Literature DB >> 35047161

Transcriptome profiling reveals that foliar water uptake occurs with C3 and crassulacean acid metabolism facultative photosynthesis in Tamarix ramosissima under extreme drought.

Xia Yan1,2, Yan Chang1, Weijia Zhao1, Chaoju Qian3, Xiaoyue Yin3,4, Xingke Fan3,4, Xinyu Zhu1, Xiangqiang Zhao1, Xiao-Fei Ma1,3.   

Abstract

Tamarix ramosissima is a typical desert plant species that is widely distributed in the desert areas of Northwest China. It plays a significant role in sand fixation and soil water conservation. In particular, how it uses water to survive in the desert plays an important role in plant growth and ecosystem function. Previous studies have revealed that T. ramosissima can alleviate drought by absorbing water from its leaves under extreme drought conditions. To date, there is no clear molecular regulation mechanism to explain foliar water uptake (FWU). In the present study, we correlated diurnal meteorological data, sap flow and photosynthetic parameters to determine the physical and biological characteristics of FWU. Our results suggested that the lesser the groundwater, the easier it is for T. ramosissima to absorb water via the leaves. Gene ontology annotation and Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis of the transcriptome profile of plants subjected to high humidity suggested that FWU was highly correlated to carbohydrate metabolism, energy transfer, pyruvate metabolism, hormone signal transduction and plant-pathogen interaction. Interestingly, as a C3 plant, genes such as PEPC, PPDK, MDH and RuBP, which are involved in crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) photosynthesis, were highly upregulated and accompanied by FWU. Therefore, we proposed that in the case of sufficient water supply, C3 photosynthesis is used in T. ramosissima, whereas in cases of extreme drought, starch is degraded to provide CO2 for CAM photosynthesis to make full use of the water obtained via FWU and the water that was transported or stored to assimilating branches and stems. This study may provide not only an important theoretical foundation for FWU and conversion from C3 plants to CAM plants but also for engineering improved photosynthesis in high-yield drought-tolerant plants and mitigation of climate change-driven drought.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon assimilation; Tamarix ramosissima; foliar water uptake; gene expression; transcriptome profiling

Year:  2022        PMID: 35047161      PMCID: PMC8763614          DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plab060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AoB Plants            Impact factor:   3.276


Introduction

Bidirectional water transport models have gradually been accepted in plants (Goldsmith ), instead of the traditional soil–plant–atmosphere continuum (SPAC; Philip 1966) model. Under this new model, water could be absorbed from leaves (foliar water uptake, FWU) in the form of dew (Liu ), fog (Wang ), clouds (Eller ), light rain showers that only wet the leaves and high humidity (Gong ). Foliar water uptake is assumed to be a significant source contributing to the water balance of terrestrial ecosystems as well as water from roots in the form of precipitation occurring as rain or snow (Limm ). With people’s understanding of aggregation of desertification under global climate change, it is becoming increasingly important to maintain the stability of fragile ecosystems (Berry ). Many studies have shown that the amount of water from foliar absorption increases with the aggregation of drought. In the coastal prairie ecosystem of California, 28–66 % of the water intake relies on FWU (Corbin ). This percentage increases to 34 % in the redwood tree ecosystem (Dawson and Goldsmith 2018) and reaches 74 % in the Negev desert, Israel (Kidron 2010). To date, at least 233 species spanning 77 plant families and six major biomes have demonstrated some capacity for FWU (Binks ). Previous studies have extensively focused on the understanding of when, where and how FWU occurs (Eller ). Most studies support that FWU occurs across stomata (Boanares ). However, FWU occurs during periods when stomata are mostly closed (i.e. at night). Therefore, it is considered that specialized structures such as cuticles, trichomes, hydathodes or scales (Berry ; Schreel ) are also important for the water to enter the plant to support FWU. The water from FWU is routinely incorporated into plant vascular networks, which is detailed in SPAC: (i) entry into the mesophyll and use for photosynthesis or capacitance (Eller ), and incorporation into photosynthetic pathways (Lehmann ); (ii) entry into the vasculature (Berry ), as well as transportation to the phloem and possibly the xylem (Yan ); (iii) transpiration back into the atmosphere. However, there is no clear explanation for species-level variation in FWU, and the molecular regulation network of FWU is seldom addressed. Across C3 to C4 plants, the circadian clock regulates the exchange of water vapour and carbon dioxide between leaves and the atmosphere through stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. On the other hand, night-time starch mobilization could also be regulated by the circadian clock to maintain a steady supply of carbon until dawn (Smith and Zeeman 2020). Therefore, there must be some molecular regulation between starch synthesis and water usage. In fact, the C3 and C4 or the C3 and crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) pathways coexist in many plants (Svensson ). Overexpression of essential C4-photosynthetic genes such as PEPC, MaeB and NADP-ME in C3 plants such as Arabidopsis, tobacco, rice, wheat and potato not only improved photosynthesis but also improved the tolerance to various environmental stresses, especially drought (Yadav ). It is widely known that CAM photosynthesis can coexist in leaves that exhibit any of the other types of photosynthesis known in terrestrial plants (i.e. C3, C4 and C3–C4 intermediate) (Winter ), and C3 and CAM metabolism can even both exist within one leaf (Yuan ). Thus, it is reasonable to infer that desert plants exhibit reduced photorespiration and improved water use efficiency with C3 and CAM intermediate photosynthesis (Monson 1989). In desert plants, genes that have a higher expression at night and a lower expression in the daytime may be important for efficient carbon fixation and water storage (Zhang ). For example, some aquaporins (which would adjust the flow of water in mesophyll cells, a bundle sheath and phloem or possibly the xylem; Mayr ), were differently expressed to regulate the transport of moisture in the air from assimilating branches to the secondary branches and the trunk stems but not to the taproot xylem or the soil (Yan ). All those genes should be linked to circadian clock regulation, stomatal movement, sugar metabolism and transport pathways (Yang ). Proteins involved in osmotic adjustment, ion transport, energy metabolism and light response may play important roles in the C3 to CAM transition (Guan ). These processes provided important insights into the CAM transition and may facilitate plant growth in arid environments (Heyduk ) and help enhance crop resilience for global food security (Guan ). Tamarix ramosissima is a desert forest tree species that is widely distributed in drought-stricken areas that have an annual precipitation of <200 mm in North China. Based on the δ 13C value, which is often used to distinguish carbon assimilation or water use strategy, T. ramosissima is traditionally regarded as a C3 plant (Zhang ). However, variations in the δ 13C value caused by the influence of temperature, wind speed, precipitation and relative humidity (RH) (Zhang ) also reflect conversion of water use strategy. In addition, a complete set of core genes of C4 carbon fixation were found not only in the two Tamarix species, namely, T. ramosissima and Tamarix chinensis (Swaminathan ), but also in Reaumuria soongorica, which belongs to the same family as Tamarix spp. according to transcriptome profiling data (Shi ). The presence of these genes enables the activation of the CAM pathway at night for C3 plants, but the molecular process is not yet validated. In C3 plants, if leaf-wetting occurs during the night-time, photosynthesis will not be affected to the same extent as if the wetting events were to occur during the day. Compared with C3 plants if leaf-wetting was to occur at night in CAM plants, we would expect productivity to increase. These contrasting cases highlight the potential trade-off between carbon fixation and increased water availability, in which we might expect a certain optimum in terms of cumulative FWU and the timing of wetting events that may impact the types of traits that influence the ability and extent of FWU (Dawson and Goldsmith 2018). Thus, we proposed that CAM photosynthesis is activated in Tamaricaceae plants to improve water usage efficiency under extreme drought environments by moving the stomatal opening time and primary CO2 uptake and fixation events to night-time. To test this hypothesis, RNA-seq transcriptome profiling was performed to identify the differently expressed genes in plants under conditions of high moisture and natural fields at night. The differential gene expression will reveal not only the mechanism of FWU but also the mechanism underlying the shift in carbon fixation under drought. This study represents a particularly exciting frontier with both basic and applied implications for plant–water relations.

