| Literature DB >> 35047144 |
Chaozhi Tang1, Yuling Zhang1, Zihan Zhai1, Xiaofeng Zhu1, Chaowei Wang2, Ganggang Yang1.
Abstract
In recent years, functional magnetic resonance technology has discovered that abnormal connections in different brain regions of the brain may serve as the pathophysiological mechanism of mental illness. Exploring the mechanism of information flow and integration between different brain regions is of great significance for understanding the pathophysiological mechanism of mental illness. This article aims to analyze the mechanism of depression by comparing human brain images of normal people and patients with depression and conduct research. Fluoxetine, a selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) widely used in clinical practice, can selectively inhibit 5-HT transporter and block the reuptake of 5-HT by the presynaptic membrane. The effect of 5-HT is prolonged and increased, thereby producing antidepressant effects. It has low affinity for adrenergic, histaminergic, and cholinergic receptors and has a weaker effect, resulting in fewer adverse reactions. This paper uses the comparative experiment method and the Welch method and uses the average shortest path length L to describe the average value of the shortest path length between two nodes in the network. Attention refers to the ability of a person's mental activity to point and to concentrate on something. Sustained attention means that attention is kept on a certain cognitive object or activity for a certain period of time, which is also called the stability of attention. The research on attention of depression patients generally focuses on continuous attention, and the results obtained show inconsistencies. Most studies have shown that the sustained attention of the depression group is significantly worse than that of the healthy control group. An overview of magnetic resonance imaging technology and an analysis of depression based on resting state were carried out. The key brain areas of the sample core network were scanned, and the ALFF results were analyzed. The data showed that the severity of depression in the depression group was negatively correlated with the ReHo value in the posterior left cerebellum (P=0.010). The sense of despair was negatively correlated with the ReHo value in the posterior right cerebellum (P=0.013). The diurnal variation was negatively correlated with the ReHo value of the left ring (P=0.014). It was positively correlated with the ReHo value of the left ventricle (P=0.048). This experiment has better completed the research on the mechanism of depression by analyzing the functional images of patients with depression and normal human brain.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35047144 PMCID: PMC8763528 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1125049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Sample image of monitoring using fMRI.
Figure 2Process analysis. (a) Connectome mapping: using DTI data to build a whole-brain structure network. (b) Topological analysis: comparing the differences in the topological properties of the whole brain through the whole-brain structure network. (c) Fiber tracts analysis: distinguishing the types of fiber damage through the differences in the properties of the three white matter fibers.
Participant population data and clinical symptom score.
| Depression group | Normal control group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 7/13 | 7/13 | 0.754 |
| Age | 41.8 (14.2) | 41.6 (13.6) | 0.931 |
| Years of education | 11.3 (2.6) | 10.3 (3.0) | 0.305 |
| PANSS | — | — | |
| Positive score | 12.9 (5.6) | ||
| Negative score | 18.0 (7.0) | ||
| General symptom score | 27.8 (5.3) | ||
| Total score | 58.7 (12.5) | ||
| HAMD-24 | 5.3 (1.3) |
Settings and coordinates of interest.
| Network name | Brain area | Mini coordinates | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Default network | 19 | PCC |
|
|
|
| MPFC | 3 | −52 | 26 | ||
|
| |||||
| Executive network on the left | 17 | LSFG | 3 | 58 | 6 |
| LSPL | −33 | 22 | 52 | ||
|
| |||||
| Execution network on the right | 9 | RSFG | −50 | −51 | 50 |
| RSPL | 27 | 28 | 52 | ||
|
| |||||
| Highlight the network | 13 | LIFG | 36 | −66 | 48 |
| LIFG | −48 | 19 | −5 | ||
|
| |||||
| Dorsal attention network | 5 | RIFG | 48 | 16 | −5 |
| LIPL | −45 | −42 | 56 | ||
|
| |||||
| Auditory network | 7 | RIPL | 48 | −39 | 55 |
| LSTG | −62 | −1 | 9 | ||
|
| |||||
| Lateral striatum network | 20 | RSTG | 62 | −26 | 16 |
| LMTG | −50 | −65 | 10 | ||
|
| |||||
| Sports network | 1 | RMTG | 45 | −76 | 10 |
| LPCG | −48 | −7 | 54 | ||
| RPCG | 48 | −13 | 54 | ||
Figure 3Distribution of regions of interest.
Figure 4The functional connection map of the dorsal, ventral, and posterior insula subregions of the insula.
Key brain areas of the core network.
| Seed point | Brain area | Left and right | Mini coordinates |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Dorsal forebrain insula (to highlight the network) | Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex | Right | 33 | 12 | 21 | 12.77 |
| Left | −36 | 42 | 21 | 10.43 | ||
| Temporoparietal junction | Right | 63 | −33 | 21 | 13.87 | |
| Left | −60 | −39 | 21 | 11.35 | ||
| Top leaflet | Right | 6 | 18 | 30 | 16.82 | |
| Left | 33 | −57 | 39 | 7.47 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (central executive network) posterior cingulate (default network) | Inferior temporal gyrus | Right | −36 | −54 | 36 | 6.72 |
| Left | 54 | −6 | −24 | 7.64 | ||
| Angular gyrus | Right | −57 | −9 | −24 | 7.82 | |
| Left | 51 | −51 | 24 | 9.61 | ||
| Middle back | Right | −42 | −75 | 27 | 9.9 | |
| Left | 24 | 33 | 36 | 9.33 | ||
| Medial prefrontal cortex | Right | −27 | 30 | 39 | 7.92 | |
| Left | −3 | 63 | 0 | 8.06 | ||
| Para hippocampus | Right | 30 | −36 | −18 | 6.23 | |
| Left | −33 | −42 | −18 | 7.24 | ||
| Posterior cerebellum | Left | −9 | −60 | −48 | 9.24 | |
The general information of the three groups of subjects.
| Depression group | Depression-susceptible group | Normal control group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 30.65 | 31.31 | 29.33 | 0.776 |
| Gender | 14/9 | 17/9 | 8/7 | 0.748 |
| Education (years) | 12.26 | 16.54 | 14.53 | |
| HAMD score | 29.09 | 2.27 | 1.27 |
Figure 5Comparison of several groups of fMRI.
Correlation between the ReHo value of abnormal brain area and clinical variables in the depression group.
| Clinical variables | Brain area |
|
|
| Correlation coefficient ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAMD | Left posterior cerebellum | −3 | −75 | −30 | −0.7597 | 0.010 |
| Despair | Right posterior cerebellum | 3 | −81 | −30 | −0.7655 | 0.013 |
| Day and night changes | Left cingulate back | −18 | −33 | 30 | −0.6106 | 0.048 |
| Day and night changes | Left thalamus | −3 | −9 | 6 | 0.7768 | 0.014 |
Figure 6Body weight change.
Figure 7Open-air test.
Figure 8Sucrose preference.
Figure 9Correlation analysis of CPT task indicators and related factors.