Literature DB >> 35047101

Sleep deprivation and fatigue in early postpartum and their association with postpartum depression in primiparas intending to establish breastfeeding.

Ai Kawashima1, Nozomi Detsuka2, Rika Yano3.   

Abstract

Objective: To examine the association of objective sleep and fatigue in the early postpartum period with postpartum depression in Japanese primiparas intending to establish breastfeeding. Materials and
Methods: The participants were 34 primiparas who were in the postnatal ward after vaginal delivery and responsively breastfeeding their rooming-in baby. Actigraphy data for objective sleep were collected for three consecutive days starting from the first day postpartum. Fatigue and postpartum depression were assessed using the Postpartum Fatigue Scale and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, respectively, on numerous days between the first day postpartum and the one-month checkup. Breastfeeding and rooming-in data were also collected.
Results: The mean total sleep time was 252.0 ± 73.1 min/day. Mean breastfeeding frequency was 12.4 ± 3.2 times/day and mean total breastfeeding time was 247.4 ± 101.8 min/day. Among the participants, 67.6% were exclusively breastfeeding on the discharge day. Fatigue scores were significantly higher during the hospital stay, compared with one month postpartum. Multiple regression analysis showed that sleep frequency on the third day postpartum and mean total breastfeeding time and fatigue on the fifth day postpartum were factors affecting the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score.
Conclusion: The association between postpartum depression among breastfeeding primiparas in the early postpartum period and objective sleep, fatigue, and total breastfeeding time per day was suggested. An environment wherein breastfeeding mothers can rest and sleep without hesitation will be beneficial. Moreover, the importance of sleep during pregnancy and the early postpartum period must be highlighted. Midwifery and/or nursing care starting while the mother is in a postnatal hospital stay can play a key role in preventing postpartum depression. ©2022 The Japanese Association of Rural Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  postpartum depression; postpartum fatigue; postpartum sleep; responsive breastfeeding

Year:  2022        PMID: 35047101      PMCID: PMC8753258          DOI: 10.2185/jrm.2021-027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Med        ISSN: 1880-487X


Introduction

Postpartum depression (PPD) has increasingly been recognized as a serious issue in Japan because social awareness of maternal suicides has increased in recent years. Takeda et al.[1]) reported that the maternal suicide rate over a decade, from 2005 to 2014, in 23 wards in Tokyo was 8.7 per 100,000 live births, which was higher than the maternal mortality rate during the same period[2]). The leading cause was PPD, which was estimated to account for 33% of maternal suicides[1]). The prevalence of PPD among women in Japan is estimated to be in the range of approximately 10–17%[3], [4]), which is comparable to the reported levels in other countries. PPD onset occurs between two weeks and one month after delivery[4]). An assessment of Japanese mothers using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) on the fifth day postpartum showed that a quarter of them were at a high risk of PPD and primiparas had a higher risk than multiparas[5]). Many postpartum women experienced sleep deprivation and strong fatigue, as well as experienced difficulty with resting[6]). A study reported that the daily total sleep time of Japanese primiparas who stayed with the baby in their ward was as short as approximately four hours in the early postpartum period, which was significantly shorter than that of multiparas[7]). In their systematic review, Bhati and Richards[8]) noted a relationship between sleep disturbance and PPD. Most (93.4%) Japanese mothers intend to breastfeed[9]), and Japanese hospitals generally endeavor to follow the WHO/UNICEF guidelines[10]) for successful breastfeeding, wherein mothers are encouraged to stay with their babies at all times and breastfeed responsively. However, to ensure the successful establishment of lactation, responsive breastfeeding indicates that eight to twelve breastfeeding sessions must occur each day[11]). If mothers prioritize their sleep, the possibility of not initiating or giving up breastfeeding may increase. Although numerous studies have focused on the association between sleep disturbance and PPD, very few studies have focused on the early postpartum period. According to the aforementioned systematic review, only two studies have measured the objective sleep time of mothers from the first day postpartum[12], [13]). These studies have revealed a relationship between subjective sleep and mood, but noted no correlation between objective sleep time and mood. The measured mean sleep times (358.28 min and 372.57 min, respectively) were notably longer than those of Japanese mothers staying with their babies in the postnatal ward, as examined by Yamazaki et al[7]). Moreover, research has yet to include breastfeeding as a variable while examining the factors affecting maternal sleep in the early postpartum period. To summarize, research has yet to determine how responsive breastfeeding and the mother-and-baby staying together in the ward would affect maternal sleep and fatigue, as well as how sleep and fatigue are related to PPD. Based on this research background, a conceptual framework was developed for this study (Figure 1). Therefore, the primary purpose of the current study was to analyze objective sleep and fatigue characteristics in the early postpartum period of Japanese primiparas staying with their babies in the ward and intending to establish breastfeeding. Moreover, this study aimed to evaluate the relationship between these factors and PPD.
Figure 1