Materials and Methods

Diurnal variation of gas exchange collection

In 2003, 2-year-old T. ramosissima seedlings were transplanted in a uniform matrix in 2-m columns and 4-m rows in an ecological station located in Jingtai County (104.07E, 37.15N) at the southern edge of the Tenger Desert. None of the plants were watered after transplantation. The transpiration rate (E), vapour pressure deficit (VPD), leaf stomatal conductance (GH2O), net photosynthetic rate (A), intercellular CO2 concentration (ci), ambient CO2 concentration (ca), water out of the leaf chamber (wo) and water into the leaf chamber (wi) were measured in the field using a Walz GFS-3000 portable photosynthesis system (Heinz Walz GmbH, http://www.walz.com/). One assimilative branch was measured using a leaf area-specific adapter. The average value of the photosynthetic parameters from three assimilating branches was used for further analysis. The air temperature in the leaf chamber of the GFS-3000 was maintained at a constant 25 °C, the simulation light intensity was set at 1200 μmol·m−2·s−1 and the air flow was maintained at 750 mol·s−1. The CO2 concentrations and humidity were dependent on external conditions. Each sample was measured three times. Before data collection, water present on the surface of the leaves was wiped off with a tissue. Diurnal data were collected across a 24-h cycle for 2 days (18th and 28th July) with an average to go best curve, and individual points were eliminated according to variance.

High air humidity exposure experiment

In the high moisture exposure experiment, it was hard to find plants in the natural field similar to those in the controlled chambers. Soil elements and root bifurcation could also complicate water conduction analysis in adult plants in field experiments. To eliminate these factors and to achieve consistency, we attempted to find one tree roughly divided into two main branches separating from the ground, with a crown width of 2.95 ± 0.05 m in the west–east direction and 3.25 ± 0.05 m in the north–south direction. One branch was exposed to natural conditions and served as the control, and the other branch that was exposed to a controlled humidity chamber was the treatment group. The humidity-controlled chamber occupied approximately 3 × 1.8 × 1.8 m3 with plexiglass sheets. Two ultrasonic humidifiers (Yadu Electronics, Beijing, China) were used to increase atmospheric moisture to 85 % in the chamber. Three thermohygrographs (MicroLog PRO-EC750; Fourier Systems Ltd, Israel) monitored the air temperature and RH every 5 min, and the values were calibrated with an automatic weather station (AWS TypeWS01; Delta-T Corp., UK).

