| Literature DB >> 35047093 |
Sparsha Pallen1, Yuthika Shetty1, Subir Das2, Joel Markus Vaz3, Nirmal Mazumder1.
Abstract
Understanding the mechanism of the brain via optical microscopy is one of the challenges in neuroimaging, considering the complex structures. Advanced neuroimaging techniques provide a more comprehensive insight into patho-mechanisms of brain disorders, which is useful in the early diagnosis of the pathological and physiological changes associated with various neurodegenerative diseases. Recent advances in optical microscopy techniques have evolved powerful tools to overcome scattering of light and provide improved in vivo neuroimaging with sub-cellular resolution, endogenous contrast specificity, pinhole less optical sectioning capability, high penetration depth, and so on. The following article reviews the developments in various optical imaging techniques including two-photon and three-photon fluorescence, second-harmonic generation, third-harmonic generation, coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering, and stimulated Raman scattering in neuroimaging. We have outlined the potentials and drawbacks of these techniques and their possible applications in the investigation of neurodegenerative diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Coherent Raman scattering; Harmonic generation; Multiphoton fluorescence microscopy; Neuroimaging; Optical microscopy
Year: 2021 PMID: 35047093 PMCID: PMC8724370 DOI: 10.1007/s12551-021-00832-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biophys Rev ISSN: 1867-2450
Fig. 1Schematic experimental setups. (A) Experimental setup of two-photon fluorescence microscope. PD, photo diode; BS, beam splitter; P, polarizer; λ/2, half wave-plate; λ/4, quarter wave-plate; DM, dichroic mirror; OL, objective lens; S, sample; F, filter; L, lens; PMT, photo-multiplier tubes. This figure is adapted with permission from Mittmann et al. 2011. (B) A homebuilt three-photon microscope with an axicon-based Bessel module. M1 and M2 are flip mirrors for switching between Gaussian (yellow path) and Bessel (red path) imaging modalities. L, lenses; X and Y, galvanometers; PMT, photomultiplier tube. This figure is adapted with permission from Rodríguez et al. (2018). (C) Forward and backward collected SHG microscope. The apparatus is built using Zeiss LSM 710 microscope and a tunable Ti:sapphire laser source at wavelength 780 nm. This figure is adapted with permission from Sivaguru et al. (2010). (D) Optical arrangement of a THG microscope. This figure is adapted with permission from Chen et al. (2015). (E) Epi and forward detection CARS microscope. BC, beam combiner; BS, beam splitter; F, filter; L, lens; OL, objective lens; S, sample; CL, condenser lens; F, filter. This figure is adapted with permission from Evans et al. (2005). (F) SRS microscope. OM, optical modulator; M, mirror; DM, dichroic mirror; GM, galvo mirror; OL, objective lens; S, sample; CL, condenser lens; BF, bandpass filter; FL, focusing lens; PD, photodiode; LIA, lock-in amplifier. This figure is adapted with permission from Nandakumar et al. (2009)
Fig. 2Transgenic mice frontal cortex in vivo 2PF images at (A) 0, (B) 30, (C) 60, and (D) 150 min after i.v. injection of QAD1 (10 mg kg−1), noted the observation of plaques over time. (E) 2PF images at the depth of ~300 μm from the surface of the cortex along the z-direction show the distribution of Aβ plaques. (F) and (G) 3D reconstructed 2PF image of transgenic mice frontal cortex after i.v. injection of QAD1 (10 mg kg−1) and dextran 40 kDa Texas red. Scale bars: 50 μm in (A) and 30 μm in (E), respectively (Heo et al. 2016)
Fig. 3Visual response characterization at different layers in V1 of awake mice. (A) 3D rendering of a sequence of 450 lateral 3PF images acquired with an increment of 2 μm. GCaMP6s signal is represented with green color. Scale bars, 100 μm. (B) Selection of lateral images from layers 2/3, 4, 5, and 6 with 250 μm field of view; scale bar, 50 μm. (C) Average calcium responses (ΔF/F) of over 10 trials of representative cells in each layer in response to oriented gratings moving in specific directions (arrow marks above each trace) and their orientation tuning curves in polar plots. Randomization of each stimulus direction in each trial caused discontinuities in (ΔF/F) traces. (ΔF/F) scale bars correspond to 100% and the time scale bar corresponds to 10 s as shown in the bottom right panel (Yildirim et al. 2019)