Conceptual framework.

Conceptual framework. In Japan, the postnatal hospital stay is longer, compared to other countries; Japanese primiparas usually remain in the hospital for four to six days after vaginal delivery. Therefore, midwives and obstetric nurses are able to engage with new mothers starting from the early days of postnatal hospital stay, observe maternal sleep and fatigue, and ensure that mothers rest as much as possible while trying to initiate and establish breastfeeding. However, clinical guidelines have yet to be established regarding the sleep and rest of breastfeeding mothers during the early postpartum period. Midwifery textbooks suggest that mothers should rest between breastfeeding sessions, but no specific advice has been provided regarding sleep. Consequently, a standard protocol has yet to be established for bedside care and support by midwives for these exhausted and vulnerable mothers. Therefore, this study also offers clinical suggestions for midwives and obstetric nurses regarding effective care, advice, and interventions that may be provided to breastfeeding primiparas in the early postpartum period, starting immediately after delivery, to minimize the risk of PPD.

Materials and Methods

Research design and data collection

Data from a sample of 42 primiparas were collected between June 2015 and April 2016 and analyzed using a descriptive and prospective design. Participants were recruited from a general hospital in Japan by the authors and midwives working there. They were provided information about the study on the delivery day or first day postpartum. The hospital has a breastfeeding policy that encourages mothers to stay with their babies at all times and breastfeed responsively immediately after childbirth. When a mother wants to spend time by herself, she may leave her baby with a midwife in the nursery room. The day of discharge was the fifth day postpartum in primiparas. The eligibility criteria were as follows: (i) continuous postnatal hospital stay after vaginal delivery, with the mother and baby staying together in the ward starting from the day of delivery; (ii) the mother must not be younger than 20 years of age; (iii) the mother must have no history of mental illnesses, and (iv) the baby must be born after a full-term without complications. The participants’ age, delivery duration, education, amount of bleeding during delivery, and hemoglobin level on the second day postpartum, as well as the baby’s sex, birth weight, weight loss rate, and other delivery and background information were collected from the clinical records.

Postpartum sleep

Each participant was asked to wear a wrist actigraph (MicroMini RC, Ambulatory Monitoring, Inc., Ardsley, NY, USA) on the non-dominant wrist starting from the first to fifth days postpartum to obtain objective measurements of sleep-wake activity, except while taking a shower and bathing the baby. Data were collected in one-minute epochs in the zero-crossing mode. AW2 software (Ambulatory Monitoring, Inc., USA) was used to calculate three sleep measures by using the algorithm of Cole et al.: cumulative length of sleep episodes (“total sleep time”), the longest sleep episode, and the number of sleep episodes lasting for twenty minutes or more (“sleep frequency”). Every participant was awake and wore a wrist actigraph at 18:00. Therefore, actigraphy data for three consecutive days starting at 18:00 on the first day postpartum were extracted for analysis, whereas data recorded while the actigraph was removed for showering and bathing the baby were excluded. The concordance between wrist actigraphy and polysomnography has been proven[14]).

Postpartum fatigue

Postpartum fatigue was assessed using the Postpartum Fatigue Scale (PFS) developed by Yamazaki et al.[15]) on the first, third, and fifth days postpartum, and the day of the one-month checkup. Participants used a four-point scale to respond to the PFS questionnaire, which included 36 question items, with nine questions for four subscales—physical stress, mental stress, sleep deprivation, and difficulties in caring for the baby (hereafter “baby care difficulties”). The maximum score is 144, and higher scores indicate a more severe postpartum fatigue level. The reliability of PFS was confirmed by the Cronbach’s alpha score (0.938), with alpha scores of subscales ranging from 0.810 to 0.909. The validity of PFS has also been demonstrated[15]).

