Literature DB >> 35046712

Enlarged Lumen Volume of Proximal Aortic Segment and Acute Type B Aortic Dissection: A Computer Fluid Dynamics Study of Ideal Aortic Models.

Yuan Peng1, Xuelan Zhang2, Jiehua Li1, Xiaolong Zhang1, Hao He1, Xin Li1, Kun Fang3, Liancun Zheng2, Chang Shu1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent study has revealed that enlarged diameters of the ascending aorta and proximal aortic arch enhance the probability of ATBAD. However, little is understood about the relation to ATBAD.
OBJECTIVE: This study explored the differences in proximal aortic segment (PAS) morphology in patients with acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD), and performed hemodynamic simulations to provide proof of principle.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The morphological characteristics of PAS in the ATBAD group (n = 163) and corresponding segment in the control group (n = 120) were retrospectively measured. The morphological parameters were analyzed using comprehensive statistical approaches. Ridge regression analysis was also performed to determine the association between independent variable and dependent variable. P < 0.01 was considered significant. Idealized aortic models were established based on variables of statistical significance, and hemodynamic simulations were performed to evaluate blood flow changes caused by morphology.
RESULTS: Diameters at landmarks of PAS were significantly larger in the ATBAD group. The lumen volume (VPAS) of PAS in the ATBAD group was significantly enlarged than that of the control group (124,659.07 ± 34,089.27 mm3 vs 89,796.65 ± 30,334.40 mm3; P < 0.001). Furthermore, the VPAS was positively correlated to diameters. As the VPAS increased, the fluid kinetic energy in PAS enhanced linearly, and time-averaged wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index at the distal area of the left subclavian artery increased significantly.
CONCLUSION: In the ATBAD group, the enlarged VPAS and increased diameters of PAS are positively correlated. Meanwhile, the enlarged VPAS leads to more aggressive hemodynamic parameters at the distal area of the left subclavian artery, which may create a contributory condition for ATBAD.
© 2022 Peng et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic dissection; aortic morphology; hemodynamics; kinetic energy; ridge regression

Year:  2022        PMID: 35046712      PMCID: PMC8763263          DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S343403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gen Med        ISSN: 1178-7074


  29 in total

1.  Motion characterization of aortic wall and intimal flap by ECG-gated CT in patients with chronic B-dissection.

Authors:  Maria-Katharina Ganten; Tim F Weber; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Dittmar Böckler; Wolfram Stiller; Philipp Geisbüsch; Günter W Kauffmann; Stefan Delorme; Michael Bock; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-08-03       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Aortic disease in patients with Marfan syndrome: aortic volume assessment for surveillance.

Authors:  Alexander W den Hartog; Romy Franken; Piet de Witte; Teodora Radonic; Henk A Marquering; Wessel E van der Steen; Janneke Timmermans; Arthur J Scholte; Maarten P van den Berg; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Barbara J M Mulder; Maarten Groenink
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Aortic Elongation and Stanford B Dissection: The Tübingen Aortic Pathoanatomy (TAIPAN) Project.

Authors:  M Lescan; K Veseli; A Oikonomou; T Walker; H Lausberg; G Blumenstock; F Bamberg; C Schlensak; T Krüger
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 7.069

4.  Age-related changes of thoracic aorta geometry used to predict the risk for acute type B dissection.

Authors:  Damian Craiem; Salma El Batti; Mariano E Casciaro; Elie Mousseaux; Marie-Emmanuelle Sirieix; Alain Simon; Jean-Marc Alsac
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Association of variant arch anatomy with type B aortic dissection and hemodynamic mechanisms.

Authors:  Sherene Shalhub; Michal Schäfer; Thomas S Hatsukami; Matthew P Sweet; Jason J Reynolds; Ferdia A Bolster; Susanna H Shin; T Brett Reece; Niten Singh; Benjamin W Starnes; Omid Jazaeri
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Acute type B aortic dissection in the absence of aortic dilatation.

Authors:  Santi Trimarchi; Frederik H W Jonker; James B Froehlich; Gilbert R Upchurch; Frans L Moll; Bart E Muhs; Vincenzo Rampoldi; Himanshu J Patel; Kim A Eagle
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Descending aortic diameter of 5.5 cm or greater is not an accurate predictor of acute type B aortic dissection.

Authors:  Santi Trimarchi; Frederik H W Jonker; Stuart Hutchison; Eric M Isselbacher; Linda A Pape; Himanshu J Patel; James B Froehlich; Bart E Muhs; Vincenzo Rampoldi; Viviana Grassi; Arturo Evangelista; Gabriel Meinhardt; Joshua Beckman; Truls Myrmel; Reed E Pyeritz; Alan T Hirsch; Thoralf M Sundt; Christoph A Nienaber; Kim A Eagle
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  High Coronary Shear Stress in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Predicts Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Arnav Kumar; Elizabeth W Thompson; Adrien Lefieux; David S Molony; Emily L Davis; Nikita Chand; Stephane Fournier; Hee Su Lee; Jon Suh; Kimi Sato; Yi-An Ko; Daniel Molloy; Karthic Chandran; Hossein Hosseini; Sonu Gupta; Anastasios Milkas; Bill Gogas; Hyuk-Jae Chang; James K Min; William F Fearon; Alessandro Veneziani; Don P Giddens; Spencer B King; Bernard De Bruyne; Habib Samady
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Multilocus association mapping using generalized ridge logistic regression.

Authors:  Zhe Liu; Yuanyuan Shen; Jurg Ott
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Shape and Enhancement Analysis as a Useful Tool for the Presentation of Blood Hemodynamic Properties in the Area of Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Andrzej Polanczyk; Aleksandra Piechota-Polanczyk; Ludomir Stefanczyk; Michal Strzelecki
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.