Treatment Strategies Against Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: An Updated Review.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with an increased risk of early recurrence and distant metastasis, as well as the development of therapeutic resistance and poor prognosis. TNBC is characterized by a wide range of genetic, immunophenotypic, morphological, and clinical features. TNBC is coined to describe cancers that lack estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). As a result, hormonal or trastuzumab-based treatments are ineffective in TNBC patients. TNBCs are biologically aggressive, and despite some evidence that they respond to treatment better than other forms of breast cancer, the prognosis remains poor. This is attributed to a shorter disease-free interval in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, as well as a more aggressive metastatic course. TNBC has a lot of clinical ramifications. In terms of new treatment methods, TNBC has lagged behind other types of breast cancer. There are not many options for treating this form of breast cancer because it is progressive. Many effective treatments for most breast cancers block the growth-stimulating effects of ER, PR, and/or HER2, leaving TNBC with few choices. Finding new and effective treatment options for TNBC remains a critical clinical need. To develop more effective drugs, new experimental approaches must be tested in patients with TNBC.

Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers among women worldwide. It has different pathological and molecular subtypes, and different therapies with different clinical results are needed to treat it.1 Numerous targeted drugs are being tested in preclinical and clinical studies to combat the complications of breast cancer. Since the late 1990s, mortality rates have decreased due to early detection using palpation and mammograms, as well as adjuvant systemic therapy for treatment. However, some breast tumors remain resistant to traditional therapies, which may be due to the activation of pro-proliferative, anti-apoptotic, and pro-survival signaling pathways. These factors work together to cause drug resistance, which affects the clinical conditions’ vulnerability to monotherapy. Apart from the urgent problem of drug resistance, which is on the verge of becoming a medical epidemic, current medications are often known to cause such adverse effects, which have a direct impact on the treatment outcome.2,3 As a result, there is a strong desire to develop new therapeutic methods to effectively treat this disorder. TNBC is a biologically active form of breast cancer that accounts for approximately 15–20% of all breast cancer cases. Estrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptors (PRs), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are absent.4 TNBC has a wide range of genetic, immunophenotypic, morphological, and clinical characteristics. TNBCs are typically greater in size and heterogeneous in nature than other breast cancer subtypes. TNBC affects the lymph nodes. TNBC can be divided into six subtypes, as per new research, each with its own gene expression profiles and ontologies.5 The lack of ERs, PRs, HER2 expression, and predictors of resistance to standard chemotherapy make designing specific TNBC drug therapies difficult.6

Androgen receptors (ARs) have been shown to play an important role in TNBC cell growth, invasion, migration, and apoptosis, both of which contribute to disease complications. Targeting ARs with AR inhibitors may be the most effective therapy for TNBC.7 Different inflammatory molecules, such as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and cytokines, suppress the immune response to TNBC during chemotherapy, increasing the risk of TNBC complications.7 In patients with TNBC, therapies targeting these inflammatory molecules can improve disease-free and overall survival rates. In TNBC, miRNAs play an important role in cancer cell survival, proliferation, invasion, and metastasis, and manipulating these miRNAs can help reduce the risk of early relapse and metastasis.8 Furthermore, although TNBC lacks estrogen receptor (ER) expression, the presence of estrogen receptor dependent receptors (ERRs) is linked to poor clinical outcomes in TNBC patients.9 Similarly, autophagy inducers, nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) have been found to play a role in disease progression.10,11 The use of inhibitors to target these molecules may be a reliable treatment technique for TNBC. To develop precise and reliable agents that can effectively target TNBC, it is critical to elucidate the prognostic markers of TNBC. TNBC prognostic factors include node status, cathepsin-D, Ki67 index, BRCA1 promoter methylation value, and p53.12,13 These prognostic tools are usually effective in predicting disease-free survival and overall survival rates in TNBC patients, and in cases of poor prognosis, other better treatment options may be considered (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Summarized conventional and novel targeted approach to treat triple-negative breast cancer.