Postpartum depression

PPD was assessed using the Japanese language edition of EPDS[16]) on the first and fifth days postpartum, and the day of the one-month checkup. Participants were asked to answer ten questions using a four-point scale. The cut-off point in Japan is 8/9[17]) and a score of nine or higher indicates a high risk of PPD. EPDS has been translated into many languages and is used as a screening test for PPD worldwide. This scale does not contain questions about physical symptoms, thus the score is not affected by the changing nature of postpartum physical conditions[16]). In Japan, EPDS is widely used for screening purposes at maternity wards and during home visits by public health visitors. Cronbach’s alpha score was 0.78. At a cut-off point of 8/9, the sensitivity was 0.75, and the specificity was 0.93, which was higher than at other cut-off points[17]).

Breastfeeding and rooming-in

The number (“breastfeeding frequency”) and cumulative length (“total breastfeeding time”) of breastfeeding sessions were collected from activity logs that every mother at the participating hospital was asked to fill in. Breastfeeding referred only to the act of the baby sucking breastmilk and did not include feeding bottled milk or pumped breastmilk. Rooming-in data (time periods when the mother and the baby stayed together in the ward and the baby was left with nursery room staff) were collected from the records filled in by midwives.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to describe sample characteristics, actigraphy data, PFS and EPDS scores, and breastfeeding and rooming-in data. A one-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance or the Freidman test was conducted to assess time-dependent changes in sleep parameters, PFS, and EPDS, and when significant differences were observed, the Bonferroni method was used for multiple comparisons. The impact of sleep deprivation on fatigue and PPD was examined by dividing participants into two groups using the mean of total sleep time on the third day postpartum as a cut-off point, and comparing PFS and EPDS scores using the Mann-Whitney test. Based on the results of the Mann-Whitney test and research findings, a multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the influencing factors of PPD by using the EPDS score on the fifth day postpartum as an independent variable. IBM SPSS Statistics 24 was employed for the analysis, and the significance level was set at 0.05.

Ethical considerations

Participants were informed about the study both orally and in writing by the authors and midwives working at the hospital. They were informed that participation in the study was voluntary and that refusal or cessation afterward would not jeopardize the hospital care provided to them. Only the participants who signed a letter of consent were recruited. The study was approved by the ethical committees of the authors’ institution (approval No. 15-9) and the participating hospital.

Results

Sample characteristics

Among the 42 mothers who consented to participate in the study, eight were excluded for not wearing the wrist actigraph as prescribed (four), removing the actigraph for more than three hours (two), or failing to answer some items of the EPDS/PFS questionnaires (two). The characteristics of the remaining 34 participants are listed in Table 1. The mean age was 29.5 (range, 21–41), with four participants (11.8%) aged 35 or above. None of the participants had experienced an epidural birth because the participating hospital did not offer this option.
Table 1

Characteristics of participants and their babies (n=34)

Variables
Age (years)29.5 ± 4.7
Over 35 years of age: N (%)4 (11.8)
Married/having a partner: N (%)34 (100.0)
Educational background: N (%)
Junior or high school11 (32.4)
Vocational school or junior college12 (35.3)
University or graduate school11 (32.4)
BMI before pregnancy20.6 ± 2.8
Increased body mass in pregnancy (kg)10.4 ± 4.6
Total delivery time (min)942.7 ± 871.0
Second stage of labor duration (min)127.3 ± 198.6
Amount of bleeding during delivery (g)576.8 ± 345.8
Hemoglobin level on day 2 (g/dL)9.6 ± 1.5
Induction of delivery: N (%)4 (11.8)
Labor inducing drug used: N (%)8 (23.5)
Vacuum extraction: N (%)3 (8.8)
Episiotomy: N (%)10 (29.4)
Gestation (weeks)39.4 ± 1.0
Birthweight (g)3,012.7 ± 354.1
Low-birth-weight (less than 2,500 g) baby: N (%)1 (2.9)
Sex of baby: N (%)
Male12 (35.3)
Female22 (64.7)
Rate of baby’s weight loss (%)8.6 ± 1.7
Baby’s lowest weight (day of life)2.4 ± 0.6
Phototherapy: N (%)3 (8.8)
Mothers who never left baby with nursery room staff: N (%)10 (29.4)
No formula used during postnatal hospital stay: N (%) 8 (23.5)
Exclusive breastfeeding on the day of discharge: N (%)23 (67.6)

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or N (%).

