy remains over the rare instances in which both thumbs are not of similar length or far apart in distance. AIM: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of pedicle complex tissue flap transfer in the treatment of duplicated thumbs with unequal size.Entities:
Keywords: Deformity; Pedicle; Pedicle flap; Thumb duplication
Year: 2021 PMID: 35047601 PMCID: PMC8678868 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i35.10909
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Clin Cases ISSN: 2307-8960 Impact factor: 1.337
Figure 1Three types of the included patients. A: Preservation of thumb body involving palmar skin defects of fingernails; B: Preservation of thumb body involving different lengths of fingernails; C: Preservation of thumb body narrow lateral deviation of fingernails.
Figure 2Surgical procedure of transfer flap. A: The excision of finger and flap was designed and transferred locally; B: The excision of nail flap was designed and transferred locally; C: The excision of composite tissue flap was designed and transferred locally.
Figure 4The design of the first web space. A: The narrow of the first web space and the thin and small finger were preserved before operation; B: The finger body was reconstructed by flap transfer and the first web space was enlarged.
TATA criteria of postoperative evaluation
|
|
|
|
|
| Range of motion | > 70% | 50%-70% | < 50% |
| Instability | - | No instability | Instability |
| Deformity | < 10° | 10°-20° | > 20° |
| Cosmetic | Acceptable | Moderate deformity | Substantial deformity |
Compared with the opposite side.
Results over or equal to 5 were categorized as good, 3 and 4 as fair, and less than 3 as poor.
ALURRA criteria
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
| Alignment | < 10° | 10°-20° | > 20° |
| IP joint deviation (radial/ulnar) | |||
| MP joint deviation (radial/ulnar) | < 10° | 10°-20° | > 20° |
| Ulnar instability | |||
| IP joint | < 5° | 5°-15° | > 15° |
| MCP joint | < 20° | 20°-40° | > 40° |
| Radial instability | |||
| IP joint | < 5° | 5°-15° | > 15° |
| MCP joint | < 20° | 20°-40° | > 40° |
| Range of motion | |||
| IP joint | > 70° | 50°-70° | < 50° |
| MCP joint (% of opposite thumb) | > 70° | 50°-70° | < 50° |
| Aesthetical aspects | |||
| Circumference (% of opposite thumb) | 75-100 | 50-75 | < 50 |
| Length | 75-100 | 50-75 | < 50 |
| Nail size | 75-100 | 50-75 | < 50 |
| Nail deformities | None | Small ridge | Severe deformation |
A total score above 20 is categorized as good, between 13 and 20 as moderate, and less than 13 as poor. IP: Interphalangeal; MCP: Metacarpophalangeal.
Demographic data of the included patients
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
| 1 | M | Yes | 12 | 10 | III | 60 | < 5 | 0 | < 5 | 15 | < 5 | 10 | 45 | 90 | 90 | 92 | 85 | None | 22 | 65 | Yes | < 10° | Ac | 6 |
| 2 | F | No | 13 | 10.5 | IV | 20 | < 5 | 5 | < 5 | 10 | < 5 | 15 | 60 | 75 | 120 | 89 | 95 | None | 22 | 65 | Yes | < 10° | Ac | 6 |
| 3 | F | Yes | 11 | 9.5 | IV | 50 | < 5 | 5 | < 5 | 10 | 25 | 15 | 60 | 70 | 90 | 95 | 88 | None | 20 | 65 | No | < 10° | Ac | 5 |
| 4 | M | No | 12 | 10 | V | 34 | < 5 | 5 | < 5 | 12 | < 5 | 10 | 65 | 75 | 74 | 80 | 70 | None | 21 | 70 | Yes | < 10° | Ac | 6 |
| 5 | M | Yes | 10 | 9 | V | 22 | < 5 | 5 | < 5 | 10 | < 5 | 5 | 60 | 75 | 130 | 78 | 90 | Small ridge | 21 | 68 | Yes | < 10° | Md | 5 |
| 6 | F | Yes | 17 | 12 | IV | 46 | < 5 | 6 | < 5 | 10 | < 5 | 10 | 75 | 85 | 80 | 75 | 80 | None | 24 | 80 | Yes | < 10° | Ac | 7 |
| 7 | M | Yes | 13 | 11 | IV | 49 | < 5 | 4 | < 5 | 14 | < 5 | 8 | 80 | 78 | 85 | 80 | 74 | None | 23 | 80 | Yes | < 10° | Ac | 7 |
| 8 | M | No | 11 | 9 | V | 43 | < 5 | 0 | < 5 | 13 | < 5 | 10 | 55 | 77 | 86 | 82 | 97 | Small ridge | 21 | 65 | Yes | < 10° | Ac | 6 |
| 9 | M | Yes | 24 | 15 | V | 53 | < 5 | 0 | < 5 | 10 | < 5 | 5 | 75 | 85 | 118 | 85 | 94 | None | 23 | 80 | Yes | < 10° | Ac | 7 |
| 10 | F | No | 12 | 10.5 | VI | 56 | < 5 | 8 | < 5 | 10 | < 5 | 15 | 55 | 60 | 80 | 86 | 72 | None | 20 | 55 | Yes | < 10° | Ac | 6 |
| 11 | F | Yes | 11 | 9 | V | 52 | < 5 | 3 | < 5 | 12 | < 5 | 10 | 65 | 85 | 78 | 90 | 96 | Small ridge | 22 | 75 | Yes | < 10° | Md | 6 |
| 12 | M | No | 13 | 11 | VI | 46 | < 5 | 4 | < 5 | 15 | < 5 | 10 | 50 | 70 | 79 | 78 | 81 | None | 23 | 60 | Yes | < 10° | Ac | 6 |
| 13 | F | Yes | 14 | 11 | V | 28 | < 5 | 5 | < 5 | 15 | < 5 | 13 | 72 | 75 | 90 | 79 | 90 | Small ridge | 23 | 70 | Yes | < 10° | Md | 5 |
| 14 | M | Yes | 12 | 12 | VI | 27 | < 5 | 6 | < 5 | 15 | < 5 | 8 | 55 | 80 | 79 | 84 | 70 | None | 21 | 66 | Yes | < 10° | Ac | 6 |
| 15 | F | Yes | 10 | 10 | III | 44 | < 5 | 3 | < 5 | 10 | < 5 | 10 | 60 | 95 | 82 | 70 | 68 | None | 21 | 70 | Yes | < 10° | Ac | 6 |
| mean | 13 | 10.6 | 42 | 3.9 | 12.1 | 10.3 | 62.1 | 78.3 | 90.7 | 82.9 | 83.3 | 21.8 | 68.9 | 6 | ||||||||||
| SD | 3.4 | 1.5 | 12.3 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 9.6 | 8.5 | 16.8 | 6.5 | 10.1 | 1.2 | 7.1 | 0.6 | ||||||||||
Shows the % of opposite thumb.
ROM: Range and motion; MCPJ: Metacarpophalangeal joints; IPJ: Interphalangeal joints; Ac: Acceptable; Md: Moderate deformity.
Figure 3Operation process. A: Longitudinal ridge after nail fusion; B: The nail flap was pushed far away to maintain the length of the finger.