Treatment Strategies for Triple Negative Breast Cancer

TNBCs are a heterogeneous and aggressive form of cancer, for which there are no scientifically validated biologically targeted effective treatments. The lack of ERs, PRs, and HER2 makes finding a reliable treatment alternative for TNBC extremely difficult. In the following sections, we will concentrate on some of the most successful and dependable treatment solutions for TNBC, as well as the reasons for their failure.

Targeting Androgen Receptors

In a subset of TNBC, the role of androgen signaling begins to emerge. ARs, a form of steroid hormone receptor, have recently been discovered to be prognostic and treatment predictive markers in patients with TNBC. AR is found in approximately 80% of invasive breast cancers and approximately 30% of TNBC patients.14 The levels of AR expression in TNBCs varied greatly. Patients with AR-dependent TNBC have a better prognosis than those with AR-independent TNBC. As a result, agents targeting ARs may be the most effective treatment marker for TNBC. According to a study conducted by Bonnefoi et al, anti-androgen drugs may be a reliable treatment marker for TNBC. For this review, 146 patients from 27 different centers were selected. An appropriate tissue sample was available for 136 of 146 patients, and they were AR positive and triple negative. They examined the effectiveness and safety of abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone in women with AR+ and ER-, PR-, HER-2- metastatic or inoperable locally advanced breast cancer in a multicenter single-arm step second study. At the end of six months, the clinical benefit rate was 20%. This suggests that AA plus prednisone is effective for AR-dependent TNBC patients, and it can be inferred from this study that targeting ARs may be a potential treatment strategy for TNBC.15

Androgen-targeting has shown promising early results and should be further studied in the right TNBC patients. AR IHC (Androgen receptor immunohistochemistry) expression (with varied cutoffs) has been used as a selection criterion in therapeutic trials including AR targeting. On the other hand, in preclinical studies of this treatment strategy, AR IHC and gene expression-defined subtypes were used (luminal or LAR subtypes). Due to the complexity of interconnected signaling pathways, IHC positive for AR alone is unlikely to reliably identify individuals who will benefit from AR modifying medicines.16–18 Subtypes of tumour AR dependence have emerged in recent years based on gene expression (LAR, intrinsic luminal subtype, PREDICT AR subtype).6,18–21 Prospective studies are needed before they may be transferred into routine clinical practice. Additional translational research should also focus on the changes in tumour AR dependency under the stresses of routine chemotherapy and whether primary or metastatic tumour androgen dependency is most likely to correspond to antiandrogen treatment response in the main tumour.18,21

Efficacy of single-agent AR inhibitors in clinical trials was shown to be limited. AR inhibitors can now be tested in a new generation of clinical studies, thanks to recent breakthroughs in our knowledge of androgenic signaling in TNBC. A solid set of biomarkers for the detection of TNBC cancers that are androgen dependent must be established at the same time as novel AR-targeting drugs are produced and tested in clinical trials. Androgen signaling has a multifaceted role, but it emerges as a therapeutic target for a subset of patients with this aggressive disease that lacks molecular targets. Antiandrogens are well tolerated and have known and acceptable safety profiles. It is being tested in clinical trials as a single drug or in combination with other antiandrogen medicines and cytotoxic chemicals. In the future, standardized and reproducible methods for identifying AR-dependent malignancies will allow researchers to adapt clinical trials to the correct patient population and allow doctors to better predict patients’ responses in future clinical trials.18

ARs play a role in TNBC by inducing cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis, as well as inhibiting apoptosis. The following subsections provide a quick overview of how ARs play a role in complicating TNBC and a potential treatment plan.

Role of Androgen Receptors in Inducing Cell Proliferation and Inhibition of Apoptosis in Mesenchymal Stem Like

