| Literature DB >> 35046776 |
Pasquale Romanelli1,2, Lara Bieler1, Patrick Heimel3,4,5, Siniša Škokić6, Dominika Jakubecova1, Christina Kreutzer1, Pia Zaunmair1, Tomislav Smolčić6, Bruno Benedetti1, Eva Rohde7,8,9, Mario Gimona7,9,10, David Hercher4,5, Marina Dobrivojević Radmilović6,11, Sebastien Couillard-Despres1,5.
Abstract
Local inflammation plays a pivotal role in the process of secondary damage after spinal cord injury. We recently reported that acute intravenous application of extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted by human umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells dampens the induction of inflammatory processes following traumatic spinal cord injury. However, systemic application of EVs is associated with delayed delivery to the site of injury and the necessity for high doses to reach therapeutic levels locally. To resolve these two constraints, we injected EVs directly at the lesion site acutely after spinal cord injury. We report here that intralesional application of EVs resulted in a more robust improvement of motor recovery, assessed with the BBB score and sub-score, as compared to the intravenous delivery. Moreover, the intralesional application was more potent in reducing inflammation and scarring after spinal cord injury than intravenous administration. Hence, the development of EV-based therapy for spinal cord injury should aim at an early application of vesicles close to the lesion.Entities:
Keywords: exosomes; inflammation; locomotion; motor function; neuroimaging; neuroregeneration; scarring; traumatic spinal cord injury
Year: 2022 PMID: 35046776 PMCID: PMC8762366 DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2021.795008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5102 Impact factor: 5.505
Figure 1Acute intralesional application of EVs improved functional recovery after tSCI. The locomotor function of rats was monitored by (A) BBB scores and (B) sub-score in the tSCI groups. (C) Inter-limb coordination was assessed by Catwalk regularity index. (D) The p(LDA) was calculated to combine the nine most SCI-affected Catwalk parameters. (E) Skilled walking was tested with the horizontal ladder walk test and the percentage of step cycles containing missteps was monitored over time. (F) Thermal sensitivity was assessed according to the withdrawal latencies to a thermal stimulus using the plantar test Hargreaves’ method. Statistical differences to sham group using two-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test: (#)p < 0.05, (##)p < 0.01, (###)p < 0.001, statistical differences to i.pa vehicle group using two-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test on tSCI groups (without sham): (*)p < 0.05, (**)p < 0.01, (***)p < 0.001. EVs, extracellular vesicles; tSCI, traumatic spinal cord injury; BBB, Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan.
Summary of functional tests.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 1 day post-injury | 0.3 ± 0.5 | 0.8 ± 1.0 | 0.3 ± 0.5 | |
| 4 days post-injury | 4.4 ± 2.1 | 5.0 ± 2.0 | 5.4 ± 2.3 | |
| 7 days post-injury | 9.1 ± 1.2 | 9.5 ± 1.2 | 9.7 ± 1.0 | |
| 11 days post-injury | 10.7 ± 1.0 | 11.0 ± 1.1 | 11.2 ± 0.7 | |
| 14 days post-injury | 11.2 ± 0.6 | 12.3 ± 1.5 | 11.6 ± 1.1 | |
| 21 days post-injury | 11.0 ± 0.0 | 13.6 ± 2.4 | 11.5 ± 1.1 | |
| 28 days post-injury | 12.0 ± 1.1 | 14.5 ± 2.2 | 12.0 ± 1.2 | |