Gas exchange measurement

The E, VPD, GH2O, A, ci, ca, wo and wi were measured in the field using a Walz portable photosynthesis system (GFS-3000; Heinz Walz GmbH, http://www.walz.com/). One fully expanded leaf per individual was measured using the leaf area-specific adapter. The air temperature was kept constant (25 °C) in the leaf chamber of the GFS-3000, the simulation light intensity was set at 1200 μmol·m−2·s−1 and the air flow was maintained at 750 mol·s−1. The CO2 concentrations and humidity were dependent on external conditions. Each sample was measured three times. Before data collection, water present on the leaf surface was wiped off with tissues.

Sap flow velocity

Heat-pulse sap flow sensors (SF100; Greenspan Technology, Coffs Harbour, Australia) on sap flow gauges (Flow32; Dynamax Inc., Houston, TX, USA) were used to continuously monitor sap velocity using the energy balance principle. Heat-pulse velocity was then converted into sap flow velocity using the algorithms developed by Edwards and Warwick (1984). All the calculations were integrated using the SAPCAL software. In the diurnal experiments, two vigorous branches, one each inside and outside the chamber, were separately implemented with three gauges set 20 cm apart from each other to obtain the integral sap flow velocity despite the diameter effect. Positive values for sap flow velocity were regarded as water storage depletion, while negative values were regarded as water replenishment or storage. Here, we used negative sap flow velocity as an indicator of the occurrence of FWU.

Collection of leaves for gene expression studies

To identify the differently expressed genes between the humidity exposure and natural field conditions at 21:30 on 28 July 2013, a minimum of 5 g of fresh leaves were collected from at least three branches inside the plexiglass chamber (high humidity stress, HHS) and from leaves growing under natural conditions (Control, CT). All the collected leaves were placed into liquid nitrogen immediately after being collected from the tree, and the samples were transported to the laboratory and stored at −80 °C. Fresh leaf samples obtained from three branches of the same plants were used as three biological replicates. Total RNA from the three biological replicates was mixed to construct a cDNA library.

RNA extraction, library preparation and RNA-seq

Total RNA was extracted using the EZNA® Plant RNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA) with 2 % polyvinylpoly pyrrolidone. The remaining DNA was removed with RNase-free DNase (Omega Bio-Tek) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA concentration and purity were assessed by optical density (OD) 260/280 nm ratios as determined using NanoDrop1000 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). All the samples passed quality control analyses with OD 260/280 ratios ranging from 1.9 to 2.2 and OD 260/230 ratios ≤ 2.0. RNA integrity was verified by 1.5 % agarose gel electrophoresis with two distinct 28S/18S ribosomal RNA bands demonstrating good RNA integrity. Total RNA (minimum 6 µg) was used to construct the DGE libraries using an Illumina gene expression kit (Illumina, Inc.; San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol (version 2.1B). Poly(A) mRNA was enriched by magnetic oligo(dT) beads, and then interrupted into 200–700 nt (nucleotide) fragments. Using these short fragments as templates, the first cDNA strand was synthesized by random hexamer primers, followed by second-strand cDNA synthesis using DNA polymerase I (New England BioLabs) and RNase H (Invitrogen). The short DNA fragments were purified with a QiaQuick polymerase chain reaction (PCR) extraction kit (QIAGEN Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) for end-repairing and A-tailing. Then, the DNA fragments were ligated to sequencing adaptors, and DNA fragments of the required length were then purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and gathered by PCR amplification. Finally, a paired-end library was sequenced in an Illumina HiSeq™ 2000 sequencer with an average read length of 100 bp. Raw sequences were transformed into clean tags by filtering out adapter-only tags and low-quality tags. All the clean tags were then assembled into transcripts by Trinity package with default settings.

Sequence annotation and identification of DEG pathways

The final assembled transcripts (≥100 bp) were submitted for homology and annotation searches using the Blast2GO software v2.4.4 (Conesa ). All sequences were annotated by aligning with public protein and nucleotide databases. Four annotation databases, namely, the National Center for Biotechnology Information non-redundant protein database (Nr), the SwissProt protein database (SwissProt), the Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins category (COGs) and the Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database were used to validate and annotate the assembled genes with an E-value cut-off of 1e-5. Based on the alignment results, further annotation analysis was performed using gene ontology (GO) terms describing biological processes, molecular functions and cellular components using the Blast2GO software. The number of reads per kilobase per million mapped reads (RPKM) of each unigene was normalized by the ERANGE 3.1 software to determine the unigene expression profiles (Mortazavi ). The false discovery rate (FDR) ranking was used to adjust the P-value in multiple tests and analyses (Qin ). Transcripts with a difference of at least 2-fold (absolute values of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1 with FDR < 0.001) were regarded to have significant differential expression.

Results

Validation of FWU by sap flow velocity in T. ramosissima

Obviously, there was reverse sap flow on both days. Slightly negative sap flow occurred at about 20:30 and reached a minimum at about 22:00, then slowly increased. The pattern and amount of sap flow velocity were similar to those on 28th during the daytime. The sap flow velocity was higher at night on the 18th than on the 28th. After analysing the meteorological factors, we found that the time lag shift and small sap flow velocity were attributed to the slight rain during the daytime on the 18th to maximize photosynthesis, which suggested that the drier environment resulted in earlier absorption on 28th, and ampler moisture supply resulted in greater negative sap flow velocity. After humidity exposure (<85 % humidity), the sap flow velocity tended to have a lower negative value. The pattern of sap flow velocity under humidity exposure was quite different from that under the control conditions. With the increase of humidity by humidifier, the amount of sap flow velocity sharply decreased to a minimum at 21:48 on 28th, which might be due to the high air humidity caused by the humidifier.