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or N (%).

State of rooming-in

Ten mothers (29.4%) never left their babies with a midwife in the nursery room, and stayed together with the baby at all times during the postnatal hospital stay. Other participants left their babies in the care of nursery room staff at some time, and this number decreased over time, from ten on the first day to seven on the second day, six on the third day, and four on the fourth day postpartum. Figure 2 shows the mean total time they stayed with their babies each day.
Figure 2

Total length of time rooming-in and in nursery room for babies.

() Length of time mothers and babies stayed together; () Length of time the baby was left with nursery room staff, excluding mothers who stayed with the baby at all times.

Total length of time rooming-in and in nursery room for babies. () Length of time mothers and babies stayed together; () Length of time the baby was left with nursery room staff, excluding mothers who stayed with the baby at all times.

State of breastfeeding

Eight mothers (23.5%) did not use formula milk during the postnatal hospital stay. On the day of discharge, there were 23 (67.6%) exclusively breastfeeding mothers and 11 (33.4%) partially breastfeeding mothers, with no exclusively bottle-feeding mothers. At one month postpartum, 19 mothers (55.9%) were exclusively breastfeeding, 14 mothers (41.2%) were partially breastfeeding, and one mother (2.9%) was exclusively bottle-feeding. Two participants who could not breastfeed due to nipple pain, and another participant who did not have complete breastfeeding time records were excluded from the breastfeeding analysis. Among the remaining 31 mothers, the mean breastfeeding frequency per 24 hours was 12.7 times (SD 3.3) and the mean total breastfeeding time per 24 hours was 247.4 min (SD 101.8). Significant chronological differences were not observed starting from the first to the fourth day postpartum, in terms of total breastfeeding time and frequency. The maximum frequency among participants was 26 times, which was recorded on the third day, and the maximum total breastfeeding time in a day was 705 min recorded on the second day postpartum by a different mother. The results are summarized in Figures 3 and 4.
Figure 3

Changes in breastfeeding frequency (n=31).

Changes in breastfeeding frequency (n=31). Changes in total breastfeeding time (n=31).

State of postpartum sleep

Table 2 presents the sleep parameters of participants. The mean value of total sleep time per day over three days of actigraphic data was 252.0 min (SD 73.1, range 158.7–456.0). Sleep episodes lasting for 20 min or more (sleep frequency) occurred 4.2 times (SD 1.6, range 1.7–8.7) per day on average, and the mean value of the longest sleep episode was 84.3 min (SD 33.7, range 35.0–164.7). The total sleep time and longest sleep were shorter and the sleep frequency was higher on the second day postpartum than the other days, but no significant differences were noted on a day-to-day basis. A positive correlation was observed between total sleep time and sleep frequency each day (Day 1; r=0.665, P<0.000, Day 2; r=0.693, P<0.000, Day 3; r=0.643, P<0.000).
Table 2

Comparison of maternal sleep parameters of two groups divided by the mean of total sleep time on Day 3

Association between sleep and fatigue

The PFS and subscale scores of participants are presented in Table 3. The PFS score, the total of four subscale scores, peaked on the third day postpartum and declined constantly thereafter. Among the subscales, the scores for baby care difficulties and physical stress gradually reduced over a one-month period, but those for sleep deprivation and mental stress showed minimal change even at one month postpartum.
Table 3

Comparison of PFS and EPDS scores of two groups divided by the mean of total sleep time on Day 3