TNBC has a subtype called mesenchymal stem-like (MSL). AR was found to be strongly expressed in the MSL subtype of TNBC. In vitro and in vivo studies performed by Zhu et al showed the tumorigenic function of ARs and the inhibitory effect of bicalutamide in AR+ MSL TNBC. The effect of AR on cell viability and apoptosis in the MSL TNBC MDA-MB-231 cell line was investigated using cell counting, flow cytometry, the MTT assay, and Western blotting to examine the protein expression of p53, p73, p21, and cyclin D1. Using a ChIP assay, AR binding to p73 and p21 was investigated. MDA-MB-231 cells were then implanted into the naked mice. Tumor growth was examined after DHT or bicalutamide treatment, and the expression of AR, p73, and p21 was determined using immunohistochemistry. The results showed that the AR agonist DHT stimulated cell proliferation and inhibited apoptosis in MSL TNBC cells. AR improves the viability of MDA-MB-231 xenografts in vivo Bicalutamide, on the other hand, is an AR antagonist that induces apoptosis and inhibits the growth of MSL TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells.22 This suggests that AR plays a significant role in TNBC development. As a result, AR inhibitors can be used as dependable treatment markers for TNBC.

Role of Androgen Receptors in Inducing Invasion and Migration

Androgen receptors (ARs) have been discovered to play a role in the development, invasion, and metastasis of TNBC. Caiazza et al explored whether targeting AR might be a hormonal approach for treating TNBC. The anti-androgen drug enzalutamide was selected for the analysis. The results showed that enzalutamide could successfully inhibit AR-induced cell growth, invasion, and metastasis in TNBC. Enzalutamide inhibits AR-induced cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis by inhibiting the transcription factors AP-1 and SP-1. In an AR-dependent manner, the first-generation anti-androgen flutamide was also found to be efficient in inhibiting cell development, invasion, and metastasis. The effect of AR on TNBC was studied in 2091 patients, and it was discovered that there is a significant link between AR expression and poor overall survival, leading to the conclusion that AR complicates TNBC by inducing cell development, invasion, and metastasis.23 Thus, it can be inferred that AR plays a major role in the violent nature of TNBC. However, this finding raises the possibility that antiandrogen drugs may be a useful hormonal tool in the treatment of TNBC. As a result, developing more anti-androgen drugs to tackle the problem of TNBCs has become a priority.

Targeting Inflammatory Molecules

Chemotherapy performance in TNBC is also influenced by the immune response created against the tumor cells that die during treatment. Genetic and epigenetic modifications of TNBC aid tumor-associated antigens in developing resistance to the immune system response. Various pathways, such as immune checkpoints, which are involved in mediating immune tolerance and mitigating collateral tissue damage, aid tumor cells in gaining resistance to chemotherapy. The involvement of inflammatory molecules, such as macrophages, cytokines, chemokines, and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been shown to influence overall survival rates in TNBC in several studies. The involvement of activated inflammatory molecules in the tumor microenvironment inhibits the immune response against tumor cells, thereby increasing TNBC complications.24 As a result, increasing disease-free survival rates in TNBC requires a focus on these inflammatory molecules. To find a solution for TNBC, various therapies targeting these inflammatory molecules must be investigated. The role of various inflammatory molecules in complicating TNBC is discussed in this section.

Role of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL)

The existence of activated inflammatory molecules also leads to its aggressive nature, according to various studies. TILs, a form of inflammatory molecule, have been linked to TNBC complications in several studies. High TIL levels are linked to a higher overall survival rate in patients with TNBC. TIL levels can be used as predictive and prognostic markers to assess the effectiveness of different standard therapies, such as neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Targeting inflammatory molecules may be the most effective way to combat TNBC. Recent research has shown that immune modulatory agents, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, would have a promising effect against TNBC. Another study by Teijido et al supports the idea that targeting molecules expressed on the surface of TNBC may be a more effective treatment approach. T-cells within the tumor setting activate programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PDL1), which is known to suppress the local immune response. In TNBC, PD-1-PD-L1 is essential for sustaining immunosuppression in the tumor setting. During clinical trials, Garcia Teijido et al discovered that targeting PD-1 with the inhibitor pembrolizumab and PD-L1 with the inhibitor atezolizumab showed promising results against TNBC.25,26 As a result, PD1-PDL1 is currently being considered as a potential therapeutic target for TNBC.