Fig. 4(A–C) Images showing optical sections obtained after H&E staining (a gold standard in neuropathology) and (D–F) merged 2PF (red) and SHG (green) images, in control (normal brain tissue), metastasis, and GBM (glioblastoma). Stars: neurons; arrow: brain vessels (Poulon et al. 2018). (G) SHG image of a neuron stained with FM4-64. (H) Averaged line scans represented with black traces (left-axis scale) are normalized intensity plots of SHG emission versus time at the membrane positions shown in (G). The red traces (right-axis scale) are the Vm from the recording electrode at the soma (Sacconi et al. 2006). Scale bars: 100 μm in (A, B, D, E) and 40 μm in (C, F) (Poulon et al. 2018; Sacconi et al. 2006)
Fig. 5Ex vivo imaging of myelin sheath with THG. (A) Image shows the lateral section of non-teased rat sciatic nerve, adaxonal (arrowhead) and abaxonal (arrow) membranes (scale bars, 10 μm). (B) Image shows the THG intensity profile for the dashed line in (A). (C) The thickness of axon (green) and myelin sheath (red), and the g-ratio (black) along the internode shown at the bottom. (D) Unfixed, teased sciatic nerves of WT, NRG1 type III, and Tr-J mice with similar caliber. Abaxonal membrane position shifts due to the myelin thickness difference (scale bar, 5 μm). (E) The scatter plot of g-ratio as a function of axon caliber in WT and NRG1 type III animals. The dashed line corresponds to the g-ratio with 0.9-μm gap between the adaxonal and abaxonal membranes (Lim et al. 2014)
Fig. 6THG imaging in mouse brain (A) co-registration of CNP-GFP and THG signals (B, C) tangential and radial fiber distribution based on depth-dependence (B) volumetric rendering of THG stacks in the range of 0–800 μm of the cortex. I, II, and III indicate 0–100 μm, 200–300 μm, and 300–400 μm below the dura, respectively. (C) Transverse and axial projections XY and XZ respectively of traced axon showing lattice structure and fiber bundles; scale bar = 20 μm (Redlich and Lim 2019)
Fig. 7Image showing the heterogeneity in lipid aggregate composition from AD brain tissue samples from 2 patients imaged with CARS at 2840 cm−1. Lamellar structures (seen in A, E, and G) and coalescent structures of different constructs most likely arise from lipid micelles initially decorating the Aβ fibrils or ApoE particles, alternatively from lipid microvesicles shed by microglia. (A–D) Patient 1, (E–H) patient 2. Scale bars, 25 μm (Kiskis et al. 2015)
Fig. 8(A and B) In vivo imaging of the mouse brain. CARS image of (A) parietal cortex (B) bundles of myelinated fibers in the sub-cortex white matter; (C and D) ex vivo imaging with slices of white and gray matter by simultaneous CARS imaging of myelin sheath and 2PF imaging of nuclei. Red: signals from CARS; green: signals from 2PF of Hoechst-labeled cell nuclei (Fu et al. 2008)
Fig. 9In vivo SRS microscopy images of human GBM xenografts. (A) Bright-field microscopy imaging appears to be nearly normal. In contrast, SRS microscopy within the same region of focus shows distinctions between tumor-infiltrated and non-infiltrated areas of the brain (normal), clearly depicting the brain/tumor interface (dashed line). (B–D) showing magnified views (B) within the tumor, (C) at the brain/tumor interface, and (D) within the normal brain (Ji et al. 2013)
Fig. 10Visible SRS imaging of an unprocessed brain tissue section from a C57 wild-type mouse. (A) Overview of a coronal section of the brain slice. SRS inspected area is shown. (B–D) Enlarged views that illustrate the architectures of the soma (B), blood vessel in the cortex (C), and fiber bundles in white matter (D), with their locations marked by white lines (B–D) in (A), respectively. (E, F) High-resolution SRS imaging of brain areas corresponding to (E, F) indicated in (A), respectively. Scale bar is 10 μm (Bi et al. 2018)
Various optical techniques for neuroimaging
| Imaging technique | Principle | Applications | Spatiotemporal resolution | Penetration depth | Pros | Cons | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two-photon fluorescence (2PF) | A fluorophore absorbs two photons simultaneously with a near-infrared wavelength and emits light in the visible range | Applicable for deep tissue imaging Auto-fluorescence signals can be measured from NADH, FAD, tryptophan, collagen, elastin, etc. | ~ 640 nm laterally and 3.35 μm axially | ~ 1600 μm | Higher penetration depths compared to a confocal microscope Live cell imaging 3D imaging capability without the need of pinhole like in confocal | A high peak power, an ultrafast femtosecond laser is used which is bulky and expensive, limited to a certain number of fluorophores | Helmchen and Denk ( |