Diurnal characteristics of photosynthetic variation under the humidity condition

Under natural field conditions, the photosynthetic rate was bimodal with a midday depression, and other photosynthetic parameters were consistent with the characteristics of C3 plants (Fig. 2). Under natural field conditions, there was a short-term lag in plant adaptation when environmental factors changed from one state to another. Although the environmental factors changed a lot in a day, their impact on plants was gentle or stable in a short period of time. However, when the saturated water vapour difference reached a certain degree, the influence on the plants’ stomata was large enough to result in significant changes in photosynthetic parameters. The E, A, VPD and ca were lower in the daytime, whereas GH2O, wo and ci were higher at night under natural field conditions than those in the presence of high humidity.
Figure 2.

Comparison of diurnal photosynthetic variation between natural field and humidity conditions. E, transpiration rate; VPD, vapour pressure deficit; GH2O, leaf stomatal conductance; A, net photosynthetic rate; ci, intercellular CO2 concentration; ca, ambient CO2 concentration; wo, water out leaf chamber (ppm); wi, water into leaf chamber.

Diurnal variation of sap flow velocity on 18th and 28th July. The yellow and red lines represent sap flow velocity (g·cm−2·h−1) under natural conditions on 18th and 28th July, respectively. The blue and grey lines represent sap flow velocity under the wetting condition with humidifier on 18th and 28th July, respectively. Comparison of diurnal photosynthetic variation between natural field and humidity conditions. E, transpiration rate; VPD, vapour pressure deficit; GH2O, leaf stomatal conductance; A, net photosynthetic rate; ci, intercellular CO2 concentration; ca, ambient CO2 concentration; wo, water out leaf chamber (ppm); wi, water into leaf chamber. To determine the inconsistencies in the GH2O, wo and wi values between day and night, we performed the humidification experiment. From Table 1, the photosynthetic parameters, except VPD and ci, between the humidity and natural field conditions were highly correlated until the moisture content in the air reached 85 %. That is to say, the effects of water absorption on photosynthesis and respiration were very small at night. On the contrary, the VPD, A and wo values were highly correlated when the humidity exceeded 85 %. This change in the correlation between parameters reveals a fundamental shift in the pathway of carbon assimilation, while the respiration pattern did not change much apart from quantitative variations.
Table 1.

Relationship of photosynthetic parameters under controlled humidity and natural field conditions.

ParametersLower than 85 %Higher than 85 %
PCC* P-valuePCC* P-value
E 0.980.020.390.03
VPD0.750.060.710.01
GH2O0.990.040.350.02
A 0.890.010.640.04
c i 0.950.080.030.01
c a 0.980.03−0.210.01
w o 0.990.020.630.00
w i 0.800.050.480.49

*PCC, Pearson correlation coefficient.

Relationship of photosynthetic parameters under controlled humidity and natural field conditions. *PCC, Pearson correlation coefficient. As shown in Table 2, there was a significant decrease in four parameters (namely, E, VPD, GH2O and wi with variations of 63 %, 11 %, 57 % and 9 %, respectively), suggesting that there was a low transpiration rate under high humidity conditions at night. The increased percentages of A and ci (40 % and 17 %, respectively) indicated that carbon accumulation occurred under conditions of high humidity at night. The changes in ca and wa were very small (0.04 % and 0.14 %, respectively), suggesting that the change in gas had very low relevance with the extracellular environment. The positive ci, A and negative GH2O levels suggested that stomata were not the sole channels by which water entered leaves. Thus, we believe that the specialized structures, such as salt glands or cuticles, could play a significant role in water movement across the leaf surface in T. ramosissima. The results suggested that plants absorbed the water on the leaf surface on the one hand, and reduced transpiration to keep the water absorbed and increased photosynthesis to fix the water under conditions of high air humidity on the other hand.
Table 2.

Comparison of photosynthesis parameters between control and wet leaves.

ParametersControl (20 %)Wet (85 %)Variation
E 0.050.02−63 %
VPD41.4636.73−11 %
GH2O1.140.49−57 %
A −0.29−0.1840 %
c i 747.63872.5117 %
c a 340.28340.400 %
w a 9012.409000.010 %
w i 49 267.7444 744.40−9 %
Comparison of photosynthesis parameters between control and wet leaves.

Global transcriptome profiling for genes response to moisture

To obtain a global view of differential gene expression at the transcriptional level in T. ramosissima under conditions of high humidity at night, a pooled cDNA library of leaves was constructed under both natural field (CT) and high humidity conditions (HHS). A data set with a total size of 4.8 gigabase was generated from 120 585 836 clean paired-end reads with a mean length of 108 bp and a Q20 of over 99 % (Table 3). The number of unique mapped transcripts was 6 713 731 (25.47 %) and 6 987 269 (25.88 %) in RNA12 (CT) and RNA13 (HHS) samples, respectively. Combined with multi-mapped transcripts, the total mapped transcripts accounted for 91.87 % and 91.59 % in CT and HHS samples, respectively. A total of 72 035 unigenes were annotated, of which 29 683 (41.21 %) were from the Nr database, 8818 (12.24 %) were from the KEGG database, 19 665 (27.30 %) were from the SwissProt database and 18 863 (26.18 %) were from the COGs (see). Despite the short length of the transcripts, there were still 42 211 (58.60 %) unigenes unannotated in T. ramosissima. Table 3 lists the details of sequencing data of the DEG. The sequence output and quality were adequate for further analysis.
Table 3.

