| Literature DB >> 35046989 |
Xueying Liu1, Le Yang1, Jinxia Wang1, Yaqing Wang1, Zhongni Guo1, Qingqing Li1, Jinming Yang1, Youlin Wu1, Li Chen1, Zhonghua Teng1, Dajun Liu1, Dexin Liu1, Kai Guo1, Zhengsheng Zhang1.
Abstract
Fiber quality and yield-related traits are important agronomic traits in cotton breeding. To detect the genetic basis of fiber quality and yield related traits, a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population consisting of 182 lines was established from a cross between Gossypium hirsutum cultivar CCRI35 and G. hirsutum race palmeri accession TX-832. The RIL population was deeply genotyped using SLAF-seq and was phenotyped in six environments. A high-density genetic linkage map with 15,765 SNP markers and 153 SSR markers was constructed, with an average distance of 0.30 cM between adjacent markers. A total of 210 fiber quality quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and 73 yield-related QTLs were identified. Of the detected QTLs, 62 fiber quality QTLs and 10 yield-related QTLs were stable across multiple environments. Twelve and twenty QTL clusters were detected on the At and Dt subgenome, respectively. Twenty-three major QTL clusters were further validated through associated analysis and five candidate genes of four stable fiber quality QTLs were identified. This study revealed elite loci influencing fiber quality and yield and significant phenotypic selection regions during G. hirsutum domestication, and set a stage for future utilization of molecular marker assisted breeding in cotton breeding programs.Entities:
Keywords: Gossypium hirsutum race palmeri; QTL; fiber quality; genetic map; yield related traits
Year: 2022 PMID: 35046989 PMCID: PMC8763314 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.817748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1The phenotype performance (A) and the correlation analysis (B) among fiber quality and yield-related traits. Red and blue point in figure a suggesting the trait performance of CCRI35 and TX-832, respectively.
FIGURE 2Detailed information about the genetic linkage map. (A) The density of SNP markers in the G. hirsutum genome in a 500 Kb window. (B) The collinearity analysis of markers between the genetic map and the physical map. The blue circle and the green circle indicating the genetic map and the physical map, respectively. (C) The distribution of markers in the genetic map. The gray lines and the red lines indicating SNP and SSR markers, respectively.
Detailed information of the high-density genetic linkage map.
| Chromosome | Length | No. | No. | Coverage | Gap |
| (cM) | Maker | SSR | ratio (%) | ||
| A01 | 180.44 | 1335 | 8 | 99.62 | 3 |
| A02 | 184.77 | 257 | 6 | 99.4 | 1 |
| A03 | 247.78 | 671 | 7 | 99.64 | 2 |
| A04 | 140.59 | 386 | 10 | 99.54 | 1 |
| A05 | 212.66 | 633 | 5 | 99.04 | 3 |
| A06 | 138.70 | 1082 | 5 | 99.6 | 4 |
| A07 | 213.50 | 437 | 5 | 99.78 | 1 |
| A08 | 213.43 | 1211 | 5 | 99.85 | 3 |
| A09 | 207.16 | 428 | 5 | 99.18 | 4 |
| A10 | 185.20 | 891 | 4 | 99.82 | 1 |
| A11 | 242.24 | 529 | 6 | 99.17 | 6 |
| A12 | 228.59 | 452 | 7 | 99.5 | 4 |
| A13 | 183.63 | 517 | 6 | 99.7 | 3 |
| D01 | 166.89 | 974 | 8 | 99.37 | 1 |
| D02 | 137.87 | 583 | 8 | 99.45 | 0 |
| D03 | 131.38 | 228 | 2 | 98.5 | 0 |
| D04 | 119.43 | 446 | 4 | 98.71 | 1 |
| D05 | 159.35 | 197 | 5 | 98.85 | 3 |
| D06 | 140.40 | 791 | 6 | 98.22 | 3 |
| D07 | 186.55 | 350 | 6 | 99.81 | 1 |
| D08 | 164.14 | 542 | 5 | 98.95 | 3 |
| D09 | 172.48 | 604 | 3 | 96.47 | 3 |
| D10 | 204.98 | 621 | 10 | 99.81 | 5 |
| D11 | 159.66 | 382 | 4 | 95.97 | 2 |
| D12 | 206.11 | 780 | 7 | 97.46 | 3 |
| D13 | 137.66 | 591 | 6 | 98.71 | 3 |
| Total | 4,665.59 | 15,918 | 153 | 2,574.12 | 64 |
FIGURE 3Distribution of QTLs for fiber quality and yield related traits and QTL clusters in the genetic map. (A) Distribution of QTLs and QTL clusters in the At subgenome. (B) Distribution of QTLs and QTL clusters in the Dt subgenome. The red rectangular frame indicating QTL clusters. The highlight rectangle indicating the confidence interval of each QTL, and the triangle indicating that the QTL is stable across environments.
FIGURE 4Validation of SNP markers in part of major QTL clusters.