A negative correlation was noted between total sleep time and the baby care difficulties subscale score (r=−0.438, P=0.010), as well as between sleep frequency and the same subscale score on the third day postpartum (r=−0.371, P=0.031). Based on these findings, we analyzed the impact of sleep on fatigue by dividing participants into two groups using the sleep data from the third day and comparing their sleep parameters and respective PFS scores. The results are presented in Tables 2 and 3. Table 3 presents the mean EPDS scores of participants. Three participants (8.8%) scored nine points or more on the first day and six participants (17.6%) scored the same points on the fifth day as well as one month postpartum. A positive correlation was found between the EPDS score on the fifth day and that at one month postpartum (r=0.513, P=0.002). A negative correlation was also noted between sleep frequency on the third day and the EPDS score on the fifth day postpartum (r=−0.405, P=0.018). Total sleep time of the low-risk group (EPDS scores of 8 or less on the fifth day postpartum) were 261.3 ± 95.1 min on Day 1, 246.7 ± 95.6 min on Day 2, and 258.8 ± 93.2 min on Day 3. On the other hand, the total sleep time of the high-risk group (scores of 9 or more) were 264.7 ± 99.4 min on Day 1, 227.2 ± 65.9 min on Day 2, and 214.5 ± 147.9 min on Day 3. Total sleep time of the high-risk group reduced over three days starting from the first to third days postpartum, albeit no significant difference was observed between the two groups on a day-to-day basis.

Factors associated with EPDS on Day 5

Based on the aforementioned findings, a forced entry multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine factors influencing the EPDS score on the fifth day, using sleep frequency on the third day and total breastfeeding time and PFS total score on the fifth day postpartum, as well as total sleep time on Day 3, as dependent variables. Data normality was confirmed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The adjusted coefficient of determination was 0.443, and the significance level was set at 1%. The test results (Table 4) show that sleep frequency on the third day as well as total breastfeeding time and PFS total score on the fifth day were significantly associated with PPD, as represented by the EPDS score, on the fifth day postpartum.
Table 4

Results of multiple regression analysis for factors associated with EPDS on Day 5

Independent variablesPartial regression coefficient (B)Standardized regression coefficient (β)t-ratioP95% CI for BR2

LowerUpper
Constant0.5240.2030.841–4.7615.8080.511
Sleep frequency on Day 3–0.963–0.536–3.0430.005–1.61–0.316
Mean total breastfeeding time 0.0110.3832.8440.0080.0030.019
PFS total score on Day 50.0720.3472.5940.0150.0150.129
Total sleep time on Day 30.0050.1480.8240.417–0.0070.016

EPDS: Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; CI: Confidence Interval; PFS: Postpartum Fatigue Scale.

EPDS: Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; CI: Confidence Interval; PFS: Postpartum Fatigue Scale.

Discussion

In this study, a relationship was noted between total sleep time and fatigue of primiparas who intended to establish breastfeeding in the early postpartum period. The results (Table 3) highlight that participants experienced difficulties in caring for their babies for a few days after giving birth, which resulted in shorter sleep time on the third day postpartum, and in turn led to fatigue and physical stress on the fifth day postpartum. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the factors affecting the EPDS score on the day of discharge (fifth day postpartum) were (i) sleep frequency on the third day; (ii) average daily total breastfeeding time during postnatal hospital stay; and (iii) fatigue represented by the PFS score on the fifth day postpartum. Therefore, an association was noted between objective sleep and PPD in the early postpartum period. The results show that cumulative breastfeeding time per day was an additional factor influencing PPD. Nearly a quarter (23–24%) of Japanese primiparas had an EPDS score of nine or higher on the day of discharge and were classified as having a high risk of experiencing PPD[5]). Another study reported that the prevalence of maternal depression among primiparas peaked at two weeks postpartum[18]). In the current study, three (50%) out of six mothers who had an EPDS score of nine or higher on the day of discharge (fifth day postpartum) also scored nine or higher on the day of the one-month checkup, thereby indicating a correlation between the EPDS scores of these two days. This indicates that nursing care designed to minimize the risk of PPD should begin during the postnatal hospital stay.