| 35 days post-injury | 11.9 ± 0.8 | 14.9 ± 1.9 | 12.1 ± 1.5 | |
| 42 days post-injury | 11.6 ± 0.5 | 14.8 ± 1.7 | 12.2 ± 1.5 | |
| 49 days post-injury | 12.0 ± 0.8 | 14.7 ± 1.6 | 12.6 ± 1.8 | |
| 56 days post-injury | 11.6 ± 0.5 | 15.2 ± 1.9 | 12.7 ± 1.7 | |
|
| ||||
| 1 day post-injury | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | |
| 4 days post-injury | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | |
| 7 days post-injury | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.7 | 0.2 ± 0.7 | |
| 11 days post-injury | 0.8 ± 1.7 | 0.8 ± 1.9 | 0.6 ± 1.1 | |
| 14 days post-injury | 0.9 ± 2.0 | 1.4 ± 1.8 | 1.1 ± 1.7 | |
| 21 days post-injury | 1.2 ± 1.5 | 2.9 ± 3.5 | 1.6 ± 1.6 | |
| 28 days post-injury | 2.0 ± 2.1 | 5.6 ± 3.1 | 3.9 ± 2.5 | |
| 35 days post-injury | 3.0 ± 1.9 | 7.2 ± 1.8 | 4.6 ± 2.6 | |
| 42 days post-injury | 2.0 ± 2.5 | 5.8 ± 2.5 | 4.1 ± 2.6 | |
| 49 days post-injury | 2.1 ± 2.2 | 5.4 ± 1.8 | 4.6 ± 2.2 | |
| 56 days post-injury | 1.6 ± 2.1 | 6.1 ± 2.7 | 4.9 ± 1.8 | |
|
| ||||
| Baseline | 99.5 ± 0.6 | 99.1 ± 1.6 | 98.6 ± 1.3 | 98.4 ± 1.9 |
| 21 days post-injury | 98.9 ± 1.4 | 83.6 ± 7.6 | 84.0 ± 6.6 | 84.6 ± 8.3 |
| 35 days post-injury | 98.5 ± 1.9 | 77.8 ± 16.8 | 88.9 ± 5.4 | 86.6 ± 7.3 |
| 49 days post-injury | 99.6 ± 0.5 | 86.3 ± 8.5 | 92.8 ± 3.5 | 89.5 ± 4.6 |
|
| ||||
| Baseline | 0.135 ± 0.041 | 0.121 ± 0.014 | 0.124 ± 0.010 | |
| 21 days post-injury | 0.027 ± 0.013 | 0.039 ± 0.018 | 0.028 ± 0.023 | |
| 35 days post-injury | 0.045 ± 0.018 | 0.064 ± 0.013 | 0.044 ± 0.014 | |
| 49 days post-injury | 0.045 ± 0.012 | 0.059 ± 0.017 | 0.062 ± 0.018 | |
|
| ||||
| Baseline | 2.7 ± 5.8 | 3.8 ± 5.5 | 0.6 ± 1.7 | 1.7 ± 2.4 |
| 28 days post-injury | 1.5 ± 2.5 | 50.5 ± 22.8 | 30.1 ± 12.4 | 38.3 ± 12.7 |
| 56 days post-injury | 1.0 ± 2.1 | 44.3 ± 10.3 | 36.5 ± 8.4 | 36.0 ± 7.5 |
|
| ||||
| Baseline | 7.9 ± 0.4 | 7.5 ± 0.7 | 7.2 ± 0.6 | 7.7 ± 0.9 |
| 28 days post-injury | 8.2 ± 0.3 | 5.2 ± 0.6 | 6.5 ± 0.7 | 7.1 ± 0.7 |
| 42 days post-injury | 8.1 ± 0.2 | 5.1 ± 0.6 | 5.9 ± 0.6 | 7.9 ± 0.7 |
| 56 days post-injury | 8.0 ± 0.4 | 6.5 ± 0.5 | 7.4 ± 0.8 | 7.9 ± 0.6 |
Summary of measurements addressing motor and sensory recovery. The results are displayed as means ± standard deviations. Statistically significant differences to the sham group are marked with .
Figure 2Acute intralesional application of EVs quenched the inflammatory response after tSCI. (A) Impact of EV treatment on the expression level of pro-inflammatory genes at the lesion site after tSCI. The density of Iba1-expressing cells was quantified at 14 days (B) and 56 days (C) after tSCI in the ventral horn. Representative immunodetection of Iba1 in the spinal cord of rats from (D) the sham group, (E) from the i.pa. vehicle-treated tSCI group and (F) from the i.pa. EVs- treated SCI-group (2 mm rostral from the epicenter). Immunodetection of Iba1-expressing microglia (red) was performed 14 days and 56 days post-tSCI. Nuclear counterstain was obtained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 50 μm. Statistical differences to sham group using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test: (###)p < 0.001, statistical differences to i.pa. vehicle group using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test on tSCI groups (without sham): (*)p < 0.05, (***)p < 0.001. Days post-injury: dpi.