Role of TNF-Alpha

While the mechanism by which inflammatory molecules mediate TNBC progression is still unknown, there is a growing body of evidence suggesting that inflammatory molecules play a role in TNBC complications. Another inflammatory molecule, TNF-α, plays a role in disease progression, according to a study conducted by Qiao et al. They discovered that transcription factor AP-1 aids in the development of cancer caused by inflammation rather than mediating the inflammatory response, and they used chIP-seq to show that the cistrome for AP-1 transcription factor c-Jun is made up of 13,800 TNF-alpha transcriptome-binding regions. Approximately one-third of the TNF-α transcriptome is controlled by c-Jun. In TNBCs, high levels of c-Jun expression have been linked to poor clinical outcomes. They discovered that TNF-alpha expression mediated by c-Jun increases the malignant characteristics of TNBC. They also mentioned that NF-κB may be a key transcription factor in the regulation of TNF-alpha, while c-Jun has little effect on TNF-alpha in the mediation of TNBC malignancy.27–33 As a result, TNF-α is implicated in complications of TNBC, and therapies targeting TNF-α could be a more effective treatment option for TNBC.

Role of Tumor Associated Macrophages and Cytokines

To learn more about the etiology of TNBC and develop drugs to treat it, researchers must identify all the factors that contribute to the disease’s complications. Wang et al investigated the expression profile of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and cytokines, as well as their functions in TNBC complications. RT-PCR and ELISA were used to check the expression of cytokines such as IL6, IL-10, IL-1B, IL-12, chemokine, and macrophage inflammatory protein −2 (MIP-2) in 48 TNBC cases. TAMs were also detected using immunohistochemical S-P staining. In TNBC patients after surgery, 34 out of 48 were found to be CD68 positive, and IL-6, CCL-5, and even TAM expression levels were all upregulated. The presence of both factors leads to a poor prognosis in TNBC. The development of drugs targeting these molecules may be a ray of hope in the battle against TNBC.34 Based on the evidence presented above, inflammatory molecules play a role in complicating the disease and contributing to TNBC’s aggressive behavior. Therefore, the development of drugs targeting these molecules may be a valuable therapeutic strategy for TNBC. The mechanisms underlying these facts must also be explored in depth, as this will aid the scientific community in developing targeted TNBC drug therapy.

Targeting MicroRNAs

It has been challenging to establish new and effective therapies to improve TNBC patients’ overall survival rates due to the heterogeneity of TNBC and the lack of frequency drive mutations other than TP53. MicroRNAs have been shown to play a role in TNBC cancer cell survival, proliferation, invasion, and metastasis, and miRNAs that target these miRNAs can reduce the risk of relapse and metastasis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are global regulators of cancer cell survival, proliferation, and migration.34 Therefore, miRNAs may be an alternative treatment for TNBC. In this segment, we will examine how miRNAs regulate cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis in TNBC.

Role of MicroRNAs in Inducing Invasion and Metastasis

The molecular basis for metastasis and disease relapse in patients with TNBC remains largely unknown. The complications of TNBC are exacerbated by metastasis and early relapse. Yan et al investigated the function of miRNAs in inducing invasion and metastasis in TNBC. They discovered that miR-136 functions as an anti-invasive microRNA in TNBC and inhibits invasion and metastasis in the mesenchymal subtype of TNBC in their research. They discovered that anti-invasive and anti-metastatic miR-136 were downregulated in TNBC. Overexpression of RASAL2 in TNBC prevents cell migration and invasion mediated by miR-136 As a result, it can be concluded that miR-136/RASAL2 serves as a suppressor of TNBC invasion and metastasis and that it can be successfully used as a drug therapy to treat the complications of TNBC invasion and metastasis.8

Role of microRNAs in Inducing Cell Proliferation

MicroRNAs have been found to play a role in cell proliferation in TNBC. Phan et al discovered that overexpression of miR-1296 in TNBC cells prevents cell proliferation and causes apoptosis. Overexpression of miR-1296 also resulted in a significant reduction in the S phase of the cell cycle. Researchers have used miRNA pRT-PCR, colony formation assays, cell cycle analysis, and apoptosis assays to investigate this. Other methods, such as immunoblotting and luciferase assays, were used to determine the expression of miRNA-1296 target protein. Based on their results, Phan et al concluded that miR-1296 targets cyclin D1 (CCND1), a cell cycle protein. The transcription factor miR1296, when overexpressed in TNBC cells, suppresses the expression of CCND1. Overexpression of MiR-1296 can be counteracted by CCND1 overexpression. Consequently, there is a negative relationship between miRNA-1296 and CCND1.35 Furthermore, miRNAs can be used to treat TNBC as an effective therapeutic strategy. However, more research is needed to fully understand the potential of miRNAs and their use as a treatment strategy for TNBC.