Statistics of DEG sequencing.

SampleCTHHS
Filtered bases (%)5 320 688 832 (88.39 %)5 449 978 036 (88.48 %)
Filtered reads (%)52 725 714 (88.46 %)54 001 096 (88.55 %)
Q2099.44 %99.45 %
Total reads26 362 85727 000 548
Unmapped reads2 144 288 (8.13 %)2 270 826 (8.41 %)
Uniq mapped6 713 731 (25.47 %)6 987 269 (25.88 %)
Multi-mapped17 504 838 (66.40 %)17 742 453 (65.71 %)
Total mapped91.87 %91.59 %
Statistics of DEG sequencing.

Differently expressed unigenes in conditions of high humidity

To compare differential expression patterns in conditions of high humidity, we normalized the distribution of transcripts for gene expression level in each library to first make an effective library size of log2 fold-change ≥ 1 by edgeR (Empirical analysis of Digital Gene Expression in R). Of the 73 025 unigenes, most of the unigenes displayed no differential expression between the HHS and CT groups (62 102, 86.21 %). There were 28 231 unigenes with more than 2-fold difference in abundance (either higher or lower) which was controlled with by the Fisher’s exact test. This number decreased to 2951 with FDR ranking (details shown in Fig. 3). Of all the 243 differential expressed genes (DEGs), 161 were upregulated and 82 were downregulated in HHS samples.
Figure 3.

Comparison of gene expression profiles between the HHS and CT samples. Absolute values of log2 fold-change ≥ 1 and FDR ≤ 0.05 were used to judge the significance of DEGs. The red dots represent upregulated unigenes, and the green dots represent downregulated unigenes. The black portion represents unigenes that were not differentially expressed.

Comparison of gene expression profiles between the HHS and CT samples. Absolute values of log2 fold-change ≥ 1 and FDR ≤ 0.05 were used to judge the significance of DEGs. The red dots represent upregulated unigenes, and the green dots represent downregulated unigenes. The black portion represents unigenes that were not differentially expressed.

GO and COG classification

Gene ontology assignments were used to classify the functions of DEGs with at least 2-fold changes in expression (Fig. 4). The DEGs were then classified into unique GO functional terms of biological process (54 unigenes, 22.22 %), cellular component (52 unigenes, 21.40 %) and molecular function (49 unigenes, 20.16 %). In terms of biological process, most of the unigenes were clustered into ‘metabolic process’ (34 unigenes, 14 %), ‘cellular process’ (31, 12.76 %), ‘single-organism process’ (25, 10.29 %) and ‘response to stimulus’ (18, 7.41 %). In terms of cellular components, most of the unigenes were clustered into cells (33, 13.58 %), (32, 13.17 %), membranes (29, 11.93 %) and organelles (26, 10.70 %). In terms of molecular function, 49 of 243 genes were clustered into ‘catalytic activity’ (33, 13.58 %), ‘binding’ (29, 11.93 %) and ‘oxidoreductase activity’ (12, 4.94 %).
Figure 4.

Gene ontology categories of the identified DEGs.

Gene ontology categories of the identified DEGs. Table 4 lists the DEGs with significant GO annotations. Among the genes associated with carbohydrate metabolism, Unigene025103 (acidic endochitinase-like), Unigene034393 (chitotriosidase-1-like), Unigene035483 (chitinase 3), Unigene 070115 (basic endochitinase CHB4-like) and Unigene031580 (6-phosphofructokinase 3-like) were upregulated to degrade starch and promote the glycolytic process, which ultimately facilitates pyruvate production and dehydrogenation to acetyl-CoA. Downregulation of Unigene027016 (probable pectate lyase 5) decreased the cellulose, hemicellulose and soluble sugar contents, which can provide enough activated acetic acid and is present in the form of acetyl-CoA in Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle (TCA) circulation, accompanied with energy transfer. For genes involved in energy transfer, the hydrogen carriers (NADH + H and FADH2) generated in the circulation will release more energy in the cell respiratory chain. In our study, most of the DEGs involved in energy transfer were upregulated following exposure to high humidity, including Unigene001618 (cytochrome c oxidase subunit I), Unigene009205 (apocytochrome b), Unigene011021 (cytochrome c oxidase subunit I), Unigene038856 (ATP synthase subunit alpha), Unigene058214 (ATPase subunit 9), Unigene058513 (cytochrome c oxidase subunit 3), Unigene061258 (cytochrome c oxidase subunit 3), Unigene063584 (NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4), Unigene063908 (cytochrome c oxidase subunit II), Unigene069302 (ATPase F0 subunit 6) and Unigene070977 (ATP synthase subunit beta). On the other hand, Unigene038863 (ATP synthase subunit alpha) was downregulated to promote respiration and to increase the intercellular CO2 concentration. In other words, the plants prioritized survival over growth in the drought environment. For pyruvate metabolism, the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (Unigene032200) catalyses the overall conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA and CO; malate dehydrogenase (MDH; Unigene024210) catalyses a reversible NAD-dependent dehydrogenase reaction involved in central metabolism and redox homeostasis between organelle compartments, and plays an essential role in autotrophic metabolism in photosynthetic tissues. In terms of transmission of genetic information, apurinic endonuclease-redox protein and ribosomal protein S10 were downregulated to repress DNA damage repair. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein 1-like (Unigene016965) and 6-phosphofructokinase 3-like (Unigene031580) might integrate different signalling pathways to direct RNA transcription and protein translation, folding, sorting and degradation, and most importantly, the phosphatidylinositol signalling system (Unigene000853, Unigene000854 and Unigene011919) and plant hormone signal transduction (Unigene013040, Unigene017342, Unigene031201 and Unigene058078).
Table 4.