Rooming-in

Participants started to stay with their babies immediately after delivery and spent more than 22 hours together per day on average. This finding can be compared with the rooming-in times of 13.9 hours on the first day and 12.3 hours on the second day postpartum after vaginal delivery at baby-friendly hospitals in Taiwan that keenly encouraged mothers to establish breastfeeding during 48 hours of postnatal hospital stay[19]). The authors suggest that the long period during which mothers stayed with their babies contributed to sleep shortage and fatigue in this study. Moreover, participants’ fatigue levels were higher during the postnatal hospital stay than at one month postpartum, and peaked on or around the third day postpartum. The authors suggest that this occurs because the mothers started rooming-in with the baby and responsive breastfeeding when they had not yet recovered from delivery fatigue, which resulted in poor quality sleep. Bozoky and Corwin[20]) reported that fatigue during the first week postpartum is predictive of depression on the 28th postpartum day, but the present study findings suggest that fatigue as early as the fifth day postpartum is indicative of PPD risk. The participants’ total sleep time per day was approximately four hours, which is similar to the results of a previous Japanese study that conducted an actigraphic sleep analysis of primiparas staying together with the baby in the ward[7]). Four hours of sleep represents a sudden drop from seven hours in late pregnancy, as reported by Shinkoda et al[21]). In this study, the longest sleep episode was only 80 min, recorded on the second and third days postpartum. These findings indicate that breastfeeding primiparas had to manage with poor sleep during the early postpartum period. Subjective awareness of sleep shortage remained high among participants even at one month postpartum. By considering the current findings along with those of past research showing that the maternal sleep cycle was noticeably irregular one month after childbirth[21]), we can predict that maternal sleeping behavior remains unchanged at one month postpartum and sleep shortage continues for more than a month. In the past, the post-delivery sleep shortage of mothers was not considered a serious issue. Horiuchi[22]), for instance, observed a significant decrease in the ratio of sleep time and an increase in the ratio of wake time in the maternal sleep-wake cycle, but suggested that mothers should maintain sleep quality to compensate for sleep shortage. According to studies on sleep, having as little as four hours of sleep a day would induce a strongly drowsy state that could lead to acute sleep disorders[23]), and having a short sleep lasting for four hours maximum for five continuous days would intensify the anxiety and depression states[24]). The present study supports these results because it showed that the total sleep time of mothers with high PPD risk was shorter than those in the low-risk group. Breastfeeding mothers may have to wake up at any time to breastfeed and look after their baby, but there should be awareness that continuous sleep shortage (four hours of sleep per day) lasting more than a month will increase the risk of PPD.

Postpartum sleep and breastfeeding

Participants breastfed the baby more than 12 times per day on average, spending more than four hours in total for breastfeeding. They spent 20 min out of every two hours on breastfeeding. As noted by Shinkoda et al.[25]), nearly 75% of sleep disruption in mothers was caused by breastfeeding. Participants sacrificed their sleep for their babies, and breastfeeding was an influential factor for sleep disruption. Research has widely recognized that mothers who intend to establish breastfeeding should be given support in line with Ten steps to successful breastfeeding[10]), and one study reported that the mother-and-baby staying together and initiation of responsive breastfeeding starting from the delivery day resulted in higher rates of breastfeeding[26]). However, there are no guidelines or evidence regarding how breastfeeding mothers who stay with their babies should spend their time during the early postpartum period, and there has been a long-standing perception that postpartum women could do with short sleep. Nighttime waking and sleep shortages were regarded as a necessity by Japanese mothers[27]) and midwives. The concentration of prolactin, a lactogenic hormone, increases during sleep[28]), thus sleep deprivation can reduce prolactin concentration in the blood[29]) and negatively impact lactation, thereby extending the breastfeeding time. Sacrificing sleep for breastfeeding can eventually lead to reduced lactation performance, thereby causing a spiral of longer breastfeeding time and sleep shortage for mothers.

Clinical suggestions

The current study findings show that sleep, breastfeeding, and fatigue can impact PPD in the early postpartum days. When this is combined with previous findings showing that on or around the fifth day postpartum, nearly a quarter of primiparas were evaluated to be at high risk of PPD[5]) and the EPDS score peaked at two weeks postpartum[18]), it becomes clear that midwifery and/or nursing care starting while mothers are in the postnatal hospital stay can play a key role in the prevention of PPD. Clinicians need to monitor the total length and frequency of mothers’ sleep and breastfeeding, as well as their fatigue levels. Noticing signs of baby care difficulties and providing appropriate support in the first two–three days after childbirth are particularly important. Postpartum women should be educated about the importance of sleep for both the prevention of PPD and the establishment of breastfeeding, and should be encouraged to take every opportunity to sleep even for a short time period. Provisions should be in place to ensure that any mother who cannot sleep between breastfeeding sessions or is extremely tired can rest even for a short time. Potential arrangements include allowing the baby to stay with a midwife in the nursery room in a manner that would not affect breastfeeding, tailoring the timing of necessary nursing/hospital duties (such as routine nursing care and discharge consultation and advice) to the condition of individual mothers, and ensuring that hospital visits should not prevent mothers from resting. If a mother spends too much time breastfeeding, nursing interventions should be considered to discuss the situation with her, determine the reason, and provide the necessary support.