Targeting Estrogen Receptor Related Receptors

Several studies have discovered the role of estrogen receptor associated receptors (ERRs) in TNBC complications. In patients with TNBC, high levels of ERR alpha are associated with a poor prognosis. YM et al discovered that inhibiting ERR alpha with the inverse agonist XCT-790 suppressed cell proliferation and induced mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis in TNBC cells in their study. XCT-790 suppressed cell proliferation by increasing the expression of p53 and p21 (growth inhibitory proteins). XCT-790 increases the levels of ATF4/6, XBT-1, and CHOP, both of which are proteins associated with ER stress. The presence of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in TNBC increases when SOD1/2 is inhibited by XCT-790. On the other hand, the ROS scavenger NAC prevented ER stress and growth arrest caused by XCT-790. ERK1/2, JNK, p38-MAPK, Akt, NF-kBp65, and IB can all be effectively targeted by XCT-790. Other ERK1/2, JNK, Akt, and NF-B inhibitors also prevent TNBC from developing ROS in response to XCT-790. Based on these results, it can be concluded that XCT-790 treatment causes activation of Akt, ERK, NFB, and p38-MAPK-based ROS in TNBC cells. Validation of these results was performed in vivo on MDA-MB-231 xenograft tumors. Treatment with XCT-790 inhibits cell growth in MDA-MB-231 xenograft tumors, which is linked to increased expression of p53, p21, ER-stress related proteins, and Bcl2 downregulation.9 All of this research supports the notion that ERRs play a role in the progression of TNBC, and that using anti-ERRs as a therapeutic option for TNBC will prove to be a successful drug candidate. Furthermore, it lays the groundwork for the potential production of drugs that target ERRs to combat TNBC complications.

Targeting Mammalian Target of Rapamycin

The downstream regulator of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (I)3K], the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), is one of the most well-known signaling pathways involved in cancer complications. In TNBC, the P(I)3K-mTOR pathway was found to be activated at the genome, gene expression, and protein levels. mTOR complexes mTORC1 and mTORC2 are known to exist. TNBC is difficult to treat due to mTOR activation at various levels in tumors. The development of mTOR inhibitors could be a successful treatment strategy for TNBC. Zhang et al investigated the effects of two mTOR inhibitors, sirolimus (rapamycin) and temsirolimus (CCI-779), on patient-derived xenografts with several TNBC subtypes.36 They observed 77–99% growth inhibition in patient xenografts after drug testing with mTOR inhibitors. However, they also mentioned that no tumor was completely eradicated; rather, the activation of the mTOR pathway was reduced. These results clearly show that mTOR inhibitors are successful against TNBC, but that they need to be used in combination with other treatments to fully eliminate the complications. In their study, Zhang and colleagues discovered that mTOR inhibitors have a cytostatic effect on tumor development, but that they are insufficient to completely eradicate tumor mass. Additional drugs, in addition to mTOR inhibitors, are necessary to completely shrink the tumor. New drug formulations containing mTOR catalytic inhibitors, dual kinase inhibitors of mTOR and P(I) 3 K, and combined targeting of selective allosteric pan-Akt inhibitor MK-2206 with mTOR inhibition are currently being studied in order to fully eradicate TNBC.37 To combat TNBC, researchers should concentrate on developing combinatorial drug therapies that include mTOR inhibitors and other medications.