DEGs with significant GO annotations.

Unigeneslog2(fold-change)Annotation
Carbohydrate metabolism
 Unigene0251032.63Acidic endochitinase-like
 Unigene0343934.77Chitotriosidase-1-like
 Unigene0354832.56Chitinase 3
 Unigene07011513.00Basic endochitinase CHB4-like
 Unigene0315802.846-Phosphofructokinase 3-like
 Unigene027016−3.64Pectate lyase 5
Genes involved in energy transfer
 Unigene0016183.96Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I
 Unigene0639083.73Cytochrome c oxidase subunit II
 Unigene06125811.68Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 3
 Unigene0110213.61Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I
 Unigene0092053.51Apocytochrome b
 Unigene038856−6.79ATP synthase subunit alpha
 Unigene06930213.82ATPase F0 subunit 6
 Unigene0582143.57ATPase subunit 9
 Unigene0709774.84ATP synthase subunit beta
 Unigene06358412.83NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4
Pyruvate metabolism
 Unigene012360−2.08Pyruvate kinase
 Unigene014495−2.11Acetyl-CoA carboxylase carboxyltransferase subunit alpha
 Unigene0198491.49Acetyl-CoA carboxylase carboxyltransferase beta subunit
 Unigene0374642.15Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member I1
 Unigene0242101.10Malate dehydrogenase
 Unigene028831−9.25Acetyl-CoA synthetase, chloroplastic/glyoxysomal-like
 Unigene0322001.49dihydrolipoyllysine-residue acetyltransferase component 2 of pyruvate dehydrogenase
 Unigene040553−1.21Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase 2
Phosphatidylinositol signalling and plant hormone signal transduction
 Unigene00085311.76Calmodulin
 Unigene0008543.75Calmodulin
 Unigene01191912.06Calmodulin
 Unigene0130403.16Auxin-induced protein X15
 Unigene0173423.38Pathogenesis-related leaf protein 6-like
 Unigene0580782.55Basic helix-loop-helix family protein
Reference genes
 Unigene054230−2.82Apurinic endonuclease-redox protein
 Unigene0169655.38Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein 1-like
 Unigene052585−5.17Ribosomal protein S10
 Unigene0694464.87Ubiquitin
 Unigene0315802.846-Phosphofructokinase 3-like
 Unigene0475444.31Elongation factor-1 alpha, partial
 Unigene0259273.02Heat shock protein 70
Plant–pathogen interaction
 Unigene01191912.06Calmodulin
 Unigene0173423.38Pathogenesis-related leaf protein 6-like
 Unigene021895−10.61Cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel 5 isoform X2
 Unigene0307773.53Calcium-binding protein CML44
DEGs with significant GO annotations. Genes involved in both pathways were upregulated, which increased the adaptation of plants to an extreme drought environment. Interestingly, some of the genes that are often considered to be less affected by environmental factors were found to be highly upregulated by humidity stress, such as ubiquitin (Unigene069446, 4.87), elongation factor-1 alpha (Unigene047544, 4.31) and HSP70 (Unigene025927, 3.02), suggesting that these processes were universal during FWU. For plant–pathogen interaction, the gene encoding pathogenesis-related leaf protein (Unigene017342) was upregulated to affect leaf physiology and potentially water movement. All those signalling were highly correlated with phosphatidylinositol signalling and plant hormone signal transduction (Unigene000853, Unigene000854, Unigene011919, Unigene013040 and Unigene058078), and facilitate downstream transmission of the cascade signal. To further gain insights into the biological functions of and interactions among our identified unigenes, a pathway analysis based on the roles in biochemical pathways was performed in the KEGG pathway database. Of all the 27 enriched KEGG pathways, the following eight had the most significant enrichments, including ‘oxidative phosphorylation’, ‘alpha-linolenic acid metabolism’, ‘monoterpenoid biosynthesis’, ‘phosphatidylinositol signalling system’, ‘amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism’ and ‘plant–pathogen interaction’. Figure 5 presents a list of the top 20 enriched KEGG pathways and their significance.
Figure 5.

The most significantly enriched KEGG pathways. The size of the circle represents gene numbers in each pathway, the colour from red to green represents the P-value for each pathway.