Summary of histological measurements.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 14 days post-injury | 8,780 ± 1323 | 25,441 ± 1,712 | 21,566 ± 715 | 23,051 ± 2,837 |
| 56 days post-injury | 7,809 ± 333 | 16,947 ± 1,028 | 16,380 ± 1,272 | 18,483 ± 3,110 |
|
| ||||
| 14 days post-injury | 4.5 ± 0.8 | 9.6 ± 1.8 | 6.3 ± 1.0 | 6.3 ± 0.9 |
| 56 days post-injury | 3.8 ± 1.3 | 8.6 ± 1.6 | 5.7 ± 1.2 | 6.3 ± 1.1 |
|
| ||||
| 14 days post-injury | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 9.0 ± 1.8 | 6.5 ± 1.0 | 7.3 ± 0.7 |
| 56 days post-injury | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 8.5 ± 1.8 | 6.4 ± 1.3 | 6.4 ± 0.5 |
|
| ||||
| 14 days post-injury | 3.0 ± 0.8 | 10.7 ± 0.9 | 8.1 ± 1.3 | 9.1 ± 0.7 |
| 56 days post-injury | 2.4 ± 0.7 | 9.5 ± 1.6 | 7.7 ± 0.7 | 7.6 ± 1.0 |
|
| ||||
| 14 days post-injury | 38.3 ± 3.1 | 23.5 ± 3.9 | 28.1 ± 3.1 | 27.9 ± 3.9 |
| 56 days post-injury | 41.0 ± 2.9 | 17.8 ± 2.4 | 22.0 ± 1.9 | 19.0 ± 2.3 |
|
| ||||
| 14 days post-injury | 60.6 ± 6.4 | 47.2 ± 6.7 | 47.7 ± 8.5 | 36.5 ± 5.4 |
| 56 days post-injury | 51.0 ± 3.2 | 35.2 ± 12.7 | 31.7 ± 6.5 | 36.0 ± 8.0 |
The results are displayed as means ± standard deviations. Statistically significant differences to the sham group are marked with .
Figure 3Acute intralesional application of EVs reduced astrogliosis and scarring after tSCI. Immunodetection of GFAP (A,B), collagen I (C,D), and NG2 (E,F) in the spinal cord of a sham rat and following tSCI. (A,B) Immunodetection of GFAP-expressing astrocytes (white) in the ventral horn of sham rats, i.pa. vehicle-treated tSCI rats and i.pa. EVs-treated tSCI rats at 14 days (A) and 56 days (B) post-injury (3 mm rostral from lesion epicenter); Nuclear counterstain with DAPI (blue). Scale bar (A) = 50 μm. (C,D) Immunodetection of collagen I (green) in the spinal cord of sham rats, i.pa. vehicle-treated and i.pa. EVs-treated rats at 14 days (C) and 56 days (D) post-tSCI at the lesion epicenter. (E,F) Immunodetection of NG-2 (green) in the spinal cord of sham rats i.pa. vehicle-treated and i.pa. EVs-treated rats at 14 days (E) and 56 days (F) post-tSCI at the lesion epicenter. Scale bar (E) = 1,000 μm. (G,H) Percentage of section area covered by GFAP at 14 days (G) and 56 days (H) post-tSCI. (I,J) Percentage of section area covered by collagen I at 14 days (I) and 56 days (J) post-tSCI. (K,L) Percentage of section area covered NG2 at 14 days (K) and 56 days (L) post-tSCI. Statistical differences to sham group using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test: (#)p < 0.05, (###)p < 0.001, statistical differences to i.pa. vehicle group using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test on tSCI groups (without sham): (*)p < 0.05, (**)p < 0.01. Days post-injury: dpi.
Figure 4Early intralesional application of EVs spared more parenchyma after tSCI. (A–F) Representative micrographs of GFAP immunodetection on spinal cord sections at lesion epicenter at 14 days (A–C) and at 56 days post-tSCI (D–F). Scale bar = 500 μm. The total volume of healthy-appearing parenchyma was calculated from 3 mm rostral to 3 mm caudal to the lesion epicenter, or the equivalent position in the sham rats at 14 days (G) and 56 days post-tSCI (H). Statistical differences to sham group using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test: (###)p < 0.001, statistical differences to i.pa. vehicle group using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test on tSCI groups (without sham): (*)p < 0.05. Days post-injury: dpi.
Figure 5Acute application of EVs improved structural outcomes after tSCI. Representative magnetic resonance (MRI) and micro-computed tomography (μCT) images of vehicle-treated rats at 56 days post-tSCI. Corresponding horizontal sections obtained with (A) T1-IR and T2 MRI sequences or (B) contrast agent-enhanced μCT. Arrows point to dense scar tissue in (A), arrowheads point to degenerating tracks in (A). Corresponding cross-sections obtained with (C) contrast agent-enhanced μCT and (D) immunohistology (GFAP in blue, NF-H in green and Iba1 in red). Arrows point to cysts in (C) and (D). (A) to (C): red lines: cysts; yellow lines: damaged tissue and green lines: sample borders. Quantification of the (E) volume of cysts, (F) volume of damaged tissue including cysts, and (G) volume of intact-appearing tissue. (E–G) Statistical differences to sham group using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test on all groups: (###)p < 0.001. (H) Longitudinal fiber tracts rostral and caudal to the lesion epicenter detected by DTI. Statistical differences to vehicle group using two-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test on tSCI groups (without sham): (***)p < 0.001.