Targeting Nuclear Factor Kappa B

Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) is a transcription factor involved in immune control, inflammation, and tumorigenesis in several cancers. When IKKB kinase is stimulated in response to proinflammatory and prooxidative stimuli, it phosphorylates and degrades IκB proteins.38,39 Another study investigated the impact of lapatinib on NF-κB activation in TNBC. Lapatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits both the EGRR and HER2 receptors. They examined how lapatinib and proteasome inhibitors affected TNBC. Chen and colleagues concluded that lapatinib inhibited NF-κB activation in TNBC, independent of EGFR/HER2 inhibition, using immunoprecipitation assays, immunoblotting, RT-qPCR, and luciferase assays. There were no other EGFR inhibitors that synergized with proteasome inhibitors, except for lapatinib. According to these findings, treatment of TNBC with lapatinib can increase oncogene addiction to NF-κB, thereby increasing the anti-tumor activity of proteasome inhibitors.40 These results strongly suggest that combination therapy combining proteasome inhibitors and lapatinib may be a viable treatment option for TNBC.

Targeting Autophagy

Autophagy is a biological process in which the cells of the body are killed. Autophagy has been linked to TNBC complications in a variety of studies. According to Liang et al, CQ, an autophagy blocker, effectively targets cancer stem cells (CSCs) in TNBC by inhibiting autophagy, mitochondrial structural damage, and impairment of double-stranded DNA break repair in CSCs. CQ has the ability to effectively suppress TNBC cell proliferation in vitro and in a TNBC xenograft model. CQ reduces tumor development in carboplatin-resistant BRCA1 wild-type TNBC orthotopic xenografts by greatly eradicating the expression of DNA repair proteins in CSC populations when used in combination with other drugs.41 As a result, it is possible that CQ, an autophagy inhibitor with anti-CSC effects, may be used as a TNBC treatment technique. However, it should be noted that no targeted therapy has received FDA approval for TNBC to date, and more reliable drug therapy against TNBC is urgently needed. The latest research aims to determine how natural metabolites and nano-enhanced natural metabolites can help combat triple-negative breast cancer.

Therapeutic strategies and targeted agents to treat TNBC are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

Therapeutic Strategies and Targeted Agents That May Be Used in Specific Subtypes of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