The most significantly enriched KEGG pathways. The size of the circle represents gene numbers in each pathway, the colour from red to green represents the P-value for each pathway. To investigate diurnal variations and the differential expression of the key genes of the three carbon assimilation types after growing the plants in a humidified atmosphere, diurnal expression patterns of four typical genes were further analysed based on the transcriptome data (unpublished data). As shown in Fig. 6, a decrease in the PEPC occurred in the morning and PEPC was maintained at a low level until 21:00, suggesting that PEPC was repressed in the daytime and activated at night (Fig. 6A). Consistent with this finding, MDH remained low in the daytime and increased sharply at night (Fig. 6B). The expression levels of PEPC and MDH were highly correlated with that of the AirRh (PCC was 0.66 and 0.63, respectively, and the P-values in both cases were <0.01). MaeB displayed a slight variation except at noon (Fig. 6C), which may have contributed to the photosynthetic noon break. Rubisco peaked in the morning, and remained high during both the day and night (Fig. 6D). Except for MaeB, all the other three genes were upregulated by the humidity over 85 % (Fig. 7).
Figure 6.

Diurnal expression of key genes involved in carbon assimilation. A, Diurnal expression of PEPC; B, Diurnal expression of MDH; C, Diurnal expression of PPDK; D, Diurnal expression of Rubisco.

Figure 7.

Expression of key genes involved in carbon assimilation under conditions of high humidity.

Diurnal expression of key genes involved in carbon assimilation. A, Diurnal expression of PEPC; B, Diurnal expression of MDH; C, Diurnal expression of PPDK; D, Diurnal expression of Rubisco. Expression of key genes involved in carbon assimilation under conditions of high humidity.

Discussion

Physical and biological characteristics of FWU

Many studies have shown that the amount of water from foliar absorption increases with the aggregation of drought. In the coastal prairie ecosystem of California, 28–66 % of the water intake relies on FWU (Corbin ). This percentage increases to 34 % in the redwood tree ecosystem (Dawson and Goldsmith 2018) and reaches 74 % in the Negev desert, Israel (Kidron 2010). According to these observations, drought seems to be a prerequisite for leaf water absorption. To clarify the adaptation mechanism of FWU in T. ramosissima, we used sap flow, diurnal meteorological data and photosynthesis parameters to determine the physical and biological characteristics of FWU. Foliar water uptake has often been observed when the air is saturated with moisture and liquid water forms on leaves. The sap flow pattern of the control group at night on 18 July was similar to that on 28 July, then gradually decreased with the passage of time due to increase in the air humidity (Fig. 1), whereas the sap flow plummeted to an extremely low value at approximately 21:30 on 28 July. Combined with the VPD (from 41.46 to 36.73) and the wi value (from 49 267 to 44 744), the phenomenon may contribute to the resistance of a phase change from vapour to liquid. Due to the magnitude of the gauges of the device, there is also evidence of FWU of water vapour when the air has not been condensed into liquid water but there have been no studies that have quantified these fluxes experimentally (Berry ). However, theoretically, if the conductance of the leaf surface (cuticle or stomata) does not vary, more negative leaf water potentials should lead to higher FWU fluxes (Limm ; Goldsmith ). Vapour uptake would be driven by vapour pressure and require the intercellular air space immediately within the leaf cuticle to have a lower vapour pressure than that of air. This routinely occurs in leaf air spaces due to negative water potentials and the Kelvin effect reducing the vapour pressure (Cernusak ). Thus, any movement from intercellular air space into cells would require liquid water, and the resistance of a phase change from vapour to liquid should be regarded. Thus, the FWU is driven by the vapour concentration gradient instead of water potentials, which are impacted by many factors, including RH and leaf temperature. For instance, at 25 °C, the water potential of the air drops below −4 MPa at 0.036 kPa VPD (97 % RH) (Berry ). This may result in the shift of CO2 assimilation, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate (Berry ) with significant variations in pore size and stomatal density in conditions with humidity of up to 85 % (Kim ). Reliable tracking equipment should be developed to monitor the movement of individual water molecules from FWU, which would open doors to explaining many phenomena in the process of FWU.
Figure 1.

Diurnal variation of sap flow velocity on 18th and 28th July. The yellow and red lines represent sap flow velocity (g·cm−2·h−1) under natural conditions on 18th and 28th July, respectively. The blue and grey lines represent sap flow velocity under the wetting condition with humidifier on 18th and 28th July, respectively.

Balance between energy demand and respiration after FWU

Genes with increased expression at night and decreased expression during the day may be important for water storage and carbon fixation (Zhang et al. 2019). To have a global view of responsive genes in the process of FWU in T. ramosissima, we constructed a cDNA library of leaves obtained from a humidification experiment. A total of 161 unigenes were upregulated to increase FWU and carbon fixation, and 82 were downregulated to decrease the water and carbon loss (Fig. 3). The great number of genes involved in ‘oxidative phosphorylation’ reveals the balance between energy demand and respiration. For example, the unigenes encoding NADH dehydrogenase (Unigene063584), cytochrome C (Unigene058513), and oxidase (Unigene009205) were downregulated to produce fewer protons, and ATP synthase (Unigene038856, Unigene038863 and Unigene070977) with different binding change mechanisms to retain H+ (Table 1). Other KEGG pathways, including ‘alpha-linolenic acid metabolism’, ‘monoterpenoid biosynthesis’, ‘phosphatidylinositol signalling system’, ‘amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism’, ‘plant–pathogen interaction’, ‘cysteine and methionine metabolism’ and ‘tyrosine metabolism’ were among the most significantly enriched categories, and these pathways are indispensable for carbon assimilation (Fig. 5). These findings suggested that carbon metabolism was highly related to the FWU at night.