| Three-photon fluorescence (3PF) | Three photons are simultaneously absorbed by a fluorophore from a high-density NIR laser beam | Image hippocampus region in intact mouse brain due to the presence of fluorescent neurons In vivo imaging of astrocytes in mouse brain through SR101 labeling | ~ 960 nm laterally and 4.6 μm axially | ~1500 μm; typically spanning 650–1200 μm from the surface | Much higher optical sectioning than TPF due to longer excitation wavelength and less scattering Live cell imaging | Due to the high density of excitation photons, it could result in photodamage and photobleaching | Horton et al. ( |
| Second harmonic generation (SHG) | Two incident photons of equal fundamental frequencies interact with a non-centrosymmetric medium and are converted into a single photon with half of the total energy and double the frequency | Collagen, skeletal muscle fiber, microtubules, starch, cellulose are the most important molecules for SHG imaging SH signals are strong in the axonal region and non-existent in the dendritic and somatic regions Used to observe the morphological changes during the early stages of ischemia development in brain tissues | ~ 330 nm laterally and 3.2 μm axially | >1000 μm | Label-free tissue structure due to contrast produced in endogenous molecules Reduces photodamage and photobleaching compared to fluorescence techniques Allows deep tissue imaging up to several hundred microns | Due to virtual transition, the signal strength is weak Specific to a small number of non-centrosymmetric molecules SHG is mainly forward scattered, and imaging efficiency reduces in thick tissue | Campagnola ( |
| Third harmonic generation (THG) | Three photons of the same fundamental frequencies interact with a medium and generate a single photon with three times the energy of the incident photon. This phenomenon occurs due to refractive index mismatch or resonance enhancement | Exploits the lipid distribution and geometry of brain tissues and allows visualization of neurons, blood vessels, and white matter structures Images myelin in the central nervous system (CNS) of vertebrates in vivo and ex vivo. Imaging of fresh, unprocessed glioblastoma condition revealed cellularity when compared to fluorescence microscopic techniques | ~ 430 nm laterally and 1.8 μm axially | >1000 μm | Allows high optical sectioning and label-free imaging technique Due to the nature of the higher harmonic generation, there is no saturation or bleaching Live-cell imaging can be performed to obtain high-resolution structural, morphological, and functional information | Limited to certain molecules only | Squier et al. ( |
| Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) | CARS is a four-wave mixing third-order NLO process. CARS signal is generated when the difference in frequency between pump and Stokes photon matches with the Raman vibration of the sample | Allows selective detection of chemical bonds thus visualization of lipid, proteins, and DNA, etc. Epi-detected CARS microscopy is used for in vivo imaging of mouse brain sub-cortex Elevated lipid levels and distribution in Alzheimer’s disease, axons to myelin in demyelination related diseases can be visualized | ~ 300 nm laterally and 1 μm axially | >1000 μm | Spatial resolution and acquisition time for live-cell and tissue imaging are improved as compared to spontaneous Raman techniques Label-free chemical imaging technique 3D sectioning capability due to the tightly focused incident beams CARS signal is free from auto-fluorescence | Detection of low concentrations is difficult Non-resonant background is coherently mixed with resonant CARS signal resulting in reduced sensitivity | Zumbusch et al. (1999); Evans et al. ( |
| Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) | SRS is a third-order nonlinear phenomenon and is similar to the CARS process; however, the SRS signal is measured as a stimulated Raman gain and stimulated Raman loss | Raman signal of 1660 cm−1 is allowed in the detection of misfolded Aβ proteins and lipids. It distinguishes normal and tumor conditions in macromolecules of the mouse cortex | 130 nm laterally, 1–2 μm axially | ~ 1000 μm with Urea+Triton X-100 | Provides background-free chemical imaging with improved image contrast in live cells and tissues The signal is free from non-resonant background | It is limited to specific molecules The signal strength is weak that requires a long measurement time (s) | Nandakumar et al. ( |