Limitations and future agenda

The sample size was small, with 34 participants from a single hospital, thus the current study findings should be validated by larger and more diverse samples. Although no correlation was noted between the PFS score and hemoglobin level or amount of bleeding during delivery, some participants had lower hemoglobin levels due to a loss of large quantities of blood during delivery, which may have affected the fatigue data. The research period should be extended to include a pre-delivery period, and additional data on subjective sleep should be collected. Experiencing difficulties while caring for the baby in the early postpartum period was found to be one of the key factors affecting PPD; therefore, future studies must identify the causes of these difficulties. The long-term goal is to aid in developing nursing and midwifery care guidelines that start as early as possible after delivery and help mothers successfully establish breastfeeding and secure sufficient sleeping time, thereby minimizing the risk of PPD.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that PPD in breastfeeding primiparas in the early postpartum period is associated with objective sleep, fatigue, and total breastfeeding time per day. Midwives who provide post-delivery care to new mothers in hospitals can play a key role in the prevention of PPD. Effective interventions may include monitoring the total length and frequency of mothers’ sleep and breastfeeding, assessing their fatigue level, helping them to deal with, and hopefully solve, baby care difficulties in the first few days after delivery, creating an environment wherein they can rest and sleep without hesitation, and educating women about the importance of sleep during pregnancy and the early postpartum period.
  19 in total

1.  Changes in sleep-wake cycle during the period from late pregnancy to puerperium identified through the wrist actigraph and sleep logs.

Authors:  H Shinkoda; K Matsumoto; Y M Park
Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.188

2.  The relationship between sleep and mood in first-time and experienced mothers.

Authors:  Soledad Coo Calcagni; Bei Bei; Jeannette Milgrom; John Trinder
Journal:  Behav Sleep Med       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.964

Review 3.  A systematic review of the relationship between postpartum sleep disturbance and postpartum depression.

Authors:  Sue Bhati; Kathy Richards
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2015-03-28

4.  Human prolactin: 24-hour pattern with increased release during sleep.

Authors:  J F Sassin; A G Frantz; E D Weitzman; S Kapen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Annual Report of the Perinatology Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2015: Proposal of urgent measures to reduce maternal deaths.

Authors:  Satoru Takeda; Jun Takeda; Keisuke Murakami; Takahiko Kubo; Hiromi Hamada; Maki Murakami; Shintaro Makino; Hiroaki Itoh; Takashi Ohba; Katsuhiko Naruse; Hiroaki Tanaka; Naohiro Kanayama; Shigeki Matsubara; Hiroshi Sameshima; Tomoaki Ikeda
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  Prevalence trends of pre- and postnatal depression in Japanese women: A population-based longitudinal study.

Authors:  Kenji Takehara; Yoshiyuki Tachibana; Keiko Yoshida; Rintaro Mori; Naoko Kakee; Takahiko Kubo
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.839

7.  Nocturnal determinants of daytime sleepiness.

Authors:  M A Carskadon; W C Dement
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Breastfeeding and the use of human milk.

Authors:  Lawrence M Gartner; Jane Morton; Ruth A Lawrence; Audrey J Naylor; Donna O'Hare; Richard J Schanler; Arthur I Eidelman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Fatigue as a predictor of postpartum depression.

Authors:  Ingrid Bozoky; Elizabeth J Corwin
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug

10.  Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the assessment of sleep and sleep disorders: an update for 2007.

Authors:  Timothy Morgenthaler; Cathy Alessi; Leah Friedman; Judith Owens; Vishesh Kapur; Brian Boehlecke; Terry Brown; Andrew Chesson; Jack Coleman; Teofilo Lee-Chiong; Jeffrey Pancer; Todd J Swick
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.