| Literature DB >> 35046883 |
Hui Lin1, Haojie Wang2, Yawen Xu2, Zhangya Lin2, Dezhi Kang2,3,4, Shufa Zheng2, Peisen Yao2.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the correlation between admission body temperature and delayed cerebral infarction in elderly patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysm (IA).Entities:
Keywords: body temperature; cerebral infarction; diabetes; hypertension; intracranial aneurysm; risk factor
Year: 2022 PMID: 35046883 PMCID: PMC8761807 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.763471
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Characteristics of infarction and non-infarction groups.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| Age(years) | 66.64 ± 3.89 | 65.99 ± 5.19 | 0.377 |
|
| 0.177 | ||
| Female | 31 (58.5%) | 253 (67.8%) | |
| Male | 22 (41.5%) | 120 (32.2%) | |
| Pulse | 79.74 ± 14.14 | 77.23 ± 16.94 | 0.305 |
| Body temperature (°C) | 36.67 ± 0.38 | 36.89 ± 0.37 | 0.000 |
| SBP, mmHg | 144.08 ± 25.92 | 143.44 ± 24.87 | 0.862 |
| DBP, mmHg | 84.75 ± 11.73 | 82.07 ± 13.78 | 0.178 |
|
| 0.051 | ||
| No | 35 (66.1%) | 193 (51.7%) | |
| Yes | 18 (33.9%) | 180 (48.3%) | |
|
| 0.092 | ||
| No | 42 (79.2%) | 327 (87.7%) | |
| Yes | 11 (20.8%) | 46 (12.3%) | |
|
| 0.228 | ||
| Grade I | 8 (15.1%) | 64 (17.2%) | |
| Grade II | 20 (37.7%) | 137 (36.7%) | |
| Grade III | 12 (22.6%) | 118 (31.6%) | |
| Grade IV | 10 (18.9%) | 34 (9.1%) | |
| Grade V | 3 (5.7%) | 20 (5.4%) | |
|
| 0.646 | ||
| Grade 0 | 10 (18.8%) | 62 (16.6%) | |
| Grade 1 | 4 (7.5%) | 49 (13.1%) | |
| Grade 2 | 14 (26.4%) | 115 (30.8%) | |
| Grade 3 | 12 (22.6%) | 64 (17.2%) | |
| Grade 4 | 13 (24.5%) | 83 (22.3%) | |
|
| 0.722 | ||
| ACA | 1 (1.9%) | 19 (5.1%) | |
| ACoA | 12 (22.6%) | 91 (24.4%) | |
| ICA | 11 (20.8%) | 68 (18.2%) | |
| MCA | 14 (26.4%) | 71 (19.0%) | |
| PCoA | 12 (22.6%) | 98 (26.3%) | |
| others | 3 (5.7%) | 26 (7.0%) | |
| Aneurysm size | 7.67 ± 6.93 | 6.12 ± 5.44 | 0.061 |
|
| 0.591 | ||
| Microsurgical clipping | 41 (77.3%) | 301 (80.7%) | |
| Endovascular coiling | 5 (9.4%) | 39 (10.5%) | |
| Conservative treatment | 7 (13.2%) | 33 (8.8%) | |
|
| 0.847 | ||
| 0 min | 8 (19.5%) | 48 (15.9%) | |
| 0–5 min | 21 (51.2%) | 174 (57.8%) | |
| 5–10 min | 8 (19.5%) | 61 (20.3%) | |
| 10–15 min | 3 (7.3%) | 14 (4.7%) | |
| >15 min | 1 (2.4%) | 4 (1.3%) | |
|
| 0.972 | ||
| <3days | 28 (52.8%) | 198 (53.1%) | |
| >3days | 25 (47.2%) | 175 (46.9%) | |
| Serum leukocyte count (*109/L) | 9.81 ± 3.88 | 9.30 ± 3.99 | 0.380 |
| Neutrophil | 7.62 ± 3.79 | 8.76 ± 10.11 | 0.317 |
| Lymphocyte | 1.36 ± 0.64 | 1.43 ± 1.89 | 0.791 |
| Hemoglobin, g/L | 127.09 ± 14.24 | 124.66 ± 17.63 | 0.337 |
|
| |||
| Prothrombin time(s) | 11.86 ± 1.11 | 11.91 ± 0.75 | 0.686 |
| Activated partial prothrombin time(s) | 29.71 ± 6.06 | 29.46 ± 6.38 | 0.793 |
| INR | 0.98 ± 0.12 | 1.01 ± 0.10 | 0.162 |
| Fib fibrinogen(g/l) | 2.98 ± 0.96 | 3.17 ± 1.64 | 0.416 |
| D-dimer (ug/mL) | 2.48 ± 1.98 | 1.99 ± 2.15 | 0.201 |
|
| 0.348 | ||
| Spring (March–May) | 13 (24.5%) | 96 (25.7%) | |
| Summer (June–August) | 9 (17.0%) | 93 (24.9%) | |
| Autumn (September–November) | 14 (26.4%) | 102 (27.3%) | |
| Winter (December–February) | 17 (32.1%) | 82 (22.0%) | |
|
| 0.000 | ||
| 0–2 | 36 (67.9%) | 328 (87.9%) | |
| 3–6 | 17 (32.1%) | 45 (12.1%) | |
Figure 1The scatterplot graph for the correlation analysis of body temperature and cerebral infarction (P < 0.001).
Independent risk factors associated with cerebral infarction.
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Body Temperature | 5.561 | 2.272–13.611 | 0.000 | 5.469 | 2.202–13.581 | 0.000 |
| Hypertension | 0.551 | 0.302–1.008 | 0.053 | 0.542 | 0.289–1.015 | 0.056 |
| Diabetes | 0.537 | 0.258–1.117 | 0.096 | 0.750 | 0.347–1.623 | 0.465 |
| Aneurysm size | 0.961 | 0.921–1.003 | 0.066 | 0.959 | 0.917–1.002 | 0.060 |
Figure 2The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the correlation between body temperature and the occurrence of cerebral infarction in elderly IA patients (the upper and lower dotted curves are the 95% confidence intervals), area under curve 0.669(95% confidence interval [CI], 0.622–0.714; p < 0.001). The cutoff = 36.6°C (sensitivity = 64.15%, specificity = 81.50%).
Clinical manifestations of delayed cerebral infarction according to the pattern in the infarction group.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Single cortical | 2 (3.8%) | 12 (22.6%) | 2 (3.8%) | 16 (30.2%) |
| Single deep | 6 (11.3%) | 6 (11.3%) | 5 (9.4%) | 17 (32.1%) |
| Multiple cortical | 1 (1.9%) | 4 (7.5%) | 5 (9.4%) | 10 (18.9%) |
| Multiple deep | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.9%) | 1 (1.9%) | 2 (3.8%) |
| Multiple combined cortical and deep | 0 (0%) | 3 (5.7%) | 5 (9.4%) | 8 (15.1%) |
| Total | 9 (17.0%) | 26 (49.1%) | 18 (33.9%) | 53 (100.0%) |
Hemiparesis, aphasia, or neglect was considered as focal neurological deficits. Decreased level of consciousness without focal neurological deficits was considered as global or non-localizing.