TNBC Subtype	Therapeutic Strategies	Therapeutic Targeted Drugs
LAR (luminal androgen receptor)	Inhibit FOXA1, AR signaling, and ERBB4 signaling	PI3K inhibitors Eg, IdelalisibmTOR inhibitors Eg, RapaLink-1, rapamycin, everolimus,Nonsteroidal antiandrogens Eg, bicalutamide
MSL (mesenchymal stem-like)	Inhibit, PI3K, mTOR, EMT, Wnt, TGFβ, MAPK, Rac, Scr, PDGF	Scr inhibitors Eg, Dasatinib, BosutinibMAPK inhibitors Eg, Dabrafenib, TrametinibPI3K inhibitors Eg, IdelalisibmTOR inhibitors Eg, RapaLink-1, rapamycin, everolimusGrowth Factor inhibitors Eg, Vandetanib, Bevacizumab, Pertuzumab, Ramucirumab, Trastuzumab, Axitinib, Cabozantinib, Ceritinib, Erlotinib, Gefitinib, Afatinib, Osimertinib, Olmutinib, Nazartinib, Avitinib, lapatinib, Cetuximab, Panitumumab, Crizotinib, Lenvatinib, Nilotinib, Pazopanib, Regorafenib, Sorafenib, Sunitinib
M (mesenchymal)	Inhibit Scr, TGFβ, EMT, Wnt, PI3K, mTOR, IGF1R, Notch	PI3K inhibitors Eg, IdelalisibScr inhibitors Eg, Bosutinib, DasatinibmTOR inhibitors Eg, Rapamycin, Everolimus, RapaLink-1Growth Factor inhibitors Eg, Erlotinib, Gefitinib, Afatinib, Osimertinib, Olmutinib, Nazartinib, Avitinib, lapatinib, Cetuximab, Panitumumab, Vandetanib, Bevacizumab, Pertuzumab, Ramucirumab, Trastuzumab, Axitinib, Cabozantinib, Ceritinib, Crizotinib, Lenvatinib, Nilotinib, Pazopanib, Regorafenib, Sorafenib, Sunitinib
IM (immunomodulatory)	Inhibit immune signaling	Immune checkpoint inhibitors Eg, Ipilimumab, NivolumabPARP inhibitors Eg, Olaparib, Rucaparib, Talazoparib and Niraparib)Cytostatics E.g.Cisplatin, Carboplatin, Nedaplatin, Eptaplatin, Oxaliplatin, Lobaplatin, Satraplatin, Mercaptopurine
BL1 (basal-like 1)	Inhibit cell proliferation and DNA damage response	DNA Synthetic inhibitors Eg, Camptothecin, Doxorubicin, Daunorubicin, Topotecan, Irinotecan, MitomycinPARP inhibitors Eg, Talazoparib, Niraparib, Olaparib, Rucaparib,Cytostatics Eg, Oxaliplatin, Lobaplatin, Satraplatin, Cisplatin, Carboplatin, Nedaplatin, Eptaplatin, MercaptopurineMitosis inhibitors Eg, Ixabepilone, Nab-Paclitaxel, Vinorelbine Paclitaxel, Docetaxel,
BL2 (basal-like 2)	Inhibit EGFR, TP63, and MET signaling	mTOR inhibitors Eg, RapaLink-1, everolimus, rapamycin,PARP inhibitors Eg, Talazoparib, Rucaparib, Olaparib, and NiraparibCytostatics Eg, Oxaliplatin, Cisplatin, Nedaplatin, Carboplatin, Lobaplatin, Satraplatin, Mercaptopurine, Eptaplatin,Growth Factor inhibitors Eg Osimertinib, Gefitinib, Erlotinib, Bevacizumab,Afatinib, Olmutinib, Nazartinib, Vandetanib, Avitinib, lapatinib, Ramucirumab, Cetuximab, Panitumumab, Lenvatinib, Trastuzumab, Nilotinib, Pazopanib, Regorafenib, Sorafenib, Sunitinib Pertuzumab, Axitinib, Cabozantinib, Ceritinib, Crizotinib.

Note: Data from these studies42–44.

Abbreviations: PI3K, Phosphoinositide 3-kinases; FOXA1, Forkhead box protein A1 (FOXA1), also known as hepatocyte nuclear factor 3-alpha (HNF-3A); AR, Androgen receptor; ERBB4, Receptor protein-tyrosine kinase ErbB-4; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; EMT, epithelial–mesenchymal transition; Wnt, Wingless-related integration site; TGFβ, Transforming growth factor beta; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; Rac, Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; IGF1R, insulin-like growth factor 1; PARP, poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase.

Conclusion

TNBC is an issue for patients and physicians since it has a poor prognosis and fewer treatment options, as seen by its high mortality rate when compared to other breast cancer subtypes. Even though TNBC is a serious disease, there is a solid foundation for its molecular subtypes that can co-occur in tumour. However, the underlying variability of the disease can limit the efficacy of treatment, despite molecular subtyping. Because of this, effective targeted remedies are becoming increasingly difficult to produce.

Some of the therapeutic approaches for TNBC management include targeting the DNA repair complex (platinum compounds and taxanes), p53 (taxanes), cell proliferation (anthracycline-containing regimen), and targeted therapy. The best adjuvant regimens for TNBC are still being developed. Several randomized trials have shown the benefits of adjuvant anthracyclines and taxanes in breast cancer.

Targeted treatments such as Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1), a nuclear DNA-binding enzyme triggered by DNA strand breaks, play a vital role in the signaling of DNA single-strand breaks as part of the repair process, are being developed successfully. This means that tailored therapeutics for TNBC must be developed immediately. Emerging treatment targets include tyrosine and non-tyrosine tyrosine kinases, PARP1, androgen receptor, immune-checkpoints, and epigenetic proteins discovered in recent molecular characterization of TNBCs.

Participating in a clinical trial of new treatments for TNBC, regardless of the stage of the disease, is a good option because TNBC is rare and has a high mortality rate (outcome) as compared to other types of breast cancer, and these trials provide patients with drugs that are not available in standard care.