A combination of C3 and CAM carbon assimilation in T. ramosissima under high humidity conditions in the desert

Tamarixramosissima has long been regarded as a C3 plant. However, all the core genes of C4 carbon fixation were found not only in the two Tamarix species T. chinensis and T. ramosissima (Swaminathan ), but also in another species in the same family: R. soongorica (Shi ). Thus, Tamarix species have the molecular basis to utilize C4 carbon fixation together with the C3 pathway. Diurnal expression patterns (Fig. 6) showed that the expression of the typical C3 metabolism Rubisco gene peaked in the morning and remained high during the daytime and night with a typical sap flow velocity photosynthesis curve. Meanwhile, essential C4-photosynthetic genes such as PEPC and MaeB displayed a photosynthetic noon break. These results suggested that the fate of CO2 assimilated at night limited CAM activity when the humidity was low. Considering that the core genes of C3 and C4 metabolism were upregulated under high moisture exposure, we agreed with the viewpoint that the plant could use starch to maximize its carbon absorption at night (Smith and Zeeman 2020). Thus, like many plant species, T. ramosissima exhibits facultative CAM, switching between CAM and C3 photosynthesis depending on drought and other abiotic conditions (Bangal and Lambrecht 2010). The combination of C3 and CAM metabolism in T. ramosissima could be a common pattern for desert plants to help them survive in a harsh environment. This study may provide not only an important theoretical foundation for the engineering of high-yield drought-tolerant plants and the conversion of C3 plants to CAM plants, but also may broaden the knowledge of plant water physiology and restoration of desert plants in arid regions. Nevertheless, there is a long way to go to understand the strategy adopted by desert plants to survive. For example, it is easier to activate a PEPC pathway than to study leaf anatomy (Arantes ). Even if the CAM pathway does not require functional and anatomic specialization, water transport and storage remain very complex processes. Further experiments should be performed to validate and strengthen the current conclusions.

Conclusions

Foliar water uptake can improve plant–water relations and lead to an increase in the plant’s performance in response to the environment. We used DEGs to globally explain the molecular mechanism of FWU and reported the combination of C3 and CAM metabolism pathways utilized by desert plants to survive in a harsh environment. However, many questions regarding the pathways and the implications of FWU remain unanswered, such as the environmental impact and gene evolution. One clear theme is that FWU not only plays an important role in plants but it may also be an important tool for plants to mitigate climate change-driven drought in the future.

Supporting Information

The following additional information is available in the online version of this article— Four gene expression of carbon assimilation. Meteorological variation of three days. Sap flow velocity in two days. RNA12-vs-RNA13.genes. RNA12-vs-RNA13.genes.filter. RNA12-vs-RNA13.DE.scatter. RNA12-vs-RNA13.DE.volcano. KOG function classification of plant sequence. Click here for additional data file.
  28 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of C4 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase.

Authors:  Per Svensson; Oliver E Bläsing; Peter Westhoff
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 2.  The value of wet leaves.

Authors:  Todd E Dawson; Gregory R Goldsmith
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 3.  Foliar water uptake: Processes, pathways, and integration into plant water budgets.

Authors:  Z Carter Berry; Nathan C Emery; Sybil G Gotsch; Gregory R Goldsmith
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 7.228

4.  The incidence and implications of clouds for cloud forest plant water relations.

Authors:  Gregory R Goldsmith; Nicholas J Matzke; Todd E Dawson
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Equivalence of foliar water uptake and stomatal conductance?

Authors:  Oliver Binks; Ingrid Coughlin; Maurizio Mencuccini; Patrick Meir
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 7.228

6.  Starch: A Flexible, Adaptable Carbon Store Coupled to Plant Growth.

Authors:  Alison M Smith; Samuel C Zeeman
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 28.310

7.  High Air Humidity Causes Atmospheric Water Absorption via Assimilating Branches in the Deep-Rooted Tree Haloxylon ammodendron in an Arid Desert Region of Northwest China.

Authors:  Xue-Wei Gong; Guang-Hui Lü; Xue-Min He; Binoy Sarkar; Xiao-Dong Yang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Water Deficit Transcriptomic Responses Differ in the Invasive Tamarix chinensis and T. ramosissima Established in the Southern and Northern United States.

Authors:  Padmapriya Swaminathan; Michelle Ohrtman; Abigail Carinder; Anup Deuja; Cankun Wang; John Gaskin; Anne Fennell; Sharon Clay
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-09

9.  Uptake of water via branches helps timberline conifers refill embolized xylem in late winter.

Authors:  Stefan Mayr; Peter Schmid; Joan Laur; Sabine Rosner; Katline Charra-Vaskou; Birgit Dämon; Uwe G Hacke
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Transcriptomic analysis of a tertiary relict plant, extreme xerophyte Reaumuria soongorica to identify genes related to drought adaptation.

Authors:  Yong Shi; Xia Yan; Pengshan Zhao; Hengxia Yin; Xin Zhao; Honglang Xiao; Xinrong Li; Guoxiong Chen; Xiao-Fei Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.